2026-04-222025/26:SfU22 · p.1SfUMigration & social insurance

Government's bill

The government's legislative proposal for a new suspension-of-removal arrangement for temporary enforcement obstacles

What's at stake: The proposal concerns foreigners who have received a removal decision but cannot currently be deported, for example for security reasons or after a criminal conviction, and determines whether they receive a residence permit with rights in the meantime or only a temporary reprieve without such status.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether parliament should adopt the government's legislative proposal to allow enforcement of removal decisions to be suspended (inhibition) instead of granting time-limited residence permits when there is a temporary obstacle to removal, or whether the proposal should be rejected on rule-of-law and proportionality grounds.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee supports the government's proposal and considers there are strong grounds for suspending enforcement instead of granting time-limited residence permits when there is a temporary obstacle to removal, in order to achieve more effective return processes. The committee therefore endorses the bill and rejects the motions.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 1 (V, MP)

The reservation holds that the proposal involves excessive infringements on individuals' human rights and lacks clear guidance for a legally certain and uniform application. The provisions, particularly on suspending enforcement based on circumstances relating to a foreigner's conduct, are not sufficiently predictable and risk arbitrary and disproportionate assessments, while the impact analysis is deficient and the proposal's benefits are uncertain. The government's proposal should therefore be rejected.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: adopting the government's legislative proposal and rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by V, MP.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
Vown reservationNoNo 0/16/0/6follows the planconfidence: highexplicit
SYesYes 90/0/0/16follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MPown reservationNoNo 0/13/0/5follows the planconfidence: highderived
CNoYes 20/0/0/4departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
LYesYes 11/0/0/5follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
KDYesYes 14/0/0/5follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
MYesYes 55/0/0/11follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
SDYesYes 60/0/0/10follows the planconfidence: highderived

Committee proposal

Parliament adopts the government's proposal for 1. law on assistance to certain foreign nationals in inhibition of enforcement, 2. law on amendment to the Social Insurance Code, 3. law on amendment to the law (1993:387) on support and services for certain disabled persons, 4. law on amendment to the law (1994:137) on reception of asylum seekers et al., 5. law on amendment to the Income Tax Act (1999:1229), 6. law on amendment to the Aliens Act (2005:716), 7. law on amendment to the law (2008:344) on healthcare for asylum seekers et al., 8. law on amendment to the Education Act (2010:800), 9. law on amendment to the law (2025:729) on amendment to the Education Act (2010:800), 10. law on amendment to the law (2017:584) on responsibility for establishment initiatives for certain newly arrived immigrants, 11. law on amendment to the Social Services Act (2025:400). Thereby Parliament grants proposition 2025/26:145 points 1-11 and rejects the motions 2025/26:3928 by Tony Haddou et al. (V) demand 1 and 2025/26:3930 by Annika Hirvonen et al. (MP) demand 1.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen antar regeringens förslag till 1. lag om bistånd till vissa utlänningar vid inhibition av verkställigheten, 2. lag om ändring i socialförsäkringsbalken, 3. lag om ändring i lagen (1993:387) om stöd och service till vissa funktionshindrade, 4. lag om ändring i lagen (1994:137) om mottagande av asylsökande m.fl., 5. lag om ändring i inkomstskattelagen (1999:1229), 6. lag om ändring i utlänningslagen (2005:716), 7. lag om ändring i lagen (2008:344) om hälso- och sjukvård åt asylsökande m.fl., 8. lag om ändring i skollagen (2010:800), 9. lag om ändring i lagen (2025:729) om ändring i skollagen (2010:800), 10. lag om ändring i lagen (2017:584) om ansvar för etableringsinsatser för vissa nyanlända invandrare, 11. lag om ändring i socialtjänstlagen (2025:400). Därmed bifaller riksdagen proposition 2025/26:145 punkterna 1-11 och avslår motionerna 2025/26:3928 av Tony Haddou m.fl. (V) yrkande 1 och 2025/26:3930 av Annika Hirvonen m.fl. (MP) yrkande 1.

Riksdag decision: Parliament approved the government's proposal for a new arrangement in temporary enforcement impediments. A foreign national who resides in Sweden but who for various reasons does not have the right to stay in the country may be issued a decision on removal or deportation. However, there may be enforcement impediments, which means that a decision on removal or deportation cannot be carried out. The impediment may concern that the person risks being punished with death, subjected to torture, or other inhuman or degrading treatment. Today, temporary residence permits are often granted in case of temporary impediments to removal or deportation. The decision means that the deportation or removal is postponed rather than the person being granted a time-limited residence permit. The foreign national may also be required to report to the Migration Agency or the Police Authority and at the same time be prohibited from leaving a residence area. The purpose of the new rules is to create conditions for more efficient work on returns. Furthermore, the rules shall strengthen the state's ability to manage persons who pose a threat to Sweden and who for a certain period cannot leave the country. The new rules enter into force on 1 June 2026.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoNofollows the planexplicit

The election manifesto establishes that temporary and conditional residence permits are a form of psychological violence and that only permanent residence permits shall be issued upon granted asylum.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto establishes that temporary and conditional residence permits are a form of psychological violence and that only permanent residence permits shall be issued upon granted asylum. The party programme furthermore requires an individual and legally secure assessment under dignified circumstances. The counter-proposal's objection that the bill restricts individuals' human rights and lacks predictability thereby lies directly in line with the plan's commitments.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet slår fast att tillfälliga och villkorade uppehållstillstånd är en form av psykologiskt våld och att endast permanenta uppehållstillstånd ska utfärdas vid beviljad asyl. Partiprogrammet kräver dessutom en individuell och rättssäker prövning under värdiga omständigheter. Motförslagets invändning att lagförslaget inskränker enskildas mänskliga rättigheter och saknar förutsebarhet ligger därmed direkt i linje med planens åtaganden.

  • against conditional residence permitsdecisive»Vänsterpartiet anser att den inhumana flyktingpolitik som råder, med tillfälliga och villkorade uppehållstillstånd, är en form av psykologiskt våld mot en redan utsatt grupp.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party considers the inhumane refugee policy that prevails, with temporary and conditional residence permits, to be a form of psychological violence against an already vulnerable group.”
  • legally secure asylum assessment»sin rätt till en individuell och rättssäker prövning under värdiga« (party programme ↗)“their right to an individual and legally secure assessment under dignified”
  • permanent residence permits»Rätten att söka asyl kan aldrig tummas på, vi kräver att endast permanenta uppehållstillstånd ska utfärdas vid beviljad asyl.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The right to seek asylum can never be compromised, we demand that only permanent residence permits be issued upon granted asylum.”
  • foreseeable legal application»Utvecklingen av ett rättsväsende byggt på rättssäkerhet är viktig« (party programme ↗)“Development of a legal system built on legal security is important”
SSocialdemokraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The election manifesto states that the tightening of migration policy is fixed and the party programme bases policy on regulated immigration; more effective return work is in line with this.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto states that the tightening of migration policy is fixed and the party programme bases policy on regulated immigration; more effective return work is in line with this. The counter-proposal wants to stop the proposal citing overly large restrictions on individuals' rights. The plan's rule-of-law and rights commitments are general and do not outweigh the explicitly strict migration line.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet slår fast att åtstramningen av migrationspolitiken ligger fast och partiprogrammet bygger politiken på reglerad invandring; ett mer effektivt återvändandearbete ligger i linje med detta. Motförslaget vill stoppa förslaget med hänvisning till alltför stora inskränkningar i enskildas rättigheter. Planens rättsstats- och rättighetsåtaganden är allmänna och väger inte över den uttalat strama migrationslinjen.

  • continuing strict migration policydecisive»Vi har stramat åt migrationspolitiken, och denna linje ligger fast.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We have tightened migration policy, and this line is fixed.”
  • regulated immigration»Det måste bygga på principen om reglerad invandring« (party programme ↗)“It must be based on the principle of regulated immigration”
  • rule of law principles»Slå vakt om rättsstatens principer.« (party programme ↗)“Protect the rule of law principles.”
  • civil liberties and rights»Skydd för medborgerliga fri- och rättigheter.« (party programme ↗)“Protection of civil liberties and rights.”
MPMiljöpartietNoNofollows the planderived

The plan requires a humane and legally secure migration policy, that no one is forced to return to oppression or mortal danger and that permanent residence permits are the main rule.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires a humane and legally secure migration policy, that no one is forced to return to oppression or mortal danger and that permanent residence permits are the main rule. The counter-proposal's objection that the bill narrows individuals' rights and lacks foreseeable, legally secure application follows from these commitments. The plan also requires that new legislation be carefully tested against fundamental freedoms and rights.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver en human och rättssäker migrationspolitik, att ingen tvingas återvända till förtryck eller livsfara och att permanenta uppehållstillstånd är huvudregel. Motförslagets invändning att lagförslaget inskränker enskildas rättigheter och saknar förutsebar, rättssäker tillämpning följer av dessa åtaganden. Planen kräver också att ny lagstiftning prövas noggrant mot grundläggande fri- och rättigheter.

  • humane and legally secure migrationdecisive»Vi gröna står för en human och rättssäker migrationspolitik.« (party programme ↗)“We Greens stand for a humane and legally secure migration policy.”
  • protection against return to danger»Ingen ska tvingas återvända till förtryck eller livsfara.« (party programme ↗)“No one should be forced to return to oppression or mortal danger.”
  • legally secure asylum process»stärka rättssäkerheten i asylprocessen och stödet för hbtqi-flyktingar och andra sårbara grupper.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“strengthen legal certainty in the asylum process and support for LGBTIQ+ refugees and other vulnerable groups”
  • testing against freedoms and rights»prövas noggrant utifrån rättssäkerhet och grundläggande fri- och rättigheter.« (party programme ↗)“be carefully tested against legal certainty and fundamental freedoms and rights.”

flags: citat_migrerat

CCenterpartietNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan establishes that the rule of law and the individual's rights against the state must be defended and that everyone living in Sweden should be able to have their case heard, with requirements for proportionality in every restriction.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that the rule of law and the individual's rights against the state must be defended and that everyone living in Sweden should be able to have their case heard, with requirements for proportionality in every restriction. The counter-proposal's objection that the proposal lacks predictability and risks arbitrary assessment rests on the same principle. However, the plan does not specifically address enforcement obstacles.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att rättsstaten och individens rättigheter gentemot staten måste försvaras och att alla som bor i Sverige ska kunna få sin sak prövad, med krav på proportionalitet i varje inskränkning. Motförslagets invändning att förslaget saknar förutsebarhet och riskerar godtyckliga bedömningar vilar på samma princip. Planen behandlar dock inte verkställighetshinder särskilt.

  • rule of law defendeddecisive»Rättsstaten och individens rättigheter gentemot staten måste försvaras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The rule of law and the individual's rights against the state must be defended.”
  • right to have one's case heard»Alla som bor i Sverige ska kunna få sin sak prövad.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Everyone living in Sweden should be able to have their case heard.”
  • proportionality in restrictions»Det måste finnas en proportionalitet mellan lagstiftningens inskränkning av medborgarnas integritet och lagarnas syfte.« (party programme ↗)“There must be proportionality between legislation's restriction of citizens' integrity and the laws' purpose.”
  • humane migration policy»Centerpartiet strävar efter öppna gränser, fri rörlighet samt en generös och human flykting- och invandringspolitik.« (party programme ↗)“The Centre Party strives for open borders, free movement and a generous and humane refugee and immigration policy.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

LLiberalernaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan's binding formulation is that asylum rights shall be protected so that those with asylum grounds stay and those without leave the country, and it wants more who await enforcement to be held in detention.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's binding formulation is that asylum rights shall be protected so that those with asylum grounds stay and those without leave the country, and it wants more who await enforcement to be held in detention. An arrangement that makes return work more effective during temporary enforcement obstacles thus aligns with the plan, while the counter-proposal's rejection request does not. The plan simultaneously requires that the asylum process lives up to international law commitments, which pulls the opposite direction and lowers confidence.

Original (Swedish)

Planens bindande formulering är att asylrätten ska värnas så att den med asylskäl stannar och den utan skäl lämnar landet, och den vill att fler som väntar på verkställighet hålls i förvar. En ordning som gör återvändandearbetet effektivare vid tillfälliga verkställighetshinder ligger därmed i linje med planen, medan motförslagets avslagsyrkande gör det inte. Planen kräver samtidigt att asylprocessen lever upp till folkrättsliga åtaganden, vilket drar åt motsatt håll och sänker säkerheten.

  • effective returndecisive»Asylrätten ska värnas där den med asylskäl ska stanna och den utan skäl lämnar landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Asylum rights shall be protected so that those with asylum grounds stay and those without leave the country.”
  • more in detention»Fler som väntar på både utvisning och avvisning ska hållas i förvar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More who await both deportation and removal shall be held in detention.”
  • international law commitments»Asylprocessen i Sverige behöver förändras för att leva upp till folkrättsliga åtaganden.« (party programme ↗)“The asylum process in Sweden needs to change to live up to international law commitments.”
  • quality-reviewed enforcement»Avvisningar och utvisningar från Sverige ska utvärderas och kvalitetsgranskas.« (party programme ↗)“Removals and deportations from Sweden shall be evaluated and quality-reviewed.”
KDKristdemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The election manifesto demands strict migration policy and the party programme that irregular migration is countered, which speaks for an order that makes return work more efficient.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto demands strict migration policy and the party programme that irregular migration is countered, which speaks for an order that makes return work more efficient. The counter-proposal's demand to reject the bill as an excessively large rights restriction therefore does not align with the plan. The plan's requirement for a legally secure process and information about voluntary return is, however, a condition that must be fulfilled.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet kräver en stram migrationspolitik och partiprogrammet att irreguljär migration motverkas, vilket talar för en ordning som gör återvändandearbetet effektivare. Motförslagets krav på att avvisa lagförslaget som en alltför stor rättighetsinskränkning ligger därför inte i linje med planen. Planens krav på en rättssäker process och på information om frivillig återvandring är dock ett villkor som måste uppfyllas.

  • strict migration policydecisive»Stram migrationspolitik krävs för att ta itu med integrationsproblem och utanförskap.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strict migration policy is required to address integration problems and exclusion.”
  • counter irregular migration»Vi vill motverka irreguljär migration, motverka människosmuggling och ha ett« (party programme ↗)“We want to counter irregular migration, counter human smuggling and have a”
  • legally secure process»För den som söker asyl i Sverige måste hela processen vara utformad så att rättssäkerhet« (party programme ↗)“For those seeking asylum in Sweden, the entire process must be designed so that legal security”
  • support for voluntary return»Det är viktigt att seriös och tidig information ges om möjligheterna« (party programme ↗)“It is important that serious and early information is provided about the opportunities”
MModeraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan's core commitment is that those who have received a rejection shall leave the country as quickly as possible and that asylum legislation shall be at the minimum level according to EU law.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's core commitment is that those who have received a rejection shall leave the country as quickly as possible and that asylum legislation shall be at the minimum level according to EU law. The counter-proposal's objection that the new arrangement restricts rights too much would brake exactly the more efficient return that the plan requires. The plan moreover sees the shadow economy, not sharpened enforcement rules, as what damages individuals most.

Original (Swedish)

Planens bärande åtagande är att den som fått avslag så snabbt som möjligt ska lämna landet och att asyllagstiftningen ska ligga på EU-rättens miniminivå. Motförslagets invändning att den nya ordningen inskränker rättigheter för mycket skulle bromsa just det effektivare återvändande planen kräver. Planen ser dessutom skuggsamhället, inte skärpta verkställighetsregler, som det som skadar enskilda mest.

  • swift returndecisive»Av största vikt är att den som fått ett nej på asylansökan så fort som möjligt lämnar landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Of utmost importance is that those who have received a rejection of their asylum application leave the country as soon as possible.”
  • minimum level according to EU law»Anpassa asyllagstiftningen efter den rättsliga miniminivån enligt EU-rätten« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Adapt asylum legislation to the legal minimum level according to EU law”
  • prevent shadow economy»Vi riskerar annars ett växande skuggsamhälle, med social utsatthet, illegalt arbete och brottslighet – där särskilt barn drabbas hårt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Otherwise we risk a growing shadow economy, with social vulnerability, illegal work and criminality - where particularly children are hard hit.”
  • strict migration policy»En målstyrd, stram och hållbar migrationspolitik är en förutsättning för att integrationen ska fungera.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Objective-driven, strict and sustainable migration policy is a prerequisite for integration to work.”

flags: citat_migrerat

SDSverigedemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan wants to turn migration policy towards focus on return and lower the thresholds for detention, deportation, and enforcement of deportations.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to turn migration policy towards focus on return and lower the thresholds for detention, deportation, and enforcement of deportations. The counter-proposal objects that enforcement is delayed rather than residence permits being granted, with reference to individuals' rights, and would thus slow more effective return work. The plan instead points out that rejections that do not lead to departure feed the shadow economy.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill vända migrationspolitiken till fokus på återvändande och sänka trösklarna för att ta i förvar, utvisa och verkställa utvisningar. Motförslaget invänder mot att verkställigheten skjuts upp i stället för att uppehållstillstånd beviljas, med hänvisning till enskildas rättigheter, och skulle därmed bromsa ett effektivare återvändandearbete. Planen pekar tvärtom ut att avslag som inte leder till avresa göder skuggsamhället.

  • lower thresholds for enforcementdecisive»Trösklarna för att ta i förvar och utvisa personer samt verkställa utvisningar behöver också sänkas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The thresholds for detention, deportation of persons, and enforcement of deportations also need to be lowered.”
  • focus on return»Sverige behöver vända decennier av oansvarig massinvandring till att fokusera på frivillig återvändandeverksamhet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden needs to turn decades of irresponsible mass immigration towards focusing on voluntary return activities.”
  • rejections must lead to departure»Många har dessutom fått avslag på sin asylansökan men ändå valt att stannat, kunnat ta del av välfärden och bidragit till framväxten av det så kallade skuggsamhället.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Many have also been denied asylum but still chosen to stay, been able to access welfare, and contributed to the growth of what is called the shadow economy.”
  • more deportations»Bekämpa skuggsamhället och illegal migration med fler kontroller och fler utvisningar« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Combat the shadow economy and illegal migration with more inspections and more deportations”

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament