2025-10-222025/26:KrU2 · p.5KrUCulture
Operating frameworks for the public service companies
Operating framework and design of the public service mandate 2026-2033
What's at stake: The decision affects how broad and stable the public service companies' mandate will be during the 2026-2033 period, including how they handle digital services and text in news operations relative to local private media.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether parliament should direct a formal statement to the government on the operating framework and design of the public service companies' mandate, or whether the government's proposal in this respect is sufficient as is.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee backs the government's proposal on the operating framework and the design of the mandate, and sees no reason to direct a formal statement to the government on the matter.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 4 (S, V, MP)
The S, V and MP parties hold that the global and digital media landscape gives the public service companies a strengthened responsibility and requires long-term stability in both mandate and funding; the parties disagree with the government's characterization that SVT's digital news service and use of text have harmed newspapers' finances, and oppose text rationing or detailed regulation of text use.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 4 by S, V, MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: CCenterpartiet
Ja 172–130Ja 152–150
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/18/0/4 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| S | No | No 0/93/0/13 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| MP | No | No 0/15/0/3 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | No | Yes 20/1/0/3 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: medium | explicit |
| L | No | Yes 13/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 17/0/0/2 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| M | No | Yes 59/0/0/9 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | Yes | Yes 63/0/0/9 | match | confidence: low | not addressed |
Broke with the party line
| CAlireza Akhondi (C, Stockholms län) | No — party line: Yes |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motions 2024/25:3435 by Vasiliki Tsouplaki et al. (V) requests 1 and 2, 2024/25:3436 by Lawen Redar et al. (S) requests 1, 8-13 and 21 and 2024/25:3439 by Mats Berglund et al. (MP) request 1.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:3435 av Vasiliki Tsouplaki m.fl. (V) yrkandena 1 och 2, 2024/25:3436 av Lawen Redar m.fl. (S) yrkandena 1, 8-13 och 21 samt 2024/25:3439 av Mats Berglund m.fl. (MP) yrkande 1.
Riksdag decision: Parliament approved the Government's legislative proposal that rules for the public service assignment and the financing of the assignment shall be gathered in a new law on public service. Parliament also approved the Government's other proposals on among other things the design of the public service assignment and the financial conditions for the public service companies during the assignment period 2026-2033. The law on public service and amendments to the Radio and Television Act shall enter into force on 2 December 2025 and other legislative changes on 1 January 2026.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants detailed regulation of text use in public service broadcasting not to be introduced. (S, V, MP) — Reservation 4
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan wants to see a strong, broad, and independent role for public service with a mandate that stands independent from political power, and requires that policy maintains arm's length distance from content.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to see a strong, broad, and independent role for public service with a mandate that stands independent from political power, and requires that policy maintains arm's length distance from content. The counter-proposal's requirement for long-term stability in mandate and funding, and its opposition to text rationing and detailed regulation of content, follow directly from that commitment. The plan also argues for diversity of channels rather than limits on supply.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill se en stark, bred och självständig roll för public service med ett uppdrag som står oberoende från den politiska makten, och kräver att politiken håller armlängds avstånd till innehållet. Motförslagets krav på långsiktighet och stabilitet i uppdrag och finansiering, och dess motstånd mot textransonering och detaljreglering av innehållet, följer direkt av det åtagandet. Planen talar också för mångfald av kanaler snarare än begränsningar av utbudet.
- independent public servicedecisive»Vi vill se en stark, bred och självständig roll för public service, med ett uppdrag som utgår från grundlagen men står oberoende från den politiska makten« (party programme ↗)“We want to see a strong, broad, and independent role for public service, with a mandate that proceeds from the Constitution but stands independent from political power”
- arm's length distance to content»Politiken ska skapa förutsättningar för en bred kultur som kommer alla till del och hålla armlängds avstånd till innehållet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Policy should create conditions for broad culture that reaches everyone and maintain arm's length distance from content.”
- invest in public service»Därför är det särskilt viktigt att satsa på och utveckla folkbiblioteken, folkbildningen och public services oberoende ställning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore, it is particularly important to invest in and develop public libraries, adult education, and public service's independent position.”
- diversity of media channels»Det behövs en mångfald av kanaler för information, nyheter, åsiktsbrytning och opinionsbildning som inte drivs av vare sig stater eller kapitalintressen.« (party programme ↗)“There is a need for a diversity of channels for information, news, debate, and opinion formation that are not driven by either states or capital interests.”
flags: citat_migrerat
The plan requires a broad, independent and constitutionally protected public service that is jointly financed, and the election manifesto wants to constitutionally protect public service.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires a broad, independent and constitutionally protected public service that is jointly financed, and the election manifesto wants to constitutionally protect public service. This supports the counter-proposal's demands for long-term stability in mandate and financing and against detailed regulation of text use. The plan simultaneously safeguards media diversity and locally anchored news distribution, but resolves that balance through media support rather than through rationing of public service text.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver en bred, oberoende och grundlagsskyddad public service som är gemensamt finansierad, och valmanifestet vill grundlagsskydda public service. Det ger stöd åt motförslagets krav på långsiktighet och stabilitet i uppdrag och finansiering och emot detaljreglering av textanvändningen. Planen värnar samtidigt mediemångfald och lokalt förankrad nyhetsförmedling, men löser den avvägningen med mediestöd snarare än med ransonering av public services text.
- independent and broad public servicedecisive»Bred, oberoende och grundlagsskyddad public service som är gemensamt finansierad.« (party programme ↗)“Broad, independent and constitutionally protected public service that is jointly financed.”
- constitutionally protected public service»Vi vill grundlagsskydda public service.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to constitutionally protect public service.”
- media diversity across the country»Mediemångfald med bredare perspektiv i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“Media diversity with broader perspectives across the country.”
- media support for local journalism»Mediestödet ska ge förutsättningar för oberoende och lokalt förankrad nyhetsförmedling i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Media support shall provide conditions for independent and locally anchored news distribution across the country.”
The plan wants to constitutionally protect an independent public service and stands guard for a broad and independent public service with long-term prerequisites.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to constitutionally protect an independent public service and stands guard for a broad and independent public service with long-term prerequisites. The counter-proposal's demand for long-term stability in assignment and financing, and its opposition to detailed regulation of text allocation, align with the principle that policy shall provide media with conditions but not control content. The plan does not mention text allocation controls, therefore the position is inferred.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill grundlagsskydda ett oberoende public service och slår vakt om ett brett och oberoende public service med långsiktiga förutsättningar. Motförslagets krav på långsiktighet och stabilitet i uppdrag och finansiering, och dess motstånd mot detaljreglering av textanvändningen, ligger i linje med principen att politiken ska ge medierna förutsättningar men inte styra innehållet. Planen nämner inte textransonering, varför ställningstagandet är härlett.
- constitutionally protected public servicedecisive»skydda ett oberoende public service i grundlagen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“protect an independent public service in the constitution”
- broad independent public service»brett och oberoende public service och en mångfald av kommersiella medier« (party programme ↗)“broad and independent public service and a diversity of commercial media”
- no political content control»Politiken ska ge konsten och kulturen förutsättningar, inte styra dess innehåll.« (party programme ↗)“Policy shall provide art and culture with conditions, not control their content.”
- support for independent media»förstärka yttrandefriheten och stödja oberoende medier i hela landet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“strengthen freedom of expression and support independent media throughout the country”
The plan explicitly defends an independent public service and requires that politics keep an arm's length distance from media and culture.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly defends an independent public service and requires that politics keep an arm's length distance from media and culture. The counter-proposal's demand for long-term stability in mandate and financing, and its opposition to text rationing and detailed regulation of text use, follow directly from that line. The plan also believes that comprehensive and vigorous media monitoring throughout the country is crucial for democracy.
Original (Swedish)
Planen försvarar uttryckligen ett oberoende public service och kräver att politiken håller armlängds avstånd till medier och kultur. Motförslagets krav på långsiktighet och stabilitet i uppdrag och finansiering, och dess motstånd mot textransonering och detaljreglering av textanvändningen, följer direkt av den linjen. Planen anser dessutom att en allsidig och livskraftig mediebevakning i hela landet är avgörande för demokratin.
- independent public service defendeddecisive»En allsidig, oberoende och livskraftig mediebevakning i hela landet är avgörande för demokratin. Pressfriheten ska skyddas och oberoende public service försvaras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Comprehensive, independent and vigorous media monitoring throughout the country is crucial for democracy. Press freedom shall be protected and independent public service defended.”
- arm's length distance from politics»Den akademiska och konstnärliga friheten liksom den fria kulturen är grundbultar i ett vitalt civilsamhälle. Politiken ska bidra till goda förutsättningar men hålla armlängds avstånd.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Academic and artistic freedom as well as free culture are cornerstones of a vital civil society. Politics should contribute to good conditions but keep an arm's length distance.”
- media free from political control»Tillgången till oberoende medier som står fria från såväl politisk kontroll och censur« (party programme ↗)“Access to independent media that stand free from both political control and censorship”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan requires that public service companies shall have increased legal protection for their independence from political control and continue a broad programme and assignment.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that public service companies shall have increased legal protection for their independence from political control and continue a broad programme and assignment. The counter-proposal's demands for long-term stability in assignment and financing and resistance to detailed regulation of text use follow from this. The plan certainly wants to promote local scrutinizing quality journalism, but does this through remade press and media support, not by rationing public service.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att public service-bolagen ska ha ökat lagskydd för sitt oberoende från politisk styrning och fortsatt ett brett programutbud och uppdrag. Motförslagets krav på långsiktighet och stabilitet i uppdrag och finansiering samt motstånd mot detaljreglering av textanvändningen följer av detta. Planen vill visserligen främja lokal granskande kvalitetsjournalistik, men gör det genom omgjort press- och mediestöd, inte genom att ransonera public service.
- legally protected independence and broad rangedecisive»Därför ska Sveriges Television, Sveriges Radio och Utbildningsradion ha ökat skydd i lagen för sitt oberoende från politisk styrning, och public service-bolagen ska fortsätta ha ett brett programutbud.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore Swedish Television, Swedish Radio and Educational Radio shall have increased legal protection for their independence from political control, and public service companies shall continue to have a broad programme range.”
- broad public service assignment»Public service ska fortsatt ha ett brett uppdrag« (party programme ↗)“Public service shall continue to have a broad assignment”
- media independence»Mediernas oberoende måste värnas.« (party programme ↗)“Media independence must be protected.”
- support for local journalism»Vi vill göra om press- och mediestödet för att främja en lokal granskande kvalitetsjournalistik i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to remake press and media support to promote local scrutinizing quality journalism throughout the country.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme emphasizes the value of independent radio and TV channels without profit interests and that public bodies shall support but not control cultural activities.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme emphasizes the value of independent radio and TV channels without profit interests and that public bodies shall support but not control cultural activities. The counter-proposal's demand for long-term commitment and financing and its resistance to detailed regulation of text use is close to that position. However, the plan says nothing about media market competition issues, so the conclusion is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Principprogrammet betonar värdet av oberoende radio- och tv-kanaler utan vinstintressen och att offentliga organ ska stödja men inte styra kulturverksamhet. Motförslagets krav på långsiktighet i uppdrag och finansiering och dess motstånd mot detaljreglering av textanvändningen ligger nära den hållningen. Planen säger dock inget om mediemarknadens konkurrensfrågor, så slutsatsen är härledd.
- independent public servicedecisive»Betydelsen av oberoende och reklamfria radio- och TV-kanaler utan vinstintressen är stor.« (party programme ↗)“The significance of independent and commercial-free radio and TV channels without profit interests is great.”
- support but not control»Den innebär att kulturverksamhet som bedrivs av det civila samhället ska stödjas av det offentliga, men inte styras« (party programme ↗)“This means that cultural activities conducted by civil society shall be supported by the public, but not controlled”
- protection for freedom of expression»Ett starkt skydd för yttrande- och meddelarfriheten samt anonymitetsskyddet, liksom för mötes- och före- ningsfriheten, är av stor vikt för en levande demokrati.« (party programme ↗)“Strong protection for freedom of expression and the press and the right to anonymity, as well as for the rights of assembly and association, is of great importance for a living democracy.”
flags: citat_migrerat
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants to safeguard and develop public service and strengthen its core mission, and the party programme states that media institutions should be free from state and politics.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to safeguard and develop public service and strengthen its core mission, and the party programme states that media institutions should be free from state and politics. Requirements for long-term commitment and financing and resistance to detailed regulation of text use are in line with this. The plan therefore supports the counter-proposal's demand.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill värna och utveckla public service och stärka dess kärnuppdrag, och partiprogrammet slår fast att medieinstitutioner ska stå fria från stat och politik. Krav på långsiktighet i uppdrag och finansiering och motstånd mot detaljreglering av textanvändningen ligger i linje med detta. Planen ger därför stöd åt motförslagets krav.
- media free from politicsdecisive»Målet ska vara självständiga institutioner som i sin verksamhet står fria från stat och politik.« (party programme ↗)“The goal should be independent institutions that in their activities are free from state and politics.”
- safeguarded public service»Vi vill värna och utveckla public service, och stärka skyddet för journalister mot hot och våld.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to safeguard and develop public service, and strengthen protection for journalists against threats and violence.”
- free and diverse media market»Moderaternas mediepolitik har som mål att skapa förutsättningar för ett brett utbud av medier i olika format som kan verka fritt, självständigt och i konkurrens med varandra.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Moderate Party's media policy aims to create conditions for a wide range of media in various formats that can operate freely, independently, and in competition with each other.”
- digital transition in media»Reformera mediestödet för att stödja den digitala transformationen och omställningen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reform media support to support the digital transformation and transition”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants to reduce the state's economic control over the media sphere and increase media diversity through less political steering.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to reduce the state's economic control over the media sphere and increase media diversity through less political steering. The counter-proposal instead requires strengthened public service responsibility with long-term expanded funding and unlimited text usage, which expands the state's role in the media market. The plan's support for public service primarily applies to core tasks such as major sporting events.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill minska det offentligas ekonomiska kontroll över mediesfären och öka mediemångfalden genom mindre politisk styrning. Motförslaget kräver i stället ett förstärkt public service-ansvar med långsiktigt utökad finansiering och obegränsad textanvändning, vilket vidgar det offentligas roll på mediemarknaden. Planens stöd för public service gäller främst kärnuppdrag som stora idrottsevenemang.
- reduced state media influencedecisive»Minska det offentligas ekonomiska kontroll över samtidskulturen och mediesfären« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce the state's economic control over contemporary culture and the media sphere”
- increased media diversity»Mediernas oberoende ska öka genom minskad politisk styrning från statsmakten och åtgärder för en ökad mångfald.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Media independence shall increase through reduced political steering from state power and measures for increased diversity.”
- public service's core tasks»Att public service ska sända stora idrottsevenemang« (2022 manifesto ↗)“That public service shall broadcast major sporting events”
- restraint with taxpayer funds»Skala bort onödiga utgifter i det offentliga« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Scale back unnecessary expenditures in the public sector”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:KrU2)
- Committee report full text (HD01KrU2)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:3435 — med anledning av prop. 2024/25:166 En lag om public service och riktlinjer för verksamheten 2026-2033 av Vasiliki Tsouplaki m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2024/25:3436 — med anledning av prop. 2024/25:166 En lag om public service och riktlinjer för verksamheten 2026-2033 av Lawen Redar m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:3437 — med anledning av prop. 2024/25:166 En lag om public service och riktlinjer för verksamheten 2026-2033 av Catarina Deremar m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2024/25:3439 — med anledning av prop. 2024/25:166 En lag om public service och riktlinjer för verksamheten 2026-2033 av Mats Berglund m.fl. (MP)
- Proposition 2024/25:166 — En lag om public service och riktlinjer för verksamheten 2026-2033
Source: The Swedish Parliament