2024-03-062023/24:UbU15 · p.5UbUEducation
Special Research Initiatives and Collaborations
Special research investments and collaborations
What's at stake: The decision affects how limited research funding is distributed across different fields, and whether currently under-researched areas such as PFAS remediation and women's diseases receive earmarked support or compete for funding on the same terms as other research.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether parliament should direct the government toward special research investments and collaborations in specific areas, such as PFAS remediation and women's diseases, through formal calls, or whether such priorities should instead be set within the ordinary research and budget bills on a scientific basis.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee stresses that the direction of research investments and the grants that govern research funding are prepared through the research and innovation policy bill and the budget bill, and that research funding should be allocated on the basis of a scientific assessment. On this basis, the committee rejects the motions on special research investments and collaborations.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 10 (MP)
The reservation wants the government's upcoming research and innovation policy bill to prioritise research, development and deployment of techniques for removing PFAS from soil and water, and to invest more resources in expanding knowledge about women's diseases, arguing that PFAS remediation methods are not yet validated and that women's diseases have historically been under-researched, leaving many to fight for years to get a correct diagnosis and treatment.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 10 by MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: CCenterpartiet, MModeraterna
Ja 221–15Ja 142–94
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 20/0/0/4 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| S | No | Yes 92/0/1/13 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| MP | No | No 0/15/0/3 | match | confidence: high | derived |
| C | No | Yes 19/0/0/5 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| L | No | Yes 13/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: low | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | No | Yes 60/0/0/8 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: medium | explicit |
| SD | No | Abstain 0/0/61/11 | differs | confidence: high | explicit |
Broke with the party line
| SLinnéa Wickman (S, Gävleborgs län) | Abstain — party line: Yes |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2023/24:386 by Michael Rubbestad et al. (SD) demand 5, 2023/24:392 by Clara Aranda et al. (SD) demand 24, 2023/24:402 by Beatrice Timgren et al. (SD) demand 30, 2023/24:497 by Rashid Farivar et al. (SD) demand 5, 2023/24:679 by Emma Berginger et al. (MP) demand 3, 2023/24:687 by Katarina Luhr et al. (MP) demand 10, 2023/24:1020 by Josef Fransson (SD), 2023/24:1429 by Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M), 2023/24:1733 by Joar Forssell (L), 2023/24:1823 by Monica Haider (S), 2023/24:2001 by Sofie Eriksson (S), 2023/24:2063 by Carina Ståhl Herrstedt et al. (SD) demand 6, 2023/24:2069 by Carina Ståhl Herrstedt et al. (SD) demands 4 and 17, 2023/24:2076 by Carina Ståhl Herrstedt et al. (SD) demand 2, 2023/24:2566 by Jytte Guteland et al. (S), 2023/24:2664 by Janine Alm Ericson et al. (MP) demand 46 and 2023/24:2736 by Rickard Nordin (C) demand 7.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2023/24:386 av Michael Rubbestad m.fl. (SD) yrkande 5, 2023/24:392 av Clara Aranda m.fl. (SD) yrkande 24, 2023/24:402 av Beatrice Timgren m.fl. (SD) yrkande 30, 2023/24:497 av Rashid Farivar m.fl. (SD) yrkande 5, 2023/24:679 av Emma Berginger m.fl. (MP) yrkande 3, 2023/24:687 av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP) yrkande 10, 2023/24:1020 av Josef Fransson (SD), 2023/24:1429 av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M), 2023/24:1733 av Joar Forssell (L), 2023/24:1823 av Monica Haider (S), 2023/24:2001 av Sofie Eriksson (S), 2023/24:2063 av Carina Ståhl Herrstedt m.fl. (SD) yrkande 6, 2023/24:2069 av Carina Ståhl Herrstedt m.fl. (SD) yrkandena 4 och 17, 2023/24:2076 av Carina Ståhl Herrstedt m.fl. (SD) yrkande 2, 2023/24:2566 av Jytte Guteland m.fl. (S), 2023/24:2664 av Janine Alm Ericson m.fl. (MP) yrkande 46 och 2023/24:2736 av Rickard Nordin (C) yrkande 7.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag said no to 80 proposals in motions about research from the general motion period 2023. The motions deal, among other things, with the freedom of research, distribution of research funding and space activities. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to existing regulations and ongoing work.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to protect research freedom and ensure that researchers can work without political interference. (MP) — Reservation 10
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan establishes that research is needed to make visible and analyse threats to the environment and that there is a need for complementary research based on varied societal needs.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that research is needed to make visible and analyse threats to the environment and that there is a need for complementary research based on varied societal needs. Targeted investments in PFAS purification and in women's diseases are such societal needs; the plan particularly emphasizes that women's ill health does not lead to expanded care. However, specific research areas are not mentioned, hence derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att forskning behövs för att synliggöra och analysera hot mot miljön och att det finns behov av kompletterande forskning baserad på skilda samhällsbehov. Riktade satsningar på PFAS-rening och på kvinnosjukdomar är sådana samhällsbehov; planen framhåller särskilt att kvinnors ohälsa inte leder till utbyggd vård. Konkreta forskningsområden nämns dock inte, därav härlett.
- research on environmental threatsdecisive»Forskning behövs för att synliggöra och analysera förtryck och hot mot miljön« (party programme ↗)“Research is needed to make visible and analyse oppression and threats to the environment”
- research based on societal needs»Vi ser också behov av en kompletterande forskning baserad på skilda samhällsbehov.« (party programme ↗)“We also see the need for complementary research based on varied societal needs.”
- women's ill health neglected»Stressrelaterade sjukdomar blir allt vanligare och psykisk ohälsa ökar särskilt bland kvinnor och hos unga utan att det leder till utbyggd vård eller förändrad arbetsmiljö.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stress-related diseases are becoming increasingly common and mental ill health is increasing particularly among women and among young people without leading to expanded care or changed working conditions.”
- against poisoning of the environment»Jordens resurser föröds och miljön förgiftas.« (party programme ↗)“The Earth's resources are destroyed and the environment is poisoned.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme makes research investments one of environmental policy's most important tools and requires clean water for future generations, which supports prioritization of PFAS remediation.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme makes research investments one of environmental policy's most important tools and requires clean water for future generations, which supports prioritization of PFAS remediation. The analysis of the gender power structure that creates unequal life conditions in turn motivates more research on women's diseases. That the state at the same time shall guarantee research freedom speaks against detailed steering but does not eliminate the substantive priorities.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet gör forskningssatsningar till ett av miljöpolitikens viktigaste instrument och kräver rent vatten för kommande generationer, vilket bär prioriteringen av PFAS-rening. Analysen av könsmaktsordningen som skapar ojämlika livsvillkor motiverar i sin tur mer forskning om kvinnosjukdomar. Att staten samtidigt ska garantera forskningens frihet talar mot detaljstyrning men upphäver inte de sakliga prioriteringarna.
- research as environmental policy tooldecisive»Detta kräver en strategisk miljöpolitik, där forskningssatsningar, lagstiftning och olika ekonomiska styrmedel är de viktigaste instrumenten.« (party programme ↗)“This requires a strategic environmental policy where research investments, legislation and various economic policy instruments are the most important tools.”
- clean water for future generations»Den ekonomiska utvecklingen måste vara i samklang med det ekologiskt hållbara, om också kommande generationer ska få leva i en värld med frisk luft och rent vatten, hållbart klimat och biologisk artrikedom.« (party programme ↗)“Economic development must be in harmony with ecological sustainability if future generations are also to live in a world with clean air and clean water, sustainable climate and biological diversity.”
- the gender power structure»En tydlig maktstruktur är det som kallas könsmaktsordningen, den systematiska över- och underordning mellan könen som skapar ojämlika livsvillkor för kvinnor och män.« (party programme ↗)“A clear power structure is what is called the gender power structure, the systematic subordination and superordination between the sexes that creates unequal life conditions for women and men.”
- research freedom»Staten har ett särskilt ansvar att garantera forskningens frihet och att trygga grundforskningen.« (party programme ↗)“The state has a particular responsibility to guarantee research freedom and to secure basic research.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan states that environmental toxins are a serious threat and that emissions of environment-damaging substances shall be reduced, and that toxic substances shall be phased out immediately, which justifies investments in cleaning PFAS from soil and water.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that environmental toxins are a serious threat and that emissions of environment-damaging substances shall be reduced, and that toxic substances shall be phased out immediately, which justifies investments in cleaning PFAS from soil and water. The plan also notes that women have to wait longer for important treatments, which carries the demand for more research into women's diseases. The plan thus speaks for both parts of the counter-proposal.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att miljögifter är ett allvarligt hot och att utsläpp av miljöstörande ämnen ska reduceras, samt att giftiga ämnen ska fasas ut omgående, vilket motiverar satsningar på rening av PFAS ur mark och vatten. Planen konstaterar också att kvinnor får vänta längre på viktiga behandlingar, vilket bär kravet på mer forskning om kvinnosjukdomar. Planen talar därför för båda delarna av motförslaget.
- phasing out toxic substancesdecisive»fasa ut giftiga ämnen omgående, speciellt från produkter för barn.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“phase out toxic substances immediately, especially from products for children.”
- reduce environmental toxins in water»Utsläpp av miljöstörande ämnen såsom kväve, fosfor, läkemedelsrester, hormonstörande ämnen, tungmetaller och nanopartiklar ska reduceras« (party programme ↗)“Emissions of environment-damaging substances such as nitrogen, phosphorus, pharmaceutical residues, hormone-disrupting substances, heavy metals and nanoparticles shall be reduced”
- equal care for women»Kvinnor får ofta vänta längre på viktiga behandlingar och har sämre tillgång till speciellt dyra behandlingsmetoder.« (party programme ↗)“Women often have to wait longer for important treatments and have poorer access to especially expensive treatment methods.”
- environmental toxins as a threat»Miljögifter är i dag ett allvarligt hot mot såväl människor som natur.« (party programme ↗)“Environmental toxins are today a serious threat to both people and nature.”
The election manifesto explicitly promises a national research programme on women's diseases, which is exactly what the counter-proposal requests.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly promises a national research programme on women's diseases, which is exactly what the counter-proposal requests. The requirement for research on PFAS remediation is borne by the commitment to save lakes and waterways so that children can bathe without poisons. The plan thus advocates politically prioritised research investments, in contrast to the committee's line that funds are allocated solely on scientific grounds.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet lovar uttryckligen ett nationellt forskningsprogram om kvinnosjukdomar, vilket är precis vad motförslaget efterfrågar. Kravet på forskning om rening av PFAS bärs av åtagandet att rädda sjöar och vattendrag så att barn kan bada utan gifter. Planen förordar alltså politiskt prioriterade forskningssatsningar, till skillnad från utskottets linje att medel fördelas enbart på vetenskaplig grund.
- research programme on women's diseasesdecisive»Vi vill inrätta ett nationellt forskningsprogram om kvinnosjukdomar och stärka den genusmedicinska kompetensen i hela vårdkedjan.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to establish a national research programme on women's diseases and strengthen gender medicine expertise throughout the healthcare chain.”
- poison-free lakes and seas»Rädda Sveriges sjöar, vattendrag och hav. Våra barn ska kunna bada utan att utsättas för gifter, nedskräpning eller algblomning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Save Sweden's lakes, waterways and seas. Our children shall be able to bathe without exposure to poisons, litter or algal blooms.”
- poison-free environment as right»Tillgång till rent vatten, ren luft och giftfri miljö är en fundamental rätt för alla människor« (party programme ↗)“Access to clean water, clean air and a poison-free environment is a fundamental right for all people”
- unknown chemical risks»Dagligen används kemikalier och tekniker vars effekter på människan och naturen är skadliga eller okända.« (party programme ↗)“Daily chemicals and techniques are used whose effects on humans and nature are harmful or unknown.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan establishes that the equality perspective shall be developed in healthcare and that chemical legislation shall depart from the precautionary principle, which underlies the counter-proposal's both demands.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that the equality perspective shall be developed in healthcare and that chemical legislation shall depart from the precautionary principle, which underlies the counter-proposal's both demands. The plan additionally wants to see continued high state research appropriations. At the same time, the plan says appropriations shall be distributed based on quality, which speaks against political detailed governance and makes the support weak and derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att jämställdhetsperspektivet ska utvecklas i hälso- och sjukvården och att kemikalielagstiftningen ska utgå från försiktighetsprincipen, vilket ligger bakom motförslagets båda krav. Planen vill dessutom se fortsatt höga statliga forskningsanslag. Samtidigt säger planen att anslagen ska fördelas utifrån kvalitet, vilket talar emot politisk detaljstyrning och gör stödet svagt och härlett.
- equal healthcaredecisive»Jämställdhetsperspektivet ska utvecklas i hälso- och sjukvården.« (party programme ↗)“The equality perspective shall be developed in healthcare.”
- precautionary principle for chemicals»Kemikalielagstiftningen ska utgå från försiktighetsprincipen.« (party programme ↗)“Chemical legislation shall depart from the precautionary principle.”
- high research appropriations»Fortsatt höga statliga forskningsanslag är nödvändiga.« (party programme ↗)“Continued high state research appropriations are necessary.”
- quality determines appropriations»Forskningsanslagen ska fördelas utifrån kvalitet.« (party programme ↗)“Research appropriations shall be distributed based on quality.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires that both pharmaceutical and health care research is aimed at both women and men and that health care consciously considers differences between genders, which directly carries the requirement for more research on women's diseases.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that both pharmaceutical and health care research is aimed at both women and men and that health care consciously considers differences between genders, which directly carries the requirement for more research on women's diseases. The precautionary principle and responsibility for a clean environment support prioritization of PFAS purification. The plan simultaneously requires sufficient resources for all subject areas.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att såväl läkemedels- som vårdforskning inriktas på både kvinnor och män och att vården medvetet beaktar skillnader mellan könen, vilket direkt bär kravet på mer forskning om kvinnosjukdomar. Försiktighetsprincipen och ansvaret för en ren miljö stödjer prioritering av PFAS-rening. Planen kräver samtidigt tillräckliga resurser till alla ämnesområden.
- research on women and mendecisive»Såväl läkemedels- som vårdforskning måste« (party programme ↗)“Both pharmaceutical and health care research must”
- care adapted to gender»Vården måste medvetet beakta skillnader mellan« (party programme ↗)“Health care must consciously consider differences between”
- the precautionary principle»också att agerandet grundas på försiktighetsprincipen.« (party programme ↗)“also that the action is based on the precautionary principle.”
- resources for all subject areas»Alla ämnesområden måste garanteras tillräckliga resurser, därför« (party programme ↗)“All subject areas must be guaranteed sufficient resources, therefore”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto explicitly promises to strengthen research into diseases that affect women and to invest in research on water purification and expansion of advanced water purification.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly promises to strengthen research into diseases that affect women and to invest in research on water purification and expansion of advanced water purification. The counter-proposal's two demands therefore hit directly two commitments in the plan. That the plan simultaneously wants to protect free research from political interference points in the other direction, but the targeted promises are more specific and carry more weight.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet lovar uttryckligen att stärka forskningen om sjukdomar som drabbar kvinnor och att satsa på forskning om vattenrening och utbyggnad av avancerad vattenrening. Motförslagets två krav träffar därmed direkt två åtaganden i planen. Att planen samtidigt vill värna den fria forskningen från politiska pekpinnar drar åt andra hållet, men de riktade löftena är mer specifika och väger tyngre.
- research on women's diseasesdecisive»Stärka forskningen gällande sjukdomar som drabbar kvinnor« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen research on diseases that affect women”
- research on water purification»Satsa på forskning om vattenrening samt utbyggnad av avancerad vattenrening« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Invest in research on water purification and expansion of advanced water purification”
- neglected women's health research»Kvinnors sjukdomar har både inom forskning och i det kliniska arbetet under lång tid varit eftersatta.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Women's diseases have for a long time been neglected both in research and in clinical work.”
- free research without political governance»Värna den fria forskningen från politiska pekpinnar« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Protect free research from political pressure”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan requires increased priority and increased funding to restore the country's thousands of contaminated sites, which is the core of the counter-proposal's demand for research on remediation of land and water.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires increased priority and increased funding to restore the country's thousands of contaminated sites, which is the core of the counter-proposal's demand for research on remediation of land and water. The plan also wants to work for equal care where women's illnesses are taken as seriously as others. Both parts of the counter-proposal thus have direct support in the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver ökad prioritet och ökad finansiering för att återställa landets tusentals förorenade områden, vilket är kärnan i motförslagets krav på forskning om rening av mark och vatten. Planen vill också verka för en jämställd vård där kvinnors sjukdomar tas på lika stort allvar som andras. Båda delarna av motförslaget har därmed direkt stöd i planen.
- remediate contaminated sitesdecisive»Ökad finansiering krävs i arbetet med att återställa de tusentals förorenade områdena i vårt land.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increased funding is required in the work to restore the thousands of contaminated sites in our country.”
- prioritize restoration»Ökad prioritet i arbetet med att återställa förorenade områden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increased priority in the work to restore contaminated sites.”
- equal care»Sverigedemokraterna vill verka för en jämställd vård där män och kvinnor behandlas lika.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden-democrats want to work for equal care where men and women are treated equally.”
- women's illnesses taken seriously»Förlossningsskador ska exempelvis tas på lika stort allvar som andra skador.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Obstetric injuries should for example be taken as seriously as other injuries.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2023/24:UbU15)
- Committee report full text (HB01UbU15)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2023/24:1020 — Djurförsök inom medicinsk forskning av Josef Fransson (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1158 — Möjliggörande av återinträde i akademisk forskning av Staffan Eklöf (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1159 — Förutsättningar för Sveriges fortsatta roll som kunskapsnation av Staffan Eklöf (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1280 — Utfasning av djurförsök av Ulrika Heindorff (M)
- Motion 2023/24:1429 — Nya rön kring anhörigas betydelse för psykiskt sjukas vårdplaner av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2023/24:1502 — Jämställd akademi av Eva Lindh (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1514 — Säkrad förlossningsvård av Jessica Rodén och Louise Thunström (båda S)
- Motion 2023/24:1699 — Plan för att fasa ut djurförsöken inom forskning och utbildning av Jytte Guteland och Sofia Skönnbrink (båda S)
- Motion 2023/24:1733 — En framtid utan graviditeter av Joar Forssell (L)
- Motion 2023/24:1809 — Flytt av Rymdstyrelsen till Västsverige av Rickard Nordin (C)
- Motion 2023/24:1823 — Forskning om afrikansk svinpest av Monica Haider (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1904 — Satsning på forskning om kvinnors hälsa och kvinnorelaterade sjukdomar av Linnéa Wickman och Sanna Backeskog (båda S)
- Motion 2023/24:2001 — Filmarkivet i Grängesberg av Sofie Eriksson (S)
- Motion 2023/24:2013 — Nationell handlingsplan för att nå en djurfri forskning av Magnus Manhammar (S)
- Motion 2023/24:2063 — En kvalitativ cancervård i framkant av Carina Ståhl Herrstedt m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:2069 — En stärkt psykisk hälsa i hela landet av Carina Ståhl Herrstedt m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:2076 — Life science av Carina Ståhl Herrstedt m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:2159 — Fysisk och social aktivitet för att minska psykofarmaka inom psykiatri av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2023/24:2453 — Ledarskap för klimat och grön omställning av Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2023/24:2454 — Utbildning och forskning - för en stark kunskapsnation av Anders Ådahl m.fl. (C)
Source: The Swedish Parliament