2025-04-232024/25:SfU18 · p.25SfUMigration & social insurance
Enforcement of removal and deportation decisions
Enforcement of refusal-of-entry and deportation decisions
What's at stake: The decision affects how effectively people with final refusal-of-entry or deportation decisions actually leave Sweden, how long they can evade enforcement, and how their detention is organised. It concerns both people who must leave the country and the authorities' return-enforcement work.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the current rules and ongoing inquiries to strengthen enforcement of returns are sufficient, or whether explicit return targets, more active cooperation with countries of origin and third countries - for example along the lines of a Norwegian model using liaison officers - and moving responsibility for detention from the Migration Agency to the border police are needed.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee points out that new rules on, among other things, limitation periods already provide better conditions for effective enforcement of returns, that the track-switch from asylum to work has been abolished, and that an ongoing inquiry is reviewing information-sharing and new powers ahead of enforcement. The committee considers that detention should continue to lie with the Migration Agency rather than the border police, and therefore rejects the motions.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 39 (S)
The reservation (S) wants to reintroduce clear, explicit targets for return-enforcement work, build more active cooperation with third countries beyond conditioning aid, and adopt a Norwegian-style model with liaison officers on the ground to improve communication and increase the share of people who actually return.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 39 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have gone the other way
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: MModeraterna, SDSverigedemokraterna
Ja 153–93Nej 31–215
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | Yes | Abstain 0/0/21/3 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| S | No | No 0/93/0/13 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | Yes | Abstain 0/0/15/3 | differs | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | No | Abstain 0/0/20/4 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | No | Yes 60/0/0/8 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| SD | No | Yes 62/0/0/10 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2024/25:1930 by Tony Haddou et al. (V) demands 10, 22 and 24, 2024/25:2379 by Arin Karapet (M), 2024/25:2719 by Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M), 2024/25:2871 by Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M), 2024/25:2949 by Jonny Cato et al. (C) demand 12, 2024/25:3025 by Anders Ygeman et al. (S) demands 8 and 11, 2024/25:3051 by Annika Hirvonen et al. (MP) demands 6, 7 and 12 and 2024/25:3052 by Annika Hirvonen et al. (MP) demand 9.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:1930 av Tony Haddou m.fl. (V) yrkandena 10, 22 och 24, 2024/25:2379 av Arin Karapet (M), 2024/25:2719 av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M), 2024/25:2871 av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M), 2024/25:2949 av Jonny Cato m.fl. (C) yrkande 12, 2024/25:3025 av Anders Ygeman m.fl. (S) yrkandena 8 och 11, 2024/25:3051 av Annika Hirvonen m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 6, 7 och 12 samt 2024/25:3052 av Annika Hirvonen m.fl. (MP) yrkande 9.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag said no to approximately 140 proposals in motions on migration issues, partly by referring to ongoing work. The proposals were submitted during the general motion period in 2024 and concern migration and asylum policy, EU migration and asylum policy, family immigration, the asylum process, reception of asylum seekers, enforcement of removal and deportation decisions and Swedish citizenship.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants the government to return to parliament with proposals about knowledge requirements in Swedish and civics for permanent residence permits. (S) — Reservation 39
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The counter-proposal requires stated goals for return activities and more active agreements with third countries to increase the share who are deported.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal requires stated goals for return activities and more active agreements with third countries to increase the share who are deported. The plan's commitment is the opposite: the right to asylum can never be compromised, only permanent residence permits shall be issued and asylum policy shall rest on the conventions with individual procedurally secure examination. The plan also wants aid to be solidary, which speaks against using it as leverage against other countries.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget kräver uttalade mål för återvändandeverksamheten och mer aktiva överenskommelser med tredjeländer för att öka andelen som utvisas. Planens åtagande är det motsatta: asylrätten får aldrig tummas på, endast permanenta uppehållstillstånd ska utfärdas och asylpolitiken ska vila på konventionerna med individuell rättssäker prövning. Planen vill dessutom att biståndet är solidariskt, vilket talar emot att använda det som hävstång mot andra länder.
- asylum right inviolabledecisive»Rätten att söka asyl kan aldrig tummas på, vi kräver att endast permanenta uppehållstillstånd ska utfärdas vid beviljad asyl.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The right to seek asylum can never be compromised, we require that only permanent residence permits shall be issued when asylum is granted.”
- asylum policy according to conventions»Vi vill se en asylpolitik grundad i respekt för« (party programme ↗)“We want to see an asylum policy based on respect for”
- procedurally secure and dignified examination»sin rätt till en individuell och rättssäker prövning under värdiga« (party programme ↗)“their right to individual and procedurally secure examination under dignified”
- solidary aid without conditions»solidariskt bistånd och rättvisa handelsvillkor.« (party programme ↗)“solidary aid and fair trade terms.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto establishes that the tightened migration policy stands firm and the party programme talks about a generous but regulated immigration, which presupposes that rejection and deportation decisions are actually enforced.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto establishes that the tightened migration policy stands firm and the party programme talks about a generous but regulated immigration, which presupposes that rejection and deportation decisions are actually enforced. Clear targets for return and established cooperation with third countries, rather than conditioning aid, are in line with the plan's aid outlook and with its desire for more international cooperation. The forms for return work are, however, not mentioned in the documents.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår fast att den åtstramade migrationspolitiken ligger fast och partiprogrammet talar om en generös men reglerad invandring, vilket förutsätter att avvisnings- och utvisningsbeslut faktiskt verkställs. Tydliga mål för återvändandet och uppbyggda samarbeten med tredjeländer, i stället för att villkora bistånd, ligger i linje med planens biståndssyn och med dess vilja till fler internationella samarbeten. Formerna för återvändandearbetet nämns dock inte i dokumenten.
- tightened migration policydecisive»Vi har stramat åt migrationspolitiken, och denna linje ligger fast« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We have tightened migration policy, and this line stands firm”
- regulated immigration»Vi vill ha en generös och reglerad invandring« (party programme ↗)“We want generous and regulated immigration”
- aid's own purposes»Svenskt bistånd ska tydligare bidra till att förhindra att människor tvingas på flykt« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Swedish aid shall more clearly contribute to preventing people being forced to flee”
- more international cooperation»Vi vill se fler och intensifierande internationella samarbeten mot smuggling av bland annat vapen och narkotika« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to see more and intensifying international cooperation against smuggling of, among other things, weapons and drugs”
The party programme states that forced removals shall be used extremely restrictively and that those who have been rejected in the first instance shall be helped to return voluntarily and not be held in detention.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme states that forced removals shall be used extremely restrictively and that those who have been rejected in the first instance shall be helped to return voluntarily and not be held in detention. The election manifesto prohibits aid from being conditional on Sweden's domestic political interests. Sharper return targets and aid-conditioned third-country cooperation therefore conflict with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att tvångsavvisningar ska användas oerhört restriktivt och att den som fått avslag i första hand ska få hjälp att återvända frivilligt och inte hållas i förvar. Valmanifestet förbjuder att biståndet villkoras mot Sveriges inrikespolitiska intressen. Skarpare återvändandemål och biståndsvillkorade tredjelandssamarbeten strider därför mot planen.
- restrictive forced removalsdecisive»Tvångsavvisningar ska användas oerhört restriktivt.« (party programme ↗)“Forced removals shall be used extremely restrictively.”
- voluntary return over coercion»inte hållas i förvar, utan i första hand få hjälp att« (party programme ↗)“not be held in detention, but rather be helped to”
- aid shall not be conditional»att biståndet ska styras av principer om effektivitet och fattigdomsbekämpning och inte villkoras mot Sveriges inrikespolitiska intressen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“that aid shall be guided by principles of efficiency and poverty reduction and not be conditional on Sweden's domestic political interests.”
- defended right to asylum»försvara asylrätten och kvotflyktingsystemet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“defend the right to asylum and the quota refugee system.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan does not address return activities or how deportation decisions are enforced.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not address return activities or how deportation decisions are enforced. The nearest principles are that processing times for administrative proceedings shall be shortened and that Sweden shall work for stronger international agreements and cooperation with other countries, which argues for clear targets and liaison officers in place. The conclusion is therefore derived from general principles and uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Planen behandlar inte återvändandeverksamheten eller hur utvisningsbeslut verkställs. Närmast liggande principer är att myndighetsutövningens ledtider ska kortas och att Sverige ska verka för starkare internationella överenskommelser och samarbete med andra länder, vilket talar för tydliga mål och sambandspersoner på plats. Slutsatsen är därför härledd ur allmänna principer och osäker.
- efficient administrationdecisive»Ledtiderna för handläggning och myndighetsutövning i domstolar och myndigheter måste kortas och tillgången till ombud förbättras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Processing times and administrative proceedings in courts and agencies must be shortened and access to counsel improved.”
- international agreements»verka för starkare internationella överenskommelser när det gäller flyktingmottagandet.« (party programme ↗)“work for stronger international agreements on refugee reception.”
- cooperation with other countries»Samarbetsorganisationer som FN och EU, handelsavtal och bistånd, kan knyta länder närmare varandra« (party programme ↗)“Collaborative organizations such as the UN and EU, trade agreements and aid can bring countries closer together”
- generous and humane policy»Centerpartiet strävar efter öppna gränser, fri rörlighet samt en generös och human flykting- och invandringspolitik.« (party programme ↗)“The Centre Party strives for open borders, free movement and a generous and humane refugee and immigration policy.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto establishes that those who lack asylum grounds shall leave the country and explicitly requires that countries that receive Swedish aid also receive their own citizens, and that more people waiting for expulsion shall be held in detention.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto establishes that those who lack asylum grounds shall leave the country and explicitly requires that countries that receive Swedish aid also receive their own citizens, and that more people waiting for expulsion shall be held in detention. The counter-proposal's requirements for clear goals for return, more active cooperation with third countries and liaison persons serve the same purpose. Liaison persons are not mentioned, but the direction in the plan is unambiguous.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår fast att den som saknar asylskäl ska lämna landet och kräver uttryckligen att länder som tar emot svenskt bistånd också tar emot egna medborgare, samt att fler som väntar på utvisning ska hållas i förvar. Motförslagets krav på tydliga mål för återvändandet, aktivare samarbeten med tredjeländer och sambandspersoner tjänar samma syfte. Sambandspersoner nämns inte, men riktningen i planen är entydig.
- effective returndecisive»Asylrätten ska värnas där den med asylskäl ska stanna och den utan skäl lämnar landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The right to asylum shall be protected where those with asylum grounds shall stay and those without grounds leave the country.”
- readmission requirements towards donor countries»Vi ska kräva att länder som tar emot svenskt bistånd också tar emot egna medborgare som dömts för brott i Sverige.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We shall require that countries that receive Swedish aid also receive their own citizens convicted of crimes in Sweden.”
- more in detention»Fler som väntar på både utvisning och avvisning ska hållas i förvar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More people waiting for both expulsion and refusal of entry shall be held in detention.”
- legally secure asylum policy»EU:s asylpolitik ska vara human och rättssäker och i linje med internationella konventioner.« (party programme ↗)“EU's asylum policy shall be humane and legally secure and in line with international conventions.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto requires strict migration policy, and the plan establishes that decided legal rules shall be consistently maintained.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto requires strict migration policy, and the plan establishes that decided legal rules shall be consistently maintained. A return that actually works - with clear targets, active cooperation with third countries and liaison officers on the ground - is a direct application of both commitments. The plan also highlights cooperation with other states and early support for voluntary return as the way forward.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet kräver en stram migrationspolitik, och planen slår fast att beslutade rättsregler konsekvent ska upprätthållas. Ett återvändande som faktiskt fungerar - med tydliga mål, aktiva samarbeten med tredjeländer och sambandspersoner på plats - är en direkt tillämpning av båda åtagandena. Planen lyfter dessutom samarbete med andra stater och tidigt stöd vid återvandring som vägen framåt.
- strict migration policydecisive»Stram migrationspolitik krävs för att ta itu med integrationsproblem och utanförskap.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strict migration policy is required to address integration problems and exclusion.”
- decided rules shall be maintained»måste konsekvent upprätthålla de rättsregler som beslutats« (party programme ↗)“must consistently maintain the legal rules that have been decided”
- support for voluntary return»Det är viktigt att seriös och tidig information ges om möjligheterna till stöd vid frivillig återvandring.« (party programme ↗)“It is important that serious and early information is provided about opportunities for support in voluntary return.”
- cooperation with other states»flyktingpolitik genom att samarbeta med andra stater.« (party programme ↗)“refugee policy through cooperation with other states.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan states that it is of utmost importance that the person who received a rejection leaves the country as soon as possible and commits itself to greatly increasing the number of deportations through more readmission agreements with third countries.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that it is of utmost importance that the person who received a rejection leaves the country as soon as possible and commits itself to greatly increasing the number of deportations through more readmission agreements with third countries. The counter-proposal's demands for clear goals for return, more active cooperation with third countries and liaison officers on the ground are the same thing in substance. The plan motivates this with the risk of a growing shadow society.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att det är av största vikt att den som fått avslag så fort som möjligt lämnar landet och åtar sig att kraftigt öka antalet utvisningar genom fler återtagandeavtal med tredjeländer. Motförslagets krav på tydliga mål för återvändandet, mer aktiva samarbeten med tredjeländer och sambandspersoner på plats är samma sak i sak. Planen motiverar detta med risken för ett växande skuggsamhälle.
- more readmission agreementsdecisive»Kraftigt öka antalet utvisningar genom fler EU-gemensamma återtagandeavtal« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Greatly increase the number of deportations through more EU joint readmission agreements”
- effective return»Av största vikt är att den som fått ett nej på asylansökan så fort som möjligt lämnar landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Of utmost importance is that the person who received a no on their asylum application leaves the country as soon as possible.”
- prevent shadow society»Vi riskerar annars ett växande skuggsamhälle, med social utsatthet, illegalt arbete och brottslighet – där särskilt barn drabbas hårt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We otherwise risk a growing shadow society, with social vulnerability, illegal work and crime - where children in particular are hit hard.”
- no track switching after rejection»Avskaffa möjligheten till spårbyte, det vill säga möjligheten för en person som fått avslag på sin asylansökan att i stället få ett arbetstillstånd« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Abolish the possibility of track switching, i.e. the possibility for a person who was rejected on their asylum application instead to get a work permit”
flags: citat_migrerat
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan explicitly commits to using diplomatic pressure and incentives to facilitate return and to build international cooperation with countries where return functions poorly.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly commits to using diplomatic pressure and incentives to facilitate return and to build international cooperation with countries where return functions poorly. The benchmark is that more should return than are granted asylum. Clear targets for return activities and liaison officers in place in third countries are precisely such tools the plan seeks.
Original (Swedish)
Planen åtar sig uttryckligen att använda diplomatiska påtryckningar och incitament för att underlätta återvändande och att bygga internationell samverkan med länder dit återvändandet fungerar dåligt. Riktmärket är att fler ska återvända än som beviljas asyl. Tydliga mål för återvändandeverksamheten och sambandspersoner på plats i tredjeländer är just sådana verktyg planen efterfrågar.
- diplomatic tools for returndecisive»Använda diplomatiska påtryckningar och incitament för att underlätta återvändande« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Use diplomatic pressure and incentives to facilitate return”
- cooperation for return»Det handlar om internationell samverkan för att mildra migrationsströmmar till Europa och att underlätta utvisningar och återvandring till länder dit återvändande av olika orsaker fungerar dåligt idag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is about international cooperation to mitigate migration flows to Europe and to facilitate deportations and return to countries where return for various reasons functions poorly today.”
- net minus in migration»Riktmärket under överskådlig tid ska vara att fler av de som befinner sig i Sverige illegalt eller saknar anknytning till det svenska samhället varje år återvänder, än de som beviljas asyl från utanför vårt närområde.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The benchmark over the foreseeable time should be that more of those who are in Sweden illegally or lack connection to Swedish society every year return than are granted asylum from outside our region.”
- conditional aid»Som regel villkora bilateralt bistånd med avtal om mottagandesamverkan« (2022 manifesto ↗)“As a rule condition bilateral aid with agreements on reception cooperation”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2024/25:SfU18)
- Committee report full text (HC01SfU18)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:1013 — Värnande av barns svenska medborgarskap av Kerstin Lundgren (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1115 — Regel om kontroll av brottsregister vid ärenden hos Migrationsverket av Marléne Lund Kopparklint (M)
- Motion 2024/25:1268 — Familjehemsplacerade barns rätt till eget ombud under asylprocesser av Adrian Magnusson (S)
- Motion 2024/25:1294 — En sanningskommission om migrationspolitiken av Staffan Eklöf (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:133 — Barns ställning vid prövning avseende migration av Magnus Jacobsson (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1695 — Väntetider för medborgarskap av Tomas Eneroth och Monica Haider (båda S)
- Motion 2024/25:1710 — Bristande vandel av Jamal El-Haj (-)
- Motion 2024/25:1763 — Asylpolitik av Ludvig Aspling och Nima Gholam Ali Pour (båda SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1764 — Ett stärkt medborgarskap av Ludvig Aspling och Nima Gholam Ali Pour (båda SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1765 — Krafttag mot illegal migration för ett säkrare Sverige av Ludvig Aspling och Nima Gholam Ali Pour (båda SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1925 — Mäns våld mot kvinnor och andra former av våld i nära relationer av Maj Karlsson m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2024/25:1930 — Svensk flyktingpolitik av Tony Haddou m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2024/25:2118 — Brott under tiden som asylsökande av Ellen Juntti och Lars Beckman (båda M)
- Motion 2024/25:2379 — Överflyttning av ansvaret för förvarsverksamheten från Migrationsverket till gränspolisen av Arin Karapet (M)
- Motion 2024/25:24 — Konsekvenser av massflyktsdirektivets upphörande av Magnus Jacobsson (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:2408 — Utvisning vid fängelsestraff för utländska medborgare av Magnus Resare (M)
- Motion 2024/25:2618 — Åtgärder för att bekämpa mäns våld mot kvinnor av Rasmus Ling m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:2619 — Flyttbidrag i stället för återvandringsbidrag av Elin Söderberg m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:2625 — En grön feministisk utvecklings- och biståndspolitik av Janine Alm Ericson m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:2718 — DNA-analys vid anhöriginvandring av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
Source: The Swedish Parliament