2024-02-072023/24:TU5 · p.6TUTransport & infrastructure

Ticket system

Ticketing system for public transport

What's at stake: The issue affects travelers who combine different modes, operators or regions, public transport's appeal relative to the car, and how simple and affordable it is to travel by public transport nationwide, which in turn affects the climate transition.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether ongoing digital initiatives for joint ticket distribution across operators and regions are sufficient to make it easy to buy and combine tickets, or whether the state should investigate a uniform, low-cost nationwide public-transport ticket modelled on the German approach.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee welcomes industry initiatives to make it easier to search for and buy tickets nationwide, including a new joint national distribution and sales solution for public-transport tickets, and judges that this promotes sustainable travel without the need for a new, uniform, state-regulated nationwide ticket.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 12 (V)

The reservation (V) wants the government to investigate a 'Sweden ticket' - a uniform, low-cost nationwide public-transport ticket modelled on Germany's approach (around 49 euros a month) - that would let travelers use all public transport nationwide without limits, instead of today's many regional systems with different fares; the rationale is that fares have risen in many places and such a ticket would attract more riders and support the climate transition.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 12 by V.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
Vown reservationNoNo 0/18/0/6follows the planconfidence: highnot addressed
SNoYes 89/0/0/18departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MPNoAbstain 0/0/11/7departs from the planconfidence: highexplicit
CYesAbstain 0/0/20/4departs from the planconfidence: lowderived
LYesYes 10/0/0/6follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
KDYesYes 12/0/0/7follows the planconfidence: lowderived
MYesYes 55/0/0/13follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
SDYesAbstain 0/0/62/10departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects the motions 2023/24:400 by Patrik Jönsson et al. (SD) motions 59 and 60, 2023/24:957 by Daniel Helldén et al. (MP) motions 3 and 4, 2023/24:996 by Per Bolund et al. (MP) motion 50, 2023/24:2345 by Linda W Snecker et al. (V) motion 3, 2023/24:2457 by Muharrem Demirok et al. (C) motion 31, 2023/24:2465 by Ulrika Heie et al. (C) motions 6-8 and 2023/24:2705 by Ulrika Westerlund et al. (MP) motion 45.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2023/24:400 av Patrik Jönsson m.fl. (SD) yrkandena 59 och 60, 2023/24:957 av Daniel Helldén m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 3 och 4, 2023/24:996 av Per Bolund m.fl. (MP) yrkande 50, 2023/24:2345 av Linda W Snecker m.fl. (V) yrkande 3, 2023/24:2457 av Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C) yrkande 31, 2023/24:2465 av Ulrika Heie m.fl. (C) yrkandena 6-8 och 2023/24:2705 av Ulrika Westerlund m.fl. (MP) yrkande 45.

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag said no to about fifty proposals in motions about various public transport matters from the general motion period of 2023. This is primarily with reference to completed or ongoing initiatives in the area. The motions address, among other things, strengthened public transport, equal and equitable public transport, ticket systems and specialized transport services (färdtjänst). The committee emphasizes that public transport is an important means of achieving climate and transport policy goals.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The plan requires that public transport is made cheaper and more accessible throughout the country and that local and regional transport should be fully tax-financed and free for users.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires that public transport is made cheaper and more accessible throughout the country and that local and regional transport should be fully tax-financed and free for users. An investigation of a nationwide, simple and inexpensive ticket instead of many regional fares is in line with that commitment and with the plan's climate rationale. The plan, however, says nothing about the industry's own distribution initiatives.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver att kollektivtrafiken görs billigare och mer tillgänglig i hela landet och att den lokala och regionala trafiken ska vara fullt skattefinansierad och gratis för brukaren. En utredning av en rikstäckande, enkel och billig biljett i stället för många regionala taxor ligger i linje med det åtagandet och med planens klimatmotiv. Planen säger däremot inget om branschens egna distributionsinitiativ.

  • cheaper public transport throughout the countrydecisive»För att såväl öka alla människors rörelsefrihet som för att minska utsläppen av växthusgaser så behöver även kollektivtrafiken byggas ut och göras billigare och mer tillgänglig i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“In order to both increase all people's freedom of movement and to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, public transport also needs to be expanded and made cheaper and more accessible throughout the country.”
  • tax-financed public transport»så att bilberoendet minskar. Den lokala och regionala kollektivtrafiken« (party programme ↗)“so that car dependency decreases. Local and regional public transport”
  • economically accessible public transport»och människors levnadsvillkor förbättras. Kollektivtrafiken ska vara« (party programme ↗)“and people's living conditions improve. Public transport shall be”
SSocialdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan wants to make public transport cheaper and easier to use and directs support to those hardest hit by price increases, among other things through free travel for students.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to make public transport cheaper and easier to use and directs support to those hardest hit by price increases, among other things through free travel for students. Investigating a simple and affordable nationwide ticket aligns with this and with the plan's reorganization of the transport system toward more public transit. The plan does not take a position on the industry's own distribution initiatives.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill göra det billigare och enklare att resa kollektivt och riktar stöd till dem som drabbas hårdast av prisökningarna, bland annat genom avgiftsfria resor för studerande. Att utreda en enkel och billig rikstäckande biljett ligger i linje med detta och med planens omläggning av transportsystemet mot mer kollektivtrafik. Planen tar inte ställning till branschens egna distributionsinitiativ.

  • cheaper public transportdecisive»Vi vill ge möjligheten till gymnasieelever och studenter att resa avgiftsfritt i kollektivtrafiken under sommaren.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to give high school and university students the opportunity to travel free on public transport during the summer.”
  • targeted support for price rises»Stöd till de som drabbas hårdast av prisökningarna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Support for those hardest hit by price increases.”
  • reorganized transport system»Transportsystemen ska läggas om för mer gång-, cykel- och kollektivtrafik« (party programme ↗)“Transport systems shall be reorganized for more walking, cycling and public transit”
  • climate-smart travel»Genom massiva investeringar i både ny och befintlig järnväg kommer fler att kunna resa klimatsmart med tåg.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Through massive investments in both new and existing railways, more will be able to travel climate-smart by train.”

Worldstate weighed in: Inflation of 4.4 percent makes households' travel costs heavier — Strengthens the plan's rationale for cheaper and simpler fares

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MPMiljöpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the planexplicit

The election manifesto wants to make it cheaper to take buses and trains across the country, and the party programme requires that train companies coordinate fares, ticket booking and timetables to become more consumer-friendly.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto wants to make it cheaper to take buses and trains across the country, and the party programme requires that train companies coordinate fares, ticket booking and timetables to become more consumer-friendly. The plan also wants economic instruments to make environmentally friendly alternatives cheaper. Investigating a simple and cheap nationwide ticket instead of today's many regional fare systems therefore directly responds to the plan's commitments.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet vill göra det billigare att åka buss och tåg i hela landet, och partiprogrammet kräver att tågbolagen samordnar taxor, biljettbeställning och tidtabeller för att bli mer konsumentvänliga. Planen vill också att ekonomiska styrmedel gör de miljövänliga alternativen billigare. Att utreda en enkel och billig rikstäckande biljett i stället för dagens många regionala taxesystem svarar därför direkt mot planens åtaganden.

  • cheaper public transportdecisive»bygga ut kollektivtrafiken i hela landet, och gör det billigare att åka buss och tåg, särskilt för unga och pensionärer.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“expand public transport across the country, and make it cheaper to take buses and trains, especially for young people and pensioners.”
  • coordinated fares and tickets»måste samordna taxor, biljettbeställning och« (party programme ↗)“must coordinate fares, ticket booking and”
  • cheaper environmentally friendly choices»miljövänliga alternativ billigare och de miljöskadliga dyrare att använda.« (party programme ↗)“environmentally friendly alternatives cheaper and environmentally harmful ones more expensive to use.”
  • social responsibility for infrastructure»Samhället måste själv styra och stå för utbyggnad« (party programme ↗)“Society must itself lead and take responsibility for expansion”

The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.

CCenterpartietYesAbstaindeparts from the planderived

The plan has no position on ticketing systems, but requires consistent decentralization with decisions made close to those affected and a market economy free from planned-economy directives.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan has no position on ticketing systems, but requires consistent decentralization with decisions made close to those affected and a market economy free from planned-economy directives. A state-regulated uniform fare removes power from regional transport authorities and ties up tax funds, while the plan wants to save taxpayers' money. The manifesto's ambition to make it easy to choose not to drive points the other way, but does not bear the demand.

Original (Swedish)

Planen saknar ställningstagande om biljettsystem, men kräver konsekvent decentralisering med beslut nära dem som berörs och en marknadsekonomi fri från planekonomiska pekpinnar. En statligt reglerad enhetlig rikstaxa flyttar i stället makten från de regionala trafikhuvudmännen och binder skattemedel, medan planen vill hushålla med skattebetalarnas pengar. Manifestets ambition att göra det smidigt att välja bort bilen drar åt andra hållet, men bär inte kravet.

  • decentralize decisionsdecisive»Decentralisera mera. Människor ska få bestämma mer själva, och politiska beslut ska fattas nära dem som berörs.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Decentralize more. People shall be allowed to decide more for themselves, and political decisions shall be made close to those affected.”
  • economical use of tax funds»Politiken ska hushålla med skattebetalarnas pengar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Policy shall be economical with taxpayers' money.”
  • easy to choose not to drive»Det ska dessutom vara smidigt att välja bort bilen till förmån för tåg, buss, båt och cykel.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It should also be easy to choose not to drive in favour of train, bus, boat and bicycle.”

flags: citat_blockerat

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

LLiberalernaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan wants to meet the climate challenge with real climate taxes and general, technology-neutral economic measures instead of subsidies and symbolic politics, and opens up for more fee-financed infrastructure.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to meet the climate challenge with real climate taxes and general, technology-neutral economic measures instead of subsidies and symbolic politics, and opens up for more fee-financed infrastructure. A state-regulated, cheap nationwide ticket is precisely such a general subsidy for travel that the plan rejects as a means. The plan's support for fossil-free public transport simultaneously supports the goal, but not this tool.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill möta klimatutmaningen med riktiga klimatskatter och generella, teknikneutrala ekonomiska styrmedel i stället för bidrag och symbolpolitik, och öppnar för mer avgiftsfinansiering i infrastrukturen. En statligt reglerad, billig rikstäckande biljett är just en sådan generell subvention av resande som planen avvisar som medel. Planens stöd för fossilfri kollektivtrafik talar samtidigt för målet, men inte för detta verktyg.

  • climate taxes before subsidiesdecisive»Därför är vi för riktiga klimatskatter i stället för att göra klimatpolitiken till en tävling i högst bidrag och flest symbolskatter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore we are for real climate taxes instead of making climate policy into a competition over highest subsidies and most symbolic taxes.”
  • general economic measures»såsom koldioxidskatt och handel med utsläppsrätter, är det mest effektiva redskapet.« (party programme ↗)“such as carbon tax and emissions trading, is the most effective tool.”
  • fee-financed infrastructure»För att höja investeringstakten ska fler nya projekt kunna avgiftsfinansieras.« (party programme ↗)“To raise the investment rate, more new projects shall be able to be fee-financed.”
  • fossil-free public transport»all kollektivtrafik på väg och spår ska vara fossilfri senast 2030« (2022 manifesto ↗)“all public transport on road and rail shall be fossil-free by 2030”
KDKristdemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan wants public transport to be attractive in a market with competition and long-term rules, and that municipal self-governance is strong with its own taxation right at regional level.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants public transport to be attractive in a market with competition and long-term rules, and that municipal self-governance is strong with its own taxation right at regional level. A state-regulated unified nationwide ticket moves tax setting away from the regional levels and thus goes against these commitments, although the plan's requirement for fares that promote collective transport pulls in the opposite direction.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill att kollektivtrafiken är attraktiv på en marknad med konkurrens och långsiktiga spelregler, och att den kommunala självstyrelsen är stark med egen beskattningsrätt på regional nivå. En statligt reglerad enhetlig rikstäckande biljett flyttar taxesättningen från de regionala nivåerna och går därmed emot dessa åtaganden, även om planens krav på taxor som främjar kollektivt resande drar i motsatt riktning.

  • public transport in competitiondecisive»marknad med konkurrens och långsiktiga spelregler.« (party programme ↗)“market with competition and long-term rules.”
  • strong municipal self-governance»Den kommunala självstyrelsen ska vara stark« (party programme ↗)“Municipal self-governance shall be strong”
  • regional taxation right»kommunala nivåerna ska ha egen beskattningsrätt.« (party programme ↗)“municipal levels shall have their own taxation right.”
  • fares that promote collective transport»ska utformas så att de främjar kollektiva transporter« (party programme ↗)“shall be designed so that they promote collective transport”
MModeraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan requires that new reforms are financed within the surplus target and prioritizes maintenance of existing infrastructure ahead of large new state investments.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires that new reforms are financed within the surplus target and prioritizes maintenance of existing infrastructure ahead of large new state investments. It also states that the public should not do what can be done equally well by others, which speaks in favour of industry's own ticket solutions rather than a state-regulated nationwide cheap ticket. The counter-proposal's demand is therefore rejected by the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver att nya reformer finansieras inom överskottsmålet och prioriterar upprustning av befintlig infrastruktur framför stora nya statliga satsningar. Den slår också fast att det offentliga inte ska utföra det som kan göras lika bra av andra, vilket talar för branschens egna biljettlösningar snarare än en statligt reglerad rikstäckande billig biljett. Motförslagets krav avvisas därför av planen.

  • reforms shall be financeddecisive»Alla nya löften och reformer – som till exempel våra inkomstskattesänkningar – behöver finansieras eller rymmas inom överskottsmålet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“All new promises and reforms – such as our income tax cuts – need to be financed or fit within the surplus target.”
  • upgrading before prestige projects»Rusta upp dagens järnväg i stället för att satsa på höghastighetståg som riskerar att vara omoderna redan innan de är klara« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Upgrade today's railway instead of betting on high-speed trains that risk becoming outdated before they're done”
  • market before state»Om något kan göras lika bra eller bättre av« (party programme ↗)“If something can be done equally well or better by”
  • combat public waste»Offentligt slöseri i alla former ska bekämpas.« (party programme ↗)“Public waste in all forms shall be combated.”
SDSverigedemokraternaYesAbstaindeparts from the plannot addressed

A nationwide and cheap single ticket presupposes greatly increased tax subsidies, and the plan precisely opposes tax payers already paying large subsidies to public transport.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

A nationwide and cheap single ticket presupposes greatly increased tax subsidies, and the plan precisely opposes tax payers already paying large subsidies to public transport. The plan wants instead to direct funds to maintenance of existing infrastructure and to welfare ahead of political prestige projects, and requires that climate measures be cost-effective. The counter-proposal's demands thus lie outside the plan's priorities.

Original (Swedish)

En rikstäckande och billig enhetsbiljett förutsätter kraftigt ökade skattesubventioner, och planen vänder sig just mot att skattebetalarna redan betalar stora bidrag till kollektivtrafiken. Planen vill i stället rikta medel till underhåll av befintlig infrastruktur och till välfärden framför politiska prestigeprojekt, och kräver att klimatåtgärder är kostnadseffektiva. Motförslagets krav ligger därför utanför planens prioriteringar.

  • criticism of public transport subsidiesdecisive»De flesta har inte råd att köpa en ny bil, men tvingas samtidigt betala för skattesubventioner för dem som har råd att köpa dyra elbilar och även betala för stora bidrag till kollektivtrafiken via skattsedeln.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Most people cannot afford to buy a new car, but are at the same time forced to pay for tax subsidies for those who can afford to buy expensive electric cars and also pay for large subsidies to public transport via the tax bill.”
  • welfare before prestige»Satsa på välfärden istället för politiska prestigeprojekt« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Invest in welfare instead of political prestige projects”
  • maintenance before prestige»Sverigedemokraterna vill rikta om prestigesatsningar på höghastighetståg till snabbare och mer trängande behov av att rusta upp transportinfrastrukturen inom alla trafikslag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Sweden Democrats want to redirect prestige expenditures on high-speed rail to faster and more pressing needs to refurbish transport infrastructure within all transport modes.”
  • cost-effective climate policy»Bedriva en effektiv klimatpolitik med ett tydligt globalt perspektiv« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Conduct effective climate policy with a clear global perspective”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament