2026-03-112025/26:KU28 · p.5KUConstitution
Religious community security and safety work
Reformed support for faith communities' security work
What's at stake: Faith communities and civil society organizations face threats and violence and need to be able to invest in protection such as surveillance cameras and security guards. How the support is designed determines whether congregations can plan long term or are left with one-off measures.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether support for security-enhancing measures for faith communities should be reformed to enable more long-term investment, or whether the already strengthened support is sufficient.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The Committee points out that the appropriation for security-enhancing measures has already been increased, that support to the Jewish Central Council has been strengthened, and that a national strategy against antisemitism has been drawn up, and against that background sees no reason to further reform the grant. The motions are rejected.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 2 (C, MP)
Despite the ability to apply for state support, it is not enough — Jewish congregations, for example, spend a large share of their budget on security. The support should be further reformed so that it is designed more appropriately and enables long-term, ongoing investment instead of one-off measures.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 2 by C, MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Abstain 1/0/17/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| S | No | Yes 88/0/0/18 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | No 0/15/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | No | No 0/21/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 13/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | No | Yes 56/0/0/12 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 62/0/0/9 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
Broke with the party line
| VLotta Johnsson Fornarve (V, Södermanlands län) | Yes — party line: Abstain |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2025/26:308 by Vasiliki Tsouplaki et al. (V) amendment 2, 2025/26:935 by Jamal El-Haj (-) amendments 1-3, 2025/26:3435 by Jan Riise et al. (MP) amendment 15, 2025/26:3583 by Muharrem Demirok et al. (C) amendment 27 and 2025/26:3608 by Mikael Oscarsson (KD) amendment 3.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:308 av Vasiliki Tsouplaki m.fl. (V) yrkande 2, 2025/26:935 av Jamal El-Haj (-) yrkandena 1-3, 2025/26:3435 av Jan Riise m.fl. (MP) yrkande 15, 2025/26:3583 av Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C) yrkande 27 och 2025/26:3608 av Mikael Oscarsson (KD) yrkande 3.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected around 60 proposals in motions from the ordinary motion period 2025 concerning freedoms and rights. The proposals address, among other things, threats based on religious belief and against elected officials, religious community security and safety work, protection of property rights, prohibition of racist organizations and protection of academic freedom. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to earlier positions and ongoing work.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to launch an investigation to find solutions for better support to elected officials facing threats, hatred, and harassment. (C, MP) — Reservation 2
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan is explicitly anti-racist and commits the party to defending the opportunities of vulnerable groups every time they are attacked, with Muslims mentioned explicitly.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan is explicitly anti-racist and commits the party to defending the opportunities of vulnerable groups every time they are attacked, with Muslims mentioned explicitly. That vulnerable religious communities are forced to spend a large part of their budget on security is precisely such a situation. A reformed, long-term support follows from that principle; the plan, however, does not address the technical design of the subsidy.
Original (Swedish)
Planen är uttalat antirasistisk och förbinder partiet att försvara utsatta gruppers möjligheter varje gång de angrips, med muslimer nämnda uttryckligen. Att utsatta trossamfund tvingas lägga en stor del av sin budget på säkerhet är just en sådan situation. Ett reformerat, långsiktigt stöd följer av den principen; planen behandlar däremot inte bidragets tekniska utformning.
- defend vulnerable groupsdecisive»just den här gången handlar om sjukskrivna, muslimer eller transpersoner.« (party programme ↗)“this time is about the sick-listed, Muslims, or transgender people.”
- counteract racism»Rasismen gror mellan grannar och arbetskamrater, människor som egentligen har allt att vinna på att hålla ihop.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Racism grows between neighbors and coworkers, people who really have everything to gain by sticking together.”
- authorities' responsibility»Myndigheter har ett särskilt ansvar att möta alla människor« (party programme ↗)“Authorities have a special responsibility to meet all people”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme makes society's responsibility for security and combating hate crimes core tasks and states the right to a safe neighbourhood for everyone.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme makes society's responsibility for security and combating hate crimes core tasks and states the right to a safe neighbourhood for everyone. Exposed faith communities forced to lay out a large part of their budget on security do not receive functioning protection through one-off measures. The plan's commitments therefore argue that the contribution is reformed so that long-term and ongoing security investments become possible.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet gör samhällets trygghetsansvar och bekämpandet av hatbrott till kärnuppgifter och slår fast rätten till en trygg närmiljö för alla. Utsatta trossamfund som tvingas lägga en stor del av sin budget på säkerhet får inte ett fungerande skydd genom engångsinsatser. Planens åtaganden talar därför för att bidraget reformeras så att långsiktiga och löpande säkerhetsinvesteringar blir möjliga.
- safe neighbourhood for everyonedecisive»Rätt till trygg närmiljö för alla, prioritering av trygghetsskapande arbete.« (party programme ↗)“Right to safe neighbourhood for everyone, prioritization of safety-creating work.”
- combating hate crimes»Bekämpande av hatbrott.« (party programme ↗)“Combating hate crimes.”
- society's responsibility for safety»Samhället har ett grundläggande ansvar att säkra tryggheten i landet.« (party programme ↗)“Society has a fundamental responsibility to secure safety in the country.”
- action against threats and hate propaganda»Åtgärder mot desinformation, hatpropaganda och hot.« (party programme ↗)“Action against misinformation, hate propaganda and threats.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme asserts that support and conditions for civil society must be long-term and clear, which is precisely what the counter-proposal requires when one-off initiatives are to be replaced by continuous security investments.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme asserts that support and conditions for civil society must be long-term and clear, which is precisely what the counter-proposal requires when one-off initiatives are to be replaced by continuous security investments. The programme also requires that work against antisemitism, Islamophobia and other racism is strengthened and that religious freedom is constantly defended. The faith communities' security contribution is not explicitly mentioned, but the commitments clearly point to strengthened and sustained support.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att stöd och villkor för civilsamhället måste vara långsiktiga och tydliga, vilket är precis vad motförslaget kräver när engångsinsatser ska ersättas av löpande säkerhetsinvesteringar. Programmet kräver också att arbetet mot antisemitism, islamofobi och annan rasism stärks och att religionsfriheten ständigt försvaras. Trossamfundens säkerhetsbidrag nämns inte uttryckligen, men åtagandena pekar entydigt mot stärkt och uthålligt stöd.
- long-term support for civil societydecisive»Stöd och villkor för civilsamhället måste vara långsiktiga och tydliga« (party programme ↗)“Support and conditions for civil society must be long-term and clear”
- strengthened work against antisemitism»Arbetet mot all typ av rasism måste stärkas. Antisemitism, islamofobi och afrofobi är« (party programme ↗)“Work against all types of racism must be strengthened. Antisemitism, Islamophobia and Afrophobia are”
- religious freedom shall be protected»Föreningsfrihet och religionsfrihet« (party programme ↗)“Freedom of association and religious freedom”
- protection against hate crimes»Rasismen tar sig också uttryck« (party programme ↗)“Racism also manifests itself”
The election manifesto explicitly commits to strengthening protection for persons active in, among other things, religious congregations when hatred and threats are directed at democracy-bearing institutions.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly commits to strengthening protection for persons active in, among other things, religious congregations when hatred and threats are directed at democracy-bearing institutions. The party programme makes religious freedom an unshakeable principle, and the election manifesto highlights civil society's role in holding communities together. Support that forces vulnerable congregations to dedicate large parts of their budget to security undermines precisely that activity. The plan therefore supports reforming the contribution for long-term efforts.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet åtar sig uttryckligen att stärka skyddet för personer verksamma i bland annat religiösa samfund när hat och hot riktas mot demokratibärande institutioner. Partiprogrammet gör religionsfriheten till en orubblig princip, och valmanifestet lyfter civilsamhällets sammanhållande roll. Ett stöd som tvingar utsatta samfund att lägga stora delar av budgeten på säkerhet urholkar just den verksamheten. Planen stöder därför att bidraget reformeras för långsiktiga insatser.
- strengthened protection for religious congregationsdecisive»Vi ska stärka skyddet för personer verksamma bland annat i media, religiösa samfund och offentlig förvaltning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We shall strengthen protection for persons active in, among other things, media, religious congregations and public administration.”
- religious freedom is unshakeable»Yttrandefrihet, religionsfrihet och föreningsfrihet är därför orubbliga« (party programme ↗)“Freedom of expression, religious freedom and freedom of association are therefore unshakeable”
- value of civil society»Civilsamhällets roll för att binda samman människor och förbättra integrationen är ovärderlig.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Civil society's role in bringing people together and improving integration is invaluable.”
The plan wants to improve civil society's financing precisely through long-term state grants, which is exactly what the counter-proposal demands instead of one-time initiatives.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to improve civil society's financing precisely through long-term state grants, which is exactly what the counter-proposal demands instead of one-time initiatives. It also establishes that the state shall with force combat all kinds of racism and intolerance, which bears the costs of vulnerable communities' security. The plan's demand for strengthened monitoring of grant-giving speaks for reform, not that today's support is sufficient.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill förbättra civilsamhällets finansiering just genom långsiktiga statsbidrag, vilket är precis vad motförslaget efterfrågar i stället för engångsinsatser. Den slår också fast att staten med kraft ska bekämpa all slags rasism och intolerans, vilket bär kostnaderna för utsatta samfunds säkerhet. Planens krav på stärkt uppföljning av bidragsgivning talar för reformering, inte för att dagens stöd är tillräckligt.
- long-term state grants for civil societydecisive»Vi vill fortsätta förbättra civilsamhällets finansiering genom både bredare skatteavdrag för gåvor och långsiktiga statsbidrag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to continue to improve civil society's financing through both broader tax deductions for donations and long-term state grants.”
- combat racism and hate crimes»Därför ska staten med kraft bekämpa all slags rasism, diskriminering och intolerans.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore the state shall with force combat all kinds of racism, discrimination and intolerance.”
- good conditions for civil society»Politiken ska bidra till att det civila samhället ges goda förutsättningar.« (party programme ↗)“Policy shall contribute to civil society being given good conditions.”
- control of community grants»Vi vill både stärka uppföljningen av bidragsgivning och stoppa dold finansiering av trossamfund så att de inte blir verktyg för extremistiska krafter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want both to strengthen monitoring of grant-giving and stop hidden financing of religious communities so they do not become tools for extremist forces.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan gives religious communities a clear positive role: support shall be provided to communities whose activities are based on human dignity, and the public shall be supportive in relation to them.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan gives religious communities a clear positive role: support shall be provided to communities whose activities are based on human dignity, and the public shall be supportive in relation to them. At the same time, the election manifesto's core commitment is that security shall be restored and that there are environments where extremists influence social life. A contribution that enables long-term security investments follows from both commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Planen ger trossamfunden en tydlig positiv roll: stöd ska utgå till samfund vars verksamhet vilar på människovärdet, och det offentliga ska vara stödjande i förhållande till dem. Samtidigt är valmanifestets bärande åtagande att tryggheten ska återupprättas och att det finns miljöer där extremister påverkar samhällslivet. Ett bidrag som möjliggör långsiktiga säkerhetsinvesteringar följer av båda åtagandena.
- restored securitydecisive»Tryggheten på gator och torg måste återupprättas, brottsförebyggande arbetet måste stärkas« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Security in streets and squares must be restored, crime prevention work must be strengthened”
- civic life benefits society»vitalt samfundsliv till gagn för samhället även i ett generellt perspektiv« (party programme ↗)“vital civic life for society's benefit also in a general perspective”
- communities shall be able to operate freely»religiösa samfund ska ges goda möjligheter att verka och« (party programme ↗)“religious communities shall be given good opportunities to operate and”
- extremism threatens social life»Det finns också områden där islamistiska extremister har en avgörande påverkan på samhällslivet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“There are also areas where Islamist extremists have a decisive influence on social life.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto explicitly commits to protecting the security of faith communities so that everyone can practice their faith without feeling threatened.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly commits to protecting the security of faith communities so that everyone can practice their faith without feeling threatened. The counter-proposal's demand for reformed and long-term security support is in line with that commitment and with the plan's view of security as our time's major freedom issue. The plan does not, however, specify the technical design of the support, which is why support is derived from the commitment rather than from an explicit formulation.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet åtar sig uttryckligen att slå vakt om trossamfundens säkerhet så att alla ska kunna utöva sin tro utan att känna sig hotade. Motförslagets krav på ett reformerat och långsiktigt säkerhetsstöd ligger i linje med det åtagandet och med planens syn på tryggheten som vår tids stora frihetsfråga. Planen anger däremot inte bidragets tekniska utformning, varför stödet härleds ur åtagandet snarare än ur en uttrycklig formulering.
- security of faith communitiesdecisive»• Slå vakt om trossamfundens säkerhet för alla ska kunna utöva sin tro utan att känna sig hotade« (2022 manifesto ↗)“• Protect the security of faith communities so that everyone can practice their faith without feeling threatened”
- security as freedom issue»Tryggheten har blivit vår tids stora frihetsfråga.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Security has become our time's major freedom issue.”
- strengthened Security Police»• Stärka Säkerhetspolisen för att öka deras förmåga att skydda den liberala demokratin och landets alla medborgare« (2022 manifesto ↗)“• Strengthen the Security Police to increase their ability to protect liberal democracy and all citizens of the country”
- protection of religious freedom»religions-, tanke-, åsikts-, yttrande- och pressfrihet.« (party programme ↗)“freedom of religion, thought, opinion, expression and press.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan makes citizens' security and safety one of the state's most important tasks and wants to increase security across the country, which speaks for vulnerable faith communities being able to build long-term security protection.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan makes citizens' security and safety one of the state's most important tasks and wants to increase security across the country, which speaks for vulnerable faith communities being able to build long-term security protection. The plan simultaneously sets a clear condition: faith communities that work for extremism shall not receive public grants at all, and every public investment shall show results. Since the plan does not address the grant's structure, the conclusion is derived and uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Planen gör medborgarnas trygghet och säkerhet till en av statens viktigaste uppgifter och vill öka tryggheten i hela landet, vilket talar för att utsatta trossamfund ska kunna bygga ett långsiktigt säkerhetsskydd. Planen ställer samtidigt ett tydligt villkor: samfund som verkar för extremism ska inte få offentliga bidrag alls, och varje offentlig satsning ska visa resultat. Eftersom planen inte behandlar bidragets konstruktion är slutsatsen härledd och osäker.
- state responsibility for securitydecisive»garantera medborgarnas trygghet och säkerhet. Trygghet är en förutsättning för frihet.« (party programme ↗)“guarantee citizens' security and safety. Security is a prerequisite for freedom.”
- security across the country»Öka tryggheten i hela Sverige och i alla bostadsområden« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase security across all of Sweden and in all residential areas”
- no grants to extremist communities»Moskéer och andra trossamfund eller organisationer som verkar för extremism ska vare sig få bidrag från det offentliga eller utländska regimer.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Mosques and other faith communities or organisations that work for extremism shall receive neither grants from the public nor from foreign regimes.”
- results requirements for public funds»Begära tydliga resultat för varje offentlig satsning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Demand clear results for every public investment”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:KU28)
- Committee report full text (HD01KU28)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:1097 — Grundlagsskydd av hbtqi-personers rättigheter av Anna Lasses (C)
- Motion 2025/26:1392 — Stärkt äganderätt av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:14 — Fackförbund utan partikoppling av Josef Fransson (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1468 — Översyn av gränsen för yttrandefriheten, hets mot folkgrupp och författningsskydd av Magnus Jacobsson (KD)
- Motion 2025/26:1520 — Utvärdering och förtydligande av religionsfrihetens gränser för att motverka normkollisioner och värna det öppna samhället av Emma Ahlström Köster (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1524 — Stärkt demokrati - mot hot och förföljelse av förtroendevalda, tjänstemän och minoriteter av Emma Ahlström Köster (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1693 — Risk för försvagad yttrandefrihet i en föränderlig tid av Staffan Eklöf (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1718 — Utökade möjligheter för kommuner att stoppa moskébyggen av Jonas Andersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1739 — Nationellt förbud mot offentlig religiös förkunnelse av Jan Ericson (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1745 — Strategi mot politisk islamism i Sverige av Jan Ericson m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1782 — Grundlagsskydd av äganderätten av Jan Ericson m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1866 — Verktyg för kontroll av finansiering av religiös verksamhet av Magnus Resare (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2488 — Stärkt äganderätt av Jesper Skalberg Karlsson (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2567 — Förbud mot framträdande religiösa tecken och klädsel i skola och offentlig sektor av Merit Frost Lindberg och Fredrik Kärrholm (båda M)
- Motion 2025/26:2785 — Akademisk frihet av Nadja Awad m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2790 — Konstitutionella frågor av Jessica Wetterling m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2808 — Rättvist förfarande vid arbetstvister av Markus Wiechel och Alexander Christiansson (båda SD)
- Motion 2025/26:2911 — Stärkt äganderätt i Sverige av Adam Reuterskiöld m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2025/26:3057 — Finansiering av religiösa organisationer av Noria Manouchi (M)
- Motion 2025/26:3062 — Förbud och begränsningar i fråga om våldsbejakande extremism av Noria Manouchi (M)
Source: The Swedish Parliament