2024-06-182023/24:TU18 · p.5TUTransport & infrastructure

Long-term sustainable transportation

Long-term sustainable transport: keeping the climate targets fixed

What's at stake: The decision concerns how firmly the Riksdag should stand behind the existing climate targets for the transport sector, which accounts for a large share of Sweden's emissions, at a time of concern that the government may be softening its ambitions.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether the Riksdag should declare, through a formal statement, that the climate policy interim target of at least a 70 percent emissions cut for domestic transport by 2030 must remain fixed and that the pace must increase, or whether the committee - which shares the goals but sees no reason for new Riksdag initiatives - should reject the motions.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee shares the government's and the motions' view on the goals but rejects the motions, pointing out that the transport policy goals and the existing interim target of at least a 70 percent emissions cut by 2030 already apply and form the starting point for future investments, and that there is no need for new goals specifically for road traffic.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 9 (S)

The reserving party (S) wants the Riksdag to declare that the interim target of at least a 70 percent emissions cut for domestic transport by 2030 must remain fixed and that the pace of the climate transition must increase, warning that the government is starting to waver on the goals even though seven parties previously agreed on them.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 9 by S.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VNoAbstain 0/0/20/4departs from the planconfidence: highexplicit
Sown reservationNoNo 0/93/0/13follows the planconfidence: highexplicit
MPNoAbstain 0/0/15/3departs from the planconfidence: highexplicit
CNoAbstain 0/0/21/3departs from the planconfidence: highderived
LNoYes 13/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
KDYesYes 16/0/0/3follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MYesYes 60/0/0/8follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
SDYesYes 63/0/0/9follows the planconfidence: highexplicit

Committee proposal

Parliament rejects the motions 2023/24:996 by Per Bolund et al. (MP) demand 37, 2023/24:1527 by Linus Lakso et al. (MP) demand 25, 2023/24:1676 by Mattias Jonsson and Johan Büser (both S) demand 1, 2023/24:2345 by Linda W Snecker et al. (V) demand 6, 2023/24:2453 by Rickard Nordin et al. (C) demand 40, 2023/24:2465 by Ulrika Heie et al. (C) demand 73, 2023/24:2625 by Gunilla Svantorp et al. (S) demands 6-8 and 2023/24:2629 by Anna-Caren Sätherberg et al. (S) demand 19.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2023/24:996 av Per Bolund m.fl. (MP) yrkande 37, 2023/24:1527 av Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP) yrkande 25, 2023/24:1676 av Mattias Jonsson och Johan Büser (båda S) yrkande 1, 2023/24:2345 av Linda W Snecker m.fl. (V) yrkande 6, 2023/24:2453 av Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C) yrkande 40, 2023/24:2465 av Ulrika Heie m.fl. (C) yrkande 73, 2023/24:2625 av Gunilla Svantorp m.fl. (S) yrkandena 6-8 och 2023/24:2629 av Anna-Caren Sätherberg m.fl. (S) yrkande 19.

Riksdag decision: Parliament has dealt with a letter from the government concerning the National Audit Office's report on a national plan for transport infrastructure. The National Audit Office's overall conclusion is that investments in the national plan contribute to achieving the transport policy objectives but not in an efficient way. In its letter, the government welcomes the National Audit Office's audit and considers it an important contribution to the work of developing a new national plan. The government is in the process of developing a new infrastructure proposition to be able to make a decision on a new national plan during 2026 and sees the National Audit Office's observations and recommendations as a basis in the continued process. Parliament filed the government's letter in the documents, that is, concluded the case. At the same time, parliament said no to proposals in motions, of which approximately 380 are from the general motion period of 2023. The proposals concern, for example, infrastructure planning, starting points for planning, measures in the infrastructure as well as financing and efficiency matters. Parliament refers, among other things, to the ongoing work to develop a new national plan for transport infrastructure.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the planexplicit

The plan establishes that the transition must happen immediately and that all political decisions must take account of the acute climate emergency, with strengthened governance based on tightened climate goals.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that the transition must happen immediately and that all political decisions must take account of the acute climate emergency, with strengthened governance based on tightened climate goals. It furthermore wants the government to work with an emissions budget that ties climate goals to concrete, quantified proposals and that heavy transport be directed to rail. Establishing that the interim target of 70 per cent is fixed and that pace must accelerate follows directly from these commitments.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att omställningen måste ske omgående och att alla politiska beslut ska ta hänsyn till det akuta klimatnödläget, med stärkt styrning utifrån skärpta klimatmål. Den vill dessutom att regeringen arbetar med en utsläppsbudget som knyter klimatmålen till konkreta, siffersatta förslag och att tunga transporter styrs till järnväg. Att slå fast att etappmålet om 70 procent ligger fast och att takten måste öka följer direkt av dessa åtaganden.

  • tightened climate goalsdecisive»Investeringar i grön teknik, industri och infrastruktur, utbyggd energikapacitet och stärkt styrning utifrån nya, skärpta klimatmål behövs.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Investments in green technology, industry and infrastructure, expanded energy capacity and strengthened governance based on new, tightened climate goals are needed.”
  • accelerated pace of transition»Omställningen behöver ske omgående och alla politiska beslut behöver ta hänsyn till den akuta kris som vi befinner oss i.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The transition needs to happen immediately and all political decisions need to take account of the acute crisis we find ourselves in.”
  • emissions budget for climate goals»Vi vill att regeringen arbetar med en utsläppsbudget som knyter ihop« (party programme ↗)“We want the government to work with an emissions budget that ties together”
  • emissions reduction in transport»Tunga transporter behöver styras till järnväg och hållbar sjöfart.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Heavy transport needs to be directed to rail and sustainable shipping.”

The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.

SSocialdemokraternaNoNofollows the planexplicit

The election manifesto establishes that the climate policy framework shall remain fixed and that the rate of emissions reductions must increase, with the goal of net zero emissions by 2045.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto establishes that the climate policy framework shall remain fixed and that the rate of emissions reductions must increase, with the goal of net zero emissions by 2045. The counter-proposal's requirement – that the interim target of at least 70 per cent reduction in emissions by 2030 remains fixed and that the rate of transformation increases – is in substance identical with the plan's own commitments. The party programme strengthens this with the requirement for restructuring the transport system.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet slår fast att det klimatpolitiska ramverket ska ligga fast och att utsläppstakten måste öka, med målet noll nettoutsläpp 2045. Motförslagets krav – att etappmålet om minst 70 procents utsläppsminskning till 2030 ligger fast och att omställningstakten ökar – är i sak identiskt med planens egna åtaganden. Partiprogrammet förstärker med kravet på omläggning av transportsystemet.

  • climate framework remains fixeddecisive»Det klimatpolitiska ramverket ska ligga fast.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The climate policy framework shall remain fixed.”
  • increased pace of transformation»Redan nu minskar utsläppen i vårt land, men takten måste öka.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Already now emissions are decreasing in our country, but the rate must increase.”
  • net zero target 2045»År 2045 ska Sverige inte ha några nettoutsläpp av växthusgaser till atmosfären« (2022 manifesto ↗)“By 2045 Sweden shall have no net greenhouse gas emissions to the atmosphere”
  • restructuring of transport»Transportsystemen ska läggas om för mer gång-, cykel- och kollektivtrafik« (party programme ↗)“Transport systems shall be restructured for more walking, cycling and public transport”
MPMiljöpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the planexplicit

The election manifesto establishes that transport emissions must decrease in order for climate goals to be achieved and that the transition must happen at record speed, and requires a Swedish emissions budget that ensures the goals are reached.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto establishes that transport emissions must decrease in order for climate goals to be achieved and that the transition must happen at record speed, and requires a Swedish emissions budget that ensures the goals are reached. The programme also wants a climate policy framework with binding caps for climate impact. The counter-proposal's demand that the intermediate target of at least 70 per cent emissions reduction by 2030 be fixed and that the pace must increase therefore follows directly from these commitments.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet slår fast att trafikens utsläpp måste minska för att klimatmålen ska klaras och att omställningen måste ske i rekordfart, och kräver en svensk utsläppsbudget som gör att målen nås. Programmet vill dessutom ha ett klimatpolitiskt ramverk med bindande tak för klimatpåverkan. Motförslagets krav att etappmålet om minst 70 procents utsläppsminskning till 2030 ska ligga fast och att takten måste öka följer direkt av dessa åtaganden.

  • reduced transport emissionsdecisive»Trafikens utsläpp måste minska om vi ska ha en chans att klara klimatmålen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Transport emissions must decrease if we are to have a chance of meeting the climate goals.”
  • emissions budget for climate goals»ta fram en svensk utsläppsbudget som gör att vi når klimatmålen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“develop a Swedish emissions budget that ensures we reach the climate goals.”
  • binding climate caps»För att klara klimatmålen krävs ett klimatpolitiskt ramverk med bindande tak för vår klimatpåverkan såväl i Sverige som internationellt.« (party programme ↗)“To meet the climate goals, a climate policy framework with binding caps for our climate impact is required both in Sweden and internationally.”
  • accelerated transition pace»Världen är i ett klimatnödläge och omställningen från fossila bränslen måste ske i rekordfart.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The world is in a climate emergency and the transition from fossil fuels must happen at record speed.”

The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.

CCenterpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the planderived

The plan establishes that transports' emissions should go away and that every day without climate action is a lost day; the interim target is not mentioned but the ambition level makes it.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that transports' emissions should go away and that every day without climate action is a lost day; the interim target is not mentioned but the ambition level makes it. The counter-proposal's demand that the target of at least 70 per cent emission reduction remains firm and that the pace of transition increases directly answers the plan's climate leadership that chooses effective measures over passivity. The party programme requires climate policy to be based on what science shows is necessary, not on lower-set demands.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att transporternas utsläpp ska bort och att varje dag utan klimathandling är en förlorad dag; etappmålet nämns inte men ambitionsnivån gör det. Motförslagets krav att målet om minst 70 procents utsläppsminskning ligger fast och att takten i omställningen ökar svarar direkt mot planens klimatledarskap som väljer effektiva åtgärder framför passivitet. Partiprogrammet kräver att klimatpolitiken utgår från vad vetenskapen visar är nödvändigt, inte från lägre satta krav.

  • away with transport emissionsdecisive»Transporternas utsläpp ska bort och ny utsläppsfri infrastruktur ska komma på plats.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Transport emissions should go away and new emission-free infrastructure should be put in place.”
  • climate work is urgent»Varje dag utan handling är en förlorad dag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Every day without action is a lost day.”
  • measures over passivity»Ett ledarskap som prioriterar effektiva åtgärder framför symbolpolitik eller passivitet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Leadership that prioritizes effective measures over symbolic politics or passivity.”
  • science-based climate goals»Klimatpolitiken ska utgå från vad vetenskapen visar är nödvändigt för att undvika farliga förändringar.« (party programme ↗)“Climate policy should be based on what science shows is necessary to avoid dangerous changes.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The election manifesto establishes that fossil emissions from the transport sector must be eliminated and sets its own timeline for the sector, including fossil-free public transport by 2030 at the latest, within a climate goal of net zero emissions by 2045.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto establishes that fossil emissions from the transport sector must be eliminated and sets its own timeline for the sector, including fossil-free public transport by 2030 at the latest, within a climate goal of net zero emissions by 2045. Holding to the interim target of 70 per cent emission reduction for domestic transport and accelerating the pace aligns with this. The plan however does not mention the interim target itself, so the coverage is derived.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet slår fast att fossilutsläppen från transportsektorn ska bort och sätter egna årtal för sektorn, bland annat fossilfri kollektivtrafik senast 2030, inom ett klimatmål om nettonollutsläpp 2045. Att hålla fast vid etappmålet om 70 procents utsläppsminskning för inrikes transporter och öka takten ligger i linje med detta. Planen nämner däremot inte etappmålet i sig, varför täckningen är härledd.

  • fossil-free transportdecisive»Fossilutsläppen från transportsektorn ska bort.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Fossil emissions from the transport sector must be eliminated.”
  • fossil-free public transport by 2030»all kollektivtrafik på väg och spår ska vara fossilfri senast 2030« (2022 manifesto ↗)“all public transport on road and rail shall be fossil-free by 2030 at the latest”
  • climate targets shall be met»Vi ska nå klimatmålen – inga nettoutsläpp av växthusgaser senast 2045 och därefter negativa utsläpp – inom ramen för en växande ekonomi.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We shall meet the climate targets – no net greenhouse gas emissions by 2045 at the latest and thereafter negative emissions – within the framework of a growing economy.”
  • accelerated electrification»Elektrifieringen av transportsektorn ska påskyndas.« (party programme ↗)“Electrification of the transport sector shall be accelerated.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The election manifesto's core commitment for domestic transport is to lower petrol and diesel prices substantially through reduced biofuel blending, and to prioritize upgraded roads over expensive rail investments.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto's core commitment for domestic transport is to lower petrol and diesel prices substantially through reduced biofuel blending, and to prioritize upgraded roads over expensive rail investments. The climate transition should continue but in a way that works and is effective. Locking in the interim target of at least 70 percent emissions reduction for domestic transport and demanding increased transition speed therefore goes against the plan's line.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestets bärande åtagande för inrikes transporter är att sänka bensin- och dieselpriserna rejält genom minskad inblandning av biobränsle, och att prioritera upprustade vägar framför dyra spårsatsningar. Klimatomställningen ska fortsätta men på ett sätt som fungerar och är effektivt. Att låsa fast etappmålet om minst 70 procents utsläppsminskning för inrikes transporter och kräva höjd omställningstakt går därför emot planens linje.

  • reduced fuel pricesdecisive»Sänk bensin- och dieselpriserna rejält för alla, främst genom minskad inblandningen av dyrt biobränsle.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Lower petrol and diesel prices substantially for everyone, primarily through reduced blending of expensive biofuel.”
  • cost-effective climate transition»Sverige är världsledande i klimatomställningen och det ska vi fortsätta vara på ett sätt som både fungerar och är effektivt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden is a world leader in climate transition and we shall continue to be in a way that both works and is effective.”
  • roads before rail investments»Miljardsatsning för att rusta eftersatta vägar i hela landet - istället för att bygga dyra höghastighetståg.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Billion investment to upgrade neglected roads across the country - instead of building expensive high-speed trains.”
  • phase-out of fossil fuels»Fossilbränslena måste fasas ut från såväl energi- som« (party programme ↗)“Fossil fuels must be phased out from both energy and”
MModeraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan's climate commitment is net zero emissions by 2045 and a cost-effective path there, where emission reductions may also occur abroad when it is cheaper.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's climate commitment is net zero emissions by 2045 and a cost-effective path there, where emission reductions may also occur abroad when it is cheaper. At the same time explicitly promised lower petrol and diesel prices, which pulls in the opposite direction against a fixed interim target of 70 per cent emission reduction in domestic transport by 2030 and a forced pace of transformation. The plan also changes target formulation from renewable to fossil-free, meaning it reconsiders rather than locks in sector goals. Therefore the plan rejects the counter-proposal's demands.

Original (Swedish)

Planens klimatåtagande är nettonollutsläpp senast 2045 och en kostnadseffektiv väg dit, där utsläppsminskningar även får ske utomlands när det är billigare. Samtidigt utlovas uttryckligen sänkta bensin- och dieselpriser, vilket drar i motsatt riktning mot ett fastlåst etappmål om 70 procents utsläppsminskning i inrikes transporter till 2030 och en forcerad omställningstakt. Planen byter också målformulering från förnybart till fossilfritt, det vill säga den omprövar snarare än låser sektorsmål. Därför avvisar planen motförslagets krav.

  • lower fuel pricesdecisive»Sänka priset på bensin och diesel så att du klarar din vardagsekonomi« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Lower the price of petrol and diesel so you can manage your everyday finances”
  • net zero 2045 as goal»Vi ska som land ta fullt ansvar här hemma och nå nettonollutsläpp senast år 2045.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We as a nation shall take full responsibility here at home and reach net zero emissions by 2045 at the latest.”
  • cost-effective climate policy»Samtidigt är kostnaden för att minska utsläppen genom internationella klimatinsatser ofta mycket lägre än för att minska utsläppen i Sverige« (2022 manifesto ↗)“At the same time, the cost of reducing emissions through international climate initiatives is often much lower than reducing emissions in Sweden”
  • reconsidered climate goals»Ändra det energipolitiska målet från 100 procent förnybart till 100 procent fossilfritt« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Change the energy policy goal from 100 per cent renewable to 100 per cent fossil-free”
SDSverigedemokraternaYesYesfollows the planexplicit

The plan wants Swedish climate goals to be adapted to EU legislation instead of Sweden going first and furthest, and wants evidence and competitiveness to guide implementation.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants Swedish climate goals to be adapted to EU legislation instead of Sweden going first and furthest, and wants evidence and competitiveness to guide implementation. The counter-proposal, conversely, requires that the national interim target of 70 per cent emission reduction by 2030 be fixed and that the transition pace increase. This stands in direct conflict with the plan's commitment, which moreover rejects higher fuel prices as a climate tool.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill att de svenska klimatmålen anpassas till EU:s lagstiftning i stället för att Sverige går först och längst, och att evidens och konkurrenskraft styr genomförandet. Motförslaget kräver tvärtom att det nationella etappmålet om 70 procents utsläppsminskning till 2030 slås fast och att omställningstakten ökar. Det står i direkt konflikt med planens åtagande, som dessutom avvisar höjda drivmedelspriser som klimatverktyg.

  • climate goals adapted to EU leveldecisive»De svenska klimatmålen bör anpassas till den klimatlagstiftning som finns på EU-nivå för att inte kraven på andra länder ska bli lägre som en konsekvens av att vi gör mer än nödvändigt på bekostnad av vår levnadsstandard och konkurrenskraft.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Swedish climate goals should be adapted to the climate legislation that exists at EU level so that requirements on other countries do not become lower as a consequence of us doing more than necessary at the expense of our living standards and competitiveness.”
  • competitiveness before ambition increase»Evidens, resultat och svensk konkurrenskraft ska styra genomförandet av klimatmål i högre utsträckning än politikers vilja att gå först och längst.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Evidence, results and Swedish competitiveness shall guide the implementation of climate goals to a greater extent than politicians' will to go first and furthest.”
  • global perspective on emissions»Sverige bidrar exempelvis inte till minskade utsläpp genom att höja drivmedelspriserna, höja elpriserna och göra det mer kostsamt för företag att verka i Sverige om Kina samtidigt kan öka sina utsläpp varje år med mer än vad hela Sverige släpper ut.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden, for example, does not contribute to reduced emissions by raising fuel prices, raising electricity prices and making it more expensive for businesses to operate in Sweden if China at the same time can increase its emissions every year by more than what Sweden as a whole emits.”
  • effective climate policy»Bedriva en effektiv klimatpolitik med ett tydligt globalt perspektiv« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Conduct effective climate policy with a clear global perspective”

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament