2024-02-282023/24:NU7 · p.6NUBusiness & energy
Other matters concerning patents
Patent incentives for mineral processing
What's at stake: If more minerals are processed near the mines, transport within the mining industry could be reduced, bringing climate benefits, but it would require changes to how the patent system is designed and affect mining and technology companies.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the patent system should be reviewed to create incentives for more extracted minerals to be processed near the extraction site, or whether current patent rules should remain unchanged.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motions and sees no reason to review the patent system to create special incentives for mineral processing near the extraction site.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 9 (V)
The reservation (V) wants the patent system reviewed in light of the EU's Critical Raw Materials Act (CRMA) to create incentives for more extracted minerals to be processed near the extraction site, which would reduce transport within the mining industry and bring climate benefits.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 9 by V.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/19/0/5 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| S | No | Abstain 0/0/92/14 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| MP | No | Yes 15/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| C | No | Yes 19/0/0/5 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | Yes | Yes 12/0/0/4 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| KD | Yes | Yes 16/0/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| M | Yes | Yes 59/0/0/9 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 61/0/0/11 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2023/24:989 by Lorena Delgado Varas et al. (V) claim 24 and 2023/24:2630 by Fredrik Olovsson et al. (S) claims 3 and 4.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2023/24:989 av Lorena Delgado Varas m.fl. (V) yrkande 24 och 2023/24:2630 av Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S) yrkandena 3 och 4.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 40 proposals on intellectual property matters, that is, the area within law that, among other things, regulates rights to intellectual achievements such as design, literature, trademarks, and inventions. The motions concern, for example, a review of the intellectual property regulations in light of the development of artificial intelligence (AI), support in case of patent infringement, knowledge-promoting activities in the field of intellectual property, and a new strategy on innovation and intellectual property. The proposals were submitted during the general motion period in 2023. The Riksdag refers to various initiatives and ongoing work.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants the government to review national copyright legislation in light of AI development. (V) — Reservation 9
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan requires that more of the value of natural resources remain where they are extracted and produced and that the state pursues an active industrial and rural policy.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that more of the value of natural resources remain where they are extracted and produced and that the state pursues an active industrial and rural policy. Incentives to process minerals near the extraction site lie directly in that line, and the plan also wants to reduce heavy transports. The plan says nothing about the patent system as such.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att mer av naturresursernas värden stannar kvar där de utvinns och produceras och att staten driver en aktiv industri- och landsbygdspolitik. Incitament för att förädla mineral nära utvinningsplatsen ligger direkt i den linjen, och planen vill dessutom minska de tunga transporterna. Planen säger däremot inget om patentsystemet som sådant.
- processing value stays localdecisive»Mer av naturresursernas värden måste stanna kvar där de utvinns och produceras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More of the value of natural resources must remain where they are extracted and produced.”
- active state industrial policy»mer aktiv statlig industri- och landsbygdspolitik. Det kan till exempel« (party programme ↗)“more active state industrial and rural policy. For example,”
- reduced transport emissions»Tunga transporter behöver styras till järnväg och hållbar sjöfart.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Heavy transports need to be directed to the railway and sustainable shipping.”
The plan says nothing about the patent system, but it wants natural resources to be used more efficiently, refining to take place in Sweden and road transport to be replaced by more climate-smart transport modes.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan says nothing about the patent system, but it wants natural resources to be used more efficiently, refining to take place in Sweden and road transport to be replaced by more climate-smart transport modes. Incentives to refine minerals near extraction sites reduce transport and strengthen the industrial transition the plan invests in. The conclusion is therefore derived from the plan's industry and climate principles.
Original (Swedish)
Planen säger inget om patentsystemet, men den vill att naturtillgångar används effektivare, att förädlingen sker i Sverige och att vägtransporter ersätts av mer klimatsmarta transportslag. Incitament för att förädla mineral nära utvinningsplatsen minskar transporterna och stärker den industriella omställning planen satsar på. Slutsatsen är därför härledd ur planens industri- och klimatprinciper.
- refining in Swedish industrydecisive»Nu tillverkar vi fossilfritt stål i Sverige, vi bygger elbilar och vi ser hur nedlagda industrier blir till batterifabriker.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Now we manufacture fossil-free steel in Sweden, we build electric cars and we see how closed-down industries become battery factories.”
- more efficient resource use»Naturtillgångarna måste användas mer effektivt och energiproduktionen ställas om.« (party programme ↗)“Natural resources must be used more efficiently and energy production must be transformed.”
- reduced road transport»vägtransporter ersätts med järnvägstransporter och sjötrafik.« (party programme ↗)“road transport is replaced with rail transport and shipping.”
- investment in green technology»Vi vill satsa på grön teknik, digitalisering och utbildning så att företagsklimatet stärks och kompetensförsörjningen förbättras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to invest in green technology, digitalisation and education so that the business climate is strengthened and skills supply is improved.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan does not address the patent system.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not address the patent system. The nearest principle is that the need for transport shall decrease and that freight transport shall be energy-efficient, and that environmental considerations shall weigh more heavily than short-term exploitation interests in the mining industry. Incentives to refine minerals near the extraction site reduce transport and thus align with these principles, although without explicit support in the documents.
Original (Swedish)
Planen behandlar inte patentsystemet. Närmast liggande princip är att behovet av transporter ska minska och att godstransporter ska ske energieffektivt, samt att miljöhänsyn ska väga tyngre än kortsiktiga exploateringsintressen i gruvnäringen. Incitament för att förädla mineral nära utvinningsplatsen minskar transporterna och ligger därmed i linje med dessa principer, om än utan uttryckligt stöd i dokumenten.
- reduced transport needdecisive»Vi vill minska behovet av transporter.« (party programme ↗)“We want to reduce the need for transport.”
- environmental considerations in mining»mineraltillgångar. Miljöhänsyn ska väga tyngre än« (party programme ↗)“mineral resources. Environmental considerations shall weigh more heavily than”
- support for commercialization»forskning, kompetensförsörjning och kommersialisering av innovationer.« (party programme ↗)“research, skills provision and commercialization of innovations.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto wants Sweden to take responsibility and extract more minerals and metals for the green transition, become the world's most resource-efficient country and for more of the value of natural resources to remain locally.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto wants Sweden to take responsibility and extract more minerals and metals for the green transition, become the world's most resource-efficient country and for more of the value of natural resources to remain locally. The manifesto also requires that transport emissions be eliminated. Incentives to refine minerals near the extraction site serve all these commitments, which is why the plan supports the counter-proposal's requirements. The plan says nothing about the design of the patent system.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet vill att Sverige tar ansvar och utvinner mer mineral och metaller för den gröna omställningen, blir världens mest resurseffektiva land och att mer av naturresursernas värde stannar lokalt. Manifestet kräver också att transporternas utsläpp bort. Incitament för att förädla mineral nära utvinningsplatsen tjänar alla dessa åtaganden, varför planen stöder motförslagets krav. Planen säger inget om patentsystemets utformning.
- extract minerals in Swedendecisive»Det är bättre att Sverige tar ansvar och utvinner mer mineral och metaller istället för att fortsätta importera dem från länder med större klimatavtryck och sämre arbetsvillkor.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is better that Sweden takes responsibility and extracts more minerals and metals instead of continuing to import them from countries with larger climate footprints and worse working conditions.”
- resource-efficient economy»Sverige ska bli världens mest resurseffektiva land och ekonomin mer cirkulär.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden shall become the world's most resource-efficient country and the economy more circular.”
- value stays locally»Mer av värdet som skapas från naturresurser« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More of the value created from natural resources”
- reduce transport emissions»Transporternas utsläpp ska bort och ny utsläppsfri infrastruktur ska komma på plats.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Transport emissions must go and new emission-free infrastructure must be put in place.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan says nothing about the patent system as a policy instrument for where minerals are refined.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan says nothing about the patent system as a policy instrument for where minerals are refined. The nearest lying principle is that general and technology-neutral economic policy instruments are the most effective tool in climate policy and that the party prefers real climate taxes over targeted support. Building geographic incentives into patent law does not follow from this, so the plan almost speaks against the demand. The conclusion is uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Planen säger ingenting om patentsystemet som styrmedel för var mineral förädlas. Närmast liggande princip är att generella och teknikneutrala ekonomiska styrmedel är det effektivaste redskapet i klimatpolitiken och att partiet föredrar riktiga klimatskatter framför riktade stöd. Att bygga in geografiska incitament i patenträtten följer inte av detta, varför planen närmast talar emot kravet. Slutsatsen är osäker.
- general policy instruments most effectivedecisive»såsom koldioxidskatt och handel med utsläppsrätter, är det mest effektiva redskapet.« (party programme ↗)“such as carbon tax and emissions trading, is the most effective tool.”
- climate taxes before targeted support»Därför är vi för riktiga klimatskatter i stället för att göra klimatpolitiken till en tävling i högst bidrag och flest symbolskatter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore we are for real climate taxes instead of making climate policy a competition in the most subsidies and most symbolic taxes.”
- general support for research»skatterabatt för forskning och utveckling ska finnas.« (party programme ↗)“tax relief for research and development shall exist.”
The plan requires that industrial policy be conducted with general means and rejects direct business subsidies, and sees patents as an exclusive right to use an intellectual achievement, not as a control mechanism for where processing shall take place.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that industrial policy be conducted with general means and rejects direct business subsidies, and sees patents as an exclusive right to use an intellectual achievement, not as a control mechanism for where processing shall take place. The counter-proposal wants to use the patent system to create incentives for processing near the extraction site, which contradicts this, although the plan's effort to reduce long-distance transport pulls in the opposite direction.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att näringspolitiken bedrivs med generella medel och avvisar direkta företagssubventioner, och ser patent som en ensamrätt att utnyttja en intellektuell prestation, inte som ett styrmedel för var förädling ska ske. Motförslaget vill använda patentsystemet för att skapa incitament till förädling nära utvinningsplatsen, vilket går emot detta, även om planens strävan att minska långväga transporter drar i motsatt riktning.
- general industrial policy meansdecisive»Näringspolitiken ska bedrivas med generella medel,« (party programme ↗)“Industrial policy shall be conducted with general means,”
- patents protect inventions»Det handlar om ensamrätt att utnyttja en intellektuell« (party programme ↗)“It is about exclusive right to use an intellectual”
- no targeted subsidies»Direkta företagssubventioner avvisas.« (party programme ↗)“Direct business subsidies are rejected.”
- proximity reduces transport need»Detta minskar behovet av långväga transporter.« (party programme ↗)“This reduces the need for long-distance transport.”
The plan's line for business is general and competitive conditions: lower taxes on enterprise, stronger incentives for investment, and a third less red tape.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's line for business is general and competitive conditions: lower taxes on enterprise, stronger incentives for investment, and a third less red tape. Building targeted political incentives into the patent system to steer where minerals are processed is a different kind of governance than the plan advocates. The plan wants mineral resources to be extracted responsibly, but says nothing about patent rights.
Original (Swedish)
Planens linje för näringslivet är generella och konkurrenskraftiga villkor: lägre skatter på företagande, starkare drivkrafter för investeringar och en tredjedel mindre regelkrångel. Att bygga in riktade politiska incitament i patentsystemet för att styra var mineral förädlas är en annan sorts styrning än planen förordar. Planen vill att mineraltillgångarna utvinns ansvarsfullt, men säger inget om patenträtten.
- general incentivesdecisive»Stärka drivkrafterna för investeringar, forskning och entreprenörskap, genom lägre skatter på företagande« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen incentives for investment, research, and entrepreneurship through lower taxes on enterprise”
- responsible mineral extraction»Våra rika mineraltillgångar ska kunna utvinnas ansvarsfullt och långsiktigt hållbart.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Our rich mineral resources should be able to be extracted responsibly and in a long-term sustainable manner.”
- simpler rules»Ta bort en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och en tredjedel av regelkrånglet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove a third of companies' administrative costs and a third of red tape”
- protected entrepreneurial freedom»Äganderätten och näringsfriheten ska ha ett starkt skydd i« (party programme ↗)“Property rights and entrepreneurial freedom should have strong protection in”
The plan emphasizes that the value of minerals in the ground is enormous in rural areas and criticizes that revenues from raw material extraction seldom benefit local communities.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan emphasizes that the value of minerals in the ground is enormous in rural areas and criticizes that revenues from raw material extraction seldom benefit local communities. That more minerals are processed near the extraction site responds to this and to the plan's demand to prioritize Swedish industry and facilitate mining. The plan, however, says nothing about the patent system, so the position is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planen framhåller att värdet på mineraler i marken är enormt på landsbygden och kritiserar att intäkter från råvaruutvinning sällan kommer lokalbygden till del. Att fler mineral förädlas nära utvinningsplatsen svarar mot detta och mot planens krav att prioritera svensk industri och underlätta gruvdrift. Planen säger dock inget om patentsystemet, varför ställningstagandet är härlett.
- the value of minerals in rural areasdecisive»Värdet på mineraler i marken, på skogar och potentialen för rekreation och turism är enorm på landsbygden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The value of minerals in the ground, forests and potential for recreation and tourism is enormous in rural areas.”
- raw material revenues to local communities»Många är istället berättelserna om bostadsområden som snabbt förvandlats till det oigenkännbara, om hur intäkter från råvaruutvinning och industri sällan kommer lokalbygden till del och om hur de som har svårt att få sin egen vardag att gå ihop alltid är de som ska ta det största ansvaret för globala världsproblem.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Instead, there are many stories about residential areas quickly transformed beyond recognition, about how revenues from raw material extraction and industry seldom benefit local communities and about how those who struggle to make ends meet are always the ones who must take the greatest responsibility for global world problems.”
- Swedish industry prioritized»Prioritera svensk industri och konkurrenskraft« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Prioritize Swedish industry and competitiveness”
- facilitated mining»Det behöver också bli enklare och gå snabbare att öppna gruvor för de mineraler som behövs för exempelvis tillverkning av batterier.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It also needs to become easier and faster to open mines for the minerals needed for, for example, battery manufacturing.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2023/24:NU7)
- Committee report full text (HB01NU7)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2023/24:1486 — Upphovsrättsliga intäkter av Mirja Räihä och Per-Arne Håkansson (båda S)
- Motion 2023/24:1522 — Säkra upphovsrätten i ljuset av AI av Amanda Lind m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2023/24:1568 — Innovationsstrategi med immaterialrättsfokus av Åsa Eriksson och Jennie Nilsson (båda S)
- Motion 2023/24:1633 — Sveriges 13 sämsta lagar av Rickard Nordin och Niels Paarup-Petersen (båda C)
- Motion 2023/24:17 — AI och upphovsrätt av Vasiliki Tsouplaki m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2023/24:2455 — Digitalisering för hela Sverige av Niels Paarup-Petersen m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2023/24:2492 — En näringspolitik för tillväxt av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2023/24:2538 — Civilrättsliga sanktioner på immaterialrättens område av Markus Wiechel och Alexander Christiansson (båda SD)
- Motion 2023/24:2543 — En nationell immaterialrättsstrategi av Cecilia Engström (KD)
- Motion 2023/24:2630 — Immateriella rättigheter av Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:348 — Framtidens e-sport av Michael Rubbestad m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:427 — Immaterialrättsliga frågor i ett digitalt samhälle av Tobias Andersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:446 — Uppfinningslandet Sverige av Tobias Andersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:94 — Utredning om rättegångskostnader för immateriella skydd av Lili André (KD)
- Motion 2023/24:989 — Handelspolitik av Lorena Delgado Varas m.fl. (V)
Source: The Swedish Parliament