2025-11-052025/26:CU3 · p.4CUCivil law & housing
Financing of municipal water and sewerage infrastructure
What's at stake: The decision concerns how the country's water and sewage networks, much of it built in the 1950s and 60s, should be financed for necessary renewal, which affects both the fees households and businesses pay and the networks' resilience to climate change.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the Water Services Act should be changed to let municipalities use the water-and-sewage fee also to build up reserves for future reinvestment, or whether this should wait for the proposals of the ongoing Va-beredskapsutredningen inquiry.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motion, pointing out that the ongoing Va-beredskapsutredningen inquiry already proposes stricter requirements on water-and-sewage finances, expanded scope for fee-charging, and an investment programme focused on preparedness and climate adaptation, work that is being processed within the Government Offices.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 5 (MP)
The reservation (MP) wants the rules in the Water Services Act reviewed so that municipalities can use the water-and-sewage fee both for reinvestment and to build up reserves for future investment needs in existing facilities. The reasoning is that delaying work on water and sewage networks can otherwise become costly, both economically and for the environment and health.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 5 by MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 19/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| S | No | Yes 91/0/0/15 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| MP | No | No 0/15/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | No | Yes 19/0/0/5 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | No | Yes 58/0/0/10 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 61/0/0/11 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects motion 2024/25:3438 by Märta Stenevi et al. (MP) request 5.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motion 2024/25:3438 av Märta Stenevi m.fl. (MP) yrkande 5.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag has discussed a memorandum from the Government. It concerns the National Audit Office's review of whether the State's efforts towards municipalities regarding their responsibility to provide general water services are effective. By general water services is meant water supply and sewerage. The National Audit Office's overall conclusion is that the State's responsibility is lacking in several respects. The National Audit Office recommends the Government to, among other things, instruct relevant authorities to deepen their cooperation. The Government agrees in principle with the National Audit Office's problem description and considers that the measures proposed by the National Audit Office are well justified. In the memorandum, the Government refers to the fact that through the assignment to the Seas and Waters Agency, the county administrative board's reporting requirements and the continued handling of the Water preparedness investigation's report, it takes necessary measures to, in accordance with the National Audit Office's recommendations, streamline the State's efforts for general water services. The Riksdag placed the memorandum on the agenda for handling, that is, concluded the matter.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants the government to prioritize water infrastructure and implement the audit office's recommendations to ensure water access. (MP) — Reservation 5
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan does not address the water and sewage tax structure, but it requires investments in society's core operations and a robust society built to handle different types of crises, and sees infrastructure as something whose investments shall be based on societal economic goals.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not address the water and sewage tax structure, but it requires investments in society's core operations and a robust society built to handle different types of crises, and sees infrastructure as something whose investments shall be based on societal economic goals. The fee being allowed to be used for reinvestments and to build up reserves is a way to avoid deferred maintenance of the pipe networks. The conclusion is derived from the plan's infrastructure principles and therefore uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Planen behandlar inte va-taxans konstruktion, men den kräver investeringar i samhällets kärnverksamheter och ett robust samhälle byggt för att klara olika slags kriser, och ser infrastruktur som något vars investeringar ska utgå från samhällsekonomiska mål. Att avgiften får användas för reinvesteringar och för att bygga upp reserver är ett sätt att undvika uppskjutet underhåll av ledningsnäten. Slutsatsen är härledd ur planens infrastrukturprinciper och därför osäker.
- investments in core operationsdecisive»Vi vill se ett robust samhälle som är byggt för att klara olika sorters kriser. Investeringar i samhällets kärnverksamheter, gemensamt ägande i nyckelsektorer och medvetna strategier för landets ekonomiska utveckling är viktiga delar av det.« (party programme ↗)“We want to see a robust society that is built to handle different kinds of crises. Investments in society's core operations, joint ownership in key sectors and conscious strategies for the country's economic development are important parts of that.”
- infrastructure guided by societal goals»Vi ser el och värme som en del av Sveriges infrastruktur, där investeringar och priser behöver utgå från samhällsekonomiska mål.« (party programme ↗)“We see electricity and heat as part of Sweden's infrastructure, where investments and prices need to be based on societal economic goals.”
- public responsibility for infrastructure»Utbyggnaden av transportinfrastruktur och fiber går alldeles för sakta, staten behöver gå in och ta ett större ansvar för utbyggnaden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The expansion of transport infrastructure and fiber is going far too slowly, the state needs to intervene and take greater responsibility for the expansion.”
flags: citat_migrerat
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires a toxic-free environment with clean water throughout Sweden and continued investments so that municipalities can climate-adapt locally.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires a toxic-free environment with clean water throughout Sweden and continued investments so that municipalities can climate-adapt locally. That the water/wastewater fee can be used for reinvestments and to build reserves is one means to avoid deferred maintenance with environmental and health consequences. The plan also values municipal autonomy with taxation rights. The counter-proposal is supported, but on derived ground.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver en giftfri miljö med rent vatten i hela Sverige och fortsatta investeringar så att kommunerna kan klimatanpassa lokalt. Att va-avgiften får användas för reinvesteringar och för att bygga reserver är ett medel för att undvika uppskjutet underhåll med miljö- och hälsokonsekvenser. Planen värnar också det kommunala självstyret med beskattningsrätt. Motförslaget stöds, men på härlett underlag.
- rent vatten i hela landetdecisive»Giftfri miljö med ren luft och rent vatten i hela Sverige.« (party programme ↗)“Toxic-free environment with clean air and clean water throughout Sweden.”
- kommunal klimatanpassning»Vi vill fortsätta de stora investeringarna så att kommunerna kan klimatanpassa lokalt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to continue the major investments so that municipalities can climate-adapt locally.”
- kommunalt självstyre»Kommunalt och regionalt självstyre med beskattningsrätt.« (party programme ↗)“Municipal and regional autonomy with taxation rights.”
- likvärdig samhällsservice»God service och välfärd till medborgarna oavsett var i landet de bor.« (party programme ↗)“Good service and welfare for citizens regardless of where in the country they live.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants to strengthen environmental adaptation of water and sewage systems to increase resilience against flooding and drought, and requires that more water sources be protected against pollution.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to strengthen environmental adaptation of water and sewage systems to increase resilience against flooding and drought, and requires that more water sources be protected against pollution. That water and sewage fees can be used for reinvestment and to build up reserves is a direct means of avoiding deferred maintenance of pipe networks. The plan also requires stable financing for climate adaptation measures, which supports the counter-proposal.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill stärka miljöanpassningen av vatten- och avloppssystem för att öka resiliensen mot översvämningar och torka, och kräver att fler vattentäkter skyddas mot föroreningar. Att va-avgiften får användas för reinvesteringar och för att bygga upp reserver är ett direkt medel för att undvika uppskjutet underhåll av ledningsnäten. Planen kräver också stabil finansiering av klimatanpassningsåtgärder, vilket stödjer motförslaget.
- resilient water and sewage systemsdecisive»miljöanpassning av vatten- och avloppssystem för att öka resiliensen mot« (party programme ↗)“environmental adaptation of water and sewage systems to increase resilience against”
- protection of drinking water»stärka skyddet av våra dricksvattentäkter och se till att det finns fungerande reservvattentäkter« (2022 manifesto ↗)“strengthen the protection of our drinking water sources and ensure there are functioning backup water sources”
- protected water sources»vattentäkter skyddas mot exploatering och föroreningar.« (party programme ↗)“water sources are protected against exploitation and pollution.”
- stable financing for climate adaptation»till att viktiga klimatanpassningsåtgärder får stabil finansiering.« (party programme ↗)“that important climate adaptation measures receive stable financing.”
The plan wants to save lakes, watercourses and seas and requires close and reliable public services throughout the country, built on decisions near those affected.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to save lakes, watercourses and seas and requires close and reliable public services throughout the country, built on decisions near those affected. Allowing municipalities to use water and sewerage fees for reinvestment and reserves is a tool to avoid deferred maintenance with environmental and health damage as a consequence. However, the plan does not address water and sewerage tax construction, so the support is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill rädda sjöar, vattendrag och hav och kräver en nära och pålitlig offentlig service i hela landet, byggd på beslut nära dem som berörs. Att kommunerna får använda va-avgiften för reinvesteringar och reserver är ett verktyg för att undvika uppskjutet underhåll med skador på miljö och hälsa som följd. Planen behandlar dock inte va-taxans konstruktion, varför stödet är härlett.
- clean lakes and watercoursesdecisive»Rädda Sveriges sjöar, vattendrag och hav. Våra barn ska kunna bada utan att utsättas för gifter, nedskräpning eller algblomning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Save Sweden's lakes, watercourses and seas. Our children should be able to swim without being exposed to toxins, littering or algal blooms.”
- reliable public services»Offentlig service ska vara nära och pålitlig i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Public services must be close and reliable throughout the country.”
- municipal self-determination»Decentralisering handlar om att flytta makten närmare människors vardag.« (party programme ↗)“Decentralisation is about moving power closer to people's daily lives.”
- long-term stewardship»Vi har en skyldighet att bruka utan att förbruka« (party programme ↗)“We have a duty to use without consuming”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan states that everyone has the right to clean water and that drinking water supply must be secured, and that spatial planning is needed to cope with the consequences of climate change.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that everyone has the right to clean water and that drinking water supply must be secured, and that spatial planning is needed to cope with the consequences of climate change. Letting the water and sewage fee finance reinvestment and reserves for future investment needs is one way to fulfill this according to the principle that those who cause costs also pay. The counter-proposal's demands thereby align with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att alla har rätt till rent vatten och att dricksvattenförsörjningen måste säkras, samt att samhällsplanering behövs för att klara klimatförändringarnas följder. Att låta va-avgiften finansiera reinvesteringar och reserver för kommande investeringsbehov är ett sätt att uppfylla detta enligt principen att den som orsakar kostnaden också betalar. Motförslagets krav ligger därmed i linje med planen.
- secured drinking water supplydecisive»Alla har rätt till rent vatten. Dricksvattenförsörjningen måste säkras och fler yt- och« (party programme ↗)“Everyone has the right to clean water. Drinking water supply must be secured and more surface and”
- climate-adapted planning»Det behövs samhällsplanering för att klara klimatförändringarnas« (party programme ↗)“Spatial planning is needed to cope with the consequences of climate change”
- cost-oriented financing»Principen att förorenaren betalar ska upprätthållas.« (party programme ↗)“The principle that the polluter pays shall be maintained.”
- cleaner seas and waters»Kampen mot övergödningen ska fortsätta« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The fight against eutrophication shall continue”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The stewardship idea means according to the plan a responsibility to steward also the common assets and that all political decisions should consider the consequences from a future perspective.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The stewardship idea means according to the plan a responsibility to steward also the common assets and that all political decisions should consider the consequences from a future perspective. Letting the water and sewage fee finance reinvestments and reserves in the face of coming investment needs is precisely such long-term stewardship of the distribution networks. The plan also gives municipalities their own taxation and financing power for their tasks.
Original (Swedish)
Förvaltarskapstanken innebär enligt planen ett ansvar att förvalta också de gemensamma tillgångarna och att alla politiska beslut ska beakta konsekvenserna utifrån ett framtidsperspektiv. Att låta va-avgiften finansiera reinvesteringar och reserver inför kommande investeringsbehov är just ett sådant långsiktigt förvaltande av ledningsnäten. Planen ger också kommunerna egen beskattnings- och finansieringsmakt för sina uppgifter.
- stewardship of common assetsdecisive»Ansvaret att förvalta gäller såväl de egna som de gemensamma tillgångarna.« (party programme ↗)“The responsibility to steward applies both to one's own and to common assets.”
- long-term future perspective»Alla politiska beslut bör fattas i enlighet med förvaltarskapsprincipen, vilket innebär att konsekvenserna av besluten ska beaktas utifrån ett framtidsperspektiv.« (party programme ↗)“All political decisions should be made in accordance with the stewardship principle, which means that the consequences of decisions shall be considered from a future perspective.”
- municipal funding power»De regionala och kommunala nivåerna ska ha egen beskattningsrätt.« (party programme ↗)“The regional and municipal levels shall have their own right to taxation.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan lacks commitments on water and sewage tax structure, but is built on stewardship and long-term economy as well as investments in water purification and a better water environment.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan lacks commitments on water and sewage tax structure, but is built on stewardship and long-term economy as well as investments in water purification and a better water environment. Allowing the water and sewage fee to finance reinvestments and reserves for coming investments is such long-term economy that prevents expensive deferred maintenance. The plan thus comes closest to the counter-proposal's demand.
Original (Swedish)
Planen saknar åtaganden om va-taxans konstruktion, men bygger på förvaltarskap och långsiktig hushållning samt på satsningar på vattenrening och en bättre vattenmiljö. Att låta va-avgiften finansiera reinvesteringar och reserver för kommande investeringar är en sådan långsiktig hushållning som förhindrar dyrt eftersatt underhåll. Planen ligger därför närmast motförslagets krav.
- expanded water purificationdecisive»Satsa på forskning om vattenrening samt utbyggnad av avancerad vattenrening« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Invest in research on water purification and expansion of advanced water purification”
- stewardship across generations»Vårt förvaltaransvar är ett ansvar mot kommande generationer,« (party programme ↗)“Our stewardship responsibility is a responsibility toward coming generations,”
- long-term economy»Marknadsekonomin främjar hushållning, ansvar, kreativitet och långsiktighet.« (party programme ↗)“Market economy promotes economy, responsibility, creativity and long-term thinking.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan is based on the stewardship idea and establishes that water distribution is of central strategic importance and should be under strong social control.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan is based on the stewardship idea and establishes that water distribution is of central strategic importance and should be under strong social control. Allowing water and sewage fees to finance reinvestments and reserves is a way to avoid deferred maintenance of distribution networks, in line with the plan's requirement for crisis planning and long-term responsibility. The plan, however, does not address the water and sewage tax's structure, which is why the conclusion is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planen bygger på förvaltarskapstanken och slår fast att vattendistributionen är av central strategisk betydelse och bör stå under stark samhällskontroll. Att låta va-avgiften finansiera reinvesteringar och reserver är ett sätt att undvika uppskjutet underhåll av ledningsnäten, i linje med planens krav på planering för kriser och långsiktigt ansvar. Planen behandlar dock inte va-taxans konstruktion, varför slutsatsen är härledd.
- social control over waterdecisive»Även andra sektorer av central strategisk och säkerhetspolitisk betydelse, såsom el- och vattendistributionen, bör stå under stark samhällskontroll.« (party programme ↗)“Also other sectors of central strategic and security policy importance, such as electricity and water distribution, should be under strong social control.”
- stewardship idea»Ett varsamt hanterande av de gemensamma ekonomiska resurserna är en viktig och naturlig del av den sverigedemokratiska förvaltarskapstanken.« (party programme ↗)“A careful handling of the common economic resources is an important and natural part of the Sweden Democrats' stewardship idea.”
- planning for crises»Analysera och planera för olika typer av stora kriser« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Analyze and plan for various types of major crises”
- municipal financing principle»Staten bör aldrig fatta beslut om nya kostnadsdrivande åtaganden för kommunerna utan att fullt ut kompensera dem för kostnaderna.« (party programme ↗)“The state should never make decisions about new cost-driving commitments for municipalities without fully compensating them for the costs.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:CU3)
- Committee report full text (HD01CU3)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:3432 — med anledning av skr. 2024/25:173 Riksrevisionens rapport om tillgången till kommunalt vatten och avlopp av Andreas Lennkvist Manriquez m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2024/25:3438 — med anledning av skr. 2024/25:173 Riksrevisionens rapport om tillgången till kommunalt vatten och avlopp av Märta Stenevi m.fl. (MP)
- Regeringens skrivelse 2024/25:173 — Riksrevisionens rapport om tillgången till kommunalt vatten och avlopp
Source: The Swedish Parliament