2026-04-012025/26:SoU19 · p.9SoUHealth & social services
Children's rights
Children's rights and preventive work in social services
What's at stake: The decision concerns how systematically children's rights are factored into government budgeting, governance and follow-up, and affects in particular children and young people in contact with social services or at risk of being drawn into crime.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether parliament should call on the government to introduce concrete tools such as child-rights budgeting and a strengthened children's-rights delegation to reinforce children's rights, or whether the preventive work already under way within social services is already sufficient.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee considers that parliament need not take any action. It points to the fact that the Social Services Act is already meant to steer toward preventive, easily accessible work, that municipalities receive support and that an agreement exists with the Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions, and that work is under way on family centres, parental-support strategies, children's right to private conversations, and crime-prevention efforts for children and young people, including through the Bob collaboration structure and assignments to the National Board of Health and Welfare. The motions are rejected.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 13 (V)
The reservation (V) argues that children's rights are repeatedly violated even though the Convention on the Rights of the Child is Swedish law, and demands that the government introduce child-rights budgeting to plan, report on and follow up the state budget from a children's-rights perspective, make the Children's Rights Delegation more effective with a clearer coordinating mandate, and ensure that public activities concerning children have clear, trackable goals.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 13 by V.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/17/0/5 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| S | No | Yes 90/0/0/16 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | Yes 15/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | No | Yes 19/0/0/5 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 12/0/0/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | Yes | Yes 55/0/0/11 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 59/0/0/11 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects motion 2025/26:2816 by Maj Karlsson et al. (V) requests 1-3, 6 and 8.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motion 2025/26:2816 av Maj Karlsson m.fl. (V) yrkandena 1-3, 6 och 8.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected 115 proposals in motions on children and young people in social services. The motions were submitted during the general motion period of 2025 and deal with, among other things, interventions for children and young people, placement arrangements for children and young people, and children's rights. The Riksdag refers primarily to the fact that work is already underway in the areas that the proposals raise.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to make it impossible for profit-driven companies to start or purchase residential care facilities. (V) — Reservation 13
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The party programme wants to continue realizing the children's convention and the principle of the child's best interests, and the election manifesto requires strengthened resources to social services, student health and social support.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme wants to continue realizing the children's convention and the principle of the child's best interests, and the election manifesto requires strengthened resources to social services, student health and social support. Child rights budgeting and measurable goals are tools for making just that into practice. The plan does not mention the budgeting method as such, so the position is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet vill fortsätta förverkliga barnkonventionen och principen om barnets bästa, och valmanifestet kräver förstärkta resurser till socialtjänst, elevhälsa och socialt stöd. Barnrättsbudgetering och uppföljningsbara mål är verktyg för att göra just det till praktik. Planen nämner inte budgeteringsmetoden som sådan, så ställningstagandet är härlett.
- realize children's rightsdecisive»Utvecklingen mot starkare rättigheter för barn är en av de progressiva« (party programme ↗)“Development towards stronger rights for children is one of the progressive”
- resources for child protection»förstärk socialtjänsten med tillräckliga resurser och kunskap för att arbeta både förebyggande och med barnskydd.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“strengthen social services with sufficient resources and expertise to work both preventively and with child protection.”
- early intervention for children»Det krävs satsningar inte bara på undervisning utan också på elevhälsa, specialpedagoger, fritidsverksamhet och socialt stöd.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“This requires initiatives not only in teaching but also in student health, special educators, leisure activities and social support.”
The plan sets up a society where children do not grow up in poverty and measures that secure good economic standard for families with children as a goal, and wants resources to be directed where needs are greatest.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan sets up a society where children do not grow up in poverty and measures that secure good economic standard for families with children as a goal, and wants resources to be directed where needs are greatest. Child rights budgeting, strengthened coordination and measurable goals are tools for planning and following up precisely this. The plan, however, does not mention child rights budgeting as a method.
Original (Swedish)
Planen sätter upp ett samhälle där barn inte växer upp i fattigdom och insatser som tryggar barnfamiljernas ekonomiska standard som mål, och vill att resurser styrs dit behoven är störst. Barnrättsbudgetering, stärkt samordning och uppföljningsbara mål är verktyg för att planera och följa upp just detta. Planen nämner dock inte barnrättsbudgetering som metod.
- no children in povertydecisive»Ett samhälle där barn inte växer upp i fattigdom.« (party programme ↗)“A society where children do not grow up in poverty.”
- secure economy for families with children»Insatser som främjar jämställdhet och tryggar god ekonomisk standard för alla« (party programme ↗)“Measures that promote equality and secure good economic standard for everyone”
- early measures for children»Håll barn borta från kriminalitet och se till att de hamnar rätt från början.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Keep children away from crime and ensure they get on the right track from the beginning.”
- resources according to need»De mest utsatta skolorna och förskolorna måste få mer resurser.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The most vulnerable schools and preschools must get more resources.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan states that the Convention on the Rights of the Child is law and that the child's best interests shall always be decisive when decisions are made regarding children, and that children are active co-creators with the right to influence.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that the Convention on the Rights of the Child is law and that the child's best interests shall always be decisive when decisions are made regarding children, and that children are active co-creators with the right to influence. Child rights budgeting, strengthened coordination and auditable goals are tools for realising precisely this. The plan moreover emphasises that children shall not grow up in economic vulnerability, which requires that the budget is followed up from the child's perspective.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att barnkonventionen är lag och att barnets bästa alltid ska vara avgörande när beslut fattas kring barn, samt att barn är aktiva medskapare med rätt till inflytande. Barnrättsbudgetering, stärkt samordning och uppföljningsbara mål är verktyg för att förverkliga just detta. Planen betonar dessutom att barn inte ska växa upp i ekonomisk utsatthet, vilket kräver att budgeten följs upp ur barnets perspektiv.
- child's best interests decisivedecisive»Barnkonventionen är svensk lag och barnets bästa« (party programme ↗)“The Convention on the Rights of the Child is Swedish law and the child's best interests”
- children's right to influence»Barn är aktiva medskapare av samhället« (party programme ↗)“Children are active co-creators of society”
- no child poverty»Ekonomisk utsatthet ska inte gå i arv.« (party programme ↗)“Economic vulnerability shall not be inherited.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan establishes that children's rights and perspective are of paramount importance and that preventive measures shall permeate the whole of society, with the foundation laid already in preschool and school.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that children's rights and perspective are of paramount importance and that preventive measures shall permeate the whole of society, with the foundation laid already in preschool and school. Demands for clear verifiable goals and strengthened coordination of children's rights work accord with that. The plan says nothing about child rights budgeting as a method, so support is weakly derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att barnens rättigheter och perspektiv är av största betydelse och att förebyggande insatser ska genomsyra hela samhället, med grunden lagd redan i förskola och skola. Krav på tydliga uppföljningsbara mål och stärkt samordning av barnrättsarbetet ligger i linje med det. Planen säger dock ingenting om barnrättsbudgetering som metod, varför stödet är svagt härlett.
- child's perspective firstdecisive»Av största betydelse är då barnens rättigheter och perspektiv.« (party programme ↗)“Of paramount importance are children's rights and perspective.”
- prevention permeates society»Därför är det viktigt att förebyggande insatser genomsyrar hela samhället och att det offentliga lägger grunden redan i förskolan och skolan.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore it is important that preventive measures permeate the whole of society and that the public lays the foundation already in preschool and school.”
- every child's right protected»Särskilt viktigt är att värna varje barns rätt att bli respekterad och att bli sedd för den man är.« (party programme ↗)“Particularly important is to protect every child's right to be respected and to be seen for who they are.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan establishes that the Convention on the Rights of the Child as law clarifies children's rights, that early and preventive measures are decisive, and that a rights perspective shall be present when political decisions are prepared and made.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that the Convention on the Rights of the Child as law clarifies children's rights, that early and preventive measures are decisive, and that a rights perspective shall be present when political decisions are prepared and made. To plan and follow up the budget from a child rights perspective with measurable targets is an application of the same principle. The plan, however, does not mention child rights budgeting, which is why the support is derived and uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att barnkonventionen som lag tydliggör barns rättigheter, att tidiga och förebyggande insatser är avgörande och att ett rättighetsperspektiv ska finnas med när politiska beslut förbereds och fattas. Att planera och följa upp budgeten ur ett barnrättsperspektiv med uppföljningsbara mål är en tillämpning av samma princip. Planen nämner dock inte barnrättsbudgetering, varför stödet är härlett och osäkert.
- the Convention on the Rights of the Child as lawdecisive»Genom att FN:s barnkonvention införlivats i svensk lag tydliggörs barns och ungas rättigheter.« (party programme ↗)“By incorporating the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child into Swedish law, children's and young people's rights are clarified.”
- early preventive measures»Tidiga och förebyggande insatser är avgörande.« (party programme ↗)“Early and preventive measures are decisive.”
- rights perspective in decisions»och att funktionsrättsperspektivet alltid finns med när politiska beslut förbereds och fattas« (party programme ↗)“and that the disability rights perspective is always present when political decisions are prepared and made”
- quality for vulnerable children»En hög kvalitet i verksamheter för barn och ungdomar är därför särskilt viktig för barn i utsatta situationer.« (party programme ↗)“High quality in activities for children and young people is therefore particularly important for children in vulnerable situations.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires that efforts for children start from the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and that the child's best interest is guiding in all decisions concerning children, and that all political decisions be analyzed based on consequences for families and close relationships.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that efforts for children start from the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and that the child's best interest is guiding in all decisions concerning children, and that all political decisions be analyzed based on consequences for families and close relationships. Child rights budgeting, strengthened coordination and measurable goals are methods for realizing just this. The principle of stewardship also requires that decisions be weighed based on a future perspective.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att insatser för barn utgår från FN:s barnkonvention och att barnets bästa är styrande vid alla beslut som rör barn, samt att alla politiska beslut analyseras utifrån konsekvenserna för familjer och nära relationer. Barnrättsbudgetering, stärkt samordning och uppföljningsbara mål är metoder för att förverkliga just detta. Förvaltarskapsprincipen kräver dessutom att beslut vägs utifrån ett framtidsperspektiv.
- child's best interest guidingdecisive»vara styrande i all familjepolitik och vid alla beslut som rör barn.« (party programme ↗)“be guiding in all family policy and in all decisions concerning children.”
- Convention on the Rights of the Child as starting point»med utgångspunkt i FN:s barnkonvention och bygga på det nära nätverk som finns runt« (party programme ↗)“starting from the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and based on the close network that exists around”
- consequence analysis of decisions»analyseras utifrån vilka konsekvenser de får för familjer och nära relationer.« (party programme ↗)“be analyzed based on what consequences they have for families and close relationships.”
- stewardship in decision-making»Alla politiska beslut bör fattas i enlighet med förvaltarskapsprincipen« (party programme ↗)“All political decisions should be made in accordance with the principle of stewardship”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's child policy is based on the premise that responsibility for children above all lies with parents and shall be emphasized and strengthened, and it invests in concrete measures in social services and schools rather than in new governance instruments.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's child policy is based on the premise that responsibility for children above all lies with parents and shall be emphasized and strengthened, and it invests in concrete measures in social services and schools rather than in new governance instruments. Child rights budgeting, expanded state coordination and new measurable targets are precisely the kinds of expanded public apparatus that the plan wants to hold back. The demand therefore lacks support in the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planens barnpolitik utgår från att ansvaret för barnen framför allt ligger hos föräldrarna och ska betonas och förstärkas, och den satsar på konkreta insatser i socialtjänst och skola snarare än på nya styrinstrument. Barnrättsbudgetering, utbyggd statlig samordning och nya uppföljningsbara mål är just den sortens utvidgade offentliga apparat som planen vill hålla tillbaka. Kravet saknar därför stöd i planen.
- parental responsibility firstdecisive»Betona och förstärka föräldraansvaret« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Emphasize and strengthen parental responsibility”
- children's development is central»Samhällets viktigaste investering för framtiden är barns utveckling.« (party programme ↗)“Society's most important investment for the future is children's development.”
- prioritize core tasks»Politiken har en viktig uppgift att prioritera och välja bort,« (party programme ↗)“Politics has an important task to prioritize and choose not to,”
- concrete social services reforms»Undanröja alla sekretesshinder mellan socialtjänst och polis« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove all secrecy barriers between social services and police”
The plan states that the child's best interests always must be considered and that every public investment must show clear results, which lies close to the counter-proposal's demand for measurable goals and a child rights perspective in budget work.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that the child's best interests always must be considered and that every public investment must show clear results, which lies close to the counter-proposal's demand for measurable goals and a child rights perspective in budget work. However, the plan also wants a minimum of bureaucracy to permeate all public activities, which makes the support weak. On balance, the plan leans towards supporting the demand.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att barnets bästa alltid ska beaktas och att varje offentlig satsning ska kunna visa tydliga resultat, vilket ligger nära motförslagets krav på uppföljningsbara mål och ett barnrättsperspektiv i budgetarbetet. Samtidigt vill planen att ett minimum av byråkrati ska genomsyra all offentlig verksamhet, vilket gör stödet svagt. Sammantaget lutar planen åt att stödja kravet.
- child's best interests in all decisionsdecisive»Att barnets bästa alltid ska beaktas« (2022 manifesto ↗)“That the child's best interests always be considered”
- measurable goals»Begära tydliga resultat för varje offentlig satsning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Demand clear results for each public investment”
- child perspective as starting point»Den centrala utgångspunkten för Sverigedemokraternas familjepolitik är att barnens bästa skall beaktas i alla situationer inom familjepolitikens område.« (party programme ↗)“The central point of Sweden-democrats' family policy is that children's best interests shall be considered in all situations within the family policy area.”
- minimum of bureaucracy»Centralt för partiet är att respekt för skattebetalarnas pengar och strävan efter ett minimum av byråkrati skall genomsyra all offentlig verksamhet.« (party programme ↗)“Central to the party is that respect for taxpayers' money and striving for a minimum of bureaucracy shall permeate all public activities.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:SoU19)
- Committee report full text (HD01SoU19)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:1052 — Stärkt rättssäkerhet och förebyggande stöd i LVU med hänsyn till kulturella och språkliga faktorer av Jamal El-Haj (-)
- Motion 2025/26:1066 — Stärkt kvalitet och kompetens på HVB-hem för barn och unga av Carina Ödebrink m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1221 — Familjehemsregister av Eva Lindh m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1233 — Kommunal fältverksamhet inom socialtjänsten av Niklas Sigvardsson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1337 — Åtgärder för att stärka HVB-hemmen och stoppa oseriösa och kriminella aktörer av Sanna Backeskog m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1339 — Åtgärder för att stoppa vinstintresset i familjehemsvården av Sanna Backeskog m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1804 — Nationell handlingsplan mot barnfattigdom av Aida Birinxhiku och Sofia Skönnbrink (båda S)
- Motion 2025/26:1825 — Nationell strategi för att avskaffa barnfattigdom av Aylin Nouri (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1849 — Stärkt vård för familjehemsplacerade barn och bättre förutsättningar för familjehem av Anna-Belle Strömberg m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1915 — Kostnader för placeringar av unga av Mathias Tegnér (S)
- Motion 2025/26:2069 — Nolltolerans mot barnsoldater i Sverige av Kerstin Lundgren (C)
- Motion 2025/26:2201 — Nationellt register för behandlings- och familjehem av Johanna Rantsi (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2202 — Placeringar av unga hos Statens institutionsstyrelse av Johanna Rantsi och Sten Bergheden (båda M)
- Motion 2025/26:2209 — Översyn av tillgång till digitala kontaktytor under behandlingstid på Sis/HVB av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2226 — Obligatoriska BVC-besök av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2763 — Stärkt kamp mot sexuellt utnyttjande av barn av Niels Paarup-Petersen och Helena Vilhelmsson (båda C)
- Motion 2025/26:2799 — En starkare folkhälsa av Karin Rågsjö m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2816 — Starkare skydd för barns rättigheter av Maj Karlsson m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2923 — Förstärkning av barnets rättigheter vid familjehemsplaceringar av Marléne Lund Kopparklint (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2924 — Behov av fortsatt upprättelse för barn som farit illa i statens vård av Marléne Lund Kopparklint (M)
Source: The Swedish Parliament