2024-05-222023/24:SfU14 · p.4SfUMigration & social insurance
Information obligation
Duty for public employees to report people without a residence permit
What's at stake: A reporting duty would give the authorities better grounds for identifying and enforcing the removal of people without a permit, but critics argue it risks deterring undocumented people from seeking healthcare, schooling and other support, and forcing staff to act against their professional ethics. The decision therefore affects both the reach of migration enforcement and trust in welfare institutions.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether public employees – for example in healthcare, schools and social services – should be required to report people without a residence permit to the authorities, as part of a stricter migration policy, or whether such a requirement should be rejected because it would damage trust between welfare-sector staff and undocumented people who seek help.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motions on a reporting duty for public employees. The exact reasoning for this specific point is not fully captured in the material, but it is in line with the committee's overall stance that migration policy should be responsible, strict and sustainable in the long term, with a focus on reducing the number of asylum seekers and granted permits and on strengthening return enforcement.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 10 (V, MP)
The reservation (V, MP) opposes a so-called denunciation law, arguing that such a law does not help people out of the shadow society but instead reduces the few points of contact undocumented people have with society and pushes them further away. The proposal has met strong protests from unions representing doctors, nurses, care staff, librarians, teachers and social workers, and, according to the reservation, obliging these professions to break with their basic professional ethics erodes trust in welfare institutions.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 10 by V, MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: LLiberalerna
Ja 151–33Ja 140–44
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/19/0/5 | match | confidence: high | derived |
| S | No | Abstain 0/0/93/13 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| MP | No | No 0/14/2/2 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | No | Abstain 0/0/19/5 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| L | No | Yes 11/0/0/5 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| KD | Yes | Yes 17/0/0/2 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| SD | Yes | Yes 62/0/0/10 | match | confidence: high | derived |
Broke with the party line
| MPCamilla Hansén (MP, Örebro län) | Abstain — party line: No |
| MPLeila Ali Elmi (MP, Göteborgs kommun) | Abstain — party line: No |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2023/24:1596 by Denis Begic et al. (S), 2023/24:2451 by Camilla Hansén et al. (MP) claim 2, 2023/24:2452 by Annika Hirvonen et al. (MP) claim 20, 2023/24:2489 by Niels Paarup-Petersen et al. (C) claim 25, 2023/24:2491 by Jonny Cato et al. (C) claim 11, 2023/24:2617 by Fredrik Lundh Sammeli et al. (S) claim 5, 2023/24:2622 by Anders Ygeman et al. (S) claims 12 and 13, and 2023/24:2686 by Lawen Redar et al. (S) claim 10.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2023/24:1596 av Denis Begic m.fl. (S), 2023/24:2451 av Camilla Hansén m.fl. (MP) yrkande 2, 2023/24:2452 av Annika Hirvonen m.fl. (MP) yrkande 20, 2023/24:2489 av Niels Paarup-Petersen m.fl. (C) yrkande 25, 2023/24:2491 av Jonny Cato m.fl. (C) yrkande 11, 2023/24:2617 av Fredrik Lundh Sammeli m.fl. (S) yrkande 5, 2023/24:2622 av Anders Ygeman m.fl. (S) yrkandena 12 och 13 samt 2023/24:2686 av Lawen Redar m.fl. (S) yrkande 10.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 130 proposals in motions on migration issues from the general motion period 2023. The proposals dealt with, for example, permanent residence permits, information obligation, the EU's migration and asylum policy, reception of asylum seekers, the asylum process, family immigration and Swedish citizenship. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to the fact that work is already underway in areas that the motions address.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to return to the Alien Act as it was before the temporary law came into force. (V, MP) — Reservation 10
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The party programme wants asylum criteria to lead to fewer people living in legal precarity and that authorities meet all people with the same respect.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme wants asylum criteria to lead to fewer people living in legal precarity and that authorities meet all people with the same respect. An information duty that makes welfare professions into informants drives, on the contrary, the undocumented deeper into precarity, which the plan explicitly sees as harmful and as something capital profits from. The counter-proposal's rejection of the information duty is therefore in line with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet vill att asylkriterierna leder till att färre människor lever i juridisk utsatthet och att myndigheter möter alla människor med samma respekt. En informationsplikt som gör välfärdens yrkesgrupper till angivare driver tvärtom papperslösa längre in i utsatthet, vilket planen uttryckligen ser som skadligt och som något kapitalet drar nytta av. Motförslagets avvisande av informationsplikten ligger därför i planens linje.
- reduce legal precaritydecisive»leda till att färre människor lever i den juridiska utsatthet som oseriösa« (party programme ↗)“lead to fewer people living in the legal precarity that unserious”
- authorities' equal treatment»Myndigheter har ett särskilt ansvar att möta alla människor« (party programme ↗)“Authorities have a special responsibility to meet all people”
- against rightlessness that suppresses wages»med kapitalets intresse av att det bor människor i Sverige som saknar« (party programme ↗)“with capital's interest in there being people in Sweden who lack”
- defend asylum rights»När rasismen växer, länder sluter sig och EU bygger murar ska Sverige agera för flyktingars rättigheter och försvara asylrätten både i Sverige och internationellt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“As racism grows, countries close and the EU builds walls, Sweden should act for refugees' rights and defend the right to asylum both in Sweden and internationally.”
The party programme establishes that welfare employees' freedom of expression and whistleblowing may not be restricted, and the election manifesto that welfare becomes weaker when staff lack the conditions to do their job.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme establishes that welfare employees' freedom of expression and whistleblowing may not be restricted, and the election manifesto that welfare becomes weaker when staff lack the conditions to do their job. A reporting requirement that forces teachers, healthcare staff and social workers to act against their professional ethics undermines precisely this. The strict migration line in the election manifesto is about permits and volumes, not about making welfare staff into control agents.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att välfärdsanställdas yttrande- och meddelarfrihet inte får inskränkas, och valmanifestet att välfärden blir svagare när personalen saknar förutsättningar att göra sitt jobb. En informationsplikt som tvingar lärare, vårdpersonal och socialsekreterare att agera mot sin yrkesetik urholkar just detta. Den strama migrationslinjen i valmanifestet handlar om tillstånd och volymer, inte om att göra välfärdens personal till kontrollorgan.
- whistleblowing in welfaredecisive»De anställdas yttrande- och meddelarfrihet får inte« (party programme ↗)“Employees' freedom of expression and whistleblowing may not”
- staff conditions determine quality»Välfärden blir svagare när personalen inte har förutsättningar att göra sitt bästa jobb.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Welfare becomes weaker when staff lack the conditions to do their best job.”
- safe haven for those fleeing»Sverige ska erbjuda en trygg fristad åt människor som tvingas fly från förföljelse och våld.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden shall offer a safe haven to people forced to flee persecution and violence.”
- strict migration policy is firm»Vi har stramat åt migrationspolitiken, och denna linje ligger fast.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We have tightened migration policy, and this line is firm.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The party programme states that life as undocumented must never be a life without legal rights, that undocumented and asylum seekers have the right to care and that Sweden shall be a refuge.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme states that life as undocumented must never be a life without legal rights, that undocumented and asylum seekers have the right to care and that Sweden shall be a refuge. An information duty that forces healthcare workers, teachers and social secretaries to report undocumented persons cuts off exactly the contact points the plan wants to guarantee. The plan therefore supports the counter-proposal's rejection of the reporting law.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att livet som papperslös aldrig får vara ett liv som rättslös, att papperslösa och asylsökande ska ha rätt till vård och att Sverige ska vara en fristad. En informationsplikt som tvingar vårdpersonal, lärare och socialsekreterare att ange papperslösa skär av just de kontaktytor planen vill garantera. Planen stöder därför motförslagets avvisande av angiverilagen.
- undocumented must not be without legal rightsdecisive»Livet som papperslös i Sverige får aldrig vara ett liv« (party programme ↗)“Life as undocumented in Sweden must never be a life”
- right to care regardless of status»Papperslösa och asylsökande« (party programme ↗)“Undocumented and asylum seekers”
- defend asylum rights»försvara asylrätten och kvotflyktingsystemet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“defend asylum rights and the quota refugee system”
- no one should be forced to live undocumented»Vi vill ha ett samhälle där ingen tvingas leva« (party programme ↗)“We want a society where no one is forced to live”
The plan defends the rule of law and the individual's rights against the state and rejects methods that draw in the innocent or hollow out legal security.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan defends the rule of law and the individual's rights against the state and rejects methods that draw in the innocent or hollow out legal security. Respect for the individual's personal privacy is described as a cornerstone of every democracy and all legislation shall be tested against its privacy impact. An information requirement that forces healthcare, school and social staff to report undocumented migrants contravenes this and the plan's generous and humane migration line.
Original (Swedish)
Planen försvarar rättsstaten och individens rättigheter gentemot staten och avvisar metoder som drar in oskyldiga eller urholkar rättssäkerheten. Respekten för den enskildes personliga integritet beskrivs som en grundsten i varje demokrati och all lagstiftning ska prövas mot sin integritetspåverkan. En informationsplikt som tvingar vård-, skol- och socialpersonal att rapportera papperslösa strider mot detta och mot planens generösa och humana migrationslinje.
- defend the rule of lawdecisive»Rättsstaten och individens rättigheter gentemot staten måste försvaras. Vi säger därför nej till visitationszoner, kollektiv bestraffning, omvänd bevisbörda, anonyma vittnen, preventiv avlyssning och inskränkningar av religionsfriheten.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The rule of law and the individual's rights against the state must be defended. We therefore say no to search zones, collective punishment, reversed burden of proof, anonymous witnesses, preventive tapping and restrictions on freedom of religion.”
- personal privacy»Respekten för den enskildes personliga integritet är en grundsten i varje demokrati.« (party programme ↗)“Respect for the individual's personal privacy is a cornerstone of every democracy.”
- humane migration policy»Centerpartiet strävar efter öppna gränser, fri rörlighet samt en generös och human flykting- och invandringspolitik.« (party programme ↗)“The Centre Party strives for open borders, free movement and a generous and humane refugee and immigration policy.”
- privacy assessment of lawsweak support»All lagstiftning bör prövas mot dess påverkan på människors personliga integritet.« (party programme ↗)“All legislation should be tested against its impact on people's personal privacy.”
flags: citat_svagt
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan establishes that those without papers are not without rights and that undocumented persons as long as they are here should have access to schooling and healthcare and be protected against exploitation.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that those without papers are not without rights and that undocumented persons as long as they are here should have access to schooling and healthcare and be protected against exploitation. An information requirement that forces school and healthcare staff to report them undermines precisely that access. The counter-proposal's requirement to reject the information requirement is therefore supported, even though the plan simultaneously wants those without asylum grounds to leave the country.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att den som är papperslös inte är rättslös och att papperslösa så länge de befinner sig här ska ha tillgång till skolgång och sjukvård och skyddas mot exploatering. En informationsplikt som tvingar personal i skola och vård att anmäla dem urholkar just den tillgången. Motförslagets krav på att avvisa informationsplikten stöds därför, även om planen samtidigt vill att den utan asylskäl lämnar landet.
- undocumented persons have rightsdecisive»Att vara papperslös är inte att vara rättslös.« (party programme ↗)“Being without papers is not being without rights.”
- right to school and healthcare»länge de befinner sig här ska de ha tillgång till skolgång och sjukvård och skyddas mot« (party programme ↗)“long as they are here they should have access to schooling and healthcare and be protected from”
- the right to asylum as a human right»Asylrätten är en grundläggande mänsklig rättighet.« (party programme ↗)“The right to asylum is a fundamental human right.”
- those without asylum grounds should leave»Asylrätten ska värnas där den med asylskäl ska stanna och den utan skäl lämnar landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The right to asylum should be valued where those with asylum grounds stay and those without grounds leave the country.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto requires a total review of secrecy rules so that authorities can share information with each other, and a strict immigration policy.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto requires a total review of secrecy rules so that authorities can share information with each other, and a strict immigration policy. The counter-proposal wants instead to stop the information obligation for public employees, which contradicts both of these commitments. The party programme also establishes that the secrecy option shall be used restrictively.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet kräver en total översyn av sekretessreglerna så att myndigheter kan dela uppgifter mellan sig, och en stram migrationspolitik. Motförslaget vill i stället stoppa informationsplikten för offentliganställda, vilket går emot båda dessa åtaganden. Principprogrammet slår dessutom fast att sekretessmöjligheten ska nyttjas restriktivt.
- authorities shall share informationdecisive»Total översyn av sekretessreglerna, så att myndigheter kan dela uppgifter mellan sig för att förebygga och klara upp brott.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Total review of secrecy rules, so that authorities can share information with each other to prevent and solve crimes.”
- strict immigration policy»Stram migrationspolitik krävs för att ta itu med integrationsproblem och utanförskap.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strict immigration policy is required to address integration problems and exclusion.”
- restrictive secrecy»Sekretessmöjligheten ska nyttjas restriktivt.« (party programme ↗)“The secrecy option shall be used restrictively.”
The election manifesto establishes that those who have been denied asylum must leave the country quickly and explicitly warns against a growing shadow society with illegal work and crime.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto establishes that those who have been denied asylum must leave the country quickly and explicitly warns against a growing shadow society with illegal work and crime. The counter-proposal wants to stop the information requirement and thus remove a tool against precisely such a shadow society. The plan instead wants to significantly increase the number of deportations.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår fast att den som fått nej på sin asylansökan snabbt ska lämna landet och varnar uttryckligen för ett växande skuggsamhälle med illegalt arbete och brottslighet. Motförslaget vill stoppa informationsplikten och därmed ta bort ett verktyg mot just skuggsamhället. Planen vill i stället kraftigt öka antalet utvisningar.
- quick returndecisive»Av största vikt är att den som fått ett nej på asylansökan så fort som möjligt lämnar landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is of utmost importance that those who have been denied asylum leave the country as soon as possible.”
- prevent shadow society»Vi riskerar annars ett växande skuggsamhälle, med social utsatthet, illegalt arbete och brottslighet – där särskilt barn drabbas hårt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Otherwise we risk a growing shadow society, with social vulnerability, illegal work and crime - where children are particularly hard hit.”
- more deportations»Kraftigt öka antalet utvisningar genom fler EU-gemensamma återtagandeavtal« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Significantly increase the number of deportations through more EU joint readmission agreements”
flags: citat_migrerat
The plan requires that the shadow economy and illegal migration be combated with more inspections and more deportations, and that the thresholds for detention and enforcement be lowered.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that the shadow economy and illegal migration be combated with more inspections and more deportations, and that the thresholds for detention and enforcement be lowered. The counter-proposal, by contrast, wants to stop an information requirement that would reveal undocumented persons in contact with the public sector. It contradicts the plan's benchmark that more should return than are granted asylum.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att skuggsamhället och den illegala migrationen bekämpas med fler kontroller och fler utvisningar och att trösklarna för förvar och verkställighet sänks. Motförslaget vill tvärtom stoppa en informationsplikt som skulle synliggöra papperslösa i kontakten med det offentliga. Det går emot planens riktmärke att fler ska återvända än beviljas asyl.
- combat the shadow economydecisive»Bekämpa skuggsamhället och illegal migration med fler kontroller och fler utvisningar« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Combat the shadow economy and illegal migration with more inspections and more deportations”
- easier to deport»Trösklarna för att ta i förvar och utvisa personer samt verkställa utvisningar behöver också sänkas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The thresholds for detention, deportation of persons, and enforcement of deportations also need to be lowered.”
- denied applicants who stay»Många har dessutom fått avslag på sin asylansökan men ändå valt att stannat, kunnat ta del av välfärden och bidragit till framväxten av det så kallade skuggsamhället.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Many have also been denied asylum but still chosen to stay, been able to access welfare, and contributed to the growth of what is called the shadow economy.”
- net reduction in migration»Riktmärket under överskådlig tid ska vara att fler av de som befinner sig i Sverige illegalt eller saknar anknytning till det svenska samhället varje år återvänder, än de som beviljas asyl från utanför vårt närområde.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The benchmark over a foreseeable period should be that more of those who are in Sweden illegally or lack ties to Swedish society each year return than those granted asylum from outside our immediate region.”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2023/24:SfU14)
- Committee report full text (HB01SfU14)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2023/24:1025 — Permanenta uppehållstillstånd av Helén Pettersson och Åsa Karlsson (båda S)
- Motion 2023/24:1114 — Reformering av flyktingkonventionen av Boriana Åberg (M)
- Motion 2023/24:1334 — Införandet av ett viseringsgarantisystem av Denis Begic (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1434 — Lättare att verkställa utvisningsbeslut av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2023/24:1443 — Obligatoriskt PCR-prov inför utvisning av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2023/24:1467 — Utvisningsdömda och anmälningsplikten av Markus Wiechel och Alexander Christiansson (båda SD)
- Motion 2023/24:1536 — Avskaffande av EBO-lagen av Eva Lindh m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:1596 — Skyldigheten att anmäla individer som riskerar utvisning av Denis Begic m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:2256 — Maten på boenden för asylsökande av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2023/24:2270 — Sexualbrott av Josefin Malmqvist (M)
- Motion 2023/24:2403 — Brott under tiden som asylsökande av Ellen Juntti och Lars Beckman (båda M)
- Motion 2023/24:2431 — Starkare ställning vid migrationsbeslut för lagstiftning som berör barns bästa och deras rättssäkerhet av Magnus Jacobsson (KD)
- Motion 2023/24:2432 — Utvärdering av Migrationsverkets hantering av asylsökande afghaner av Magnus Jacobsson (KD)
- Motion 2023/24:2451 — Utbildning och forskning för ett hållbart samhälle av Camilla Hansén m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2023/24:2452 — Stärkta rättigheter för barn som flyr till Sverige av Annika Hirvonen m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2023/24:2458 — En folkrörelse för klimatet av Muharrem Demirok m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2023/24:2489 — Utbildning för livslångt lärande av Niels Paarup-Petersen m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2023/24:2491 — Migration och integration av Jonny Cato m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2023/24:2556 — Dagersättning för asylsökande av Åsa Karlsson och Isak From (båda S)
- Motion 2023/24:2583 — Begäran om upphävande av svenskt medborgarskap av Kerstin Lundgren (C)
Source: The Swedish Parliament