2026-03-042025/26:NU12 · p.4NUBusiness & energy
Localization of state agencies
Relocating and spreading out central government agencies
What's at stake: Where state jobs and agencies are placed affects employment, services and confidence in the future for smaller towns and sparsely populated areas, and the decision determines whether more active government steering or continued case-by-case assessment should apply.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the government should actively steer where central government agencies are located - through a comprehensive programme for establishing and relocating agencies and renewed monitoring of their geographic spread - or whether location decisions should continue to be handled within ongoing review and reorganisation work, without a specific parliamentary directive.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee notes that the government has already carried out several relocations of central government agencies and that work to strengthen state presence continues, including through more service offices. Citing ongoing review work on how agencies are organised, the committee considers that location decisions should be weighed as part of an overall assessment rather than driven by a stand-alone programme, and therefore rejects the motions.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 12 (S, V)
The reservation (S, V) calls for the government to draw up a comprehensive programme for establishing and relocating central government agencies, and to resume monitoring of how agencies distribute their functions geographically. The reasoning is that a wider regional spread strengthens the state's legitimacy and public trust in smaller towns, and that an ongoing trend toward centralisation - for example new agency functions being placed in Stockholm rather than smaller towns - risks working against regional development.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 12 by S, V.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have gone the other way
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: LLiberalerna, SDSverigedemokraterna
Ja 188–115Nej 113–190
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/19/0/3 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| S | No | No 0/93/0/13 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| MP | No | Yes 15/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | No | Yes 21/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: high | derived |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: medium | explicit |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: high | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | match | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 61/0/0/10 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2025/26:616 by Marie Olsson et al. (S), 2025/26:843 by Niels Paarup-Petersen (C) demand 1, 2025/26:3595 by Fredrik Olovsson et al. (S) demands 2 and 3, and 2025/26:3721 by Jennie Nilsson et al. (S) demand 16.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:616 av Marie Olsson m.fl. (S), 2025/26:843 av Niels Paarup-Petersen (C) yrkande 1, 2025/26:3595 av Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S) yrkandena 2 och 3 samt 2025/26:3721 av Jennie Nilsson m.fl. (S) yrkande 16.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag said no to 70 proposals about regional development policy in motions from the general motion period 2025. The proposals concern measures for regional development and growth, commercial and public service, reallocation of funds from production values, natural resources and property, localization of state agencies, and measures for certain regions. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to ongoing measures and investigation.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to reinstate and increase state grants to Sweden's smallest municipalities to strengthen business development in rural areas. (S, V) — Reservation 12
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan wants to use collective ownership and economic tools for regionally balanced development and states that welfare and services should exist everywhere.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to use collective ownership and economic tools for regionally balanced development and states that welfare and services should exist everywhere. A comprehensive programme for new placement and relocation of government agencies is a means to counter the centralisation that, according to the plan, leaves industrial towns and countryside behind. The plan does not address agency location directly, so the assessment is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill använda det gemensamma ägandet och de ekonomiska verktygen för en regionalt balanserad utveckling och slår fast att välfärd och service ska finnas överallt. Ett samlat program för ny- och omlokalisering av myndigheter är ett medel för att motverka den centralisering som enligt planen lämnar bruksorter och landsbygd efter. Planen behandlar inte myndigheters lokalisering direkt, varför bedömningen är härledd.
- regionally balanced developmentdecisive»för att skapa en regionalt balanserad ekonomisk utveckling.« (party programme ↗)“to create regionally balanced economic development.”
- the countryside must not be impoverished»Oavsett var i landet vi bor så har vi ett gemensamt intresse av att landsbygden inte utarmas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Regardless of where in the country we live, we have a common interest in the countryside not being impoverished.”
- towns are left behind»Stadsdelar, förorter, bruksorter, småorter och landsbygd lämnas med« (party programme ↗)“City districts, suburbs, industrial towns, small towns and countryside are left with”
- public presence everywhere»Skola, vård, omsorg och annan service behöver fungera överallt.« (party programme ↗)“School, healthcare, care and other services need to function everywhere.”
The plan's decisive commitment is that the state should be present throughout the country and take greater responsibility for equal conditions, with labour market policy that provides job opportunities around Sweden.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's decisive commitment is that the state should be present throughout the country and take greater responsibility for equal conditions, with labour market policy that provides job opportunities around Sweden. A broader regional distribution of authorities and a comprehensive program for relocation and new location is exactly what the counter-proposal requires and the plan promises. Centralized establishments go in the opposite direction.
Original (Swedish)
Planens avgörande åtagande är att staten ska finnas närvarande i hela landet och ta ett större ansvar för likvärdiga förutsättningar, med arbetsmarknadspolitik som ger jobbmöjligheter runt om i Sverige. En bredare regional spridning av myndigheter och ett samlat program för om- och nylokalisering är just det motförslaget kräver och planen lovar. Centraliserade etableringar går i motsatt riktning.
- state presence throughout the countrydecisive»Staten ska finnas närvarande i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The state should be present throughout the country.”
- equal conditions»Större statligt ansvar för likvärdiga förutsättningar i hela Sverige.« (party programme ↗)“Greater state responsibility for equal conditions throughout Sweden.”
- jobs throughout the country»Nationell arbetsmarknadspolitik med regional förankring som ger goda möjligheter till« (party programme ↗)“National labour market policy with regional anchorage that provides good opportunities for”
- services throughout the country»God tillgång till samhällets service i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“Good access to society's services throughout the country.”
The plan states that all of Sweden shall live and that society's institutions shall be present in all areas, and it wants to reduce geographic inequality.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that all of Sweden shall live and that society's institutions shall be present in all areas, and it wants to reduce geographic inequality. Economic policy shall also contribute to regional development so that all of Sweden can grow. A comprehensive programme for localization of state authorities is a direct tool against the centralization the plan opposes.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att hela Sverige ska leva och att samhällets institutioner ska vara närvarande i alla områden, och den vill minska de geografiska klyftorna. Den ekonomiska politiken ska dessutom bidra till regional utveckling så att hela landet kan växa. Ett samlat program för lokalisering av statliga myndigheter är ett direkt verktyg mot den centralisering planen vänder sig mot.
- state presence everywheredecisive»Samhället och dess institutioner ska vara närvarande i alla områden.« (party programme ↗)“Society and its institutions shall be present in all areas.”
- reduced geographic inequality»Vi vill minska de geografiska klyftorna och ge hela landet goda förutsättningar att utvecklas.« (party programme ↗)“We want to reduce geographic inequality and give all areas good conditions to develop.”
- regional development»bidra till regional utveckling så att hela Sverige kan växa och må bra.« (party programme ↗)“contribute to regional development so that all of Sweden can grow and do well.”
- all of Sweden shall live»Hela Sverige ska leva – från glesbygd till storstad och från skärgård till inland.« (party programme ↗)“All of Sweden shall live – from countryside to city and from archipelago to inland.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan identifies that reduced agency presence in parts of the country leads to lower trust and requires that public services be close and reliable throughout the country, with equal conditions for all parts of the country.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan identifies that reduced agency presence in parts of the country leads to lower trust and requires that public services be close and reliable throughout the country, with equal conditions for all parts of the country. A comprehensive program for relocation and establishment of agencies and resumed monitoring of their geographical distribution is a direct tool for this and for the plan's decentralization line. The plan does not mention individual agencies' location, so the conclusion is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planen pekar ut att myndigheters minskade närvaro i delar av landet leder till lägre tillit och kräver att offentlig service ska vara nära och pålitlig i hela landet, med likvärdiga förutsättningar för alla delar av landet. Ett samlat program för ny- och omlokalisering av myndigheter och återupptagen uppföljning av deras geografiska spridning är ett direkt verktyg för detta och för planens decentraliseringslinje. Planen nämner inte enskilda myndigheters placering, varför slutsatsen härleds.
- state presence and trustdecisive»På många håll har myndigheters närvaro och förståelse för människors livssituation minskat, vilket leder till lägre tillit.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“In many places, agency presence and understanding of people's life situations has decreased, leading to lower trust.”
- decentralization»Decentralisera mera. Människor ska få bestämma mer själva, och politiska beslut ska fattas nära dem som berörs.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Decentralize more. People should decide more for themselves, and political decisions should be made close to those affected.”
- service throughout the country»Offentlig service ska vara nära och pålitlig i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Public services should be close and reliable throughout the country.”
- equal conditions»Alla delar av landet ska ges likvärdiga förutsättningar för utveckling och tillväxt.« (party programme ↗)“All parts of the country should be given equal conditions for development and growth.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto promises that state authorities shall be present in all parts of Sweden and the party programme that access to state service shall be secured throughout the country.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto promises that state authorities shall be present in all parts of Sweden and the party programme that access to state service shall be secured throughout the country. A broader regional distribution of authorities and workplaces is what corresponds to that commitment, and the plan also wants to strengthen conditions for business and growth throughout the country. Digitalization, which the plan welcomes, makes distribution easier to implement.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet lovar att statliga myndigheter ska finnas närvarande i alla delar av Sverige och partiprogrammet att tillgången till statlig service ska säkras i hela landet. En bredare regional spridning av myndigheter och arbetsplatser är det som svarar mot det åtagandet, och planen vill också stärka förutsättningarna för företagande och tillväxt i hela landet. Digitaliseringen, som planen bejakar, gör spridningen lättare att genomföra.
- authorities throughout the countrydecisive»Vägnätet ska fungera och statliga myndigheter ska finnas närvarande i alla delar av Sverige.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The road network shall function and state authorities shall be present in all parts of Sweden.”
- state service throughout the country»Tillgången till statlig service ska säkras i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“Access to state service shall be secured throughout the country.”
- growth throughout the country»Förutsättningarna för företagande, innovationer och tillväxt ska stärkas i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“Conditions for business, innovation, and growth shall be strengthened throughout the country.”
- digital accessibility»En central princip är därför att alla offentliga funktioner som till en rimlig kostnad kan göras digitalt tillgängliga också ska göras digitalt tillgängliga.« (party programme ↗)“A central principle is therefore that all public functions that can be made digitally accessible at reasonable cost shall also be made digitally accessible.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The party programme demands that societal planning be characterized by a purposeful striving toward a decentralized society and that new technology enabling decentralization of production and decision-making is seized.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme demands that societal planning be characterized by a purposeful striving toward a decentralized society and that new technology enabling decentralization of production and decision-making is seized. The state is responsible for state services being available throughout Sweden, and the election manifesto wants to establish more state service offices. A comprehensive programme for relocation of public agencies is a means for precisely this.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet kräver att samhällsplaneringen präglas av en målmedveten strävan mot ett decentraliserat samhälle och att ny teknik som möjliggör decentralisering av produktion och beslutsfattande tas tillvara. Staten ansvarar för att statlig service är tillgänglig i hela Sverige, och valmanifestet vill inrätta fler statliga servicekontor. Ett samlat program för omlokalisering av myndigheter är ett medel för just detta.
- decentralized societydecisive»målmedveten strävan mot ett decentraliserat samhälle.« (party programme ↗)“purposeful striving toward a decentralized society.”
- seize opportunities for decentralization»skapar stora möjligheter till decentralisering av produktion och beslutsfattande ska tas« (party programme ↗)“creates great opportunities for decentralization of production and decision-making should be seized”
- state presence throughout the country»Samtidigt har staten ansvar för att den statliga servicen är tillgänglig i hela Sverige.« (party programme ↗)“At the same time, the state has responsibility for state services being available throughout Sweden.”
- more state service offices»Fler poliser med lokal närvaro, utbyggd primärvård, enklare starta lokal läkarmottagning och inrätta fler statliga servicekontor. Du ska känna dig trygg i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More police with local presence, expanded primary healthcare, easier to start local medical office and establish more state service offices. You shall feel safe throughout the country.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The counter-proposal wants a comprehensive programme for relocation and re-localisation of state agencies as a tool against centralisation.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wants a comprehensive programme for relocation and re-localisation of state agencies as a tool against centralisation. The plan contains no such commitment but wants instead to go through the agencies' finances to free up resources for defence and prioritise hard between expenditures. That the state should be present near citizens throughout the country is admittedly a commitment, but the plan expresses it as functioning service rather than as geographical placement of agencies.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill ha ett samlat program för ny- och omlokalisering av statliga myndigheter som styrmedel mot centralisering. Planen innehåller inget sådant åtagande utan vill tvärtom gå igenom myndigheternas ekonomi för att frigöra resurser till försvaret och prioritera hårt mellan utgifter. Att staten ska finnas nära medborgarna i hela landet är visserligen ett åtagande, men planen uttrycker det som fungerande service snarare än som geografisk placering av myndigheter.
- streamline agenciesdecisive»Inrätta ett effektiviseringskansli som ska gå inom alla myndigheters ekonomi för att frigöra resurser till försvaret« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Establish an efficiency office that shall go through all agencies' finances to free up resources for defence”
- prioritisation of core tasks»De stora behoven inom rättsväsendet, försvaret och välfärden ställer stora krav på prioriteringar under åren som kommer.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The major needs within the judiciary, defence and welfare make high demands on prioritisation in the years to come.”
- state presence throughout the country»Mobiltäckning överallt ska vara en självklarhet, liksom vetskapen om att polisen kommer när du ringer oavsett var du bor.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Mobile coverage everywhere should be taken for granted, as should the certainty that the police will come when you call regardless of where you live.”
The plan explicitly says that the party sees potential in relocating more government jobs to smaller towns, which is the core of the counter-proposal's demand for a programme for new and relocation.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly says that the party sees potential in relocating more government jobs to smaller towns, which is the core of the counter-proposal's demand for a programme for new and relocation. The plan wants to conduct policy for all of Sweden and invest in public services throughout the country, which speaks against continued centralisation to Stockholm. Simultaneously the plan requires efficiency in the government structure, which sets a limit on how relocation should be implemented.
Original (Swedish)
Planen säger uttryckligen att partiet ser potential i att utlokalisera fler myndighetsjobb till mindre orter, vilket är kärnan i motförslagets krav på ett program för ny- och omlokalisering. Planen vill bedriva en politik för hela Sverige och satsa på samhällsservice i hela landet, vilket talar mot fortsatt centralisering till Stockholm. Samtidigt kräver planen effektivitet i myndighetsstrukturen, vilket sätter en gräns för hur omlokalisering ska genomföras.
- relocate government jobsdecisive»Sverigedemokraterna ser potential för att utlokalisera fler myndighetsjobb till mindre orter men det främsta verktyget för tillväxt och jobb på landsbygd är enklare regler och möjligheter för landsbygden att växa.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats see potential to relocate more government jobs to smaller towns but the primary tool for growth and jobs in rural areas is simpler rules and opportunities for rural areas to grow.”
- policy for the whole country»Bedriva en politik för hela Sverige« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Conduct policy for all of Sweden”
- state services throughout the country»Sverigedemokraterna vill satsa på en stark välfärd och samhällsservice i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats want to invest in strong welfare and public services throughout the country.”
- efficient government structure»Stoppa slöseriet inom myndigheterna och slå samman myndigheter« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop waste within government agencies and merge agencies”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:NU12)
- Committee report full text (HD01NU12)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:1117 — Regionalisering av fastighetsskatten på vatten- och vindkraft av Anne-Li Sjölund (C)
- Motion 2025/26:1132 — Utvärdering av fastighetsskatten av Martina Johansson (C)
- Motion 2025/26:1230 — Västsvensk industri av Erik Ezelius (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1246 — Statlig närvaro i hela landet av Anna-Caren Sätherberg och Lena Bäckelin (båda S)
- Motion 2025/26:1269 — Statlig närvaro i hela landet av Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1276 — Reformer för ökad tillväxt i Stockholmsregionen av Josefin Malmqvist m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1382 — Västmotion om energi- och näringspolitik av Marcus Andersson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:156 — Utredning om förutsättningarna för en regionalisering av fastighetsskatten för elproduktions- och industrifastigheter av Eric Palmqvist m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1660 — Livskraftig skånsk landsbygd av Peter Ollén m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1852 — Uppdaterad strategi för norra Sverige av Lena Bäckelin m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1889 — Det svenska säkerhetsstråket av Caroline Högström m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1890 — Länen norr om Dalälven förtjänar utdelning av Viktor Wärnick (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1944 — Resursavgift på gruvbrytning för rättvis regional utveckling av Lars Isacsson (S)
- Motion 2025/26:221 — Antagande av den norska modellen för en levande landsbygd av Elsa Widding (-)
- Motion 2025/26:2241 — Framtagande av en ö-strategi av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2273 — Regionala skärgårdssamordnare för en hållbar utveckling på västkusten av Johanna Rantsi (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2334 — Statlig närvaro av Isak From och Åsa Karlsson (båda S)
- Motion 2025/26:2490 — Gotlandsstödet av Jesper Skalberg Karlsson (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2507 — Öpolitiken av Jesper Skalberg Karlsson (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2678 — Behovet av en fortsatt stark sammanhållningspolitik av Robert Olesen (S)
Source: The Swedish Parliament