2024-04-182023/24:JuU23 · p.1JuUJustice

Cross-bloc agreement on violent extremism and terrorism

A new cross-party agreement on work against violent extremism and terrorism

What's at stake: A cross-party agreement could give work against extremism and terrorism broader political backing and long-term stability regardless of changes in government, while the government argues the new strategy already creates good conditions for broad-based work.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether the government should take the initiative for a new cross-party agreement on work against violent extremism and terrorism, or whether the newly presented national strategy is sufficient without such an agreement.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee views the government's new comprehensive strategy positively and considers that it creates the conditions for broad, long-term work in the area; it does not see anything that gives grounds for the Riksdag to take the initiative for a new cross-party agreement, and therefore rejects the motion.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 1 (MP)

The reservation welcomes the new national strategy but regrets that it was not preceded by a cross-party agreement like the one concluded in 2017, and argues that such an agreement would provide more long-term work with broad backing in the Riksdag, and that the government should therefore take the initiative for a new such agreement.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by MP.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VNoYes 19/0/0/5departs from the planconfidence: lowderived
SNoYes 90/0/0/16departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
MPown reservationNoNo 0/14/0/4follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
CNoYes 21/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: highnot addressed
LNoYes 12/0/0/4departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
KDNoYes 16/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
MYesYes 57/0/0/11follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
SDNoYes 63/0/0/9departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects motion 2023/24:2818 by Rasmus Ling et al. (MP) demand 1.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motion 2023/24:2818 av Rasmus Ling m.fl. (MP) yrkande 1.

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag has considered a government communication on a new comprehensive national strategy against violent extremism and terrorism. The aim of the strategy is to provide long-term direction for work in Sweden – locally, regionally, nationally and internationally. The strategy is divided into four areas: prevent – for example, reduce the growth of violent extremism by preventing the risk of radicalization. stop – for example, prevent opportunities for financing and access to weapons protect – for example, work to protect the democratic society and continue to identify risks and vulnerabilities manage – for example, work on how attacks or ongoing lethal violence should be managed, and focus on the importance of accountability and assistance to crime victims. The new strategy replaces the previous strategies against violent extremism and terrorism from 2015. The Riksdag considers that the strategy creates conditions for broad and long-term work in the field and proposes that the Riksdag should file the government communication, that is, close the case.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan says that work against racism and fascism requires political breadth and popular roots, which is the principle closest to a demand for a broadly anchored agreement on work against violent extremism.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan says that work against racism and fascism requires political breadth and popular roots, which is the principle closest to a demand for a broadly anchored agreement on work against violent extremism. The plan does not, however, address agreements between the Riksdag's blocs, so the support is derived and uncertain.

Original (Swedish)

Planen säger att arbetet mot rasism och fascism kräver politisk bredd och folklig förankring, vilket är den princip som ligger närmast ett krav på en brett förankrad överenskommelse om arbetet mot våldsbejakande extremism. Planen behandlar dock inte överenskommelser mellan riksdagens block, varför stödet är härlett och osäkert.

  • political breadth requireddecisive»Arbetet mot rasism och fascism kräver politisk bredd och folklig förankring.« (party programme ↗)“Work against racism and fascism requires political breadth and popular roots.”
  • broad popular roots»Vänsterpartiet värnar starka och självständiga folkrörelser som kan bidra till progressiva samhällsförändringar« (party programme ↗)“The Left Party values strong and independent grassroots movements that can contribute to progressive social change”
  • cohesion against division»Ett tryggt samhälle ställer inte människor mot varandra.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“A safe society does not set people against each other.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SSocialdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan expresses that our time's great challenges must be met together and explicitly seeks broad settlements across party lines in other long-term questions.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan expresses that our time's great challenges must be met together and explicitly seeks broad settlements across party lines in other long-term questions. That a national strategy against violent extremism should rest on a cross-bloc agreement follows from this stance. However, no statement about this specific strategy exists, so the conclusion is derived.

Original (Swedish)

Planen uttrycker att vår tids stora utmaningar måste mötas tillsammans och söker uttryckligen breda uppgörelser över partigränserna i andra långsiktiga frågor. Att en nationell strategi mot våldsbejakande extremism borde vila på en blocköverskridande överenskommelse följer av den hållningen. Något uttalande om just denna strategi finns dock inte, varför slutsatsen är härledd.

  • joint solutions to major threatsdecisive»Coronapandemin och det fruktansvärda kriget i Ukraina har än en gång visat att ensam inte är stark, utan att vår tids stora utmaningar måste mötas tillsammans.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The coronavirus pandemic and the appalling war in Ukraine have once again shown that alone you are not strong, but that our time's great challenges must be met together.”
  • broad cross-party agreements»Efter valet vill vi se en ny energiöverenskommelse för Sveriges bästa« (2022 manifesto ↗)“After the election we want to see a new energy agreement for Sweden's benefit”
  • responsible leadership»Vi socialdemokrater står för ett ansvarstagande ledarskap för Sverige – både i kris och i medgång.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We social democrats stand for responsible leadership for Sweden – both in crisis and in good times.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MPMiljöpartietNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The plan says nothing about cross-bloc agreements as a working method.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan says nothing about cross-bloc agreements as a working method. The closest principle is that common matters shall be handled with openness and free debate, that long-termism shall characterize politics and that basic institutions shall be protected against rapid changes. Based on this, a broadly anchored and long-term direction lies in line with the plan.

Original (Swedish)

Planen säger ingenting om blocköverskridande överenskommelser som arbetsform. Närmast liggande princip är att gemensamma angelägenheter ska hanteras med öppenhet och fri debatt, att långsiktighet ska prägla politiken och att grundläggande ordningar ska skyddas mot snabba förändringar. Utifrån detta ligger en brett förankrad och långsiktig inriktning i linje med planen.

  • öppen gemensam hanteringdecisive»Våra gemensamma angelägenheter ska hanteras med öppenhet, respekt, fri« (party programme ↗)“Our common matters shall be handled with openness, respect, free”
  • långsiktighet i politiken»Långsiktighet är inte bara ett synsätt inom« (party programme ↗)“Long-termism is not just a viewpoint within”
  • bred förankring i viktiga frågor»skydda Sveriges grundlag mot snabba förändringar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“protect Sweden's constitution against rapid changes.”
CCenterpartietNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan makes broad, cross-bloc agreements its own main line: long-term joint solutions with parties from both left and right, and an explicit wish that more parties cooperate across bloc lines.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan makes broad, cross-bloc agreements its own main line: long-term joint solutions with parties from both left and right, and an explicit wish that more parties cooperate across bloc lines. Work against violent extremism and terrorism, which requires long-term commitment, is precisely such an area. The plan does not mention this particular policy area, which is why the position is derived from the collaboration commitment.

Original (Swedish)

Planen gör breda, blocköverskridande uppgörelser till en egen huvudlinje: långsiktiga gemensamma lösningar med partier från både vänster och höger, och en uttalad önskan att fler partier samarbetar över blockgränsen. Ett arbete mot våldsbejakande extremism och terrorism, som kräver långsiktighet, är precis ett sådant område. Planen nämner inte just detta politikområde, varför ställningstagandet är härlett ur samarbetsåtagandet.

  • cross-bloc long-term approachdecisive»Vi prioriterar långsiktiga, gemensamma lösningar med partier från både vänster och höger.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We prioritize long-term, joint solutions with parties from both left and right.”
  • cooperation across bloc lines»Det bästa för Sverige vore om fler partier hade mod att samarbeta över den traditionella blockgränsen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It would be best for Sweden if more parties had the courage to cooperate across the traditional bloc line.”
  • cooperation over political games»Vi värderar samarbete, ansvarstagande och resultat framför politiskt spel.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We value collaboration, accountability and results over political games.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan says nothing about cross-bloc agreements as a working method.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan says nothing about cross-bloc agreements as a working method. The nearest principle is that extremism constitutes a threat to democracy, that much more must be done and that democracy requires constant and sustained work. From this follows support for a long-term and broadly anchored approach to work against violent extremism, but the conclusion is uncertain.

Original (Swedish)

Planen säger ingenting om blocköverskridande överenskommelser som arbetsform. Närmast liggande princip är att extremismen utgör ett hot mot demokratin, att mycket mer måste göras och att demokratin kräver ett ständigt och uthålligt arbete. Av det följer stöd för en långsiktig och brett förankrad inriktning på arbetet mot våldsbejakande extremism, men slutsatsen är osäker.

  • more must be done against extremismdecisive»När Säpo säger att flera organisationer från extremistmiljöer finansieras av skattepengar måste mycket mer göras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“When Säpo says that several organizations from extremist circles are financed by taxpayers much more must be done.”
  • extremism threatens democracy»högerextremismen och den islamistiska extremismen utgör ett hot mot demokratin.« (party programme ↗)“right-wing extremism and Islamist extremism constitute a threat to democracy.”
  • sustained democracy work»och uthålligt arbete för att upprätthålla demokratiska värderingar.« (party programme ↗)“and sustained work to uphold democratic values.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The party programme makes the search for consensus instead of confrontation a characteristic of Christian Democracy and assumes that no party alone has the complete truth.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme makes the search for consensus instead of confrontation a characteristic of Christian Democracy and assumes that no party alone has the complete truth. Politics' task is described as ensuring long-term rules of the game. A cross-bloc agreement on work against extremism responds to that stance, but the plan does not treat the question directly.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet gör sökandet efter samförstånd i stället för konfrontation till ett kännetecken för kristdemokratin och utgår från att inget parti ensamt har hela sanningen. Politikens uppgift beskrivs som att säkerställa långsiktiga spelregler. En blocköverskridande överenskommelse om arbetet mot extremism svarar mot den hållningen, men planen behandlar inte frågan direkt.

  • consensus over confrontationdecisive»inget politiskt parti ensamt står för den kompletta sanningen« (party programme ↗)“no political party alone stands for the complete truth”
  • long-term rules of the game»Det innebär bland annat att säkerställa de långsiktiga spelreglerna för samhället« (party programme ↗)“It means, among other things, ensuring the long-term rules of the game for society”
  • long-term security work»Tryggheten på gator och torg måste återupprättas, brottsförebyggande arbetet måste stärkas, brottslingar dömas och brottsoffer få upprättelse.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Security in streets and squares must be restored, crime prevention work must be strengthened, criminals are convicted and crime victims receive reparation.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan says nothing about cross-party agreements as a working method.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan says nothing about cross-party agreements as a working method. Its line against violence-advocating extremism is instead concrete measures such as organization bans and stopped subsidies, driven by a forceful government that gets things done. Based on the closest principle, the plan does not support the demand for first seeking a broad agreement.

Original (Swedish)

Planen säger ingenting om blocköverskridande överenskommelser som arbetsform. Dess linje mot våldsbejakande extremism är i stället konkreta åtgärder som organisationsförbud och stoppade bidrag, drivna av en handlingskraftig regering som får något gjort. Utifrån den närmast liggande principen ger planen inte stöd åt kravet på att först söka en bred uppgörelse.

  • handlingskraft framför förhandlingdecisive»Den utvecklingen måste vändas – och den kan vändas med en ny handlingskraftig regering och en offensiv reformpolitik som på allvar kan ta itu med samhällsproblemen och få något gjort.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“That development must be reversed – and it can be reversed with a new forceful government and an offensive reform policy that can seriously tackle society's problems and get things done.”
  • konkreta åtgärder mot extremism»Förbjuda deltagande i organisationer med våldsbejakande verksamhet samt förbjuda deltagande i kriminella gäng« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Prohibit participation in organizations with violence-advocating activities and prohibit participation in criminal gangs”
  • skydda demokratin mot extremism»Vi måste också stärka demokratins skydd mot våldsbejakande extremism och andra kriminella hot.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We must also strengthen democracy's protection against violence-advocating extremism and other criminal threats.”
SDSverigedemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan says nothing about the form of political agreements between blocs, but expresses itself on the substance: that strong and effective measures against terrorism and extremism should be put in place.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan says nothing about the form of political agreements between blocs, but expresses itself on the substance: that strong and effective measures against terrorism and extremism should be put in place. Broadly anchored and long-term work does not contradict the closest principle, which is that extremists should neither be allowed to exist nor be fostered in Sweden. The position is therefore derived from a principle of decisiveness and uncertain.

Original (Swedish)

Planen säger ingenting om formen för politiska överenskommelser mellan block, utan uttalar sig om sakinnehållet: att kraftiga och verkansfulla åtgärder mot terrorism och extremism ska komma på plats. Ett brett förankrat och långsiktigt arbete strider inte mot den närmast liggande principen, som är att extremister varken ska tillåtas finnas eller fostras i Sverige. Ställningstagandet är därför härlett ur en princip om handlingskraft och osäkert.

  • verkansfulla åtgärder mot terrorismdecisive»Sverigedemokraterna kommer tillse att kraftiga och verkansfulla åtgärder kommer på plats.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats will ensure that strong and effective measures are put in place.”
  • nolltolerans mot extremism»I vårt land ska terrorister och extremister vare sig tillåtas finnas eller fostras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“In our country, terrorists and extremists shall neither be allowed to exist nor be fostered.”
  • bekämpa islamism»Bekämpa islamism« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Combat Islamism”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament