2025-04-102024/25:JuU16 · p.6JuUJustice
Legal aid etc.
Legal aid and legal counsel
What's at stake: How legal aid is designed affects the ability of economically or cognitively vulnerable groups — for example people with intellectual disabilities — to assert their rights in court.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether parliament should now take action on issues of legal aid and litigation costs — including legal aid for people with intellectual disabilities — or whether this should wait for an ongoing government inquiry into legal counsel and litigation costs.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The Committee notes that a special investigator has already been tasked with reviewing questions about legal counsel and litigation costs, due to report by August 2025, and does not want to preempt this work. The motions on legal aid are therefore rejected.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 6 (SD)
The reservation (Sweden Democrats) considers that people with intellectual disabilities have limited access to justice due to financial and knowledge-related barriers, and wants the government to set up a state inquiry to improve their access to legal aid.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 6 by SD.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: CCenterpartiet, LLiberalerna, VVänsterpartiet
Ja 225–61Ja 174–112
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 19/0/0/5 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| S | No | Yes 89/0/0/17 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | Yes 13/0/0/5 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | No | Yes 20/0/0/4 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| L | No | Yes 12/0/0/4 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| KD | No | Yes 14/0/0/5 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | No | Yes 56/0/0/12 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | No | No 1/61/0/10 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
Broke with the party line
| SDLinda Lindberg (SD, Skåne läns västra) | Yes — party line: No |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motions 2024/25:573 by Per Söderlund and Eric Palmqvist (both SD), 2024/25:1657 by Karin Sundin (S) motion 4, 2024/25:2036 by Mats Green (M) and 2024/25:2891 by Richard Jomshof et al. (SD) motion 2.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:573 av Per Söderlund och Eric Palmqvist (båda SD), 2024/25:1657 av Karin Sundin (S) yrkande 4, 2024/25:2036 av Mats Green (M) och 2024/25:2891 av Richard Jomshof m.fl. (SD) yrkande 2.
Riksdag decision: Parliament rejected approximately 50 proposals in motions on procedural law matters. Among other things with reference to ongoing work. The proposals were submitted during the general motion period 2024 and deal with, among other things, legislation on coercive measures, the court process, Sweden's Courts and legal aid.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants the government to appoint a state investigation to improve access to legal aid for persons with intellectual disabilities. (SD) — Reservation 6
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The party programme establishes that legal certainty needs to be upheld through, among other things, legal aid, and that those who have a disability should be able to participate in society on the same conditions as everyone else.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme establishes that legal certainty needs to be upheld through, among other things, legal aid, and that those who have a disability should be able to participate in society on the same conditions as everyone else. The counter-proposal's demand for an investigation into legal aid for people with intellectual disability lies directly at the intersection of the two commitments. The plan also wants the disability perspective to be included in all policy areas.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att rättssäkerheten behöver upprätthållas genom bland annat rättshjälp, och att den som har en funktionsnedsättning ska kunna vara delaktig i samhället på samma villkor som alla andra. Motförslagets krav på en utredning om rättshjälp för personer med intellektuell funktionsnedsättning ligger direkt i skärningen mellan de två åtagandena. Planen vill dessutom att funktionshinderperspektivet finns med i alla politikområden.
- legal aid as legal certaintydecisive»Rättssäkerheten behöver upprätthållas genom rättshjälp, medborgerlig« (party programme ↗)“Legal certainty needs to be upheld through legal aid, public”
- participation on equal terms»i ett fotbollslag och använda sin rösträtt till att ta en fika på stan.« (party programme ↗)“in a football team and use their right to vote to have a coffee in town.”
- accessible society»Vi vill skapa ett mer inkluderande samhälle genom att stärka välfärden« (party programme ↗)“We want to create a more inclusive society by strengthening welfare”
- functioning justice system»Samhället behöver ett väl fungerande rättsväsende, med självständiga« (party programme ↗)“Society needs a well-functioning justice system, with independent”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto promises that people with disabilities shall be able to live their lives like others, and the party programme requires a society where everyone regardless of functional capacity has the right to an active life and where authorities respect everyone's equality before the law.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto promises that people with disabilities shall be able to live their lives like others, and the party programme requires a society where everyone regardless of functional capacity has the right to an active life and where authorities respect everyone's equality before the law. An investigation into better access to legal aid for people with intellectual disabilities follows from these commitments. The plan does not explicitly address the legal aid system.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet lovar att personer med funktionsnedsättning ska kunna leva sitt liv som andra, och partiprogrammet kräver ett samhälle där alla oavsett funktionsförmåga har rätt till ett aktivt liv och där myndigheter iakttar allas likhet inför lagen. En utredning om bättre tillgång till rättshjälp för personer med intellektuell funktionsnedsättning följer av dessa åtaganden. Planen behandlar inte rättshjälpssystemet uttryckligen.
- participation despite disabilitiesdecisive»Personer med funktionsnedsättning ska kunna leva sitt liv som andra« (2022 manifesto ↗)“People with disabilities shall be able to live their lives like others”
- equal rights regardless of functional capacity»har rätt till arbete, eget boende, full rörelsefrihet och ett aktivt liv« (party programme ↗)“have the right to work, own housing, full freedom of movement and an active life”
- equality before the law»allas likhet inför lagen och iaktta saklighet och opartiskhet« (party programme ↗)“everyone's equality before the law and observe objectivity and impartiality”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto explicitly wants to review the right to legal aid and improve support for people with disabilities regardless of where in the country you live.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly wants to review the right to legal aid and improve support for people with disabilities regardless of where in the country you live. The party programme states that people with disabilities should have the same opportunity to participate in society as others. A government inquiry into their access to legal aid follows from these commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet vill uttryckligen se över rätten till rättshjälp och förbättra stödet för personer med funktionsnedsättning oavsett var i landet man bor. Partiprogrammet slår fast att personer med funktionsnedsättning ska ha samma möjlighet att delta i samhället som andra. En statlig utredning om deras tillgång till rättshjälp följer av dessa åtaganden.
- expanded right to legal aiddecisive»stärka lagstiftningen mot diskriminering och se över rätten till rättshjälp i diskrimineringsfall.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“strengthen legislation against discrimination and review the right to legal aid in discrimination cases.”
- strengthened support for disabilities»förbättra stödet för personer med funktionsnedsättning och sällsynta diagnoser oavsett var du bor i landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“improve support for people with disabilities and rare diagnoses regardless of where you live in the country.”
- equal participation in society»Människor med funktionsnedsättningar ska ha samma möjlighet att delta i samhället« (party programme ↗)“People with disabilities should have the same opportunity to participate in society”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan states that all who live in Sweden shall be able to have their case examined, that access to counsel shall be improved and that the right to litigate shall not be the preserve of those with high income.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that all who live in Sweden shall be able to have their case examined, that access to counsel shall be improved and that the right to litigate shall not be the preserve of those with high income. An investigation into legal aid for people with intellectual disability hits exactly that commitment, reinforced by the demand for full accessibility. The plan therefore supports the demand.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att alla som bor i Sverige ska kunna få sin sak prövad, att tillgången till ombud ska förbättras och att rätten att processa inte får vara förbehållen dem med hög inkomst. En utredning om rättshjälp för personer med intellektuell funktionsnedsättning träffar precis det åtagandet, förstärkt av kravet på full tillgänglighet. Planen stöder därför kravet.
- access to counseldecisive»Alla som bor i Sverige ska kunna få sin sak prövad. Ledtiderna för handläggning och myndighetsutövning i domstolar och myndigheter måste kortas och tillgången till ombud förbättras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“All who live in Sweden shall be able to have their case examined. Processing times and administrative proceedings in courts and agencies must be shortened and access to counsel improved.”
- justice regardless of income»Möjligheten att processa mot stat eller kommun, då man har goda skäl att få sin sak prövad, ska i en liberal demokrati inte vara en rätt förbehållen de med hög inkomst.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The possibility of suing the state or municipality, when one has good reason to have one's case examined, shall in a liberal democracy not be a right reserved for those with high income.”
- compensation for counsel»Vi vill skapa en möjlighet för enskilda att kunna få ersättning för ombud i förvaltningsärenden då denne haft skäl att få sin sak prövad.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to create a possibility for individuals to receive compensation for counsel in administrative matters when this person had reason to have their case examined.”
- accessibility with disability»Tillgängligheten är avgörande för människor med olika funktionsnedsättningar.« (party programme ↗)“Accessibility is crucial for people with various disabilities.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The party programme explicitly establishes that general legal aid shall be strengthened and that the individual's opportunities to assert their rights against authorities must increase.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme explicitly establishes that general legal aid shall be strengthened and that the individual's opportunities to assert their rights against authorities must increase. To investigate how people with intellectual disabilities get better access to legal aid is precisely that commitment. The plan also requires that the disability rights perspective is always included when political decisions are prepared.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår uttryckligen fast att den allmänna rättshjälpen ska stärkas och att den enskildes möjligheter att hävda sina rättigheter gentemot myndigheterna måste öka. Att utreda hur personer med intellektuell funktionsnedsättning får bättre tillgång till rättshjälp är just det åtagandet. Planen kräver dessutom att funktionsrättsperspektivet alltid finns med när politiska beslut förbereds.
- strengthened general legal aiddecisive»Den allmänna rättshjälpen ska stärkas.« (party programme ↗)“General legal aid shall be strengthened.”
- rights against authorities»Den enskildes möjligheter att hävda sina rättigheter gentemot myndigheterna måste öka.« (party programme ↗)“The individual's opportunities to assert their rights against authorities must increase.”
- disability rights perspective in decisions»funktionsrättsperspektivet alltid finns med när politiska beslut förbereds och fattas.« (party programme ↗)“the disability rights perspective is always included when political decisions are prepared and made.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan establishes that it is justified to use the legislative instrument to facilitate the situation for persons with disabilities and that there should be a rights law that creates conditions for good living conditions.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that it is justified to use the legislative instrument to facilitate the situation for persons with disabilities and that there should be a rights law that creates conditions for good living conditions. Investigating how access to legal aid can be improved for persons with intellectual disabilities is an expression of the same commitment. Negative special treatment shall, according to the plan, never be tolerated.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att det är befogat att använda lagstiftningsinstrumentet för att underlätta situationen för personer med funktionsnedsättning och att det bör finnas en rättighetslag som skapar förutsättningar för goda levnadsvillkor. Att utreda hur tillgången till rättshjälp kan förbättras för personer med intellektuell funktionsnedsättning är ett uttryck för samma åtagande. Negativ särbehandling får enligt planen aldrig tolereras.
- legislation for persons with disabilitiesdecisive»Det är befogat att använda lagstiftningsinstrumentet för att underlätta situationen för personer« (party programme ↗)“It is justified to use the legislative instrument to facilitate the situation for persons”
- rights law for good living conditions»finnas en rättighetslag som skapar förutsättningar för« (party programme ↗)“be a rights law that creates conditions for”
- prohibition of discrimination»är diskriminering och kan aldrig tolereras. Därför behöver det finnas en lagstiftning mot diskriminering.« (party programme ↗)“is discrimination and can never be tolerated. Therefore there must be legislation against discrimination.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan does not address legal aid for people with intellectual disabilities.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not address legal aid for people with intellectual disabilities. The nearest commitment is to expand the right to legal victim assistance for a particularly vulnerable group and that basic law protection should be practical and effective for the individual in relation to authorities. Based on that principle, the plan speaks for the counter-proposal's demand for an inquiry that improves access to legal aid.
Original (Swedish)
Planen behandlar inte rättshjälp för personer med intellektuell funktionsnedsättning. Närmast liggande åtagande är att utvidga rätten till målsägandebiträde för en särskilt utsatt grupp och att grundlagens rättighetsskydd ska vara praktiskt och effektivt för den enskilde gentemot myndigheter. Utifrån den principen talar planen för motförslagets krav på en utredning som förbättrar tillgången till rättshjälp.
- legal support for vulnerable groupsdecisive»Utöka rätten till målsägandebiträde för äldre brottsoffer« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Expand the right to legal victim assistance for older crime victims”
- effective rights protection»Vi måste se till att det inte bara är vackra ord, utan att grundlagen också ger ett praktiskt och effektivt skydd för enskilda människor i relation till exempelvis en kommun eller en statlig myndighet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We must make sure that it is not just fine words, but that the constitution also provides practical and effective protection for ordinary people in relation to, for example, a municipality or a state authority.”
- equal rights for all»Sverige ska vara ett fritt och öppet samhälle där rättigheter, skyldigheter och möjligheter gäller lika för alla.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden should be a free and open society where rights, duties and opportunities apply equally to all.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan establishes that citizens with cognitive limitations should have the right to a good life and should not be limited in their access to social life, and that the person in need of support should also get it.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that citizens with cognitive limitations should have the right to a good life and should not be limited in their access to social life, and that the person in need of support should also get it. That investigate how persons with intellectual disability get better access to legal aid follows from these commitments. However, the plan does not mention legal aid, so support is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att medborgare med kognitiva begränsningar ska ha rätt till ett gott liv och inte begränsas i sin tillgång till samhällslivet, och att den som är i behov av stöd också ska få det. Att utreda hur personer med intellektuell funktionsnedsättning får bättre tillgång till rättshjälp följer av dessa åtaganden. Planen nämner dock inte rättshjälp, varför stödet härleds.
- full participation in social lifedecisive»Medborgare som på grund av omständigheter bortom egen kontroll möter andra utmaningar i vardagen ska inte begränsas i sin tillgång till samhälls- eller arbetslivet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Citizens who due to circumstances beyond their own control face other challenges in daily life should not be limited in their access to social or working life.”
- equal conditions with cognitive limitations»Alla medborgare ska ha rätt till ett gott liv och en fullgod levnadsstandard, även om man är född med eller råkar ut för något som gjort att man har fysiska eller kognitiva begränsningar eller variationer.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“All citizens should have the right to a good life and a full standard of living, even if one is born with or suffers something that has made one have physical or cognitive limitations or variations.”
- support according to need»Den som är i behov av stöd ska också få det.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The person in need of support should also get it.”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2024/25:JuU16)
- Committee report full text (HC01JuU16)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:100 — Införande av ämbetsdräkt för domare av Torsten Elofsson (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1309 — Ett reformerat system med nämndemän av Rasmus Ling m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:1490 — Ett rättssystem som sätter brottsoffret i fokus av Magnus Berntsson (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1657 — Kriminalisering av det ekonomiska våldet av Karin Sundin (S)
- Motion 2024/25:1904 — Åtgärder mot organiserad brottslighet av Gudrun Nordborg m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2024/25:1929 — Rättsväsendet av Gudrun Nordborg m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2024/25:1997 — Märkning av åtelkameror och fällor med jägar-id av Erik Ottoson (M)
- Motion 2024/25:2022 — Ökad transparens i tillståndsprocesser av Ulrik Nilsson (M)
- Motion 2024/25:2036 — Stärkt rättssamhälle och äganderätt av Mats Green (M)
- Motion 2024/25:2056 — För ett tryggare Malmö och Sverige av Niels Paarup-Petersen (C)
- Motion 2024/25:2058 — Indexering av nämndemäns arvoden av Mats Wiking och Jonathan Svensson (båda S)
- Motion 2024/25:2069 — Politiskt tillsatta nämndemän av Alireza Akhondi (C)
- Motion 2024/25:2177 — Förundersökningssekretessen av Eva Lindh m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:2508 — Handläggningstiderna för olovlig andrahandsuthyrning av Ingela Nylund Watz m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:2601 — Tillsynen över Sveriges advokater av Boriana Åberg (M)
- Motion 2024/25:2605 — Störande av ordning i rättssalen av Boriana Åberg (M)
- Motion 2024/25:2618 — Åtgärder för att bekämpa mäns våld mot kvinnor av Rasmus Ling m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:276 — Grundlagsförhör enligt dansk modell av Torsten Elofsson (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:278 — Höjd inkomstgräns för rättshjälp av Torsten Elofsson (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:2794 — Dold egendomsbevakning av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
Source: The Swedish Parliament