2026-02-042025/26:SoU12 · p.1SoUHealth & social services

Priorities in public health work

What's at stake: The decision concerns how the goal of closing avoidable health gaps within a generation is to be reached, and whether responsibility between the state, regions and municipalities should be clarified through a new law. It particularly affects the groups with the poorest health, who clearer governance and targeted communication could reach more effectively.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether Sweden should introduce a dedicated public health act and a new national communication strategy to drive public health work, or whether the goal of good and equal health should be pursued through the Public Health Agency's current mandate and existing support structures without new legislation.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee notes that the goal for public health work is ambitious but well-founded, and points out that the Public Health Agency has already developed a support structure with follow-up methods, that the government has taken steps toward health-economic analyses and greater knowledge of preventive measures, and that regions' responsibility is already set out in the Health and Medical Services Act. With reference to this, the committee rejects the motion for a public health act.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 1 (V)

The reservation (V) wants the government to investigate the basis for a Swedish public health act with clear state responsibility, setting out national targets and clarifying the division of responsibility between levels, and wants the Public Health Agency tasked with mapping how public health has developed and identifying the most urgent priority areas. It also wants a national strategy for health communication aimed at groups with the poorest health, and for public health work to carry more weight when state subsidies are allocated to regions.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by V.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
Vown reservationNoNo 0/19/0/3follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
SNoYes 91/0/0/15departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
MPNoAbstain 0/0/12/6departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
CYesYes 21/0/0/3follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
LNoYes 14/0/0/2departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
KDNoYes 14/0/0/5departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
MYesYes 58/0/0/10follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
SDNoYes 62/0/0/9departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects the motions 2025/26:1960 by Mattias Vepsä and Mathias Tegnér (both S) claims 1, 2 and 4, 2025/26:2799 by Karin Rågsjö et al. (V) claims 1-4 and 2025/26:3544 by Nils Seye Larsen et al. (MP) claim 1.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:1960 av Mattias Vepsä och Mathias Tegnér (båda S) yrkandena 1, 2 och 4, 2025/26:2799 av Karin Rågsjö m.fl. (V) yrkandena 1-4 och 2025/26:3544 av Nils Seye Larsen m.fl. (MP) yrkande 1.

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected 105 proposals on public health. The proposals were submitted during the general motion period 2025 and concern, among other things, public health promotion measures, communicable disease control, and mental health. The Riksdag refers primarily to the fact that work is already underway in the areas addressed by the proposals and to previous Riksdag decisions.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoNofollows the planderived

The plan sees healthcare as part of a broader public health effort and requires that the state takes greater responsibility for creating equal conditions throughout the country.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan sees healthcare as part of a broader public health effort and requires that the state takes greater responsibility for creating equal conditions throughout the country. Clarified state responsibility and targeted measures for groups with the poorest health respond to the requirement for equal and equitable healthcare regardless of location. The plan does not state its position on a specific public health act, so the form is derived from the responsibility principle.

Original (Swedish)

Planen ser vården som en del av ett bredare folkhälsoarbete och kräver att staten tar ett större ansvar för att skapa lika förutsättningar i hela landet. Ett tydliggjort statligt ansvar och riktade insatser mot de grupper som har sämst hälsa svarar mot kravet på en jämlik och jämställd hälsa oavsett var man bor. Planen uttalar sig inte om en särskild folkhälsolag, så formen härleds ur ansvarsprincipen.

  • comprehensive public health effortsdecisive»Vården behöver ses som en del i det bredare arbetet med folkhälsa.« (party programme ↗)“Healthcare needs to be seen as part of the broader work on public health.”
  • greater state responsibility»Lösningen är inte att förstatliga sjukvården men för att säkerställa en jämlik vård i Sverige måste staten ta ett större ansvar för att skapa lika förutsättningar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The solution is not to nationalize healthcare, but to ensure equal healthcare in Sweden, the state must take greater responsibility for creating equal conditions.”
  • equal healthcare throughout the country»Sjukvården måste vara jämlik, jämställd och tillgänglig, oavsett var i landet du bor och oavsett vem du är.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Healthcare must be equal, equitable and accessible, regardless of where in the country you live and regardless of who you are.”
SSocialdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan's goal is equal and equitable public health and increased state responsibility for national equivalence in healthcare.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's goal is equal and equitable public health and increased state responsibility for national equivalence in healthcare. A clearer state responsibility in law, national targets and directed health communication to groups with poorest health is directly in line with this, as is the requirement for ambitious measures against mental health problems. The plan however does not state a position on a special public health law.

Original (Swedish)

Planens mål är en jämlik och jämställd folkhälsa och ett ökat statligt ansvar för nationell likvärdighet i hälso- och sjukvården. Ett tydligare statligt ansvar i lag, nationella mål och riktad hälsokommunikation till grupper med sämst hälsa ligger direkt i linje med detta, liksom kravet på ambitiösa insatser mot psykisk ohälsa. Planen uttalar sig dock inte om en särskild folkhälsolag.

  • equal public healthdecisive»Jämlik och jämställd folkhälsa.« (party programme ↗)“Equal and equitable public health.”
  • increased state responsibility»Ökat statligt ansvar och kontroll över sjukvården för nationell likvärdighet.« (party programme ↗)“Increased state responsibility and control over healthcare for national equivalence.”
  • care according to need»Lika rätt för alla till god hälso- och sjukvård genom samhällets försorg.« (party programme ↗)“Equal right for all to good health and healthcare through public provision.”
  • measures against mental health problems»Ambitiösa insatser mot psykisk ohälsa, särskilt bland barn och unga.« (party programme ↗)“Ambitious measures against mental health problems, especially among children and young people.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MPMiljöpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan establishes that public health is crucial for an equal society, that health gaps grow with socioeconomic background and that policy must take early action.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that public health is crucial for an equal society, that health gaps grow with socioeconomic background and that policy must take early action. It also wants to see increased cooperation between actors because healthcare alone cannot prevent disease. Clearer state responsibility, mapping and targeted health communication to groups with the poorest health follows from this.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att folkhälsan är avgörande för ett jämlikt samhälle, att hälsoklyftorna växer med socioekonomisk bakgrund och att politiken måste sätta in tidiga insatser. Den vill också se ökad samverkan mellan aktörer eftersom vården ensam inte kan förebygga sjukdom. Ett tydligare statligt ansvar, kartläggning och riktad hälsokommunikation till grupper med sämst hälsa följer av detta.

  • public health requires political leadershipdecisive»Folkhälsan är avgörande för ett jämlikt och fungerande samhälle och därför måste politiken sätta in tidiga insatser och skapa förutsättningar för god hälsa genom hela livet.« (party programme ↗)“Public health is crucial for an equal and functioning society and therefore policy must take early action and create conditions for good health throughout life.”
  • growing health gaps»Klyftorna i hälsa och välmående växer. Socioekonomiska faktorer påverkar i hög grad människors livslängd och hälsotillstånd.« (party programme ↗)“Health and wellbeing gaps are growing. Socioeconomic factors significantly affect people's life expectancy and health status.”
  • cooperation for public health»Vi vill se ökad samverkan mellan olika aktörer för att uppnå en god folkhälsa, då vården i sig ensamt inte kan förebygga sjukdomar.« (party programme ↗)“We want to see increased cooperation between different actors to achieve good public health, since healthcare alone cannot prevent disease.”
  • health-promoting orientation»Miljöpartiet vill att vården ska bidra till hälsa, inte bara behandla sjukdom.« (party programme ↗)“The Greens want healthcare to contribute to health, not just treat disease.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

CCenterpartietYesYesfollows the planderived

The election manifesto establishes that responsibility for healthcare must not be moved from the regions to the state and that decisions must be made near those affected.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto establishes that responsibility for healthcare must not be moved from the regions to the state and that decisions must be made near those affected. The counter-proposal wants to investigate a special law with clear state responsibility that governs the division of responsibility between levels and let public health work weigh more heavily in the distribution of state grants, that is, centralisation. The plan shares the goal of preventive public health work but rejects the state-driven route.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet slår fast att ansvaret för vården inte ska flyttas från regionerna till staten och att beslut ska fattas nära dem som berörs. Motförslaget vill utreda en särskild lag med ett tydligt statligt ansvar som styr ansvarsfördelningen mellan nivåerna och låta folkhälsoarbetet väga tyngre vid fördelning av statsbidrag, alltså en centralisering. Planen delar målet om ett förebyggande folkhälsoarbete men avvisar den statliga styrvägen.

  • no state takeover of healthcaredecisive»Vi vill försvara valfriheten inom vård och omsorg och bedriva verksamheten nära vårdtagarna. Ansvaret för vården ska inte flyttas från regionerna till staten.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to defend freedom of choice in healthcare and care and conduct activities close to care recipients. Responsibility for healthcare must not be moved from the regions to the state.”
  • decentralisation»Decentralisera mera. Människor ska få bestämma mer själva, och politiska beslut ska fattas nära dem som berörs.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Decentralise more. People should be allowed to decide more for themselves, and political decisions should be made near those affected.”
  • preventive public health work»En förutsättning för en hållbar välfärd är ett förebyggande förhållningssätt. Folkhälsoperspektivet måste genomsyra hela samhället för att ge resultat.« (party programme ↗)“A prerequisite for sustainable welfare is a preventive approach. The public health perspective must permeate the whole of society to produce results.”
  • power near the people»Decentralisering handlar om att flytta makten närmare människors vardag.« (party programme ↗)“Decentralisation is about moving power closer to people's daily lives.”
LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan states that mental health shall be an explicit public health goal and that care needs increased national coordination and steering to strengthen equality.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan states that mental health shall be an explicit public health goal and that care needs increased national coordination and steering to strengthen equality. It also wants knowledge about the importance of lifestyle habits to be communicated broadly from school age and up. This speaks for investigating a clearer state responsibility and a strategy for health communication to groups with the worst health, even though the plan does not take a position on a particular public health law.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att psykisk hälsa ska vara ett uttalat folkhälsomål och att vården behöver utökad nationell samordning och styrning för att stärka likvärdigheten. Den vill också att kunskap om levnadsvanornas betydelse förmedlas brett från skolåldern och uppåt. Det talar för att utreda ett tydligare statligt ansvar och en strategi för hälsokommunikation till grupper med sämst hälsa, även om planen inte tar ställning till en särskild folkhälsolag.

  • national public health goalsdecisive»Psykisk hälsa ska vara ett uttalat folkhälsomål.« (party programme ↗)“Mental health shall be an explicit public health goal.”
  • clearer state responsibility»Det behövs en utökad nationell samordning och styrning.« (party programme ↗)“There is a need for increased national coordination and steering.”
  • knowledge-based public health work»Folkhälsoarbetet och de förebyggande hälsoinsatserna ska vila på kunskap och respekt för individens självbestämmande.« (party programme ↗)“Public health work and preventive health initiatives shall rest on knowledge and respect for the individual's self-determination.”
  • health communication and knowledge»Kunskap om hur de egna levnadsvanorna påverkar hälsan ska förmedlas från skolåldern och uppåt.« (party programme ↗)“Knowledge about how personal lifestyle habits affect health shall be communicated from school age and up.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The election manifesto wants to abolish the regions' responsibility for healthcare and let the state take over with a unified organization, which is precisely the clear state allocation of responsibility the counter-proposal seeks.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto wants to abolish the regions' responsibility for healthcare and let the state take over with a unified organization, which is precisely the clear state allocation of responsibility the counter-proposal seeks. The party programme also states that public health work must not be limited to healthcare and that healthcare must be equitable for the entire population, which supports the requirement for national targets and targeted health communication to groups with the poorest health. The counter-proposal is supported.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet vill avskaffa regionernas ansvar för vården och låta staten ta över med en gemensam organisation, vilket är precis den tydliga statliga ansvarsfördelning motförslaget efterfrågar. Partiprogrammet slår dessutom fast att folkhälsoarbetet inte får inskränkas till hälso- och sjukvården och att vården ska vara jämlik för hela befolkningen, vilket bär kravet på nationella mål och riktad hälsokommunikation till grupper med sämst hälsa. Motförslaget stöds.

  • state principal responsibility for caredecisive»Avskaffa regionernas ansvar för sjukvården. Låt staten ta över ansvaret för vården med en gemensam organisation i stället för 21 olika.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Abolish the regions' responsibility for healthcare. Let the state take over responsibility for care with a unified organization instead of 21 different ones.”
  • broad public health responsibility»Folkhälsoarbetet får därför inte inskränkas till hälso- och sjukvården utan kräver ett gemensamt ansvarstagande och samverkan mellan olika samhällsaktörer.« (party programme ↗)“Public health work must therefore not be limited to healthcare but requires joint responsibility and cooperation between different societal actors.”
  • equitable care»Vården ska vara jämlik och tillgänglig för hela befolkningen.« (party programme ↗)“Healthcare must be equitable and accessible to the entire population.”
  • social conditions determine health»Sociala och ekonomiska villkor, arbetsmiljö och levnadsvanor är viktiga faktorer för hälsoutvecklingen.« (party programme ↗)“Social and economic conditions, work environment and living habits are important factors for health development.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The party programme states that not even world-class healthcare can replace one's own engagement in one's own health, and that decisions should be made at the lowest effective level where regions can choose different paths.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme states that not even world-class healthcare can replace one's own engagement in one's own health, and that decisions should be made at the lowest effective level where regions can choose different paths. A new special public health act with state responsibility and steering of state grants goes against both these commitments. The plan also wants politics to prioritize and choose not to do things rather than build out new commitments.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet slår fast att inte ens en sjukvård i världsklass kan ersätta det egna engagemanget i den egna hälsan, och att beslut ska fattas på lägsta effektiva nivå där regioner får välja olika vägar. En ny särskild folkhälsolag med statligt ansvar och styrning av statsbidrag går emot båda dessa åtaganden. Planen vill dessutom att politiken prioriterar och väljer bort snarare än bygger ut nya åtaganden.

  • personal responsibility for healthdecisive»Men inte ens en sjukvård i världsklass kan ersätta det egna« (party programme ↗)“But not even world-class healthcare can replace one's own”
  • decisions at the lowest effective level»Det politiska systemet ska bygga på att beslut fattas på lägsta« (party programme ↗)“The political system shall be built on decisions being made at the lowest”
  • prioritize and choose not to do things»Politiken har en viktig uppgift att prioritera och välja bort,« (party programme ↗)“Politics has an important task to prioritize and choose not to do things,”
  • limited state role»En stor stat leder till ett svagare samhälle.« (party programme ↗)“A large state leads to a weaker society.”
SDSverigedemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan requires clear national driving governance in the public health field with a strengthened role for the Public Health Agency and a unified, long-term plan instead of individual and short-term expenditures.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires clear national driving governance in the public health field with a strengthened role for the Public Health Agency and a unified, long-term plan instead of individual and short-term expenditures. The counter-proposal's requirement to investigate a special act with clear state responsibility, national targets and clearer division of responsibility between levels follows from this. The plan furthermore wants to review a greater state overall responsibility for healthcare.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver en tydlig nationell pådrivande styrning på folkhälsoområdet med en förstärkt roll för Folkhälsomyndigheten och en samlad, långsiktig plan i stället för enskilda och kortsiktiga satsningar. Motförslagets krav på att utreda en särskild lag med tydligt statligt ansvar, nationella mål och klarare ansvarsfördelning mellan nivåerna följer av det. Planen vill dessutom se över ett större statligt huvudansvar för vården.

  • national driving governancedecisive»Sverigedemokraterna förespråkar därför en tydlig nationell pådrivande styrning där Folkhälsomyndighetens roll förstärks och förtydligas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Sweden Democrats therefore advocate clear national driving governance where the Public Health Agency's role is strengthened and clarified.”
  • unified long-term plan»Sverige behöver en samlad och långsiktig plan för att hantera den växande psykiska ohälsan.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden needs a unified and long-term plan to handle the growing mental ill-health.”
  • national health strategy»Ta fram en nationell strategi för det fortsatta arbetet med psykisk hälsa« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Develop a national strategy for continued work on mental health”
  • increased state overall responsibility»Sverigedemokraterna vill också se över hur staten i större utsträckning kan ta över huvudansvaret för sjukvården, med utgångspunkt i framgångsrika exempel i Norge och Danmark.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Sweden Democrats also want to review how the state to a greater extent can take overall responsibility for healthcare, based on successful examples in Norway and Denmark.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament