2023-03-292022/23:SoU19 · p.8SoUHealth & social services

Farm Sales of Alcoholic Beverages

Rules for on-site farm sales of alcoholic beverages

What's at stake: The outcome affects whether small-scale producers of alcoholic beverages will be allowed to sell directly to visitors on-site, which could strengthen rural tourism, while the issue also touches on Systembolaget's retail monopoly and public-health protections.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether on-site farm sales of alcoholic beverages should be introduced in Sweden without the production and purchase volume limits proposed in the government inquiry, or whether the matter should await further processing.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee refers to the ongoing government processing of the question of farm sales and sees no grounds at this stage for parliament to take its own initiative, and therefore rejects the motions on farm sales.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 8 (C)

The reserving party points to a government inquiry showing that farm sales neither endanger public health nor Systembolaget's monopoly and are compatible with EU law, and wants farm sales introduced without the production-volume limit for the farm and the per-customer purchase cap proposed by the inquiry, since these restrictions exclude many farms and can easily be circumvented.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 8 by C.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VYesYes 21/0/0/3follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
SYesYes 93/0/0/14follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
MPYesYes 15/0/0/3follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
Cown reservationNoNo 0/21/0/3follows the planconfidence: highexplicit
LYesYes 14/0/0/2follows the planconfidence: highnot addressed
KDYesYes 15/0/0/4follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MNoYes 59/0/0/9departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
SDNoAbstain 1/0/64/8departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed

Broke with the party line

SDRunar Filper (SD, Värmlands län)Yes — party line: Abstain

MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects the motions 2022/23:306 by Margareta Cederfelt (M), 2022/23:567 by Markus Wiechel et al. (SD) provision 1, 2022/23:669 by Caroline Högström and Mikael Damsgaard (both M) provisions 1 and 2, 2022/23:771 by Anna af Sillén and Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (both M), 2022/23:843 by Daniel Bäckström et al. (C) provision 14, 2022/23:921 by Linda Lindberg et al. (SD) provision 3, 2022/23:931 by Tobias Andersson et al. (SD) provision 7, 2022/23:934 by Tobias Andersson et al. (SD) provision 11, 2022/23:937 by Eric Palmqvist et al. (SD) provision 3, 2022/23:1065 by Camilla Brunsberg (M), 2022/23:1124 by Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist et al. (C) provision 6, 2022/23:1609 by Stina Larsson et al. (C) provisions 1-3, 2022/23:1635 by Martina Johansson (C) provision 2, 2022/23:1647 by Kerstin Lundgren (C), 2022/23:1672 by Annie Lööf et al. (C) provision 18, 2022/23:1855 by Sten Bergheden (M), 2022/23:1996 by Ann-Charlotte Hammar Johnsson et al. (M) and 2022/23:2144 by Markus Wiechel et al. (SD) provision 9.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2022/23:306 av Margareta Cederfelt (M), 2022/23:567 av Markus Wiechel m.fl. (SD) yrkande 1, 2022/23:669 av Caroline Högström och Mikael Damsgaard (båda M) yrkandena 1 och 2, 2022/23:771 av Anna af Sillén och Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (båda M), 2022/23:843 av Daniel Bäckström m.fl. (C) yrkande 14, 2022/23:921 av Linda Lindberg m.fl. (SD) yrkande 3, 2022/23:931 av Tobias Andersson m.fl. (SD) yrkande 7, 2022/23:934 av Tobias Andersson m.fl. (SD) yrkande 11, 2022/23:937 av Eric Palmqvist m.fl. (SD) yrkande 3, 2022/23:1065 av Camilla Brunsberg (M), 2022/23:1124 av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist m.fl. (C) yrkande 6, 2022/23:1609 av Stina Larsson m.fl. (C) yrkandena 1-3, 2022/23:1635 av Martina Johansson (C) yrkande 2, 2022/23:1647 av Kerstin Lundgren (C), 2022/23:1672 av Annie Lööf m.fl. (C) yrkande 18, 2022/23:1855 av Sten Bergheden (M), 2022/23:1996 av Ann-Charlotte Hammar Johnsson m.fl. (M) och 2022/23:2144 av Markus Wiechel m.fl. (SD) yrkande 9.

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag said no to approximately 80 proposals in motions submitted during the general motion session of 2022. The motions concern, among other things, the overarching policy for alcohol, narcotic drugs, doping, tobacco and gambling, the so-called ANDTS policy. The Riksdag points out that work is already underway to review the ANDTS policy. Other proposals concern changing alcohol legislation, including regarding the regulatory framework for serving permits. In this case too, the Riksdag refers to the work that is already underway.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan's core principle is that social and democratic rights are subordinate to the freedom of capital and that socially important activities should be taken back into collective management instead of being opened to the market.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's core principle is that social and democratic rights are subordinate to the freedom of capital and that socially important activities should be taken back into collective management instead of being opened to the market. Farm sales without volume limits or purchase caps means a step away from the collective retail monopoly and thus a market opening in an area where the plan sees public health and class as decisive. The plan does not address farm sales directly, which is why the conclusion is derived.

Original (Swedish)

Planens bärande princip är att sociala och demokratiska rättigheter överordnas kapitalets frihet och att samhällsviktig verksamhet ska tas tillbaka i gemensam regi i stället för att öppnas för marknaden. Gårdsförsäljning utan volymgräns eller köptak innebär ett steg bort från det gemensamma detaljhandelsmonopolet och därmed en marknadsöppning på ett område där planen ser folkhälsa och klass som avgörande. Planen behandlar inte gårdsförsäljning direkt, varför slutsatsen härleds.

  • rights before freedom of capitaldecisive»demokratiska rättigheter ska överordnas kapitalets frihet.« (party programme ↗)“democratic rights should be subordinate to the freedom of capital.”
  • take back collective activities»Det är hög tid att agera och ta tillbaka den samhällsviktiga verksamhet och infrastruktur som har privatiserats.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is high time to act and take back the socially important activities and infrastructure that have been privatized.”
  • class and health»Precis som att klass påverkar människor i en pandemi, påverkar klass vår livslängd och möjlighet till ett bra liv utanför en pandemi.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Just as class affects people in a pandemic, class affects our life expectancy and opportunity for a good life outside a pandemic.”
SSocialdemokraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

Farm sales of alcohol are not addressed in the documents.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

Farm sales of alcohol are not addressed in the documents. Closest principles are that children and young people shall have an upbringing free from drugs and that the consumer perspective, not producer interest, shall be the starting point for policy. The counter-proposal's demand for farm sales entirely without volume limitations or purchase caps puts producers' interest first, why the plan's principles weigh against it. Security is low since the subject matter is not addressed at all.

Original (Swedish)

Gårdsförsäljning av alkohol behandlas inte i dokumenten. Närmast liggande principer är att barn och unga ska ha en uppväxt fri från droger och att konsumentperspektivet, inte producentintresset, ska vara utgångspunkten för politiken. Motförslagets krav på gårdsförsäljning helt utan volymbegränsning eller köptak sätter producenternas intresse först, varför planens principer väger emot. Säkerheten är låg eftersom sakfrågan inte alls berörs.

  • public health before availabilitydecisive»och till en trygg uppväxt fri från droger och våld.« (party programme ↗)“and to a safe upbringing free from drugs and violence.”
  • consumer before producer interest»producentintresset, ska vara utgångspunkten för en politik där säkra livsmedel, miljöhänsyn« (party programme ↗)“producer interest, shall be the starting point for a policy where safe foodstuffs, environmental consideration”
MPMiljöpartietYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The party programme establishes that alcohol and other drugs cause society enormous costs and affected individuals great suffering, and holds a restrictive line where alcohol advertising shall be banned and public health is an overriding goal.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme establishes that alcohol and other drugs cause society enormous costs and affected individuals great suffering, and holds a restrictive line where alcohol advertising shall be banned and public health is an overriding goal. Introducing farm sales entirely without volume limits or purchase caps expands access to alcohol and undermines the public-health-motivated monopoly. The counter-proposal's demand is therefore rejected.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet slår fast att alkohol och andra droger orsakar samhället enorma kostnader och drabbade individer stort lidande, och håller en restriktiv linje där alkoholreklam ska förbjudas och folkhälsan är ett överordnat mål. Att införa gårdsförsäljning helt utan volymbegränsning eller köptak vidgar tillgängligheten till alkohol och urholkar det folkhälsomotiverade monopolet. Motförslagets krav avvisas därför.

  • alcohol's societal costsdecisive»Alkohol och andra droger orsakar samhället« (party programme ↗)“Alcohol and other drugs cause society”
  • public health as an overriding goal»Vi menar att en långsiktig satsning på folkhälsa« (party programme ↗)“We believe that a long-term investment in public health”
  • restrictive alcohol policy»förbjudet, liksom reklam för spel och alkohol.« (party programme ↗)“banned, as is advertising for gambling and alcohol.”
CCenterpartietNoNofollows the planexplicit

The election manifesto explicitly demands that farm sales of alcohol are allowed to strengthen the tourism industry and develop the countryside, and calls it unreasonable that local producers cannot sell their products to visitors.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto explicitly demands that farm sales of alcohol are allowed to strengthen the tourism industry and develop the countryside, and calls it unreasonable that local producers cannot sell their products to visitors. The counter-proposal wishes to introduce exactly this without limitations that would exclude many farms, which lies in line with the plan's purpose. The reform is moreover counted among those that must come in place for rural competitiveness and people's self-determination.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet kräver uttryckligen att gårdsförsäljning av alkohol tillåts för att stärka besöksnäringen och utveckla landsbygden, och kallar det orimligt att lokala producenter inte får sälja sina produkter till besökare. Motförslaget vill införa just detta utan begränsningar som skulle utesluta många gårdar, vilket ligger i linje med planens syfte. Reformen räknas dessutom till dem som måste komma på plats för landsbygdens konkurrenskraft och människors självbestämmande.

  • allow farm salesdecisive»Tillåt gårdsförsäljning av alkohol för att stärka besöksnäringen och utveckla landsbygden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Allow farm sales of alcohol to strengthen the tourism industry and develop the countryside.”
  • freedom for local producers»Det är orimligt att lokala producenter av alkoholhaltiga drycker inte kan sälja sina produkter till besökare.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is unreasonable that local producers of alcoholic drinks cannot sell their products to visitors.”
  • reform for the countryside»Regelförenklingar, skattesänkningar, gårdsförsäljning av alkohol och ett mer tillväxtvänligt strandskydd är bara några av de reformer som måste komma på plats« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Regulatory simplifications, tax cuts, farm sales of alcohol and a more growth-friendly shoreline protection are just some of the reforms that must come in place”
  • tourism industry's value»Besöksnäringen har stor betydelse för hela landets utveckling« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The tourism industry has great importance for development across the country”
LLiberalernaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan establishes that Sweden shall have a restrictive alcohol policy, that total alcohol consumption shall be kept down and that the Systembolaget monopoly on retail shall be kept.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that Sweden shall have a restrictive alcohol policy, that total alcohol consumption shall be kept down and that the Systembolaget monopoly on retail shall be kept. Farm sales without volume limits or purchase ceiling would open a new sales channel outside the monopoly and thus conflict with these commitments. The plan does not mention farm sales explicitly, so the position is derived from the restrictive line.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att Sverige ska ha en restriktiv alkoholpolitik, att den totala alkoholkonsumtionen ska hållas nere och att Systembolagets detaljhandelsmonopol ska behållas. Gårdsförsäljning utan volymbegränsning eller köptak skulle öppna en ny försäljningskanal utanför monopolet och står därför i strid med dessa åtaganden. Planen nämner inte gårdsförsäljning uttryckligen, varför ställningstagandet är härlett ur den restriktiva linjen.

  • retained retail monopolydecisive»Systembolagets detaljhandelsmonopol« (party programme ↗)“Systembolaget's retail monopoly”
  • restrictive alcohol policy»Sverige ska ha en restriktiv alkoholpolitik.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden shall have a restrictive alcohol policy.”
  • low total alcohol consumption»alkoholkonsumtionen hålls nere, bland annat genom en hög alkoholskatt.« (party programme ↗)“alcohol consumption is kept down, among other things through a high alcohol tax.”
  • public health over farming interests»I EU ska hänsynen till folkhälsan väga tyngre än jordbruksintressen.« (party programme ↗)“In the EU, considerations for public health should outweigh farming interests.”
KDKristdemokraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan's alcohol policy commitment is to minimise harm through low total consumption, with sales monopoly and restrictive legislation as stated means, and monopoly is accepted precisely for public health reasons.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's alcohol policy commitment is to minimise harm through low total consumption, with sales monopoly and restrictive legislation as stated means, and monopoly is accepted precisely for public health reasons. Farm sales without volume limits or purchase caps increase accessibility and undermine these means. The plan's desire to facilitate differentiated rural enterprise pulls in the opposite direction.

Original (Swedish)

Planens alkoholpolitiska åtagande är att minimera skadorna genom en låg totalkonsumtion, med försäljningsmonopol och restriktiv lagstiftning som uttalade medel, och monopol godtas just av folkhälsoskäl. Gårdsförsäljning utan volymbegränsning eller köptak ökar tillgängligheten och urholkar dessa medel. Planens vilja att underlätta differentierat landsbygdsföretagande drar i motsatt riktning.

  • monopoly and restrictive legislationdecisive»aktiv prispolitik, försäljningsmonopol och en restriktiv lagstiftning« (party programme ↗)“active price policy, sales monopoly and restrictive legislation”
  • low total consumption»alkoholskador genom en låg totalkonsumtion« (party programme ↗)“alcohol harm through low total consumption”
  • monopoly for public health reasons»exempelvis av folkhälsoskäl.« (party programme ↗)“for example for public health reasons.”
  • rural enterprise»Även differentierat landsbygdsföretagande ska underlättas.« (party programme ↗)“Also differentiated rural enterprise shall be facilitated.”
MModeraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan wants small-scale producers to be able to sell directly to consumers and itself identifies such direct sales as a reform, while conditions for starting and growing should be good and red tape should be reduced.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants small-scale producers to be able to sell directly to consumers and itself identifies such direct sales as a reform, while conditions for starting and growing should be good and red tape should be reduced. Farm sales without volume or purchase caps align with that line and with utilizing all of Sweden's opportunities. However, the plan does not address alcohol sales.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill att småskaliga producenter ska kunna sälja direkt till konsumenter och pekar själv ut sådan direktförsäljning som en reform, samtidigt som villkoren för att starta och växa ska vara goda och regelkrånglet minska. Gårdsförsäljning utan volym- eller köptak ligger i linje med den linjen och med att hela Sveriges möjligheter ska tas tillvara. Planen behandlar dock inte alkoholförsäljning.

  • direct sales to consumerdecisive»Låta jägare sälja vildsvinskött direkt till konsumenter« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Allow hunters to sell wild boar meat directly to consumers”
  • good conditions for entrepreneurs»Villkoren för att starta, växa och expandera behöver vara goda för att fler ska våga lämna trygga och välbetalda jobb för att starta företag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Conditions for starting, growing and expanding need to be good so that more dare to leave secure and well-paid jobs to start businesses.”
  • reduced red tape»Ta bort en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och en tredjedel av regelkrånglet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove one third of companies' administrative costs and one third of red tape”
  • all of Sweden's opportunities»Moderaterna vill ta vara på hela Sveriges möjligheter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Moderate Party wants to utilize all of Sweden's opportunities.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SDSverigedemokraternaNoAbstaindeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan seeks to harness the value of rural areas and make it easier to create more businesses and jobs there, through regulatory simplification and better conditions for new entrepreneurship across the country.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan seeks to harness the value of rural areas and make it easier to create more businesses and jobs there, through regulatory simplification and better conditions for new entrepreneurship across the country. Farm sales without volume caps or purchase caps, which do not exclude small farms, are a direct expression of that approach. However, the plan does not address alcohol legislation, so the conclusion is inferred.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill ta till vara landsbygdens värden och göra det enklare att skapa fler verksamheter och jobb där, med regelförenkling och bättre förutsättningar för nyföretagande i hela landet. Gårdsförsäljning utan volymtak eller köptak, som inte utesluter mindre gårdar, är ett direkt uttryck för den linjen. Planen behandlar dock inte alkohollagstiftningen, varför slutsatsen är härledd.

  • develop rural industrydecisive»Sverige behöver en politik som tar till vara värdet ute i landsbygden och som gör det enklare att i kombination med en väl avvägd miljöhänsyn att skapa fler verksamheter, jobb och ökad tillväxt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden needs a policy that harnesses the value of rural areas and makes it easier, in combination with well-considered environmental consideration, to create more businesses, jobs and increased growth.”
  • business across the country»Underlätta för industri och näringsliv i hela landet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Facilitate industry and business across the country”
  • stimulate new entrepreneurship»Skapa förutsättningar för nyföretagande och entreprenörskap« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Create conditions for new entrepreneurship and enterprise”
  • regulatory simplification for small businesses»Verka för regelförenkling och avlasta småföretagens administrativa börda« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Work for regulatory simplification and ease the administrative burden on small businesses”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament