2024-05-152023/24:MJU14 · p.3MJUEnvironment & agriculture
Wolf Management
Wolf management and wolf hunting seasons
What's at stake: A smaller but viable wolf population is meant to be achieved through legal hunting, but how that hunting is organized affects both livestock keepers hit by attacks on their animals and the ability to effectively regulate the population's size and spread.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the Riksdag should direct the government to change wolf management, including aligning the wolf-hunting season with the moose-hunting season, or whether the current management approach and hunting periods should remain unchanged.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee finds that the wolf population needs to be considerably smaller than today and should be reduced through legally regulated hunting such as protective and licensed hunting under existing and forthcoming management plans and measures against illegal hunting, and therefore rejects the motions on wolf management.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 4 (C)
The reservation (C) holds that acceptance of a wolf population requires taking into account livestock keepers affected by stress, injury and death among cattle, horses and lambs, especially in livestock-dense counties, and proposes aligning the wolf-hunting season with the moose-hunting season to make licensed hunting more flexible and effective.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 4 by C.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: KDKristdemokraterna
Ja 284–19Ja 267–36
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | Yes | Yes 21/0/0/3 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| S | Yes | Yes 93/0/0/13 | match | confidence: low | not addressed |
| MP | Yes | Yes 16/0/0/2 | match | confidence: high | derived |
| C | No | No 0/19/0/5 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| L | Yes | Yes 14/0/0/2 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 17/0/0/2 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| M | No | Yes 60/0/0/8 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| SD | No | Yes 61/0/0/11 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2023/24:149 by Mathias Bengtsson (KD), 2023/24:1221 by Anders Karlsson (C) call 2, 2023/24:1275 by Lars Johnsson and Emma Ahlström Köster (both M), 2023/24:1414 by Sten Bergheden (M), 2023/24:1704 by Mikael Dahlqvist et al. (S) call 2 and 2023/24:2242 by Sten Bergheden (M).
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2023/24:149 av Mathias Bengtsson (KD), 2023/24:1221 av Anders Karlsson (C) yrkande 2, 2023/24:1275 av Lars Johnsson och Emma Ahlström Köster (båda M), 2023/24:1414 av Sten Bergheden (M), 2023/24:1704 av Mikael Dahlqvist m.fl. (S) yrkande 2 och 2023/24:2242 av Sten Bergheden (M).
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag urges the government, through a formal request (tillkännagivande), to create a coordinated management system for cloven-hoofed wildlife – for example moose and red deer – that takes the ecosystem into account. The purpose of coordinated cloven-hoofed wildlife management should among other things be to maintain wildlife populations, reduce damage to forests and crops, and minimize the number of traffic accidents involving cloven-hoofed wildlife. The Riksdag also decided to say no to 110 proposals in motions from the general motion period 2023 on hunting and wildlife management. The motions deal with, among other things, management of wolf and moose, review of the hunting law, measures against illegal hunting, lead ammunition and compensation for predator-repellent fencing. The Riksdag believes that work is already underway in the areas covered by the motions.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants licensed wolf hunting to coincide with elk hunting to increase flexibility in hunting. (C) — Reservation 4
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan sets high priority to protection of biological diversity and good conditions for rich ecosystems and wants to see ambitious environmental goals that are followed up with strict legislation.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan sets high priority to protection of biological diversity and good conditions for rich ecosystems and wants to see ambitious environmental goals that are followed up with strict legislation. Making wolf hunting more flexible and efficient by combining the hunting season with elk hunting aims at a smaller wolf population and pulls in the opposite direction. The counter-proposal's demand is therefore rejected by the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen sätter skyddet av den biologiska mångfalden och goda villkor för rika ekosystem högt och vill se ambitiösa miljömål som följs upp med skarp lagstiftning. Att göra licensjakten på varg mer flexibel och effektiv genom att lägga jaktperioden samman med älgjakten syftar till en mindre vargstam och drar åt motsatt håll. Motförslagets krav avvisas därför av planen.
- protect biological diversitydecisive»Vi måste lösa klimatkrisen och skydda den biologiska mångfalden – omställningen går alldeles för sakta.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We must solve the climate crisis and protect biological diversity – the transition is far too slow.”
- rich ecosystems»skapa goda villkor för rika ekosystem« (party programme ↗)“create good conditions for rich ecosystems”
- ambitious environmental goals»miljömål som följs upp med skarp lagstiftning och praktiskt arbete.« (party programme ↗)“environmental goals that are followed up with strict legislation and practical work.”
- consideration for animals»All djurhållning ska utgå från att djur är kännande« (party programme ↗)“All animal husbandry should be based on the understanding that animals are sentient”
The plan does not address either wolf management or hunting seasons.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not address either wolf management or hunting seasons. The closest principle is the party programme's requirement that biological diversity shall be protected and that nature's boundaries are absolute, which argues against making licensed wolf hunting more extensive and flexible. The conclusion rests solely on this general principle.
Original (Swedish)
Planen behandlar varken vargförvaltning eller jakttider. Närmast liggande princip är partiprogrammets krav på att den biologiska mångfalden ska skyddas och att naturens ramar är absoluta, vilket talar emot att göra licensjakten på varg mer omfattande och flexibel. Slutsatsen vilar enbart på denna allmänna princip.
- protect biological diversitydecisive»biologiska mångfalden måste skyddas.« (party programme ↗)“biological diversity must be protected.”
- nature's boundaries»Produktion och reproduktion kan organiseras på många olika sätt, men naturens ramar är« (party programme ↗)“Production and reproduction can be organised in many different ways, but nature's boundaries are”
- rural conditions are weighed in»Alla har ett gemensamt intresse av att hela landet kan leva och utvecklas.« (party programme ↗)“Everyone has a common interest in the whole country being able to live and develop.”
The plan requires long-term viable populations of wolf, lynx, bear and wolverine and that the predators are given the opportunity to regain their ecological function in the ecosystem.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires long-term viable populations of wolf, lynx, bear and wolverine and that the predators are given the opportunity to regain their ecological function in the ecosystem. To make hunting of wolves more flexible and effective by combining the hunting period with elk hunting aims instead to keep the population down. The plan also establishes that conservation interests should take precedence in hunting.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver långsiktigt livskraftiga stammar av varg, lo, björn och järv och att rovdjuren ges möjlighet att återfå sin ekologiska funktion i ekosystemet. Att göra licensjakten på varg mer flexibel och effektiv genom att lägga jaktperioden samman med älgjakten syftar tvärtom till att hålla stammen nere. Planen slår dessutom fast att naturvårdsintressen ska få företräde vid jakt.
- viable predator populationsdecisive»Sverige ska hysa långsiktigt livskraftiga stammar av de fyra stora rovdjuren: varg, lo, björn och järv.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden should support long-term viable populations of the four major predators: wolf, lynx, bear and wolverine.”
- predators' ecological function»Rovdjurens existens i Sverige ska inte enbart ses som överlevnad utan rovdjuren måste även ges möjlighet att återfå något av sin ekologiska funktion i ekosystemet.« (party programme ↗)“Predator existence in Sweden should not be seen only as survival but predators must also be given the opportunity to regain some of their ecological function in the ecosystem.”
- conservation before hunting interests»Det är viktigt att det ekologiska perspektivet sätts i fokus vid jakt och att naturvårdsintressen får företräde.« (party programme ↗)“It is important that the ecological perspective is put in focus in hunting and that conservation interests take precedence.”
- respect for nature's diversity»Respekten för naturens mångfald är en grundvärdering i den gröna ideologin.« (party programme ↗)“Respect for the diversity of nature is a fundamental value in the green ideology.”
The plan requires that protection of biological diversity harmonizes with rural populations' opportunities to conduct activities without risking loss of animals and property, and advocates active management of predators.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that protection of biological diversity harmonizes with rural populations' opportunities to conduct activities without risking loss of animals and property, and advocates active management of predators. Placing the hunting period for wolf so licensed hunting becomes more flexible and effective is a practical means for that active management and for acceptance among livestock keepers. The plan's demand to clean up complicated rules points in the same direction.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att värnandet av biologisk mångfald harmonierar med landsbygdsbefolkningens möjligheter att bedriva verksamhet utan att riskera förlust av djur och egendom, och förespråkar en aktiv förvaltning av rovdjur. Att lägga jaktperioden för varg så att licensjakten blir mer flexibel och effektiv är ett praktiskt medel för den aktiva förvaltningen och för acceptans hos djurhållarna. Planens krav på att rensa bland krångliga regler pekar åt samma håll.
- protect livestock keepersdecisive»möjligheter att leva och bedriva verksamheter utan att riskera förlust av djur och annan egendom.« (party programme ↗)“possibilities to live and conduct activities without risking loss of animals and other property.”
- active predator management»en aktiv förvaltning av rovdjur och klövvilt« (party programme ↗)“active management of predators and hoofed game”
- voluntariness and property rights»då frivillighet och äganderätt är grunden för en bättre naturvård.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“then voluntariness and property rights are the foundation for better nature conservation.”
- simpler rules in rural areas»Vi ska rensa upp bland överflödiga regler och byråkrati.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We should clean up excess rules and bureaucracy.”
The party programme establishes that Sweden shall have viable populations of all five large carnivores, explicitly including wolves.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme establishes that Sweden shall have viable populations of all five large carnivores, explicitly including wolves. The counter-proposal aims to make licensed wolf hunting more flexible and efficient by combining the hunting season with moose hunting, which tends toward a smaller wolf population and conflicts with that commitment. The plan's support for dialogue with local populations addresses the livestock farmers' situation, but does not resolve the question of expanded hunting.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att Sverige ska ha livskraftiga stammar av alla fem stora rovdjur, uttryckligen inklusive vargen. Motförslaget syftar till att göra licensjakten på varg mer flexibel och effektiv genom att lägga jaktperioden samman med älgjakten, vilket drar mot en mindre vargstam och står i strid med det åtagandet. Planens stöd för dialog med lokalbefolkningen svarar mot djurhållarnas situation, men avgör inte frågan om utökad jakt.
- viable wolf populationdecisive»Sverige ska ha livskraftiga stammar av alla de fem stora rovdjuren: björn, järv, lo, varg och kungsörn.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden shall have viable populations of all five large carnivores: bear, wolverine, lynx, wolf and golden eagle.”
- protection of threatened species»Hotade växter och djur ska skyddas genom fridlysning, information och biotopskydd.« (party programme ↗)“Threatened plants and animals shall be protected through protection status, information and habitat protection.”
- dialogue with local populations»Dialog med lokalbefolkningen i berörda områden är en viktig del av rovdjursförvaltningen.« (party programme ↗)“Dialogue with local populations in affected areas is an important part of carnivore management.”
- measures against illegal hunting»Det internationella samarbetet mot smuggling och olovlig jakt ska fördjupas.« (party programme ↗)“International cooperation against smuggling and illegal hunting shall be deepened.”
The election manifesto explicitly states that the wolf population shall be reduced to 170 individuals, which requires a licensed hunt that functions effectively in practice.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly states that the wolf population shall be reduced to 170 individuals, which requires a licensed hunt that functions effectively in practice. The party programme wants defensive hunting to be possible to protect life and property and for predator policy to be designed in consultation with the affected rural population, that is, with the livestock holders the counter-proposal highlights. Avoiding stress and injury to domestic animals follows from the plan's animal welfare perspective.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet säger uttryckligen att vargstammen ska minskas till 170 individer, vilket förutsätter en licensjakt som fungerar effektivt i praktiken. Partiprogrammet vill att skyddsjakt ska vara möjlig för att värna liv och egendom och att rovdjurspolitiken utformas i samråd med den berörda landsbygdsbefolkningen, alltså med de djurhållare motförslaget lyfter fram. Att undvika stress och skador hos tamdjur följer av planens djurskyddssyn.
- reduced wolf populationdecisive»Den svenska vargstammen ska minskas till 170 individer.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Swedish wolf population shall be reduced to 170 individuals.”
- defensive hunting protects life and property»också finnas möjlighet till skyddsjakt för att värna liv och egendom.« (party programme ↗)“also be possibility for defensive hunting to protect life and property.”
- consultation with the rural population»En långsiktigt hållbar rovdjurspolitik måste utformas i samråd med den berörda landsbygdsbefolkningen.« (party programme ↗)“A long-term sustainable predator policy must be designed in consultation with the affected rural population.”
- avoid suffering in domestic animals»Utgångspunkten för människans umgänge med djur bör vara, att så långt det är möjligt, undvika stress, smärta och skador för djuren.« (party programme ↗)“The starting point for humanity's dealings with animals should be, as far as possible, to avoid stress, pain and injury to animals.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan wants to reduce the wolf population to 170 wolves through increased hunting and states that the person who owns livestock shall not suffer economic damage from predator attacks.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to reduce the wolf population to 170 wolves through increased hunting and states that the person who owns livestock shall not suffer economic damage from predator attacks. To align the wolf's hunting period with the moose hunt to make licensed hunting more flexible and efficient is a means to precisely that increased hunting. The plan does not specify hunting times, wherefore support is inferred.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill minska vargstammen till 170 vargar genom ökad jakt och slår fast att den som äger tamboskap inte ska lida ekonomisk skada av rovdjursangrepp. Att lägga vargens jaktperiod samman med älgjakten för att göra licensjakten mer flexibel och effektiv är ett medel för just den ökade jakten. Planen anger inte jakttider, varför stödet är härlett.
- reduced wolf population through huntingdecisive»Verka för att minska vargstammen i Sverige till 170 vargar – genom ökad jakt« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Work towards reducing Sweden's wolf population to 170 wolves – through increased hunting”
- consideration for livestock owners»Samtidigt ska du som äger tamboskap inte lida ekonomisk skada på grund av rovdjursangrepp som du inte haft möjlighet att förhindra.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“At the same time, as an owner of livestock you shall not suffer economic damage because of predator attacks that you had no opportunity to prevent.”
- compensation for predator attacks»Höja ersättningsnivåerna för rovdjursangrepp så att de ligger i nivå med de faktiska kostnaderna« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Raise compensation levels for predator attacks so they are in line with actual costs”
- valued hunting tradition»Värna den svenska löshundsjakten« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Protect the Swedish loose-hound hunt”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires that the total large predator pressure be kept at reasonable levels in all parts of the country and that local influence over large predator policy increase.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that the total large predator pressure be kept at reasonable levels in all parts of the country and that local influence over large predator policy increase. Combining the wolf hunting period with elk hunting for more flexible and effective licence hunting is a practical application of this, in line with the plan's desire to facilitate hunting where game causes damage to livestock keepers and landowners.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att det sammantagna rovdjurstrycket hålls på rimliga nivåer i alla delar av landet och att det lokala inflytandet över rovdjurspolitiken ökar. Att lägga vargens jaktperiod samman med älgjakten för en mer flexibel och effektiv licensjakt är en praktisk tillämpning av det, i linje med planens vilja att underlätta jakten där viltet orsakar skador för djurhållare och markägare.
- reasonable large predator pressuredecisive»Ett större lokalt inflytande bör råda över rovdjurspolitiken. De stora rovdjuren måste förvaltas på ett ansvarsfullt sätt och det sammantagna rovdjurstrycket måste hållas på rimliga nivåer i alla delar av landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Greater local influence should prevail over large predator policy. The large predators must be managed responsibly and the total large predator pressure must be kept at reasonable levels in all parts of the country.”
- facilitated hunting»Underlätta jakt i områden med mycket vilt« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Facilitate hunting in areas with much game”
- balance between human and wildlife»Det finns behov av att långsiktigt förvalta bestånden av vilt för att uppnå en god balans mellan människor och djur« (2022 manifesto ↗)“There is a need to manage wildlife stocks in the long term to achieve a good balance between humans and animals”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2023/24:MJU14)
- Committee report full text (HB01MJU14)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2023/24:1012 — Vargföryngringar inom renskötselområdet av Helén Pettersson (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1015 — Acceptansen för den svenska älgförvaltningen av Helén Pettersson (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1063 — En hållbar småviltsjakt i de svenska fjällen av Helén Pettersson (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1181 — Minskat bestånd av skarv av Jim Svensk Larm och Kristoffer Lindberg (båda S)
- Motion 2023/24:1201 — Vargjakt av Jim Svensk Larm och Kristoffer Lindberg (båda S)
- Motion 2023/24:121 — Lättnader i reglerna för skyddsjakt av gäss av Eric Palmqvist (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1221 — Ökad möjlighet till licensjakt på varg i tamdjurstäta län av Anders Karlsson (C)
- Motion 2023/24:1245 — Förändrad lagstiftning för jakt av Martina Johansson (C)
- Motion 2023/24:1261 — Begränsning av förekomsten av vildsvin av Anders Ådahl (C)
- Motion 2023/24:1275 — Ett Skåne fritt från varg av Lars Johnsson och Emma Ahlström Köster (båda M)
- Motion 2023/24:1397 — Vargens påverkan på landsbygden och svensk livsmedelsproduktion av Ann-Sofie Alm (M)
- Motion 2023/24:1414 — Straffändring för olovlig jakt på varg av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2023/24:145 — Ersättning för skyddsjakt av Mathias Bengtsson (KD)
- Motion 2023/24:147 — Minskning av vargstammen i Dalarna av Mathias Bengtsson (KD)
- Motion 2023/24:149 — Skyddsjakt vid fäbodar av Mathias Bengtsson (KD)
- Motion 2023/24:1497 — Skarvens utbredning och påverkan i Blekinge av Heléne Björklund (S)
- Motion 2023/24:152 — Bockjakt av Magnus Jacobsson (KD)
- Motion 2023/24:1545 — Skarvar och sälar av Mattias Ottosson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:157 — Skottpengar på vildsvin av Erik Hellsborn (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1582 — Råbock av Emma Ahlström Köster och Lars Johnsson (båda M)
Source: The Swedish Parliament