The question is whether the government should carry out a review of the state's company portfolio to identify companies, or parts of companies, that could be divested, or whether no such review is needed.
Committee proposal adopted, 196–82
Plan → Vote
»utnyttjas fullt ut. De gemensamt ägda företagens andel av ekonomin«“is fully utilized. The share of collectively owned companies in the economy”increase collective ownership · party programme ↗
»Det är dags att ta tillbaka den demokratiska kontrollen över välfärden och att stoppa sönderprivatiseringen.«“It is time to take back democratic control over welfare and to stop privatisation.”stop to privatisation · 2022 manifesto ↗
»ska ägarskapet vara aktivt och inflytandet«“ownership should be active and the influence”active state ownership · party programme ↗
»Offentlig verksamhet kan med fördel konkurrensutsättas«“Public activities can advantageously be exposed to competition”expose public activities to competition · party programme ↗
»Det offentliga ska endast driva affärsverksamhet om det finns ett starkt samhällsintresse.«“The public shall only run business activity if there is a strong societal interest.”restrictive state enterprise · party programme ↗
»Det är också angeläget att det personliga ägandet uppmuntras på bekostnad av det institutionella ägandet.«“It is also important that personal ownership is encouraged at the expense of institutional ownership.”personal before institutional ownership · party programme ↗
»Om något kan göras lika bra eller bättre av«“If something can be done equally well or better by”limited public responsibility · party programme ↗
»Det viktigaste för oss är i de flesta fall inte vem som utför en specifik uppgift«“What is most important for us in most cases is not who performs a specific task”benefit before provider · party programme ↗
The plan is an AI reading of the party’s own manifesto and programme, with verbatim quotes. Not a prediction. Open the case → · airiksdagen.se