2023-03-232022/23:MJU11 · p.10MJUEnvironment & agriculture
Direction of the food strategy
Direction of the national food strategy and supply security
What's at stake: Sweden imports large amounts of staple foods and farming inputs, making the question of how resilient the food chain is in a crisis or war central to national preparedness and to the security of both farmers and consumers.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the national food strategy should be updated to include supply security as a new, explicitly named strategic area, or whether the government's ongoing update work already takes this into account.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motions, pointing to the government's ongoing work to update the food strategy, which aims among other things to strengthen the food chain's competitiveness, increase Swedish production and reduce Sweden's vulnerability in a crisis, and also sees no reason to change the current targets for organic production.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 14 (S, C)
The reserving parties (S, C) want the food strategy updated with supply security and self-sufficiency as a new strategic area, arguing that the pandemic and the war in Ukraine have shown that Sweden is vulnerable due to its dependence on imported staple foods and farming inputs, and that the whole chain - not just production volume - must hold together in a crisis or war.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 14 by S, C.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have gone the other way
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: KDKristdemokraterna, MModeraterna, SDSverigedemokraterna
Ja 187–114Nej 49–252
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 20/0/0/4 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| S | No | No 0/94/0/13 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | Yes 15/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: high | not addressed |
| C | No | No 0/20/0/4 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| M | No | Yes 60/0/0/8 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| SD | No | Yes 62/0/0/11 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motions 2022/23:221 by Mikael Larsson (C), 2022/23:843 by Daniel Bäckström et al. (C) demand 1, 2022/23:851 by Mikael Larsson et al. (C) demand 20, 2022/23:1790 by Ulrika Heindorff (M), 2022/23:1833 by Sten Bergheden (M), 2022/23:1946 by Sten Bergheden (M), 2022/23:1952 by Sten Bergheden (M) demand 1 and 2022/23:2072 by Anna-Caren Sätherberg et al. (S) demands 3 and 4.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2022/23:221 av Mikael Larsson (C), 2022/23:843 av Daniel Bäckström m.fl. (C) yrkande 1, 2022/23:851 av Mikael Larsson m.fl. (C) yrkande 20, 2022/23:1790 av Ulrika Heindorff (M), 2022/23:1833 av Sten Bergheden (M), 2022/23:1946 av Sten Bergheden (M), 2022/23:1952 av Sten Bergheden (M) yrkande 1 och 2022/23:2072 av Anna-Caren Sätherberg m.fl. (S) yrkandena 3 och 4.
Riksdag decision: Parliament said no to the 110 proposals in motions on agricultural policy that came in during the general motion period 2022, primarily with reference to ongoing work. The proposals concern, among other things, the common agricultural policy, competitiveness, agriculture's impact on the environment and climate, biological diversity in the cultivated landscape and research issues.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants the national food strategy to be supplemented with the perspectives of supply security and supply capacity. (S, C) — Reservation 14
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan wants to invest in sustainable food production and food from its own countryside, and demands that more of the value of natural resources remains where they are produced.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to invest in sustainable food production and food from its own countryside, and demands that more of the value of natural resources remains where they are produced. Making supply security a separate strategic area in the food strategy is a means for precisely domestic and robust food production. The programme moreover recognises countries' right to protect their own production against undercutting competition.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill satsa på hållbar livsmedelsproduktion och mat från den egna landsbygden, och den kräver att mer av naturresursernas värden stannar där de produceras. Att göra försörjningstrygghet till ett eget strategiskt område i livsmedelsstrategin är ett medel för just en inhemsk och robust livsmedelsproduktion. Programmet erkänner dessutom länders rätt att skydda sin egen produktion mot underbudskonkurrens.
- sustainable food productiondecisive»En annan viktig del i den gröna omställningen är satsningar på hållbar livsmedelsproduktion.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Another important part of the green transition is investment in sustainable food production.”
- domestic food production»Hälsosammare mat från vår egen svenska landsbygd.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Healthier food from our own Swedish countryside.”
- value remains in production areas»Mer av naturresursernas värden måste stanna kvar där de utvinns och produceras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More of the value of natural resources must remain where they are extracted and produced.”
- right to protect own production»länder ska ha rätt att skydda sig mot underbuds- och miljöskadlig« (party programme ↗)“countries should have the right to protect themselves against undercutting and environmentally damaging”
Worldstate weighed in: The war in Ukraine and the pandemic have exposed dependence on imports of staple food — makes supply security an acute issue the plan did not anticipate and strengthens support for the requirement
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's commitment is that work on civil defense and crisis preparedness should continue, with emergency stockpiles and increased readiness in the transport sector.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's commitment is that work on civil defense and crisis preparedness should continue, with emergency stockpiles and increased readiness in the transport sector. The counter-proposal's requirement to make supply security a separate strategic area in the food strategy is an application of the same preparedness thinking to the food chain. The programme moreover requires an agricultural policy that ensures safe food. The food strategy is not mentioned in the documents, hence derived coverage.
Original (Swedish)
Planens åtagande är att arbetet med det civila försvaret och krisberedskapen ska fortsätta, med beredskapslager och ökad beredskap i transportsektorn. Motförslagets krav på att göra försörjningstrygghet till ett eget strategiskt område i livsmedelsstrategin är en tillämpning av samma beredskapstanke på livsmedelskedjan. Programmet kräver dessutom en jordbrukspolitik som tryggar säkra livsmedel. Livsmedelsstrategin nämns inte i dokumenten, därav härledd täckning.
- strengthened civil crisis preparednessdecisive»Arbetet att förstärka det civila försvaret och krisberedskapen måste fortsätta, bland annat genom ökade resurser för att rusta och bygga beredskapslager för sjukvården« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Work to strengthen civil defense and crisis preparedness must continue, among other things through increased resources to prepare and build emergency stockpiles for health care”
- readiness in the transport chain»öka beredskapen i transportsektorn.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“increase readiness in the transport sector.”
- agricultural policy for safe food»Jordbrukspolitiken ska utformas för att tillgodose« (party programme ↗)“Agricultural policy should be designed to meet”
- robustness against crises»Stärk beredskapen mot extremväder.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen readiness against extreme weather.”
The election manifesto requires that Swedish agriculture be strengthened for increased self-sufficiency in basic foodstuffs, and the party programme that production should contribute to a high degree of self-sufficiency and that Sweden and local communities become more self-sufficient and less vulnerable.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto requires that Swedish agriculture be strengthened for increased self-sufficiency in basic foodstuffs, and the party programme that production should contribute to a high degree of self-sufficiency and that Sweden and local communities become more self-sufficient and less vulnerable. Making supply security its own strategic area in the food strategy is thus the plan's own priority. The plan's condition is that this occurs with an ecological and fossil-free direction.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet kräver att det svenska jordbruket stärks för ökad självförsörjning med baslivsmedel, och partiprogrammet att produktionen ska bidra till en hög självförsörjningsgrad och att Sverige och lokalsamhällena blir mer självförsörjande och mindre sårbara. Att göra försörjningstrygghet till ett eget strategiskt område i livsmedelsstrategin är därmed planens egen prioritering. Planens villkor är att detta sker med ekologisk och fossiloberoende inriktning.
- increased self-sufficiency in basic foodstuffsdecisive»stärka det svenska jordbruket för ökad självförsörjning med baslivsmedel, och stödja övergången till ett ekologiskt och hållbart jordbruk med fossiloberoende arbetsmaskiner.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“strengthen Swedish agriculture for increased self-sufficiency in basic foodstuffs, and support the transition to ecological and sustainable agriculture with fossil-free working machinery.”
- less vulnerable society»bli mer självförsörjande och mindre sårbara.« (party programme ↗)“become more self-sufficient and less vulnerable.”
- high self-sufficiency level»till en hög självförsörjningsgrad på baslivsmedel« (party programme ↗)“to a high degree of self-sufficiency in basic foodstuffs”
- secure food supply»livsmedelsförsörjning ska Sverige vara ledande.« (party programme ↗)“food supply, Sweden should be leading.”
Worldstate weighed in: Inflation of 11.7 percent and pressured food chain — Sharpens the plan's requirements for self-sufficiency in basic foodstuffs
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto makes supply security a separate commitment: food supply is vital in case of war or crisis and food production must increase in the short and long term.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto makes supply security a separate commitment: food supply is vital in case of war or crisis and food production must increase in the short and long term. The plan also requires that civil defense and society's preparedness be strengthened, which is precisely the perspective the counter-proposal wants to bring into the food strategy. That the entire chain should function in crisis is thus in line with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet gör försörjningstryggheten till ett eget åtagande: livsmedelsförsörjningen är livsviktig i händelse av krig eller kris och matproduktionen måste öka på kort och lång sikt. Planen kräver dessutom att civilförsvaret och samhällets beredskap rustas, vilket är precis det perspektiv motförslaget vill lyfta in i livsmedelsstrategin. Att hela kedjan ska fungera vid kris ligger därmed i linje med planen.
- food supply securitydecisive»Den är viktig i goda tider och livsviktig i händelse av krig eller kris. Matproduktionen måste öka, på kort och lång sikt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is important in good times and vital in case of war or crisis. Food production must increase, in the short and long term.”
- increased supply security»En långsiktigt hållbar livsmedelsförsörjning med ökad försörjningstrygghet och ökad matproduktion kräver regelförenklingar och skattesänkningar« (2022 manifesto ↗)“A long-term sustainable food supply with increased supply security and increased food production requires regulatory simplifications and tax reductions”
- civil preparedness»Vi måste rusta civilförsvaret och samhällets beredskap inför krig och kris.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We must strengthen civil defense and society's preparedness for war and crisis.”
- protect farmland»Åkermarken är en begränsad tillgång som måste skyddas bättre.« (party programme ↗)“Farmland is a limited resource that must be protected better.”
The election manifesto requires that civil defense be strengthened at the same rate as the military, and the party programme sees dependence on other countries' deliveries as a security policy issue and emphasizes that arable agricultural land is important for food supply.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto requires that civil defense be strengthened at the same rate as the military, and the party programme sees dependence on other countries' deliveries as a security policy issue and emphasizes that arable agricultural land is important for food supply. Making supply security its own strategic area in the food strategy follows from this. The plan is at the same time explicitly free-trade friendly and sees open markets as part of food supply, which makes the support inferred rather than explicit.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet kräver att det civila försvaret stärks i samma takt som det militära, och partiprogrammet ser beroende av andra länders leveranser som en säkerhetspolitisk fråga och betonar att bördig jordbruksmark är viktig för matförsörjningen. Att göra försörjningstrygghet till ett eget strategiskt område i livsmedelsstrategin följer av detta. Planen är samtidigt uttalat frihandelsvänlig och ser öppna marknader som en del av livsmedelsförsörjningen, vilket gör stödet härlett snarare än uttalat.
- strengthened civil defensedecisive»Antalet anställda och värnpliktiga i krigsorganisationen ska öka, ny materiel tillföras och det civila försvaret stärkas i samma takt som det militära.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The number of employees and conscripts in the war organization shall increase, new equipment shall be introduced, and civil defense shall be strengthened at the same rate as the military.”
- dependence is a security risk»Många fria stater är beroende av odemokratiska regimer för sin energiförsörjning.« (party programme ↗)“Many free states are dependent on undemocratic regimes for their energy supply.”
- secure food supply»Bevarandet av bördig jordbruksmark är viktig för matförsörjningen av den växande världsbefolkningen.« (party programme ↗)“The preservation of arable agricultural land is important for food supply of the growing world population.”
- free trade as food strategy»Att öppna marknader för handel stimulerar livsmedelsproduktion och effektiv användning av åkermark.« (party programme ↗)“Opening markets for trade stimulates food production and efficient use of agricultural land.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto promises regulatory changes to increase Sweden's self-supply, and the party programme states that Sweden in principle should be able to meet the population's food supply and maintain preparedness for severance of foreign trade.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto promises regulatory changes to increase Sweden's self-supply, and the party programme states that Sweden in principle should be able to meet the population's food supply and maintain preparedness for severance of foreign trade. Food production is described as a basic industry that stewardship obligates us to care for. Making supply security a separate strategic area in food strategy follows directly from this.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet lovar regeländringar för att öka Sveriges självförsörjning, och partiprogrammet slår fast att Sverige i princip ska kunna svara för befolkningens livsmedelsförsörjning och hålla beredskap inför avspärrning av utrikeshandeln. Livsmedelsproduktion beskrivs som en basnäring som förvaltarskapet ålägger oss att vårda. Att göra försörjningstrygghet till ett eget strategiskt område i livsmedelsstrategin följer direkt av detta.
- own food supplydecisive»kunna svara för befolkningens livsmedels- och energi« (party programme ↗)“be able to meet the population's food and energy”
- increased self-supply»Regeländringar och kostnadslättnader för svenskt lantbruk för att öka Sveriges självförsörjning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Regulatory changes and cost relief for Swedish agriculture to increase Sweden's self-supply”
- secure food supply»Förvaltarskapsprincipen ska vara vägledande vid utformandet av en säker livsmedelsförsörjning.« (party programme ↗)“The stewardship principle shall guide the design of a secure food supply.”
- food as a basic industry»Produktionen av livsmedel är en basnäring som måste vårdas och« (party programme ↗)“The production of food is a basic industry that must be cared for and”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan states that the new security situation requires reduced vulnerability and increased self-sufficiency, and wants to strengthen the food strategy and prepare a plan for animal and plant production in heightened readiness.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that the new security situation requires reduced vulnerability and increased self-sufficiency, and wants to strengthen the food strategy and prepare a plan for animal and plant production in heightened readiness. To incorporate supply security as a separate strategic area in the food strategy is the same thing in substance. The plan therefore supports the demand.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att det nya säkerhetsläget kräver minskad sårbarhet och ökad självförsörjningsgrad, och vill förstärka livsmedelsstrategin samt ta fram en plan för animalieproduktion och växtodling vid höjd beredskap. Att lyfta in försörjningstrygghet som ett eget strategiskt område i livsmedelsstrategin är samma sak i sak. Planen stöder därför kravet.
- increased self-sufficiencydecisive»Det nya säkerhetsläget i Europa gör att vi som land måste minska vår sårbarhet och öka vår självförsörjningsgrad.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The new security situation in Europe means that we as a nation must reduce our vulnerability and increase our self-sufficiency.”
- strengthened food strategy»Förstärka livsmedelsstrategin« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen the food strategy”
- food production in heightened readiness»Ta fram en plan för hur animalieproduktion och växtodling ska kunna bedrivas vid höjd beredskap« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Prepare a plan for how animal production and plant cultivation can be conducted in heightened readiness”
- domestic food production»Stärka jordbruket för att öka den inhemska produktionen av livsmedel« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen agriculture to increase domestic food production”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan makes increased Swedish food self-sufficiency an explicit goal and requires that self-sufficiency in energy, food and medical material increases and can be rapidly scaled up during prolonged disruptions.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan makes increased Swedish food self-sufficiency an explicit goal and requires that self-sufficiency in energy, food and medical material increases and can be rapidly scaled up during prolonged disruptions. Introducing supply security and supply capacity as its own strategic area in the food strategy implements this commitment. The plan also requires planning for various types of major crises.
Original (Swedish)
Planen gör ökad svensk självförsörjning av livsmedel till ett uttalat mål och kräver att självförsörjningen av energi, livsmedel och medicinskt material ökar och snabbt kan skalas upp vid långvariga störningar. Att lyfta in försörjningstrygghet och försörjningsförmåga som eget strategiskt område i livsmedelsstrategin verkställer detta åtagande. Planen kräver också planering för olika typer av stora kriser.
- increased food self-sufficiencydecisive»Öka det svenska jordbrukets konkurrenskraft och Sveriges självförsörjning av livsmedel« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase Swedish agriculture's competitiveness and Sweden's food self-sufficiency”
- supply capacity in crisis»Sveriges självförsörjning av energi, livsmedel och medicinskt material behöver öka och snabbt kunna skalas upp vid långvariga störningar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden's self-sufficiency in energy, food and medical material needs to increase and be able to be rapidly scaled up during prolonged disruptions.”
- self-sufficiency in critical goods»Öka den svenska självförsörjningsgraden av kritiska produkter och varor« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase Sweden's self-sufficiency level for critical products and goods”
- crisis planning»Analysera och planera för olika typer av stora kriser« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Analyse and plan for various types of major crises”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2022/23:MJU11)
- Committee report full text (HA01MJU11)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2022/23:1006 — Långsiktigt planerande och byggande av Mikael Eskilandersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2022/23:1124 — En hållbar besöksnäring av Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:1208 — Livskraftig skånsk landsbygd av Peter Ollén m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2022/23:1645 — Ansvar för rovdjursförvaltningen av Kerstin Lundgren (C)
- Motion 2022/23:1672 — En levande landsbygd för Sveriges bästa av Annie Lööf m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:1673 — Jämställdhet för hållbar utveckling av Annie Lööf m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:1790 — En starkare livsmedelsstrategi av Ulrika Heindorff (M)
- Motion 2022/23:1831 — Underlättande av småskalig djurhållning på landsbygden av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2022/23:1833 — Mål för att uppnå livsmedelsstrategin av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2022/23:1834 — Dubbla ekonomiska sanktioner för Sveriges lantbrukare av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2022/23:1857 — Ekologisk mat av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2022/23:1861 — En konkurrenskraftsjämförelse årligen för lantbruket av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2022/23:1940 — Svensk biodling av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2022/23:1946 — Myndigheters anpassning efter livsmedelsstrategin av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2022/23:1952 — Strategi för ökad produktion och export av svensk mat av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2022/23:203 — Likvärdig stödområdesindelning för det nationella stödet och kompensationsstödet för norra Sverige av Helena Lindahl (C)
- Motion 2022/23:2072 — Utgiftsområde 23 Areella näringar, landsbygd och livsmedel av Anna-Caren Sätherberg m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:210 — Bekämpning av ogräsen stånds och renkavle av Mikael Larsson (C)
- Motion 2022/23:2110 — En kraftfull naturpolitik för starka ekosystem, biologisk mångfald och ökad klimatnytta av Per Bolund m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2022/23:2175 — En klimatpolitik som står upp för Parisavtalet av Per Bolund m.fl. (MP)
Source: The Swedish Parliament