2025-04-092024/25:TU11 · p.9TUTransport & infrastructure

Parking matters

Municipal parking policy and parking in the archipelago

What's at stake: The outcome affects how parking spaces, fees and norms are designed locally, and whether residents of the archipelago and islands get more parking spaces, such as floating parking facilities, to make travel to and from the mainland easier.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether the Riksdag should take initiatives that steer municipalities' parking policy and parking access for island residents, or whether this should continue to be a matter for municipalities to decide without national initiatives.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee considers it a municipal matter to decide on parking availability, fees and norms, and sees no grounds for national initiatives on differentiated parking fees, parking norms or parking apps. The Riksdag therefore rejects the motions.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 18 (SD)

The reservation (SD) calls for more parking spaces to be built for residents of the archipelago and islands, including floating parking facilities where land is limited. The reasoning is that access to parking on the mainland is a major problem for island residents, and that such solutions could also help summer visitors, tradespeople and visitors while freeing up existing parking spaces.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 18 by SD.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VYesYes 20/0/0/4follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
SNoAbstain 0/0/93/13departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
MPYesAbstain 0/0/14/4departs from the planconfidence: lowderived
CNoAbstain 0/0/19/5departs from the planconfidence: lowderived
LNoYes 13/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: lowderived
KDNoYes 15/0/0/4departs from the planconfidence: lowderived
MNoYes 60/0/0/8departs from the planconfidence: lowderived
SDown reservationNoNo 0/62/0/10follows the planconfidence: mediumderived

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects the motions 2024/25:609 by Jimmy Ståhl and Dennis Dioukarev (both SD), 2024/25:736 by Magnus Manhammar (S), 2024/25:990 by Rickard Nordin (C) demand 7, 2024/25:1425 by Thomas Morell et al. (SD) demand 14, 2024/25:1689 by Hans Ekström (S), 2024/25:1854 by Kristina Axén Olin et al. (M), 2024/25:2063 by Niels Paarup-Petersen et al. (C) demands 1 and 2, 2024/25:2947 by Ulrika Heie et al. (C) demand 100, 2024/25:3044 by Linus Lakso et al. (MP) demands 2 and 3 and 2024/25:3126 by Gunilla Svantorp et al. (S) demand 56.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:609 av Jimmy Ståhl och Dennis Dioukarev (båda SD), 2024/25:736 av Magnus Manhammar (S), 2024/25:990 av Rickard Nordin (C) yrkande 7, 2024/25:1425 av Thomas Morell m.fl. (SD) yrkande 14, 2024/25:1689 av Hans Ekström (S), 2024/25:1854 av Kristina Axén Olin m.fl. (M), 2024/25:2063 av Niels Paarup-Petersen m.fl. (C) yrkandena 1 och 2, 2024/25:2947 av Ulrika Heie m.fl. (C) yrkande 100, 2024/25:3044 av Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 2 och 3 samt 2024/25:3126 av Gunilla Svantorp m.fl. (S) yrkande 56.

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag says no to approximately 110 proposals in motions on road traffic and vehicle matters. The proposals were submitted during the general motion period 2024 and deal, among other things, with the work for a fossil-free vehicle fleet, charging infrastructure for electric vehicles, parking issues and winter maintenance of roads. The Riksdag mainly refers to the fact that work is already underway or has been completed within the areas covered by the proposals.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan does not address parking. The nearest lying principle is that urban planning as far as possible should avoid locking people into car…

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan does not address parking. The nearest lying principle is that urban planning as far as possible should avoid locking people into car dependency and that freedom of movement instead is secured through expanded and cheaper public transport throughout the country. New parking spaces, including floating ones, lie to the side of that line, even though the plan wants that the countryside is not drained.

Original (Swedish)

Planen behandlar inte parkering. Närmast liggande princip är att samhällsplaneringen så långt möjligt ska undvika att låsa människor i bilberoende och att rörelsefriheten i stället säkras genom utbyggd och billigare kollektivtrafik i hela landet. Nya parkeringsplatser, inklusive flytande, ligger vid sidan av den linjen, även om planen vill att landsbygden inte utarmas.

  • avoid car dependencydecisive»Vi vill se en samhällsplanering som så långt som möjligt undviker att låsa människor i bilberoende.« (party programme ↗)“We want to see urban planning that as far as possible avoids locking people into car dependency.”
  • expanded public transport»För att såväl öka alla människors rörelsefrihet som för att minska utsläppen av växthusgaser så behöver även kollektivtrafiken byggas ut och göras billigare och mer tillgänglig i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“To increase all people's freedom of movement as well as to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases, public transport also needs to be expanded and made cheaper and more accessible throughout the country.”
  • countryside shall not be drained»Oavsett var i landet vi bor så har vi ett gemensamt intresse av att landsbygden inte utarmas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Regardless of where in the country we live we have a shared interest in the countryside not being drained.”
SSocialdemokraternaNoAbstaindeparts from the plannot addressed

The documents do not address parking, but the election manifesto establishes that climate policy must never blame people who are dependent on the car and wants a travel allowance with a fairer rural profile, and the party programme that the whole country shall be able to live and develop.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The documents do not address parking, but the election manifesto establishes that climate policy must never blame people who are dependent on the car and wants a travel allowance with a fairer rural profile, and the party programme that the whole country shall be able to live and develop. More parking spaces for island residents follows from that principle. At the same time the plan wishes to restructure transport systems towards public transport, which pulls partly in the other direction.

Original (Swedish)

Dokumenten behandlar inte parkering, men valmanifestet slår fast att klimatpolitiken aldrig får skuldbelägga människor som är beroende av bilen och vill ha ett reseavdrag med rättvisare landsbygdsprofil, och partiprogrammet att hela landet ska kunna leva och utvecklas. Fler parkeringsplatser för öbor följer av den principen. Samtidigt vill planen lägga om transportsystemen mot kollektivtrafik, vilket drar delvis åt andra hållet.

  • consideration for car dependencedecisive»Klimatkrisen kan aldrig lösas med att skuldbelägga människor som behöver ta bilen till affären« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The climate crisis can never be solved by blaming people who need to take the car to the shop”
  • the whole country shall live»Alla har ett gemensamt intresse av att hela landet kan leva och utvecklas.« (party programme ↗)“Everyone has a common interest in the whole country being able to live and develop.”
  • fair rural profile»Ett nytt reseavdrag ska förbättra möjligheterna att få avdrag också för mer klimatsmarta resor, och med rättvisare landsbygdsprofil.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“A new travel allowance shall improve opportunities to receive deduction also for more climate-smart journeys, and with a fairer rural profile.”
  • restructured transport systems»Transportsystemen ska läggas om för mer gång-, cykel- och kollektivtrafik och så att« (party programme ↗)“Transport systems shall be restructured for more walking, cycling and public transport and so that”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MPMiljöpartietYesAbstaindeparts from the planderived

The plan wants to defend the right to public access to nature, strengthen shore protection and save the coast's ecosystem, which argues against building more parking spaces, not least floating ones, in coastal and archipelago environments.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to defend the right to public access to nature, strengthen shore protection and save the coast's ecosystem, which argues against building more parking spaces, not least floating ones, in coastal and archipelago environments. The plan at the same time recognizes that the car is often the main alternative outside cities and that parking is a municipal matter, which makes the position uncertain.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill försvara allemansrätten, stärka strandskyddet och rädda kustens ekosystem, vilket talar mot att anlägga fler parkeringsplatser, inte minst flytande, i kust- och skärgårdsmiljö. Planen erkänner samtidigt att bilen ofta är huvudalternativet utanför städerna och att parkering är en kommunal fråga, vilket gör ställningstagandet osäkert.

  • shore protectiondecisive»försvara allemansrätten och stärka strandskyddet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“defend the right to public access to nature and strengthen shore protection.”
  • protect the coast's ecosystem»rädda kustens ekosystem — återskapa förstörda miljöer .« (2022 manifesto ↗)“save the coast's ecosystem — recreate destroyed environments.”
  • car dependence outside cities»Många på landsbygden är beroende av bilen, även« (party programme ↗)“Many in rural areas depend on the car, even”
  • municipal matter»Beslut bör tas så nära medborgarna som möjligt.« (party programme ↗)“Decisions should be made as close to citizens as possible.”

flags: citat_migrerat

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

CCenterpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the planderived

The plan promises increased freedom, security and accessibility in all parts of Sweden and explicitly mentions better parking options as a means.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan promises increased freedom, security and accessibility in all parts of Sweden and explicitly mentions better parking options as a means. More parking spaces for residents in the archipelago follows that line about accessibility where distances are difficult. At the same time, the plan wants decisions made close to those affected, which speaks for municipal decision-making, so the support is derived and uncertain.

Original (Swedish)

Planen lovar ökad frihet, trygghet och tillgänglighet i alla delar av Sverige och nämner uttryckligen bättre parkeringsmöjligheter som ett medel. Fler parkeringsplatser för boende i skärgården följer den linjen om tillgänglighet där avstånden är svåra. Samtidigt vill planen att beslut fattas nära de berörda, vilket talar för kommunalt avgörande, så stödet är härlett och osäkert.

  • accessibility throughout the countrydecisive»Alla delar av Sverige ska se ökad frihet, trygghet och tillgänglighet nästa mandatperiod.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“All parts of Sweden shall see increased freedom, security and accessibility next term.”
  • better parking options»Elbilarna ska främjas med hjälp av fler laddplatser, differentierade trängselskatter som gynnar miljöbilar och bättre parkeringsmöjligheter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Electric cars should be promoted by means of more charging stations, differentiated congestion charges that favor eco-friendly cars and better parking options.”
  • reliable infrastructure everywhere»Hela landet ska ha tillgång till en pålitlig infrastruktur, snabbt bredband och pålitlig mobiltäckning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“All of the country should have access to reliable infrastructure, fast broadband and reliable mobile coverage.”
  • decisions close to those affected»Decentralisera mera. Människor ska få bestämma mer själva, och politiska beslut ska fattas nära dem som berörs.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Decentralize more. People should be able to decide more for themselves, and political decisions should be made close to those affected.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan does not address parking issues. The nearest principle is that transport policy must recognize the car's role outside cities and that good…

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan does not address parking issues. The nearest principle is that transport policy must recognize the car's role outside cities and that good communications bear people's freedom, which speaks for more parking options for islanders. The plan simultaneously states that such traffic charges and solutions should be decided at local or regional level, which makes the conclusion uncertain.

Original (Swedish)

Planen behandlar inte parkeringsfrågor. Närmast liggande princip är att transportpolitiken måste erkänna bilens roll utanför städerna och att goda kommunikationer bär människors frihet, vilket talar för fler parkeringsmöjligheter för öbor. Planen anger samtidigt att sådana trafikavgifter och lösningar bör beslutas på lokal eller regional nivå, vilket gör slutsatsen osäker.

  • car's role outside citiesdecisive»Transportpolitiken måste erkänna bilens roll på landsbygden.« (party programme ↗)“Transport policy must recognize the car's role in rural areas.”
  • good communications»Människors frihet och välstånd gynnas av goda kommunikationer.« (party programme ↗)“People's freedom and wellbeing are benefited by good communications.”
  • decision at local level»som ska beslutas på lokal eller regional nivå« (party programme ↗)“which shall be decided at local or regional level”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan establishes that access to car for many is a prerequisite for being able to live and work regardless of where in the country one lives, and the election manifesto lifts especially one who lives outside the major cities and is dependent on his car.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that access to car for many is a prerequisite for being able to live and work regardless of where in the country one lives, and the election manifesto lifts especially one who lives outside the major cities and is dependent on his car. More parking places for residents in the archipelago and on islands follow from that commitment. The plan's strong municipal self-determination means however that national initiatives shall be used with restraint.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att tillgång till bil för många är en förutsättning för att kunna leva och verka oavsett var i landet man bor, och valmanifestet lyfter särskilt den som bor utanför storstäderna och är beroende av sin bil. Fler parkeringsplatser för boende i skärgården och på öar följer av det åtagandet. Planens starka kommunala självstyrelse gör dock att nationella initiativ ska användas återhållsamt.

  • car's necessitydecisive»Tillgång till bil är för många en förutsättning för att« (party programme ↗)“Access to car is for many a prerequisite for being able to”
  • car dependent outside cities»Vi ser den som bor utanför storstäderna och är beroende av sin bil.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We see the one who lives outside the major cities and is dependent on his car.”
  • living Sweden»Hela Sverige ska fungera och det ska gå att bo och verka även utanför de stora städerna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The whole Sweden shall function and it shall be possible to live and work also outside the major cities.”
  • municipal self-rule»Den kommunala självstyrelsen ska vara stark« (party programme ↗)“Municipal self-determination shall be strong”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan does not address parking spaces for islanders.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan does not address parking spaces for islanders. The closest relevant commitments point in favour of the requirement in substance: the whole of Sweden shall work for the person who wants to live and work there, and the person who needs the car shall have the means and opportunity to use it. High-quality infrastructure is described as important in all parts of the country, while at the same time the plan thinks decisions should be made close to citizens. The plan therefore supports the requirement, but weakly.

Original (Swedish)

Planen behandlar inte parkeringsplatser för öbor. Närmast liggande åtaganden talar för kravet i sak: hela Sverige ska fungera för den som ska bo och verka där, och den som behöver bilen ska ha råd och möjlighet att använda den. Infrastruktur av hög kvalitet beskrivs som viktig i alla delar av landet, samtidigt som planen anser att beslut bör fattas nära medborgarna. Planen stöder därför kravet, men svagt.

  • the whole of Sweden shall workdecisive»Moderaterna vill ta vara på hela Sveriges möjligheter. Men ska det gå att bo och verka i hela Sverige måste också hela Sverige fungera.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Moderate Party wants to make use of all of Sweden's opportunities. But for it to be possible to live and work in the whole of Sweden, the whole of Sweden must also work.”
  • the car must be possible»Där du som behöver åka en bit för att skjutsa dina barn till fotbollsträningen eller musikskolan har råd att ta bilen, oavsett om den går på bensin eller el.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Where you who need to drive a bit to take your children to football practice or music lessons can afford to take the car, regardless of whether it runs on petrol or electricity.”
  • infrastructure throughout the country»En infrastruktur av hög kvalitet är viktig för jobb och tillväxt i alla delar av landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“High-quality infrastructure is important for jobs and growth in all parts of the country.”
  • decisions close to citizens»Beslut ska fattas på lägsta möjliga nivå, så nära medborgarna som möjligt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Decisions shall be made at the lowest possible level, as close to citizens as possible.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SDSverigedemokraternaNoNofollows the planderived

The plan establishes that the countryside primarily exists for those who live and work there and that mobility is fundamental in smaller places with long distances.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that the countryside primarily exists for those who live and work there and that mobility is fundamental in smaller places with long distances. It explicitly wants to improve conditions for car commuting outside major cities. More parking spaces for residents in archipelago and on islands follow from these commitments, although the plan does not mention parking.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att landsbygden i första hand finns till för dem som bor och verkar där och att mobilitet är grundläggande i mindre orter med långa avstånd. Den vill uttryckligen förbättra förutsättningarna för bilpendling utanför storstäderna. Fler parkeringsplatser för boende i skärgård och på öar följer av dessa åtaganden, även om planen inte nämner parkering.

  • bilpendling på landsbygdendecisive»Förbättra förutsättningarna för bilpendling, framförallt på landsbygden« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Improve conditions for car commuting, above all in the countryside”
  • landsbygdens boende först»Landsbygden finns i första hand till för de människor som bor och verkar här och inte för att storstadsborna ska ha någonstans att vistas på semestern eller som en tillflyktsort för människor som tröttnat på den urbana kulturen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The countryside primarily exists for the people who live and work here and not for city dwellers to have somewhere to spend their holidays or as a refuge for people tired of urban culture.”
  • mobilitet i mindre orter»Mobilitet är grundläggande för att människor ska kunna leva och verka i mindre orter där avstånden till jobb och offentlig service är längre.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Mobility is fundamental for people to be able to live and work in smaller places where distances to work and public services are longer.”
  • kommunalt självstyre»Vi betraktar det kommunala självbestämmandet som en central del av demokratin« (party programme ↗)“We view municipal self-determination as a central part of democracy”

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament