The question is whether the government should appoint an inquiry to review copyright legislation in light of AI developments, or whether current legislation should remain unchanged for now.
Committee proposal adopted, 168–127 · ⇄ The decision would have gone the other way
Plan → Vote
»Marknadsmakten har ett starkt grepp om Internet, tv och kultur.«“Market power has a strong grip on the internet, television, and culture.”break market power over culture · party programme ↗
»En viktig del av detta är att slå vakt om den konstnärliga«“An important part of this is to protect artistic”safeguard artistic copyright · party programme ↗
»modernisera upphovsrätten så att kulturskaparnas rättigheter värnas.«“modernize copyright so that cultural creators' rights are valued.”modernized copyright · 2022 manifesto ↗
»Digitaliseringen utmanar den traditionella synen på upphovsrätten.«“Digitalisation challenges the traditional view of copyright.”copyright is challenged by technology · party programme ↗
»Upphovsrätten måste dock anpassas till ny teknik och«“Copyright must however be adapted to new technology and”copyright adapted to new technology · party programme ↗
»möjligheten att skydda äganderätten till uppfinningar.«“the ability to protect intellectual property rights to inventions.”protection of intellectual property rights · party programme ↗
»Äganderätten och näringsfriheten ska ha ett starkt skydd i«“Property rights and freedom of enterprise shall have strong protection in”strong protection for property rights · party programme ↗
»Föråldrade regler om upphovsrätt behöver också anpassas efter hur människor konsumerar och skapar innehåll i det digitala samhället.«“Outdated copyright rules also need to be adapted to how people consume and create content in the digital society.”modernized copyright · 2022 manifesto ↗
The plan is an AI reading of the party’s own manifesto and programme, with verbatim quotes. Not a prediction. Open the case → · airiksdagen.se