The question is whether the government should investigate how the rights of nature could be incorporated into the constitution, or whether the current regulation should remain unchanged.
Committee proposal adopted, 278–17
Plan → Vote
»Vi befinner oss i ett klimatnödläge.«“We find ourselves in a climate emergency.”climate emergency · 2022 manifesto ↗
»ser principen om att all offentlig makt utgår från folket och den parlamentariska demokratin«“sees the principle that all public power emanates from the people and parliamentary democracy”popular sovereignty and parliamentarism · party programme ↗
»att Sverige verkar för en ekocidlagstiftning«“that Sweden works for ecocide legislation”ecocide legislation · 2022 manifesto ↗
»Vi vill göra det svårare att ändra grundlagen«“We want to make it harder to change the fundamental law”restrictive view of constitutional amendments · 2022 manifesto ↗
»Den enskilda människan är liberalismens utgångspunkt.«“The individual human being is liberalism's starting point.”the individual as starting point · party programme ↗
»ekosofismen, där människan varken tillåts ingripa i naturen eller förvalta«“ecosophy, where man is neither allowed to intervene in nature nor manage”avvisar ekosofism · party programme ↗
»Människan måste vara miljöpolitikens utgångspunkt.«“Humans must be the starting point of environmental policy.”humans in focus · party programme ↗
»Förstärka grundlagens rättighetsskydd vad gäller yttrandefrihet, äganderätt och frihet från religion«“Strengthen the Constitution's protection of rights regarding freedom of expression, property rights and freedom of religion”constitutional protection of civil rights · 2022 manifesto ↗
The plan is an AI reading of the party’s own manifesto and programme, with verbatim quotes. Not a prediction. Open the case → · airiksdagen.se