2025-05-082024/25:MJU15 · p.2MJUEnvironment & agriculture

Coordination of climate transition efforts

Coordination around the Industriklivet programme and the climate transition

What's at stake: Industriklivet is a key support scheme for meeting Sweden's industrial climate targets; the question is whether current work and inter-agency coordination are enough to prevent the support's intended effects from failing to materialise, or whether a clearer mandate for broader coordination and alternative measures is needed.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether the government should actively coordinate climate policy with other policy areas and report on alternative measures for the climate targets, beyond the work and inter-agency coordination already under way around support for the industry's climate transition.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee welcomes the audit but considers that current work is sufficient: an ongoing inter-agency assignment is to clarify the boundary between Industriklivet and Klimatklivet, and the support scheme's target group is already considered well defined, which is why the committee rejects the motions calling for a further coordination mandate.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 3 (V)

The reservation (V) wants the government to be tasked with coordinating climate policy with other policy areas, citing the audit's finding of shortcomings in governance and coordination and the risk that insufficient access to electricity will limit industry's ability to carry out projects, and also wants the government to report on alternative measures for the climate targets if Industriklivet's expected effects fail to materialise.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 3 by V.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
Vown reservationNoNo 0/19/0/5follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
SNoYes 92/0/0/14departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MPNoAbstain 0/0/17/1departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
CNoYes 20/0/0/4departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
LNoYes 12/0/0/4departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
KDNoYes 17/0/0/2departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MNoYes 59/0/0/9departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
SDNoYes 61/0/0/11departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed

Committee proposal

Parliament rejects the motions 2024/25:3317 by Kajsa Fredholm et al. (V) motions 3 and 4 as well as 2024/25:3320 by Katarina Luhr et al. (MP) motion 3.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:3317 av Kajsa Fredholm m.fl. (V) yrkandena 3 och 4 samt 2024/25:3320 av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP) yrkande 3.

Riksdag decision: Parliament has considered a communication from the government concerning the National Audit Office's audit of Industriklivet (Industrial Climate Initiative). In the audit, the National Audit Office examined whether the government and the Swedish Energy Agency have managed Industriklivet in such a way that it can effectively contribute to industry's climate transition and thereby Sweden's climate objectives. The National Audit Office's overall conclusion is that both the government's design of and the Swedish Energy Agency's work with Industriklivet has several shortcomings. The report contains a number of recommendations to the government and the Swedish Energy Agency, including on coordinating government support for climate transition. The government agrees with certain conclusions, for example that Industriklivet can contribute more effectively to industry's transition. However, the government does not share the National Audit Office's assessment in certain other respects, for example that the target group for Industriklivet is unclear. Parliament supports the government's assessment in several respects and decided to file the communication away, that is, to close the case.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The plan requires that all political decisions take climate crisis into account and that the transition programme is based on updated climate targets for all emissions over which Swedish policy has influence.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires that all political decisions take climate crisis into account and that the transition programme is based on updated climate targets for all emissions over which Swedish policy has influence. This supports the counter-proposal's requirement for broader coordination between climate policy and other policy areas, as well as reporting on alternative measures if effects fail to materialize. The plan also requires public investment in renewable electricity, which carries the power supply issue the counter-proposal raises.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver att alla politiska beslut tar hänsyn till klimatkrisen och att omställningsprogrammet utgår från uppdaterade klimatmål för alla utsläpp som svensk politik har inflytande över. Det talar för motförslagets krav på bredare samordning mellan klimatpolitiken och andra politikområden samt redovisning av alternativa åtgärder om effekterna uteblir. Planen kräver också statliga satsningar på förnybar el, vilket bär den elförsörjningsfråga motförslaget lyfter.

  • climate consideration in all decisionsdecisive»Omställningen behöver ske omgående och alla politiska beslut behöver ta hänsyn till den akuta kris som vi befinner oss i.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The transition needs to happen immediately and all political decisions need to take into account the acute crisis we find ourselves in.”
  • comprehensive transition programme»ett program med utgångspunkt i uppdaterade klimatmål för alla utsläpp som svensk politik har inflytande över, som svarar mot den senaste forskningen och bygger på solidaritet med framtida generationer och andra delar av världen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“a programme based on updated climate targets for all emissions over which Swedish policy has influence, which responds to the latest research and is built on solidarity with future generations and other parts of the world”
  • public investment in renewable electricity»därför behöver staten gå in med satsningar på förnybar energi« (2022 manifesto ↗)“therefore the state needs to make investments in renewable energy”
  • radical electricity expansion»En radikal utbyggnad av den förnybara elproduktionen är avgörande« (party programme ↗)“A radical expansion of renewable electricity production is crucial”
SSocialdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The election manifesto places responsibility for climate transition on politics and links state investments to the pace of industrial transformation, which is exactly the broader governance and coordination the counter-proposal seeks.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto places responsibility for climate transition on politics and links state investments to the pace of industrial transformation, which is exactly the broader governance and coordination the counter-proposal seeks. The manifesto also sees electricity supply as decisive and wants to rapidly expand electricity production and remove authorization barriers, which supports the requirement that insufficient electricity supply shall not block industry's climate projects. The requirement for documented alternatives follows from the same responsibility-taking.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet lägger ansvaret för klimatomställningen på politiken och kopplar samman statliga investeringar med takten i industrins omställning, vilket är just den bredare styrning och samordning motförslaget efterfrågar. Manifestet ser också eltillgången som avgörande och vill snabbt bygga ut elproduktionen och riva tillståndshindren, vilket stödjer kravet att bristande eltillgång inte får blockera industrins klimatprojekt. Kravet på redovisade alternativ följer av samma ansvarstagande.

  • political responsibility for transitiondecisive»Politiken måste ta ett större ansvar. Det klimatpolitiska ramverket ska ligga fast. Genom statliga investeringar kan vi öka takten i industrins omställning och underlätta ett klimatsmart liv.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Politics must take greater responsibility. The climate policy framework shall remain fixed. Through state investments we can increase the pace of industrial transformation and facilitate a climate-smart life.”
  • secured electricity supply for industry»Vi behöver bygga ut elproduktionen för att få mer billig el, snabbt, inte minst i södra Sverige.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We need to expand electricity production to get cheaper electricity, quickly, not least in southern Sweden.”
  • faster authorization processes»Riv de byråkratiska hindren för mer el. Långsamma tillståndsprocesser ska snabbas på.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Tear down the bureaucratic barriers for more electricity. Slow authorization processes shall be accelerated.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MPMiljöpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan requires unified and binding climate governance: a Swedish emissions budget and a transition law that forces all industry away from fossil fuels by 2030.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires unified and binding climate governance: a Swedish emissions budget and a transition law that forces all industry away from fossil fuels by 2030. A requirement for broader coordination of climate policy with other policy areas and for reporting of alternative measures when support programmes are insufficient aligns with that governance ambition. However, the plan does not comment on the individual support programme.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver en samlad och bindande klimatstyrning: en svensk utsläppsbudget och en omställningslag som tvingar hela industrin bort från fossila bränslen till 2030. Ett krav på bredare samordning av klimatpolitiken med andra politikområden och på redovisning av alternativa åtgärder när stödprogram inte räcker ligger i linje med den styrningsambitionen. Planen uttalar sig dock inte om det enskilda stödprogrammet.

  • national emissions budgetdecisive»ta fram en svensk utsläppsbudget som gör att vi når klimatmålen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“develop a Swedish emissions budget that ensures we reach climate targets.”
  • transition law for industry»införa en omställningslag så att all industri fasar ut kol, olja och fossilgas till senast 2030.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“introduce a transition law so that all industry phases out coal, oil and fossil gas by at the latest 2030.”
  • climate policy framework»ramverk med bindande tak för vår klimatpåverkan« (party programme ↗)“framework with binding caps for our climate impact”
  • large transition investments»investera minst 100 miljarder per år i att ställa om så att Sverige blir ett fossilfritt välfärdsland senast år 2030.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“invest at least 100 billion per year in the transition so that Sweden becomes a fossil-free welfare state by at the latest 2030.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

CCenterpartietNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The counter-proposal links climate governance to electricity supply for industry's transition projects, and the plan's most binding climate commitment is precisely to double the production of zero-emission electricity and upgrade the electricity grid so that the transition does not get stuck.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The counter-proposal links climate governance to electricity supply for industry's transition projects, and the plan's most binding climate commitment is precisely to double the production of zero-emission electricity and upgrade the electricity grid so that the transition does not get stuck. The plan also requires climate leadership that prioritizes effective measures and reports results rather than symbolic politics. Requirements for broader coordination and for reporting alternative measures if the support programme does not work are thus in line with the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Motförslaget knyter klimatstyrningen till eltillgången för industrins omställningsprojekt, och planens mest bindande klimatåtagande är just att fördubbla produktionen av utsläppsfri el och rusta elnätet så att omställningen inte fastnar. Planen kräver också ett klimatledarskap som prioriterar effektiva åtgärder och redovisar resultat framför symbolpolitik. Krav på bredare samordning och på redovisning av alternativa åtgärder om stödprogrammet inte biter ligger därmed i linje med planen.

  • doubled zero-emission electricitydecisive»Sverige ska bli Europas gröna batteri och exportera el till grannländer som fasar ut sitt fossilberoende. Vi vill fördubbla produktionen av utsläppsfri el, och rusta och bygga ut elnätet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden shall become Europe's green battery and export electricity to neighbouring countries that phase out their fossil dependence. We want to double the production of zero-emission electricity, and upgrade and expand the electricity grid.”
  • effective measures before symbolic politics»Ett ledarskap som prioriterar effektiva åtgärder framför symbolpolitik eller passivitet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Leadership that prioritizes effective measures rather than symbolic politics or passivity.”
  • decisive climate leadership»Sverige behöver ett handlingskraftigt klimatledarskap som gör skillnad på riktigt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden needs decisive climate leadership that makes a real difference.”
  • climate threat is paramount»Klimatförändringarna är det största miljöhotet mänskligheten känner.« (party programme ↗)“Climate change is the greatest environmental threat humanity faces.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan's guiding climate commitment is that the transition requires approximately twice as much electricity and that industry therefore must have sufficient and cheap electricity to be able to transition.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's guiding climate commitment is that the transition requires approximately twice as much electricity and that industry therefore must have sufficient and cheap electricity to be able to transition. The counter-proposal's substantive point - that insufficient electricity supply risks stopping industry's climate projects and that climate policy therefore must be linked to energy policy - follows directly from that commitment. The plan also requires that climate policy is measured in actually reduced emissions and effective policy instruments, which supports the demand for reporting of alternative measures if the support programme does not deliver.

Original (Swedish)

Planens bärande klimatåtagande är att omställningen kräver ungefär dubbelt så mycket el och att industrin därför måste ha tillräcklig och billig el för att kunna ställa om. Motförslagets sakliga poäng - att bristande eltillgång riskerar att stoppa industrins klimatprojekt och att klimatpolitiken därför måste hänga ihop med energipolitiken - följer direkt av det åtagandet. Planen kräver dessutom att klimatpolitiken mäts i faktiskt minskade utsläpp och effektiva styrmedel, vilket stöder kravet på redovisning av alternativa åtgärder om stödprogrammet inte levererar.

  • doubled electricity needdecisive»Klimatomställningen kräver dubbelt så mycket el som i dag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The climate transition requires twice as much electricity as today.”
  • electricity for green industries»Nu behöver vi energipolitik som ser till att det både finns billig el i hela landet och tillräcklig med el till både nya elbilar alla de nya industrier som nu kan drivas på ren energi i stället för olja, gas och kol.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Now we need energy policy that ensures that there is both cheap electricity throughout the country and sufficient electricity for both new electric cars and all the new industries that can now be powered by clean energy instead of oil, gas and coal.”
  • effective policy instruments before symbolic politics»En klimatpolitik som ersätter den symbolpolitik där bidrag betalas ut till klimatångest i stället för det vi vet är allra viktigast: mer ny teknik, mer internationellt samarbete och fler effektiva styrmedel.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“A climate policy that replaces the symbolic politics where subsidies are paid out for climate anxiety instead of what we know is most important: more new technology, more international cooperation and more effective policy instruments.”
  • climate goals within growing economy»Vi ska nå klimatmålen – inga nettoutsläpp av växthusgaser senast 2045 och därefter negativa utsläpp – inom ramen för en växande ekonomi.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We shall reach the climate goals – no net greenhouse gas emissions by 2045 at the latest and thereafter negative emissions – within the framework of a growing economy.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The party programme requires that environmental considerations permeate all policy areas and that ecology, economy and social considerations are integrated, which is precisely the broader coordination the counter-proposal seeks.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme requires that environmental considerations permeate all policy areas and that ecology, economy and social considerations are integrated, which is precisely the broader coordination the counter-proposal seeks. The election manifesto's requirement for climate transition that works and is effective, together with the investment in nuclear power for secure electricity supply, also addresses the objection that insufficient electricity supply hinders industry's climate projects. The requirement for documented alternatives responds to the plan's view of evaluation and monitoring as political core tasks.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet kräver att miljöhänsyn genomsyrar alla politikområden och att ekologi, ekonomi och sociala hänsyn integreras, vilket är just den bredare samordning motförslaget efterfrågar. Valmanifestets krav på en klimatomställning som fungerar och är effektiv, tillsammans med satsningen på kärnkraft för trygg elförsörjning, träffar också invändningen att bristande eltillgång hindrar industrins klimatprojekt. Kravet på redovisade alternativ svarar mot planens syn på utvärdering och uppföljning som politiska kärnuppgifter.

  • environmental considerations in all policy areasdecisive»Miljöhänsyn behöver genomsyra alla politikområden.« (party programme ↗)“Environmental considerations need to permeate all policy areas.”
  • effective climate transition»Sverige är världsledande i klimatomställningen och det ska vi fortsätta vara på ett sätt som både fungerar och är effektivt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden is a world leader in climate transition and we shall continue to be in a way that both works and is effective.”
  • secure electricity supply for industry»Satsa på kärnkraften med långsiktiga villkor att utvecklas. Förläng befintliga reaktorers drift och bygg ut med nya reaktorer.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Invest in nuclear power with long-term conditions to develop. Extend the operation of existing reactors and expand with new reactors.”
  • monitoring of public efforts»Utvärdering, kostnadsuppföljning och kvalitetskontroll är därför viktiga politiska uppgifter.« (party programme ↗)“Evaluation, cost monitoring and quality control are therefore important political tasks.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan's crucial climate commitment is that the transition requires access to clean and stable electricity and that industry's transition shall be facilitated through Industriklivet and shorter permit processes.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's crucial climate commitment is that the transition requires access to clean and stable electricity and that industry's transition shall be facilitated through Industriklivet and shorter permit processes. The counter-proposal's demand for broader coordination and for electricity supply to be weighed into climate policy is in line with this, as is the demand for reporting on alternative measures since the plan sets high demands for efficiency in climate policy. Therefore the plan supports what the counter-proposal demands in substance.

Original (Swedish)

Planens avgörande klimatåtagande är att omställningen förutsätter tillgång till ren och stabil el och att industrins omställning ska underlättas genom Industriklivet och kortare tillståndsprocesser. Motförslagets krav på bredare samordning och på att eltillgången vägs in i klimatpolitiken ligger i linje med detta, liksom kravet på redovisning av alternativa åtgärder eftersom planen ställer höga krav på effektivitet i klimatpolitiken. Planen stöder därför det motförslaget kräver i sak.

  • electricity a prerequisite for transitiondecisive»Utan ren och stabil el till rimligt pris blir det ingen klimatomställning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Without clean and stable electricity at a reasonable price there will be no climate transition.”
  • faster permits for industry»förkorta och förenkla tillståndsprocesser för industrier som satsar på omställning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“shorten and simplify permit processes for industries investing in transition”
  • support for industry transition»Fortsätta satsa på Industriklivet som hjälper industrin att ställa om« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Continue to invest in Industriklivet which helps industry transition”
  • effective climate policy»höga krav på effektivitet och precision i den förda« (party programme ↗)“high requirements for efficiency and precision in”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SDSverigedemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan establishes that evidence, results, and Swedish competitiveness shall guide the implementation of climate targets and that clear results shall be demanded for every public investment.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that evidence, results, and Swedish competitiveness shall guide the implementation of climate targets and that clear results shall be demanded for every public investment. The counter-proposal wants alternative measures to be reported if the support programme's effects fail to materialise and points out that lack of electricity supply worsens industry's opportunities — a concern that the plan shares when it calls the electricity system central to basal industry's competitiveness. The plan thus speaks for the counter-proposal's demands.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att evidens, resultat och svensk konkurrenskraft ska styra genomförandet av klimatmålen och att tydliga resultat ska begäras för varje offentlig satsning. Motförslaget vill just att alternativa åtgärder redovisas om stödprogrammets effekter uteblir och pekar på att bristande eltillgång försämrar industrins möjligheter — en oro som planen delar när den kallar elsystemet centralt för basindustrins konkurrenskraft. Planen talar därför för motförslagets krav.

  • evidence-driven climate policydecisive»Evidens, resultat och svensk konkurrenskraft ska styra genomförandet av klimatmål i högre utsträckning än politikers vilja att gå först och längst.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Evidence, results, and Swedish competitiveness shall guide the implementation of climate targets to a greater extent than politicians' desire to go first and furthest.”
  • results requirements for investments»Begära tydliga resultat för varje offentlig satsning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Demand clear results for every public investment”
  • electricity supply for industry»Elsystemet är centralt för basindustrins konkurrenskraft. El behövs året runt till rimliga priser.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The electricity system is central to basal industry's competitiveness. Electricity is needed year-round at reasonable prices.”
  • effective climate policy»Bedriva en effektiv klimatpolitik med ett tydligt globalt perspektiv« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Conduct effective climate policy with a clear global perspective”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament