2025-01-292024/25:SfU11 · p.3SfUMigration & social insurance
Own housing
Self-arranged housing for asylum seekers
What's at stake: The decision affects where and how asylum seekers live while awaiting a decision, and matters for municipalities that receive many asylum seekers settling in areas already marked by social exclusion, as well as for the Migration Agency's ability to know where asylum seekers are.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether asylum seekers' option to arrange their own housing during the asylum process should be abolished in favour of housing at Migration Agency facilities, or whether self-arranged housing should remain available as an alternative.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee shares the government's assessment that the system of self-arranged housing has not delivered the intended benefits, such as increased integration, and that the share of asylum seekers choosing self-arranged housing has become far larger than expected, resulting in problems such as social exclusion and strain on a small number of municipalities; the committee therefore holds that asylum seekers should, as a general rule, live in Migration Agency housing.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 3 (S)
The reservation (S) holds that self-arranged housing will in practice remain an option despite the government's proposal, since the Migration Agency estimates that roughly half of asylum seekers will still choose it even without daily allowance, and wants the government to return with a proposal that more clearly abolishes the option of self-arranged housing.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 3 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: LLiberalerna
Ja 164–94Ja 151–107
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | Yes | Abstain 0/0/20/4 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| S | No | No 0/93/0/13 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| MP | Yes | Yes 15/0/0/3 | match | confidence: high | derived |
| C | Yes | Abstain 0/0/19/5 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| L | No | Yes 13/0/0/3 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | No | Yes 60/0/0/8 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| SD | No | Yes 59/0/0/13 | differs | confidence: high | derived |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2024/25:1589 by Lawen Redar (S), 2024/25:2176 by Eva Lindh et al. (S), 2024/25:2504 by Ingela Nylund Watz et al. (S), 2024/25:2514 by Mathias Tegnér et al. (S) request 7, 2024/25:2949 by Jonny Cato et al. (C) request 11, 2024/25:3025 by Anders Ygeman et al. (S) request 6, 2024/25:3072 by Ardalan Shekarabi et al. (S) request 9, and 2024/25:3266 by Anders Ygeman et al. (S).
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:1589 av Lawen Redar (S), 2024/25:2176 av Eva Lindh m.fl. (S), 2024/25:2504 av Ingela Nylund Watz m.fl. (S), 2024/25:2514 av Mathias Tegnér m.fl. (S) yrkande 7, 2024/25:2949 av Jonny Cato m.fl. (C) yrkande 11, 2024/25:3025 av Anders Ygeman m.fl. (S) yrkande 6, 2024/25:3072 av Ardalan Shekarabi m.fl. (S) yrkande 9 och 2024/25:3266 av Anders Ygeman m.fl. (S).
Riksdag decision: Asylum seekers shall as a main rule only be entitled to financial assistance if they exclusively reside in the asylum accommodation that they have been assigned. The Riksdag said yes to the government's proposal. The new rules mean that the Migration Board will have the opportunity to inspect spaces in asylum accommodations in order to control that asylum seekers reside at the assigned accommodation place. The purpose is to ensure that asylum seekers do not live in exclusion or economic and social hardship, and is a prerequisite for the asylum process and return work to function effectively. Furthermore, an application for a residence permit shall be considered withdrawn for asylum seekers who do not reside in an asylum accommodation and have not notified the Migration Board of their residential address. In addition, a statutory obligation is introduced for asylum seekers to participate in community integration. The new rules begin to apply on 1 March 2025.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to abolish the possibility of own housing for asylum seekers except in very limited exceptional cases. (S) — Reservation 3
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The counter-proposal wants to go further and clearly abolish asylum seekers' possibility of independent housing.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wants to go further and clearly abolish asylum seekers' possibility of independent housing. The party programme requires an asylum policy based on respect for international conventions with dignified circumstances, and the election manifesto states that integration is not improved by making asylum seekers' situation more conditional and insecure. A sharpened restriction of housing choice therefore lacks support in the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill gå längre och tydligare avskaffa asylsökandes möjlighet till eget boende. Partiprogrammet kräver en asylpolitik grundad i respekt för internationella konventioner med värdiga omständigheter, och valmanifestet slår fast att integrationen inte förbättras genom att asylsökandes tillvaro görs mer villkorad och otrygg. En skärpt begränsning av boendevalet saknar därför stöd i planen.
- inviolable right to asylumdecisive»Rätten att söka asyl kan aldrig tummas på, vi kräver att endast permanenta uppehållstillstånd ska utfärdas vid beviljad asyl.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The right to seek asylum can never be compromised, we require that only permanent residence permits shall be issued when asylum is granted.”
- security fosters integration»Det är inte genom tidsbegränsade uppehållstillstånd som integrationen förbättras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is not through time-limited residence permits that integration is improved.”
- dignified conditions in reception»sin rätt till en individuell och rättssäker prövning under värdiga« (party programme ↗)“their right to an individual and legally secure examination under dignified”
- secure conditions for newcomers»och leva på samma trygga villkor som andra.« (party programme ↗)“and live on the same secure conditions as others.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto explicitly establishes that asylum seekers shall no longer have the opportunity to choose where they will live, as part of work against residential segregation.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly establishes that asylum seekers shall no longer have the opportunity to choose where they will live, as part of work against residential segregation. The counter-proposal's requirement for a clearer abolition of self-directed accommodation, with exceptions only in special cases, is exactly this commitment. The manifesto also emphasizes that the restrictive migration policy holds and that all municipalities shall take their share of responsibility.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår uttryckligen fast att asylsökande inte längre ska ha möjlighet att själva välja var de ska bo, som en del av arbetet mot boendesegregationen. Motförslagets krav på ett tydligare avskaffande av eget boende, med undantag bara i särskilda fall, är just detta åtagande. Manifestet understryker också att den åtstramade migrationspolitiken ligger fast och att alla kommuner ska ta sin del av ansvaret.
- abolished self-directed accommodationdecisive»Asylsökande ska inte längre ha möjlighet att själva välja var de ska bo.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Asylum seekers shall no longer have the opportunity to choose where they will live.”
- break residential segregation»Gå till botten med orsakerna till boendesegrega tionen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Get to the bottom of the causes of residential segregation.”
- tighter migration policy»Vi har stramat åt migrationspolitiken, och denna linje ligger fast.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We have tightened migration policy, and this line holds.”
- shared municipal reception responsibility»Alla kommuner, även de välbeställda, ska ta sin del av ansvaret.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“All municipalities, even the well-off, shall take their share of responsibility.”
flags: citat_migrerat
The counter-proposal wants to abolish the possibility of independent housing even more clearly, with exceptions only in special cases.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wants to abolish the possibility of independent housing even more clearly, with exceptions only in special cases. The plan is based on people's right to choose where they want to live and that freedom of movement should be a human right, and wants those who have the right to asylum to be welcomed and given the opportunity to establish themselves. The demand for sharper abolition therefore directly contradicts the plan; distributing the burden fairly is solved in the plan through generous reception in all municipalities.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill avskaffa möjligheten till eget boende ännu tydligare, med undantag bara i särskilda fall. Planen utgår från människors rätt att välja var de vill bo och att fri rörlighet borde vara en mänsklig rättighet, och vill att den som har rätt till asyl välkomnas och ges möjlighet att etablera sig. Kravet på ett skarpare avskaffande går därför rakt emot planen; att bördan fördelas jämnt löses i planen genom generöst mottagande i alla kommuner.
- right to choose place of residencedecisive»Vi tror inte på länders rätt att välja sina invånare, vi tror på människors rätt att välja var de vill bo.« (party programme ↗)“We do not believe in countries' right to choose their inhabitants, we believe in people's right to choose where they want to live.”
- welcoming reception»Den som har rätt till asyl ska välkomnas och ges möjlighet att etablera sig i Sverige.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Those who have the right to asylum shall be welcomed and given the opportunity to establish themselves in Sweden.”
- equal municipal reception»Alla kommuner ska ha ett generöst och likvärdigt flyktingmottagande.« (party programme ↗)“All municipalities shall have generous and equal refugee reception.”
- freedom of movement»Fri rörlighet borde vara en mänsklig rättighet.« (party programme ↗)“Freedom of movement should be a human right.”
The party programme establishes that it is not the borders that should be closed but the labour market that should be opened, and that the housing market must become more open while municipalities are given greater opportunities to manage the challenges.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme establishes that it is not the borders that should be closed but the labour market that should be opened, and that the housing market must become more open while municipalities are given greater opportunities to manage the challenges. The counter-proposal's demand for a clearer abolition of the possibility of own housing is a restriction on the individual's choice that does not follow from the plan's openness line. The plan therefore speaks against the demand.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att det inte är gränserna som ska stängas utan arbetsmarknaden som ska öppnas, och att bostadsmarknaden måste bli öppnare medan kommunerna ges större möjligheter att hantera utmaningarna. Motförslagets krav på ett tydligare avskaffande av möjligheten till eget boende är en inskränkning av den enskildes val som inte följer av planens öppenhetslinje. Planen talar därför emot kravet.
- open labour market not closed bordersdecisive»är inte gränserna som ska stängas, utan arbetsmarknaden som ska öppnas.« (party programme ↗)“it is not the borders that should be closed, but the labour market that should be opened.”
- more open housing market»Även bostadsmarknaden måste bli öppnare.« (party programme ↗)“The housing market too must become more open.”
- municipal responsibility for challenges»Kommunerna måste få större möjligheter att ta ansvar för dessa utmaningar.« (party programme ↗)“Municipalities must be given greater opportunities to take responsibility for these challenges.”
- individual self-determination»Centerpartiet kommer alltid att kämpa för ett friare Sverige där människor kan bestämma mer över sina egna liv.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Centre Party will always fight for a freer Sweden where people can decide more about their own lives.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme explicitly states that asylum seekers' possibility of own accommodation shall be abolished to prevent overcrowding and segregation.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme explicitly states that asylum seekers' possibility of own accommodation shall be abolished to prevent overcrowding and segregation. The counter-proposal's demand for clearer abolition with exceptions only in special cases is thus precisely the plan's line, whereas a change that in practice lets half stay in own accommodation does not reach the plan's goal. The plan also binds itself to that Sweden in 2030 shall not have a single vulnerable area and that all municipalities shall be able to receive newly arrived.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår uttryckligen fast att asylsökandes möjlighet till eget boende ska avskaffas för att motverka trångboddhet och segregation. Motförslagets krav på ett tydligare avskaffande med undantag endast i särskilda fall är därmed just planens linje, medan en förändring som i praktiken låter hälften bo kvar i eget boende inte når planens mål. Planen binder sig också vid att Sverige år 2030 inte ska ha ett enda utsatt område och att alla kommuner ska kunna ta emot nyanlända.
- EBO shall be abolisheddecisive»För att motverka trångboddhet och segregation ska asylsökandes möjlighet till eget boende (EBO)« (party programme ↗)“In order to prevent overcrowding and segregation asylum seekers' possibility of own accommodation (EBO)”
- no vulnerable areas in 2030»Vårt viktigaste mål är detta: Sverige ska år 2030 inte ha ett enda utsatt område.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Our most important goal is this: Sweden shall in 2030 not have a single vulnerable area.”
- more even municipal reception»Alla kommuner ska kunna ta emot nyanlända.« (party programme ↗)“All municipalities shall be able to receive newly arrived.”
- stricter migration policy»Ska integrationen lyckas måste Sverige få en migrationspolitik med en lagstiftning i linje med andra EU-länder.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“If integration is to succeed Sweden must have a migration policy with legislation in line with other EU countries.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto requires strict migration policy precisely to address integration problems and exclusion, and highlights strict migration and improved integration as its own commitments.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto requires strict migration policy precisely to address integration problems and exclusion, and highlights strict migration and improved integration as its own commitments. The counter-proposal's requirement for clearer abolition of self-accommodation is motivated by the same problem. The party programme's statement about immigrants' right to settle where they want weighs against it, but the election manifesto carries the most weight during this term.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet kräver en stram migrationspolitik just för att ta itu med integrationsproblem och utanförskap, och lyfter stram migration och förbättrad integration som egna åtaganden. Motförslagets krav på ett tydligare avskaffande av eget boende motiveras av samma problem. Partiprogrammets skrivning om invandrares rätt att bosätta sig var de vill väger emot, men valmanifestet väger tyngst i denna mandatperiod.
- strict migration against exclusiondecisive»Stram migrationspolitik krävs för att ta itu med integrationsproblem och utanförskap.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strict migration policy is required to address integration problems and exclusion.”
- strict migration»EN STRAM MIGRATION« (2022 manifesto ↗)“STRICT MIGRATION”
- improved integration»FÖRBÄTTRAD INTEGRATION« (2022 manifesto ↗)“IMPROVED INTEGRATION”
- immigrants' freedom to settle»medborgare och ha rätt att bosätta sig var de vill« (party programme ↗)“citizens and have the right to settle where they want”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires a goal-driven, strict and sustainable migration policy and wants the term 'excluded area' relegated to history, while warning of a growing shadow society with social deprivation and criminality.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires a goal-driven, strict and sustainable migration policy and wants the term 'excluded area' relegated to history, while warning of a growing shadow society with social deprivation and criminality. The counter-proposal's demand for clearer abolition of own accommodation, with exceptions only in special cases, aligns with the order and control the plan presupposes in reception. The documents do not mention this system, so the conclusion is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver en målstyrd, stram och hållbar migrationspolitik och vill att ordet utanförskapsområde förpassas till historien, samtidigt som den varnar för ett växande skuggsamhälle med social utsatthet och brottslighet. Motförslagets krav på ett tydligare avskaffande av eget boende, med undantag endast i särskilda fall, ligger i linje med den ordning och kontroll planen förutsätter i mottagandet. Dokumenten nämner inte ebo-systemet, varför slutsatsen är härledd.
- strict migration policydecisive»En målstyrd, stram och hållbar migrationspolitik är en förutsättning för att integrationen ska fungera.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“A goal-driven, strict and sustainable migration policy is a prerequisite for integration to function.”
- break up excluded areas»För det finns ett Sverige där ordet utanförskapsområde är förpassat till historien, för att inget område längre är utanför.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“For there is a Sweden where the term excluded area is relegated to history, because no area is any longer excluded.”
- counter shadow society»Vi riskerar annars ett växande skuggsamhälle, med social utsatthet, illegalt arbete och brottslighet – där särskilt barn drabbas hårt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We risk otherwise a growing shadow society, with social deprivation, illegal work and criminality - where children in particular are hit hard.”
- orderly processes in reception»Vår öppenhet mot omvärlden ska alltid bygga på ordnade« (party programme ↗)“Our openness to the outside world shall always be built on orderly”
flags: citat_migrerat
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto wants to sharpen the immigration act to the strictest possible level according to EU law and review social attraction factors to limit non-citizens' rights to welfare.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto wants to sharpen the immigration act to the strictest possible level according to EU law and review social attraction factors to limit non-citizens' rights to welfare. A clearer abolition of own residence, with exceptions only in special cases, is in line with the strictest possible approach and with the fight against shadow society and segregation. That roughly half are still expected to choose own residence suggests, according to the plan's logic, a stricter rule, not a milder one.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet vill skärpa utlänningslagen till striktast möjliga nivå enligt EU-rätten och se över sociala attraktionsfaktorer för att begränsa icke-medborgares rätt till välfärden. Ett tydligare avskaffande av eget boende, med undantag endast i särskilda fall, ligger i linje med den striktaste möjliga linjen och med kampen mot skuggsamhälle och segregation. Att omkring hälften ändå väntas välja eget boende talar enligt planens logik för en skarpare regel, inte en mildare.
- strictest possible immigration actdecisive»Skärpa reglerna i utlänningslagen till striktas möjliga nivå enligt EU-rätten« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sharpen the rules in the immigration act to the strictest possible level according to EU law”
- reduce attraction factors»Sociala attraktionsfaktorer som exempelvis bidragssystem behöver ses över för att begränsa icke-medborgares rätt till välfärden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Social attraction factors such as for example benefit systems need to be reviewed to limit non-citizens' rights to welfare.”
- combat the shadow society»Bekämpa skuggsamhället och illegal migration med fler kontroller och fler utvisningar« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Combat the shadow society and illegal migration with more controls and more deportations”
- raised threshold to welfare»Skärpa villkoren för medborgarskap och höja tröskeln för att ta del av skattefinansierad välfärd« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sharpen the conditions for citizenship and raise the threshold for access to tax-financed welfare”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2024/25:SfU11)
- Committee report full text (HC01SfU11)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:1589 — Ett slutligt avskaffande av EBO av Lawen Redar (S)
- Motion 2024/25:2176 — Avskaffande av EBO-lagen av Eva Lindh m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:2504 — Avskaffande av EBO-lagen och etablering av nya asylboenden av Ingela Nylund Watz m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:2514 — Stockholm som hållbar tillväxtmotor av Mathias Tegnér m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:2949 — Migration och integration av Jonny Cato m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2024/25:3025 — Utgiftsområde 8 Migration av Anders Ygeman m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:3072 — Utgiftsområde 13 Integration och jämställdhet av Ardalan Shekarabi m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:3263 — med anledning av prop. 2024/25:49 En ny ordning för asylsökandes boende av Tony Haddou m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2024/25:3266 — med anledning av prop. 2024/25:49 En ny ordning för asylsökandes boende av Anders Ygeman m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:3269 — med anledning av prop. 2024/25:49 En ny ordning för asylsökandes boende av Annika Hirvonen m.fl. (MP)
- Proposition 2024/25:49 — En ny ordning för asylsökandes boende
Source: The Swedish Parliament