2025-02-262024/25:KrU5 · p.8KrUCulture
Digitalization of cultural heritage
Digitisation of cultural heritage
What's at stake: The question is at what pace and with what resources cultural heritage, including church heritage, should be digitised — from photographs to 3D scanning — to make it accessible to more people while also protecting it from risk, which in turn requires sufficient expertise and nationwide broadband coverage.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The motions called for the digitisation of cultural heritage, including church heritage, to be pursued at a faster pace and with better resources, while the committee held that ongoing efforts — including the National Heritage Board's national strategy for digital heritage — already meet the need.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee welcomes the National Heritage Board's national strategy for digital heritage and notes that several agencies, museums and the Church of Sweden already play important roles and make investments in the area, and therefore rejects the motions with reference to ongoing efforts.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 11 (C)
The reserving party (C) wants the digitisation of church cultural heritage, from simple photographs to 3D scanning, carried out at a faster pace, with the Church of Sweden, the National Heritage Board and county administrative boards given sufficient expertise or resources for external expertise, and broadband expanded nationwide to make heritage accessible to everyone and protect it against risk.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 11 by C.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: VVänsterpartiet
Ja 201–21Ja 182–40
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 19/0/0/5 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: medium | explicit |
| S | No | Yes 93/0/0/13 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/15/3 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | No | No 0/21/0/3 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 12/0/0/4 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | No | Yes 60/0/0/8 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | No | Abstain 0/0/63/9 | differs | confidence: medium | explicit |
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motions 2024/25:1417 by Runar Filper et al. (SD) motion 15, 2024/25:1774 by Mats Berglund et al. (MP) motion 29 and 2024/25:2958 by Catarina Deremar et al. (C) motions 8 and 9.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:1417 av Runar Filper m.fl. (SD) yrkande 15, 2024/25:1774 av Mats Berglund m.fl. (MP) yrkande 29 och 2024/25:2958 av Catarina Deremar m.fl. (C) yrkandena 8 och 9.
Riksdag decision: Parliament said no to approximately 120 proposals on cultural heritage in motions from the general motion period of 2024. The proposals deal with, among other things, cultural environment management, crisis preparedness and museum questions. Parliament refers, among other things, to ongoing work and measures that have been implemented.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to digitalize the church cultural heritage and ensure adequate competence and broadband access nationwide. (C) — Reservation 11
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The party programme wants to build up digital commons with free access to humanity's accumulated knowledge and culture, which is exactly what accelerated digitalization of the cultural heritage aims at.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme wants to build up digital commons with free access to humanity's accumulated knowledge and culture, which is exactly what accelerated digitalization of the cultural heritage aims at. The election manifesto moreover establishes that fiber expansion is going too slowly and that the state needs to take greater responsibility for it, which covers the requirement for broadband throughout the country. The plan also requires resources for culture so that it reaches everyone.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet vill bygga upp digitala allmänningar med fri tillgång till mänsklighetens samlade kunskap och kultur, vilket är precis vad en snabbare digitalisering av kulturarvet syftar till. Valmanifestet slår dessutom fast att fiberutbyggnaden går för sakta och att staten behöver ta ett större ansvar för den, vilket täcker kravet på bredband i hela landet. Planen kräver också resurser till kulturen så att den kommer alla till del.
- digital commons with free accessdecisive»Vi vill bygga upp digitala allmänningar med fri tillgång« (party programme ↗)“We want to build up digital commons with free access”
- state responsibility for broadband expansion»Utbyggnaden av transportinfrastruktur och fiber går alldeles för sakta, staten behöver gå in och ta ett större ansvar för utbyggnaden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The expansion of transport infrastructure and fiber is going far too slowly, the state needs to step in and take greater responsibility for the expansion.”
- free access to knowledge and culture»till mänsklighetens samlade kunskap och kultur.« (party programme ↗)“to humanity's accumulated knowledge and culture.”
- good economic conditions for culture»Kulturpolitiken behöver skapa goda ekonomiska villkor för såväl« (party programme ↗)“Cultural policy needs to create good economic conditions for as well”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The party programme wants to connect digital technology's cross-border distribution with powerful investments in living culture, so that people throughout the country can participate in high-quality culture.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme wants to connect digital technology's cross-border distribution with powerful investments in living culture, so that people throughout the country can participate in high-quality culture. The counter-proposal's demand for faster digitization of cultural heritage, competence among responsible actors and broadband throughout the country is precisely that path. The election manifesto's investment in digitization strengthens the conclusion.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet vill binda samman den digitala teknikens gränsöverskridande distribution med kraftfulla satsningar på den levande kulturen, så att människor i hela landet kan ta del av kultur av hög klass. Motförslagets krav på snabbare digitalisering av kulturarvet, kompetens hos ansvariga aktörer och bredband i hela landet är precis den vägen. Valmanifestets satsning på digitalisering stärker slutsatsen.
- digital distribution of culturedecisive»gränsöverskridande distribution med kraftfulla satsningar på den levande kulturen.« (party programme ↗)“cross-border distribution with powerful investments in living culture.”
- cultural access throughout the country»möjligheterna handlar om att människor i hela landet kan ta del av konst och kultur av hög« (party programme ↗)“the possibilities are about people throughout the country being able to participate in art and culture of high”
- investment in digitization»Vi vill satsa på grön teknik, digitalisering och utbildning så att företagsklimatet stärks och kompetensförsörjningen förbättras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to invest in green technology, digitization and education so that the business climate is strengthened and skills supply is improved.”
- living cultural life»Sverige ska ha ett levande, fritt och obundet kulturliv som både stärker samhörigheten och utmanar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden shall have a living, free and unbound cultural life that both strengthens togetherness and challenges.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants digital technology to be used best to spread culture and that culturally and historically valuable buildings and environments are preserved for the future.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants digital technology to be used best to spread culture and that culturally and historically valuable buildings and environments are preserved for the future. Faster digitalization of the Church's cultural heritage and resources for necessary expertise serve both these commitments. The plan also sees broadband expansion as crucial, which directly supports the counter-proposal's demand for broadband nationwide.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill att digital teknik används på bästa sätt för att sprida kultur och att kulturhistoriskt värdefulla byggnader och miljöer bevaras för framtiden. Snabbare digitalisering av det kyrkliga kulturarvet och resurser för nödvändig kompetens tjänar båda dessa åtaganden. Planen ser dessutom bredbandsutbyggnad som avgörande, vilket direkt stöder motförslagets krav på bredband i hela landet.
- digital spreading of culturedecisive»Digital teknik ska användas på bästa sätt för att sprida kultur.« (party programme ↗)“Digital technology should be used best to spread culture.”
- broadband nationwide»Bredbandsutbyggnad är av avgörande betydelse för en levande landsbygd.« (party programme ↗)“Broadband expansion is of crucial importance for a thriving countryside.”
- preserve culturally historical environments»Kulturhistorisk värdefulla byggnader, minnesmärken och andra miljöer, såväl i städerna som på landsbygden, bör bevaras och vårdas för framtiden.« (party programme ↗)“Culturally and historically valuable buildings, monuments and other environments, both in cities and countryside, should be preserved and maintained for the future.”
- make cultural heritage accessible»De statliga kulturinstitutionerna ska ha ett tydligt uppdrag att tillgängliggöra sin verksamhet i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“The state cultural institutions shall have a clear mandate to make their activities accessible throughout the country.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto promises broadband, mobile telephony and internet access throughout the country, and the party programme makes digitization on equal terms a prerequisite for democracy.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto promises broadband, mobile telephony and internet access throughout the country, and the party programme makes digitization on equal terms a prerequisite for democracy. Together with the commitment to care for and provide culture throughout the country, the plan supports that digitization of the church's cultural heritage be driven faster and that broadband be expanded to make it accessible.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet lovar bredband, mobiltelefoni och surf i hela landet, och partiprogrammet gör digitalisering på lika villkor till en förutsättning för demokrati. Tillsammans med åtagandet att vårda kulturarvet och tillhandahålla kultur i hela landet stöder planen att digitaliseringen av det kyrkliga kulturarvet drivs snabbare och att bredbandet byggs ut för att göra det tillgängligt.
- broadband throughout the countrydecisive»Alla ska ha tillgång till bredband, mobiltelefoni och surf i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Everyone should have access to broadband, mobile telephony and internet access throughout the country.”
- digitization on equal terms»Digitalisering på lika villkor, oavsett var man bor, är en förutsättning för demokrati och möjliggör decentralisering.« (party programme ↗)“Digitization on equal terms, regardless of where one lives, is a prerequisite for democracy and enables decentralization.”
- care for cultural heritage»att vårda och utveckla ett kulturarv« (party programme ↗)“to care for and develop a cultural heritage”
- culture throughout the country»Att tillhandahålla kultur i hela landet är en viktig utgångspunkt för Centerpartiet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Providing culture throughout the country is an important starting point for the Centre Party.”
The plan states that new technology increases access to culture and requires that cultural heritage be kept accessible for future generations.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that new technology increases access to culture and requires that cultural heritage be kept accessible for future generations. It also establishes the principle that all public functions that can be made digitally accessible at reasonable cost shall also be made so, and wants the state if necessary to co-finance IT expansion in sparsely populated areas. Faster digitalization of church cultural heritage and broadband throughout the country therefore follow from the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen konstaterar att ny teknik ökar tillgängligheten till kultur och kräver att kulturarvet hålls tillgängligt för kommande generationer. Den slår också fast principen att alla offentliga funktioner som till rimlig kostnad kan göras digitalt tillgängliga också ska göras det, och vill att staten vid behov medfinansierar IT-utbyggnad i glesbygd. Snabbare digitalisering av det kyrkliga kulturarvet och bredband i hela landet följer därför av planen.
- digital accessibility as principledecisive»En central princip är därför att alla offentliga funktioner som till en rimlig kostnad kan göras digitalt tillgängliga också ska göras digitalt tillgängliga.« (party programme ↗)“A central principle is therefore that all public functions that at a reasonable cost can be made digitally accessible shall also be made digitally accessible.”
- technology increases cultural access»Den nya tekniken ökar tillgängligheten till kultur.« (party programme ↗)“New technology increases access to culture.”
- expanded IT infrastructure»Sverige ska vara en föregångare vad gäller IT-infrastruktur.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden shall be a leader in IT infrastructure.”
- state co-financing of broadband»För att kompensera för höga utbyggnadskostnader i dessa områden, ska staten vid behov medfinansiera denna utbyggnad.« (party programme ↗)“To compensate for high expansion costs in these areas, the state shall if necessary co-finance this expansion.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan makes cultural heritage a stewardship responsibility that explicitly includes cultural-historical buildings and objects, and cultural policy should preserve the heritage left by earlier generations.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan makes cultural heritage a stewardship responsibility that explicitly includes cultural-historical buildings and objects, and cultural policy should preserve the heritage left by earlier generations. The party programme also emphasises that reliable electronic communications with high performance are a prerequisite for regional balance and that the state is responsible for the investment level in that infrastructure. The counter-proposal's demand for faster digitisation of the church's cultural heritage and expanded broadband throughout the country therefore follows from the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen gör kulturarvet till ett förvaltarskapsansvar som uttryckligen omfattar kulturhistorisk bebyggelse och föremål, och kulturpolitiken ska ta tillvara det arv tidigare generationer lämnat. Partiprogrammet slår samtidigt fast att tillförlitliga elektroniska kommunikationer med hög prestanda är en förutsättning för regional balans och att staten ansvarar för investeringsnivån i den infrastrukturen. Motförslagets krav på snabbare digitalisering av det kyrkliga kulturarvet och utbyggt bredband i hela landet följer därför av planen.
- preserve cultural heritagedecisive»En god kulturpolitik måste sträva efter att ta tillvara det värdefulla kulturella arv« (party programme ↗)“Good cultural policy must strive to preserve the valuable cultural heritage”
- tangible cultural heritage to manage»vi ser i form av till exempel kulturhistorisk bebyggelse, fornlämningar och föremål« (party programme ↗)“we see in the form of for example cultural-historical buildings, ancient monuments and objects”
- reliable electronic communications»tillförlitliga elektroniska kommunikationer med hög prestanda är en« (party programme ↗)“reliable electronic communications with high performance are a”
- state responsibility for infrastructure»att investeringsnivån i kommunikationssystemens infrastruktur« (party programme ↗)“that the investment level in communication systems infrastructure”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan explicitly commits to classifying broadband as national infrastructure and prioritizing accordingly, so that everyone in the country can connect, which is a key part of the counter-proposal's demand for accessible digital cultural heritage.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly commits to classifying broadband as national infrastructure and prioritizing accordingly, so that everyone in the country can connect, which is a key part of the counter-proposal's demand for accessible digital cultural heritage. The plan is also based on Sweden's Christian cultural heritage being managed. The fact that public funding and political ambitions constitute a risk qualifies but does not override this. The demand is supported.
Original (Swedish)
Planen åtar sig uttryckligen att klassa bredband som nationell infrastruktur och prioritera därefter, så att alla i landet kan koppla upp sig, vilket är en bärande del av motförslagets krav på tillgängliggjort digitalt kulturarv. Planen bygger dessutom på att Sveriges kristna kulturarv ska förvaltas. Att offentlig finansiering och politiska ambitioner utgör en risk kvalificerar men upphäver inte detta. Kravet stöds.
- broadband as national infrastructuredecisive»Klassa bredband som nationell infrastruktur och prioritera därefter« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Classify broadband as national infrastructure and prioritize accordingly”
- broadband throughout the country»Bredband måste finnas så att alla har samma möjligheter att koppla upp sig mot en vårdcentral eller att jobba hemifrån.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Broadband must be available so that everyone has the same opportunity to connect to a health centre or work from home.”
- Christian cultural heritage»Sverige är format av ett kristet socialt och kulturellt arv som« (party programme ↗)“Sweden is shaped by a Christian social and cultural heritage that”
- risk with political cultural control»offentlig finansiering och politiska ambitioner utgör en risk« (party programme ↗)“public funding and political ambitions constitute a risk”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto explicitly undertakes to invest in broadband expansion throughout the country and regrets that rural areas are falling behind, which is precisely what the counter-proposal requires for making cultural heritage accessible.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly undertakes to invest in broadband expansion throughout the country and regrets that rural areas are falling behind, which is precisely what the counter-proposal requires for making cultural heritage accessible. The party programme additionally establishes that preservation of the Christian cultural heritage concerns all Swedes, and the election manifesto wants to protect, care for and showcase Swedish culture. Faster digitisation of the church's cultural heritage thus aligns with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet åtar sig uttryckligen att satsa på utbyggnad av bredband i hela landet och beklagar att landsbygden halkar efter, vilket är just det som motförslaget kräver för att göra kulturarvet tillgängligt. Partiprogrammet slår dessutom fast att bevarandet av det kristna kulturarvet angår alla svenskar, och valmanifestet vill värna, vårda och visa svensk kultur. Snabbare digitalisering av det kyrkliga kulturarvet ligger därmed i linje med planen.
- broadband throughout the countrydecisive»Satsa på utbyggnad av bredband och telefoni i hela landet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Invest in broadband and telephony expansion throughout the country”
- rural broadband»Sverigedemokraterna ser med oro på hur landsbygden halkar efter i bredbandsutbyggnaden« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats view with concern how rural areas are falling behind in broadband expansion”
- church cultural heritage matters»Bevarandet av detta kulturarv är således en angelägenhet för alla svenskar« (party programme ↗)“Preservation of this cultural heritage is thus a matter for all Swedes”
- protect Swedish culture»Sverigedemokraterna vill värna, vårda och visa svensk kultur.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats want to protect, care for and showcase Swedish culture.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2024/25:KrU5)
- Committee report full text (HC01KrU5)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:1022 — Ett levande fäbodbruk av Anders W Jonsson (C)
- Motion 2024/25:108 — Museum för varvs- och industrihistoria i Göteborg av Björn Tidland (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:109 — Avveckling av Världskulturmuseet och inrättande av ett museum för runstenar av Björn Tidland (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:110 — Bevarandeprogram för runstenar av Björn Tidland (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1201 — Finansiering av utgrävningar i Uppåkra av Niels Paarup-Petersen (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1212 — Det kristna kulturarvet i Turkiet av Yusuf Aydin (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1277 — Kyrkoantikvarisk ersättning av Mirja Räihä m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:1321 — Politik för tornedalingar, kväner och lantalaiset av Jan Riise m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:1337 — Kulturmiljöer av Runar Filper m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1347 — Arkitekturfrågor av Anna-Lena Hedberg m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:136 — Åtgärder för att motverka antisemitism av Magnus Jacobsson (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1370 — Skog, skogsbruk och ekonomi av Martin Kinnunen m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1373 — Livsmedel av Martin Kinnunen m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1384 — Konsumentpolitik av Mikael Eskilandersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1395 — Jordbruk - ökad konkurrenskraft utan förlust av biologisk mångfald av Martin Kinnunen m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1416 — Trossamfundsfrågor av Alexander Christiansson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1417 — Svenskt kulturarv av Runar Filper m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1421 — Nationella minoriteter och urfolk i Sverige av Michael Rubbestad m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1422 — Museifrågor av Runar Filper m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1435 — Stöd till utsatta grupper av Rasmus Giertz m.fl. (SD)
Source: The Swedish Parliament