2025-06-172024/25:MJU21 · p.14MJUEnvironment & agriculture
Implementation of the Water Directive
Implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive
What's at stake: The outcome affects how quickly treatment plants can be expanded to remove more nutrients and pharmaceutical residues, with implications for both water quality and the treatment plants and activities currently constrained by the directive's requirements.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether Sweden should work to change the design of the Water Framework Directive and allow exemptions that make it easier to expand treatment capacity for pharmaceutical residues, or whether the current rules and ongoing agency work should stand.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee welcomes the government's active work to increase the pace of measures for implementing the water directive while safeguarding Swedish competitiveness, sees no reason to preempt the outcome of the ongoing work, and has not changed its view on restructuring the water management authorities, so the motions are opposed and left without further action.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 22 (SD)
The reservation (SD) wants the government to work to change the water directive so that treatment plants and other environmentally protective activities can always be permitted to expand, with reasonable exemptions and national self-determination for member states' permitting authorities, arguing that the directive in its current form blocks investment in technology to remove pharmaceutical residues and favours less efficient facilities.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 22 by SD.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The division would have tied — and been settled by lot
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: CCenterpartiet, MModeraterna
Ja 224–64Tied 144–144
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 20/0/0/4 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| S | No | Yes 93/0/0/13 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | Yes | Abstain 0/0/15/3 | differs | confidence: low | derived |
| C | No | Yes 21/0/0/3 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | No | Yes 59/0/0/9 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| SD | No | No 0/63/0/9 | match | confidence: high | derived |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2024/25:1153 by Camilla Brodin et al. (KD) motions 2 and 3, 2024/25:1372 by Martin Kinnunen et al. (SD) motions 27, 30 and 31, 2024/25:1457 by Tobias Andersson et al. (SD) motion 10 and 2024/25:3037 by Daniel Helldén et al. (MP) motions 126 and 193.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:1153 av Camilla Brodin m.fl. (KD) yrkandena 2 och 3, 2024/25:1372 av Martin Kinnunen m.fl. (SD) yrkandena 27, 30 och 31, 2024/25:1457 av Tobias Andersson m.fl. (SD) yrkande 10 och 2024/25:3037 av Daniel Helldén m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 126 och 193.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag approved the establishment of the Nämdö archipelago national park in Värmdö municipality. The purpose of the proposal is to preserve a marine and archipelago landscape that is diverse and representative of the Baltic Sea. The national park will become Sweden's first marine national park in the Baltic Sea. The Riksdag also rejected approximately 180 proposals in motions from the ordinary motion period 2024, mainly referring to already taken or ongoing measures. The motions deal with, among other things, area protection, marine environment issues, species protection and invasive alien species.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to implement increased monitoring and reporting of nutrient leakage to combat eutrophication. (SD) — Reservation 22
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan considers that EU law contains unreasonable limitations on member states' right to carry out the policy they want and wants Sweden to challenge the supranational rules.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan considers that EU law contains unreasonable limitations on member states' right to carry out the policy they want and wants Sweden to challenge the supranational rules. The counter-proposal's demand for national self-determination for permit authorities and for environmental protection installations such as sewage treatment always being able to be expanded aligns with that and aims at better cleaning of pharmaceutical residues. At the same time, the plan requires sharp environmental legislation, which makes the assessment uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Planen anser att EU-rätten innehåller orimliga begränsningar av medlemsländernas rätt att genomföra den politik de vill och vill att Sverige utmanar de överstatliga reglerna. Motförslagets krav på nationellt självbestämmande för tillståndsmyndigheter och på att miljöskyddande anläggningar som reningsverk alltid ska kunna byggas ut ligger i linje med det och syftar till bättre rening av läkemedelsrester. Samtidigt kräver planen skarp miljölagstiftning, vilket gör bedömningen osäker.
- EU limits democratic decisionsdecisive»EU-rätten innehåller orimliga begränsningar av medlemsländernas« (party programme ↗)“EU law contains unreasonable limitations on member states'”
- challenge supranational rules»Vi vill att Sverige utmanar EU:s överstatliga fördrag och lagar« (party programme ↗)“We want Sweden to challenge the EU's supranational treaties and laws”
- inter-state minimum rules»en bättre väg att gå än överstatliga beslut.« (party programme ↗)“a better path to take than supranational decisions.”
- sharp environmental legislation»miljömål som följs upp med skarp lagstiftning och praktiskt arbete.« (party programme ↗)“environmental targets followed up with sharp legislation and practical work.”
flags: generella undantag riskerar att försvaga vattenskyddet
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme's goal of a toxic-free environment with clean water throughout Sweden speaks for investments in purification of pharmaceutical residues being able to be carried out, and the election manifesto demands that slow permit processes be expedited.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme's goal of a toxic-free environment with clean water throughout Sweden speaks for investments in purification of pharmaceutical residues being able to be carried out, and the election manifesto demands that slow permit processes be expedited. The counter-proposal wants precisely that environmental protection facilities always be allowed to expand. The plan does not address the Water Directive's exemption rules, hence derived coverage.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammets mål om en giftfri miljö med rent vatten i hela Sverige talar för att investeringar i rening av läkemedelsrester ska kunna genomföras, och valmanifestet kräver att långsamma tillståndsprocesser snabbas på. Motförslaget vill just att miljöskyddande anläggningar alltid ska kunna tillåtas byggas ut. Planen behandlar inte vattendirektivets undantagsregler, därav härledd täckning.
- clean water throughout Swedendecisive»Giftfri miljö med ren luft och rent vatten i hela Sverige.« (party programme ↗)“Toxic-free environment with clean air and clean water throughout Sweden.”
- faster permit processes»Långsamma tillståndsprocesser ska snabbas på.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Slow permit processes shall be expedited.”
- protection of water environments»Värn av biologisk mångfald och Sveriges värdefulla natur och vattenmiljöer.« (party programme ↗)“Protection of biological diversity and Sweden's valuable nature and water environments.”
- national determination»För andra frågor, som exempelvis skatter, ska den nationella bestämmanderätten vara kvar.« (party programme ↗)“For other issues, such as taxes, national determination shall remain.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants Sweden to work through the EU for all countries around shared waters to introduce measures against emissions, and that member states should be allowed to go ahead with stricter environmental legislation — not water down the directive with general exemptions and national self-determination for permit authorities.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants Sweden to work through the EU for all countries around shared waters to introduce measures against emissions, and that member states should be allowed to go ahead with stricter environmental legislation — not water down the directive with general exemptions and national self-determination for permit authorities. The demand for reduced pharmaceutical residues is shared, but the counter-proposal's method of amending the directive goes against the plan's line.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill att Sverige verkar genom EU för att alla länder kring gemensamma vatten inför åtgärder mot utsläpp, och att medlemsländer ska få gå före med hårdare miljölagstiftning — inte urvattna direktivet med generella undantag och nationellt självbestämmande för tillståndsmyndigheter. Kravet på minskade läkemedelsrester delas, men motförslagets metod att ändra direktivet går emot planens linje.
- common water requirements via EUdecisive»Sverige måste verka genom internationella organisationer, i synnerhet EU, för att alla länder runt gemensamma vatten ska införa dessa åtgärder.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden must work through international organizations, especially the EU, for all countries around shared waters to introduce these measures.”
- go ahead, not fall behind»Medlemsländerna måste få rätt att gå före med hårdare lagstiftning till skydd för miljö och hälsa även om det strider mot EU:s inre marknad.« (party programme ↗)“Member states must have the right to go ahead with stricter legislation to protect environment and health even if it conflicts with the EU's internal market.”
- clean water as a fundamental condition»Rent vatten är en förutsättning för att kunna bevara den biologiska mångfalden.« (party programme ↗)“Clean water is a prerequisite for being able to preserve biological diversity.”
- reduced pharmaceutical residues»Utsläpp av miljöstörande ämnen såsom kväve, fosfor, läkemedelsrester, hormonstörande ämnen, tungmetaller och nanopartiklar ska reduceras« (party programme ↗)“Emissions of environmentally harmful substances such as nitrogen, phosphorus, pharmaceutical residues, hormone-disrupting substances, heavy metals and nanoparticles should be reduced”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto states that the climate cannot wait for expensive and complicated rule systems and wants to halve permit times for green investments and give environmental benefit greater weight in assessment.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto states that the climate cannot wait for expensive and complicated rule systems and wants to halve permit times for green investments and give environmental benefit greater weight in assessment. The counter-proposal's demand that treatment plants and other environmental protection activities can always be expanded, with reasonable exceptions and national discretion, is the same commitment. The plan's promise to save lakes, watercourses and seas also carries the demand for investments against pharmaceutical residues.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår fast att klimatet inte kan vänta på dyra och krångliga regelverk och vill halvera tillståndstiderna för gröna investeringar samt ge miljönyttan större vikt i prövningen. Motförslagets krav på att reningsverk och andra miljöskyddande verksamheter alltid ska kunna byggas ut, med rimliga undantag och nationellt handlingsutrymme, är samma åtagande. Planens löfte att rädda sjöar, vattendrag och hav bär också kravet på investeringar mot läkemedelsrester.
- faster assessment of environmentally beneficial projectsdecisive»Det är dags att halvera tiden det tar att få tillstånd för gröna investeringar och reformera miljöbalken så att ett projekts klimatnytta ges större vikt i miljöprövningen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is time to halve the time it takes to get permits for green investments and reform the Environmental Code so that a project's climate benefit is given greater weight in environmental assessment.”
- rules must not hinder environmental benefit»Klimatet kan inte vänta på dyra och krångliga regelverk.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The climate cannot wait for expensive and complicated rule systems.”
- cleaner water»Rädda Sveriges sjöar, vattendrag och hav. Våra barn ska kunna bada utan att utsättas för gifter, nedskräpning eller algblomning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Save Sweden's lakes, watercourses and seas. Our children should be able to swim without being exposed to poisons, pollution or algal blooms.”
- national discretion»Principen måste vara att beslut fattas så nära medborgaren som möjligt och att endast de beslut som måste fattas gemensamt beslutas på EU-nivå.« (party programme ↗)“The principle must be that decisions are made as close to the citizen as possible and that only decisions that must be made jointly are decided at EU level.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan requires continued efforts to prevent pollutants such as pharmaceuticals from spreading in our water and that waste policy prevents pharmaceutical residues from reaching nature.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires continued efforts to prevent pollutants such as pharmaceuticals from spreading in our water and that waste policy prevents pharmaceutical residues from reaching nature. A regulatory framework that prevents expansion of treatment plants thereby counters the plan's own goals, and the plan sees technical development as a central part of the solution to environmental problems. The counter-proposal's demand to amend the directive so that environmentally protective facilities can always be expanded thereby aligns with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver fortsatta insatser för att förhindra att föroreningar som läkemedel sprids i våra vatten och att avfallspolitiken hindrar läkemedelsrester från att nå naturen. Ett regelverk som hindrar utbyggnad av reningsverk motverkar därmed planens egna mål, och planen ser teknisk utveckling som en central del av lösningen på miljöproblemen. Motförslagets krav på att ändra direktivet så att miljöskyddande anläggningar alltid kan byggas ut ligger därför i linje med planen.
- stop pharmaceuticals in waterdecisive»Samtidigt behövs fortsatta insatser för att förhindra att skräp och föroreningar, som plast och läkemedel, sprids i våra vatten.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“At the same time continued efforts are needed to prevent rubbish and pollutants, such as plastic and pharmaceuticals, from spreading in our water.”
- dangerous substances out of nature»Avfallspolitiken måste förebygga och förhindra att tungmetaller, läkemedelsrester och andra« (party programme ↗)“Waste policy must prevent and stop heavy metals, pharmaceutical residues and other”
- right to clean water»Alla har rätt till rent vatten.« (party programme ↗)“Everyone has the right to clean water.”
- technology solves environmental problems»Teknisk utveckling är en central del av lösningen på dagens miljöproblem.« (party programme ↗)“Technical development is a central part of the solution to today's environmental problems.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires that environmental policy is so flexible that each country and region can adapt measures according to its unique conditions and that the EU's tasks are delimited to prevent unwelcome centralization, which supports the requirement for reasonable exceptions and national self-determination for licensing authorities.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that environmental policy is so flexible that each country and region can adapt measures according to its unique conditions and that the EU's tasks are delimited to prevent unwelcome centralization, which supports the requirement for reasonable exceptions and national self-determination for licensing authorities. That treatment plants should be able to be expanded meets the plan's principle that the polluter pays and the protection of clean water. The plan does not mention the water directive, so the conclusion is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att miljöpolitiken är så flexibel att varje land och region kan anpassa åtgärder efter sina unika förhållanden och att EU:s uppgifter avgränsas för att förhindra ovälkommen centralisering, vilket bär kravet på rimliga undantag och nationellt självbestämmande för tillståndsmyndigheterna. Att reningsverk ska kunna byggas ut svarar mot planens princip att förorenaren betalar och mot skyddet av rent vatten. Planen nämner inte vattendirektivet, så slutsatsen är härledd.
- adaptation according to local conditionsdecisive»så flexibel att varje land och region kan anpassa åtgärder efter sina unika förhållanden.« (party programme ↗)“so flexible that each country and region can adapt measures according to its unique conditions.”
- delimited EU powers»En avgränsning av EU:s uppgifter är nödvändig för att« (party programme ↗)“A delimitation of the EU's tasks is necessary to”
- the polluter pays»förorenaren betalar, bör vara centrala i miljöarbetet« (party programme ↗)“the polluter pays, should be central in environmental work”
- stewardship of water resources»Miljön och naturresurserna måste förvaltas ansvarsfullt, så att goda livsbetingelser inte äventyras och så att kommande generationer också får del av dem.« (party programme ↗)“The environment and natural resources must be managed responsibly, so that good living conditions are not jeopardized and so that future generations also benefit from them.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The counter-proposal wants to amend the water directive so that water treatment facilities and other environmental protection facilities can always be expanded, with reasonable exceptions and national discretion.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wants to amend the water directive so that water treatment facilities and other environmental protection facilities can always be expanded, with reasonable exceptions and national discretion. The plan explicitly commits to investing in water treatment research and expansion of advanced water treatment, which requires that the licensing rules do not block such investments. The plan also wants to prevent over-implementation of EU decisions and allow decisions to be made at the lowest possible level.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill ändra vattendirektivet så att reningsverk och andra miljöskyddande anläggningar alltid kan byggas ut, med rimliga undantag och nationellt handlingsutrymme. Planen åtar sig uttryckligen att satsa på forskning om vattenrening och utbyggnad av avancerad vattenrening, vilket förutsätter att tillståndsreglerna inte blockerar sådana investeringar. Planen vill dessutom motverka överimplementering av EU-beslut och låta beslut fattas på lägsta möjliga nivå.
- expanded advanced water treatmentdecisive»Satsa på forskning om vattenrening samt utbyggnad av avancerad vattenrening« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Invest in water treatment research and expansion of advanced water treatment”
- against over-implementation»Minska regelkrånglet och onödig byråkrati, bland annat genom att motverka överimplementering i Sverige av EU-beslut« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce red tape and unnecessary bureaucracy, inter alia by preventing over-implementation in Sweden of EU decisions”
- national discretion»Beslut ska fattas på lägsta möjliga nivå, så nära medborgarna som möjligt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Decisions shall be made at the lowest possible level, as close to citizens as possible.”
- cleaner water environment»Förstärka det gemensamma Östersjöarbetet för åtgärder mot övergödning och nedskräpning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen the joint Baltic work for measures against eutrophication and littering”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan requires that EU rules become fewer and more flexible based on each member state's conditions and that national self-determination be strengthened.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that EU rules become fewer and more flexible based on each member state's conditions and that national self-determination be strengthened. Working for the Water Framework Directive to be changed so that treatment plants can always be expanded and that permit authorities be given national room follows from this. The plan additionally wants to streamline permit processes and simultaneously increase pace in work on the sea environment, which expanded treatment serves.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att EU-reglerna blir färre och mer flexibla utifrån varje medlemsstats förhållanden och att det nationella självbestämmandet stärks. Att verka för att vattendirektivet ändras så att reningsverk alltid kan byggas ut och att tillståndsmyndigheterna får nationellt utrymme följer av det. Planen vill dessutom effektivisera tillståndsprocesserna och samtidigt öka takten i arbetet med havsmiljön, vilket en utbyggd rening tjänar.
- more flexible EU rulesdecisive»EU-reglerna måste bli färre och mer flexibla utifrån varje medlemsstats unika landskap, tradition och standarder.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“EU rules must become fewer and more flexible based on each member state's unique landscape, tradition and standards.”
- national self-determination»Stärka det nationella självbestämmandet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen national self-determination”
- effective permit processes»Effektivisera och öka förutsägbarheten i tillståndsprocesserna för gruvnäring, elnätsutbyggnad och industri« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Streamline and increase predictability in permit processes for mining, power grid expansion and industry”
- better sea environment»Öka takten i arbetet med att återställa havsmiljön i Östersjön« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase pace in work to restore the sea environment in the Baltic Sea”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2024/25:MJU21)
- Committee report full text (HC01MJU21)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:1026 — Översvämningsmygg vid nedre Dalälven av Anders W Jonsson och Catarina Deremar (båda C)
- Motion 2024/25:1027 — Myskoxens framtid i den svenska fjällvärlden av Anders W Jonsson (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1153 — Utveckla vattenkraftens möjligheter av Camilla Brodin m.fl. (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1190 — Sanering av Östersjön av Niels Paarup-Petersen (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1191 — Sveriges 13 sämsta lagar av Rickard Nordin och Niels Paarup-Petersen (båda C)
- Motion 2024/25:1196 — En plan för att göra Öresund till biosfärområde av Niels Paarup-Petersen (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1297 — Utsättning av myskoxe i den svenska fjällvärlden av Runar Filper (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1313 — Minskande av PFAS i vår närmiljö av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:1315 — Stärkande av naturen i våra stadsmiljöer av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:1369 — Svenskt fiske och vattenbruk av Martin Kinnunen m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1370 — Skog, skogsbruk och ekonomi av Martin Kinnunen m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1371 — Politik för stärkt äganderätt av Martin Kinnunen m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1372 — Marina miljöer och vattenvård av Martin Kinnunen m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1373 — Livsmedel av Martin Kinnunen m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1394 — Kemikaliepolitik av Martin Kinnunen m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1395 — Jordbruk - ökad konkurrenskraft utan förlust av biologisk mångfald av Martin Kinnunen m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1396 — Jakt- och viltvård av Mattias Eriksson Falk m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1457 — Mineralpolitik för en stark gruvnäring av Tobias Andersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1566 — Åtgärder för minskad vargstam av Daniel Bäckström (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1613 — Urholkning av äganderätten av Ulrika Heie (C)
Source: The Swedish Parliament