2025-03-262024/25:SkU9 · p.7SkUTaxation
Job Tax Deduction
Phasing out the in-work tax credit at high incomes
What's at stake: The decision affects how much tax high earners pay and how much of the tax cuts go to high-income versus low-income earners. It involves tens of billions of kronor in public revenue and how evenly tax relief is distributed across income groups.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the in-work tax credit should continue to be given in full even at high incomes, without any phase-out, or whether the phase-out should be reinstated so the credit shrinks and eventually disappears for those with the highest monthly incomes.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee notes that the government has already implemented and improved the rules on the in-work tax credit, including by removing the phase-out at higher income levels, in line with a policy of lower tax on work within a framework of sustainable public finances. The committee therefore sees no reason to now call on the government for further changes to the in-work tax credit system, and rejects all the motions on this point.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 15 (V)
The reservation (V) opposes giving the in-work tax credit in full even at high incomes without any phase-out, for reasons of public finances and distribution, and instead wants the credit to be phased out on incomes between 45,000 and 100,000 kronor a month and removed entirely above 100,000 kronor a month.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 15 by V.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: MPMiljöpartiet
Ja 190–20Ja 174–36
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/20/0/4 | match | confidence: high | derived |
| S | No | Abstain 0/0/93/13 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| MP | No | Yes 16/0/0/2 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | Yes | Yes 20/0/0/4 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| L | Yes | Yes 14/0/0/2 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| KD | Yes | Yes 17/0/0/2 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| SD | Yes | Yes 62/0/0/10 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2024/25:565 by David Perez (SD), 2024/25:1921 by Ilona Szatmári Waldau et al. (V) motion 6, 2024/25:2773 by Sten Bergheden (M) and 2024/25:3190 by Niklas Karlsson et al. (S) motion 6.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:565 av David Perez (SD), 2024/25:1921 av Ilona Szatmári Waldau m.fl. (V) yrkande 6, 2024/25:2773 av Sten Bergheden (M) och 2024/25:3190 av Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S) yrkande 6.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 140 proposals concerning income tax on individuals contained in motions submitted during the general motion period 2024. The Riksdag refers primarily to previous decisions, ongoing legislative work, and existing legislation in the field. The motions address, among other things, income taxation regarding job tax deductions, tax reduction for sickness and activity benefits, home renovation and household service deductions, and various tax reforms.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to introduce a new 5 percent tax on monthly incomes over 62,000 kronor. (V) — Reservation 15
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan requires that tax levels increase especially on high incomes and large fortunes and that the tax system is designed progressively so that the richest once again pay their share.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that tax levels increase especially on high incomes and large fortunes and that the tax system is designed progressively so that the richest once again pay their share. A job tax reduction that is given in full even at very high incomes goes in the opposite direction, and a phase-out above 45,000 kronor with a reduction above 100,000 is precisely such a progressive design. The job tax reduction is not mentioned by name.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att skattenivåerna ökar framför allt på höga inkomster och stora förmögenheter och att skattesystemet utformas progressivt så att de rikaste åter betalar sin del. Ett jobbskatteavdrag som ges fullt ut även vid mycket höga inkomster går i motsatt riktning, och en avtrappning över 45 000 kronor med bortfall över 100 000 är precis en sådan progressiv utformning. Jobbskatteavdraget nämns inte vid namn.
- the richest pay their sharedecisive»skattesystem där de rikaste åter börjar betala sin del.« (party programme ↗)“tax system where the richest once again start paying their share.”
- progressive taxation»de utformas progressivt och används till saker alla har användning av.« (party programme ↗)“they are designed progressively and used for things all have use for.”
- tax according to capacity»Vi vill inte höja skatten för vanliga löntagare utan på mångmiljonarv, lyxvillor och stora aktievinster som man inte ens behöver jobba för.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We do not want to raise taxes for ordinary wage earners but on multimillionaires, luxury villas, and large stock profits that you don't even have to work for.”
- no tax cuts for a few»Vänsterpartiet tycker att det är viktigare med en arbetstidsförkortning som kommer alla till del än sänkta skatter för ett fåtal.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party believes it is more important to have a shortened working week that benefits all than tax cuts for a few.”
The plan's key commitment is that resources for welfare shall increase and that large tax cuts prevent this, and that the very richest shall contribute more through a readiness tax.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's key commitment is that resources for welfare shall increase and that large tax cuts prevent this, and that the very richest shall contribute more through a readiness tax. That the job tax credit is phased out at high incomes and completely disappears above 100,000 kronor per month is consistent with the requirement for progressive taxation according to ability to pay. The job tax credit is not mentioned explicitly, though, which is why the assessment is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planens avgörande åtagande är att resurserna till välfärden ska öka och att stora skattesänkningar omöjliggör det, samt att de allra rikaste ska bidra mer genom en beredskapsskatt. Att jobbskatteavdraget trappas av på höga inkomster och helt uteblir över 100 000 kronor i månaden är förenligt med kravet på progressiv beskattning efter bärkraft. Jobbskatteavdraget nämns dock inte uttryckligen, varför bedömningen härleds.
- welfare before tax cutsdecisive»Stora skattesänkningar omöjliggör det.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Large tax cuts prevent it.”
- the richest shall contribute more»Vi vill införa en beredskapsskatt för de allra rikaste.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to introduce a readiness tax for the very richest.”
- progressive taxation»Skatterna ska vara progressiva och tas ut efter bärkraft och« (party programme ↗)“Taxes shall be progressive and levied according to ability to pay and”
- resources for welfare»En avgörande fråga i höstens val är om vi ska fortsätta öka resurserna till välfärden, eller om stora skattesänkningar ska gå före.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“A decisive question in this autumn's election is whether we should continue to increase resources for welfare, or whether large tax cuts should come first.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto asserts that those who are well-off shall contribute more than those with small margins and that those with most money shall contribute more to welfare, while those with least resources shall have lower tax.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto asserts that those who are well-off shall contribute more than those with small margins and that those with most money shall contribute more to welfare, while those with least resources shall have lower tax. The party programme wishes to reduce economic inequalities. That the earned income tax deduction is phased out at high incomes and is absent above one hundred thousand per month follows directly from this.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår fast att den som har det gott ställt ska bidra mer än den som har små marginaler och att de med mest pengar ska bidra mer till välfärden, medan de med minst resurser ska få lägre skatt. Partiprogrammet vill minska de ekonomiska klyftorna. Att jobbskatteavdraget trappas av vid höga inkomster och uteblir över hundratusen i månaden följer direkt av detta.
- progressive distributiondecisive»Den som har det gott ställt ska bidra mer än den som har små marginaler.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Those who are well-off shall contribute more than those with small margins.”
- high earners contribute more»att de med mest pengar, som också orsakar större utsläpp, ska bidra mer till omställningen och välfärden genom en progressiv beskattning av kapital.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“that those with most money, who also cause greater emissions, shall contribute more to the transition and welfare through progressive taxation of capital.”
- sustainability principle in taxation»Det är rimligt att den som har det gott ställt ekonomiskt bidrar mer till det gemensamma trygghetssystemet än den som har ett mindre ekonomiskt utrymme.« (party programme ↗)“It is reasonable that those who are well-off economically contribute more to the common security system than those with less economic scope.”
- reduced inequalities»De ekonomiska klyftorna ska minska.« (party programme ↗)“Economic inequalities shall decrease.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto states that total tax pressure must come down and that the party will not participate in tax increases that damage jobs or personal savings.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto states that total tax pressure must come down and that the party will not participate in tax increases that damage jobs or personal savings. Phasing out and eliminating the earned income tax credit at higher incomes is precisely such an increase in tax on work. The party programme also wants to make the tax scale less steep so that it does not penalize effort.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår fast att det totala skattetrycket ska ner och att partiet inte medverkar till skattehöjningar som skadar jobben eller det egna sparandet. Att trappa av och slopa jobbskatteavdraget vid högre inkomster är just en sådan höjning av skatten på arbete. Partiprogrammet vill dessutom göra skatteskalan mindre brant så att den inte bestraffar ansträngningar.
- no tax increases on jobsdecisive»Det totala skattetrycket måste ner nästa mandatperiod. Vi kommer inte att medverka till några skattehöjningar som skadar jobben, det egna sparandet eller gör det dyrare att bo.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Total tax pressure must come down next term. We will not participate in any tax increases that damage jobs, personal savings or make housing more expensive.”
- less steep tax scale»Därför måste skatteskalan göras mindre brant« (party programme ↗)“Therefore, the tax scale must be made less steep”
- lower tax on work»Därför vill vi sänka skatten, särskilt för dem med lägre inkomster och för de viktiga småföretagen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore, we want to lower taxes, especially for those with lower incomes and for important small businesses.”
- low tax on job creation»Skattebördan på jobbskapande i företag ska göras så liten som möjligt.« (party programme ↗)“The tax burden on job creation in business should be as small as possible.”
The plan requires a new broad earned income tax credit and that marginal tax rates for everyone continue to decrease, with the highest marginal rates closer to the OECD average.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires a new broad earned income tax credit and that marginal tax rates for everyone continue to decrease, with the highest marginal rates closer to the OECD average. The counter-proposal's demand to phase out the deduction at high incomes and completely remove it above 100,000 kronor per month raises the marginal tax rate precisely and therefore contradicts the plan. The plan also wants to abolish the surtax and raise the threshold.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver ett nytt brett jobbskatteavdrag och att marginalskatterna för alla fortsätter att minska, med de högsta marginalskatterna närmare OECD-snittet. Motförslagets krav på att trappa av avdraget vid höga inkomster och helt slopa det över 100 000 kronor i månaden höjer just marginalskatten och strider därför mot planen. Planen vill dessutom avskaffa värnskatten och höja brytpunkten.
- broad earned income tax creditdecisive»För att stärka arbetslinjen och hushållens ekonomi i ett oroligt ekonomiskt läge vill vi skyndsamt genomföra ett nytt brett jobbskatteavdrag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“To strengthen the work line and household finances in an uncertain economic situation we want to quickly implement a new broad earned income tax credit.”
- reduced marginal tax rates for all»marginalskatterna för alla fortsätter att minska« (2022 manifesto ↗)“marginal tax rates for everyone continue to decrease”
- lower top marginal tax rate»De högsta marginalskatterna bör närma sig snittet i OECD.« (party programme ↗)“The highest marginal tax rates should approach the OECD average.”
- abolished surtax»Därför ska både värnskatten avskaffas,« (party programme ↗)“Therefore both the surtax shall be abolished,”
The plan establishes that the tax system shall be designed so that the individual to the greatest possible extent retains their own wages, that taxation shall be designed so that work is favoured and that the system shall stimulate work and enterprise.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that the tax system shall be designed so that the individual to the greatest possible extent retains their own wages, that taxation shall be designed so that work is favoured and that the system shall stimulate work and enterprise. A phase-out that completely removes the earned income tax credit for high incomes goes against this, although the plan also mentions that taxes shall mitigate income dispersion.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att skattesystemet ska utformas så att den enskilde i största möjliga utsträckning får behålla sin egen lön, att beskattningen ska utformas så att arbete gynnas och att systemet ska stimulera arbete och företagande. En avtrappning som helt tar bort jobbskatteavdraget vid höga inkomster går emot detta, även om planen också nämner att skatter ska mildra inkomstspridningen.
- retain own wagesdecisive»Skattesystemet ska vara utformat så att den enskilde i största möjliga utsträckning får behålla sin egen« (party programme ↗)“The tax system shall be designed so that the individual to the greatest possible extent retains their own”
- work shall be favoured»Beskattningen ska utformas så att arbete gynnas« (party programme ↗)“Taxation shall be designed so that work is favoured”
- taxes that stimulate work»Det bör också utformas så att det stimulerar arbete, hederlighet, sparande och företagande.« (party programme ↗)“It should also be designed so that it stimulates work, integrity, savings and enterprise.”
- mitigate income dispersion»styra den ekonomiska utvecklingen i en social och ekologisk riktning samt mildra inkomstspridningen« (party programme ↗)“steer economic development in a social and ecological direction and mitigate income dispersion”
The plan commits to lowering taxes on work so that effort pays off better and to introducing a tax freeze where aggregate taxes are not raised.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan commits to lowering taxes on work so that effort pays off better and to introducing a tax freeze where aggregate taxes are not raised. It also states that the tax burden is already among the world's highest and that more tax is no solution. A phasing down of the job tax credit at higher incomes is in substance a tax increase on work and therefore conflicts with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen åtar sig att sänka skatten på arbete så att ansträngning lönar sig bättre och att införa ett skattehöjarstopp där de samlade skatterna inte höjs. Den slår också fast att skattetrycket redan är bland världens högsta och att mer skatt inte är någon lösning. En avtrappning av jobbskatteavdraget vid högre inkomster är i sak en skattehöjning på arbete och strider därför mot planen.
- lower taxes on workdecisive»Sänka skatten på arbete så att din ansträngning lönar sig bättre« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Lower taxes on work so that your effort pays off better”
- tax freeze»Införa ett skattehöjarstopp under den kommande mandatperioden som innebär att de samlade skatterna inte höjs« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce a tax freeze for the coming term which means that aggregate taxes are not raised”
- no higher taxes(2022 manifesto)
- work line in the tax system»Skatter och bidragssystem ska utgå från arbetslinjen.« (party programme ↗)“Taxes and benefit systems shall be based on the work line.”
flags: citat_ej_verifierat
The plan's tax line is that it shall become more profitable to work and that tax take shall not undermine incentives to contribute to growth.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's tax line is that it shall become more profitable to work and that tax take shall not undermine incentives to contribute to growth. A job tax credit that is phased out and completely disappears at high incomes goes in the opposite direction and is the type of far-reaching redistribution policy the party programme warns against. The levels of the phase-out are not addressed in the documents.
Original (Swedish)
Planens skattelinje är att det ska bli mer lönsamt att arbeta och att skatteuttaget inte får undanröja incitamenten att bidra till tillväxten. Ett jobbskatteavdrag som trappas av och helt faller bort vid höga inkomster går i motsatt riktning och är den typ av långtgående fördelningspolitik partiprogrammet varnar för. Just avtrappningens nivåer behandlas inte i dokumenten.
- work shall paydecisive»Göra det mer lönsamt att arbeta« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Make it more profitable to work”
- preserved work incentives»undanröjer incitamenten för att vilja bidra till den ekonomiska tillväxten« (party programme ↗)“undermines incentives to want to contribute to economic growth”
- education and risk shall pay»måste det löna sig att utbilda sig, arbeta och ta risker« (party programme ↗)“it must pay to educate oneself, work, and take risks”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2024/25:SkU9)
- Committee report full text (HC01SkU9)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:1002 — Avdragsrätt för pensionssparande för den med tjänstepension under del av året av Rickard Nordin (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1143 — Donationer till kultursektorn av Magnus Berntsson (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1145 — Utveckling av avdragsgilla gåvor av Mikael Oscarsson (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1149 — Förtydligande av skattelagstiftningen i fråga om styrelsearvoden av Charlotte Nordström (M)
- Motion 2024/25:1187 — Möjliggörande av skattereduktion för gåvor till kulturen av Niels Paarup-Petersen (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1200 — En fungerande arbetsmarknad i hela Öresundsområdet av Niels Paarup-Petersen (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1206 — Införande av ett blått avdrag av Niels Paarup-Petersen (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1250 — Begränsning av rot- och rutavdrag av Louise Thunström (S)
- Motion 2024/25:1253 — Reformering av skattesystemet av Louise Thunström och Jessica Rodén (båda S)
- Motion 2024/25:1257 — Mer rättvisa skatter för att stärka försvaret och trygga välfärden av Dzenan Cisija (S)
- Motion 2024/25:1350 — Skatteförfarande och folkbokföring av Per Söderlund m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1353 — Inkomstbeskattning av Per Söderlund m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1387 — Finansiering inom bostads- och fastighetsområdet av Mikael Eskilandersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1420 — Politik för ett starkt och oberoende civilsamhälle av Jonas Andersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:143 — Återinförande av avdragsrätten för fackavgift av Arber Gashi (S)
- Motion 2024/25:1455 — Nästa generation företagare av Tobias Andersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1460 — Kapitalförsörjning och riskkapital av Tobias Andersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1464 — En tillväxtorienterad politik för industrilandet Sverige av Tobias Andersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1476 — Skattereformer för företagande och tillväxt av Christian Carlsson (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1555 — Utredning av förutsättningarna för att utöka rotavdraget av Ingemar Kihlström (KD)
Source: The Swedish Parliament