The question is whether the government should be required to evaluate the law on preventive presence bans, for example one year after it takes effect and continuously thereafter, or whether the Riksdag should not decide on any such evaluation.
Committee proposal adopted, 171–109
Plan → Vote
»Vänsterpartiets politik ska utformas så att barnens bästa kommer i första rummet.«“The Left Party's policy must be designed so that the child's best interest comes first.”child's best interest first · party programme ↗
»Alla barn ska ha rätt till en trygg uppväxt i enlighet med FN:s barnkonvention.«“All children shall have the right to a safe upbringing in accordance with the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.”the convention governs decisions · party programme ↗
»beslut bör föregås av en barnkonsekvensanalys.«“decisions should be preceded by a child impact analysis.”child impact analysis of decisions · party programme ↗
»Mer måste göras mot diskriminering.«“More must be done against discrimination.”combat discrimination · 2022 manifesto ↗
»påverkan på den personliga integriteten ska regelbundet utvärderas.«“impact on personal integrity be regularly evaluated.”regular evaluation of integrity laws · party programme ↗
»Utvärdering, kostnadsuppföljning och kvalitetskontroll är därför viktiga politiska«“Evaluation, cost monitoring and quality control are therefore important political”evaluation is a political task · party programme ↗
»beredskap för att utvärdera, ompröva, förändra och förbättra«“readiness to evaluate, reconsider, change and improve”evaluate implemented reforms · party programme ↗
»Begära tydliga resultat för varje offentlig satsning«“Demand clear results for every public initiative”performance requirements for reforms · 2022 manifesto ↗
The plan is an AI reading of the party’s own manifesto and programme, with verbatim quotes. Not a prediction. Open the case → · airiksdagen.se