2024-06-182023/24:KrU7 · p.3KrUCulture

Conditions for state grants to religious communities

Minimum number of members served as a condition for state grants to religious communities

What's at stake: A higher threshold shuts more small and medium-sized religious communities out of state support, on the reasoning that grants should go to communities that are stable and have their own viability, while a lower threshold would give more, smaller communities access to support for their religious activities.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is how high the requirement for the number of members served who are resident in Sweden should be set for a registered religious community to qualify for state grants - the government's proposed minimum of 2,500 members served, or the earlier inquiry's proposal of a minimum of 1,000.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee, agreeing with the Committee on the Constitution, considers it important that religious communities receiving support are stable and have their own viability, and therefore judges the government's proposed requirement of a minimum of 2,500 members served resident in Sweden to be well balanced; the committee accordingly rejects the motions calling for the threshold to instead be set at a minimum of 1,000.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 1 (V, MP)

The reservation (V, MP) instead wants to stick with the earlier inquiry's proposal that grants be available to a registered religious community with a minimum of 1,000 members served resident in Sweden, in line with both an earlier government inquiry and an earlier government's bill, rather than the government's newly proposed threshold of 2,500.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by V, MP.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
Vown reservationNoNo 0/20/0/4follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
SNoYes 93/0/0/13departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
MPown reservationNoNo 0/15/0/3follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
CNoYes 21/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
LYesYes 13/0/0/3follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
KDNoYes 16/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
MYesYes 60/0/0/8follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
SDYesYes 63/0/0/9follows the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed

Committee proposal

Parliament rejects the motions 2023/24:2869 by Vasiliki Tsouplaki et al. (V) demand 1 and 2023/24:2875 by Amanda Lind et al. (MP) demand 3.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2023/24:2869 av Vasiliki Tsouplaki m.fl. (V) yrkande 1 och 2023/24:2875 av Amanda Lind m.fl. (MP) yrkande 3.

Riksdag decision: The government has proposed new rules on state grants to religious communities. The new legislation shall include provisions on when a religious community other than the Church of Sweden is entitled to state grants, state fee assistance, and that the definition of religious community is changed. The new regulation also means that a democracy condition shall apply to support for religious communities and to support from the General Heritage Fund. Parliament said yes to the government's legislative proposal and no to proposals in motions, of which approximately 40 are from the general motion period of 2023. The new rules enter into force on 1 January 2025.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The plan does not address limit values for state grants to faith communities, but it requires that religious freedom is guaranteed and that national minorities' right to religion and cultural heritage is strengthened, which speaks for smaller communities also being able to receive support.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan does not address limit values for state grants to faith communities, but it requires that religious freedom is guaranteed and that national minorities' right to religion and cultural heritage is strengthened, which speaks for smaller communities also being able to receive support. The plan also wants to ensure good conditions and independence for public education and association life throughout the country. The lower limit of 1000 served thus lies closer to the plan's principles than the higher one.

Original (Swedish)

Planen behandlar inte gränsvärden för statsbidrag till trossamfund, men den kräver att religionsfriheten garanteras och att nationella minoriteters rätt till religion och kulturarv stärks, vilket talar för att även mindre samfund ska kunna få stöd. Planen vill också säkra goda villkor och självständighet för folkbildning och föreningsliv i hela landet. Den lägre gränsen om 1000 betjänade ligger därför närmare planens principer än den högre.

  • minorities' religious rightsdecisive»de nationella minoriteternas rättigheter till identitet, språk, kulturarv« (party programme ↗)“the rights of national minorities to identity, language, cultural heritage”
  • religious freedom guaranteed»staten ska vara sekulär, det vill säga inte ha några band« (party programme ↗)“the state shall be secular, that is not have any bonds”
  • strong independent association life»folkbildning, konst, kultur- och föreningsliv.« (party programme ↗)“public education, art, culture and association life.”
  • activity throughout the country»Det är viktigt att kulturen står fri från såväl kommersiell som politisk styrning och finns i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is important that culture be free from both commercial and political control and exist throughout the country.”
SSocialdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan says nothing about state grants to faith communities or about limits for the number of people served.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan says nothing about state grants to faith communities or about limits for the number of people served. The closest principle is the party programme's view of civil society, where communities are explicitly counted as part of democracy's foundation, together with the demand for equality regardless of religion. This speaks for the lower limit of 1,000 people served, which allows in more and smaller communities. At the same time the party is restrictive towards religious influence in schools, which makes the conclusion uncertain.

Original (Swedish)

Planen säger ingenting om statsbidrag till trossamfund eller om gränser för antal betjänade. Närmast liggande princip är partiprogrammets syn på civilsamhället, där samfund uttryckligen räknas in som en del av demokratins underbyggnad, tillsammans med kravet på jämlikhet oavsett religion. Det talar för den lägre gränsen på 1000 betjänade, som släpper in fler och mindre samfund. Samtidigt är partiet restriktivt mot religiös påverkan inom skolan, vilket gör slutsatsen osäker.

  • communities as part of civil societydecisive»Ett starkt och levande civilsamhälle är demokratins underbyggnad.« (party programme ↗)“A strong and living civil society is the foundation of democracy.”
  • equality regardless of religion»efter jämlikhet oavsett hudfärg, etnisk och kulturell tillhörighet eller religion.« (party programme ↗)“for equality regardless of skin colour, ethnic and cultural affiliation or religion.”
  • restrictive towards religious influence»Därför vill vi förbjuda nya religiösa friskolor.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore we wish to ban new religious independent schools.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MPMiljöpartietNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The plan is based on people being able to themselves define and practise their identity, culture and faith, and that support for various forms of expression is therefore important.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan is based on people being able to themselves define and practise their identity, culture and faith, and that support for various forms of expression is therefore important. Where the party expresses itself about public support it wants support to be designed so that it strengthens smaller actors, not the already large ones. A lower limit of 1000 served lets in more and smaller congregations into the state grant and therefore aligns with the plan's principles, while the plan does not express itself about faith communities' viability as a condition.

Original (Swedish)

Planen bygger på att människor själva ska få definiera och utöva sin identitet, kultur och tro, och att stöd till olika sorters yttringar därför är viktigt. Där partiet uttalar sig om offentligt stöd vill det att stödet utformas så att det stärker mindre aktörer, inte de redan stora. En lägre gräns om 1000 betjänade släpper in fler och mindre samfund i statsbidraget och stämmer därför med planens principer, medan planen inte uttalar sig om trossamfunds livskraft som villkor.

  • support for diversity of expressiondecisive»Miljöpartiet vill att människor alltid ska ges rätt att definiera och utöva sin egen identitet och kultur. Därför är stöd till olika sorters kulturyttringar viktigt.« (party programme ↗)“The Green Party wants people to always be given the right to define and practise their own identity and culture. Therefore, support for various forms of cultural expression is important.”
  • public support strengthens smaller actors»Vi värnar presstödet och vill att det omformas så att det stärker mindre aktörer.« (party programme ↗)“We value press support and want it to be reformed so that it strengthens smaller actors.”
  • religious freedom for all»Alla ska ha rätt att utöva sin tro, eller att avstå från religionsutövning.« (party programme ↗)“Everyone shall have the right to practise their faith, or to refrain from religious practice.”
  • strengthened position for minorities»Deras särskilda ställning, med egen kultur och eget språk, måste respekteras och stärkas.« (party programme ↗)“Their special position, with their own culture and language, must be respected and strengthened.”
CCenterpartietNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan does not address threshold values for government grants to religious communities, but explicitly rejects restrictions on freedom of religion and wants to strengthen minority protection.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan does not address threshold values for government grants to religious communities, but explicitly rejects restrictions on freedom of religion and wants to strengthen minority protection. A higher threshold of 2,500 served excludes smaller communities, while the lower threshold of 1,000 keeps support open for more and smaller religious communities. Based on the plan's safeguarding of religious freedom, minority protection and civil society's role, the counter-proposal's requirement lies closest to the party's line.

Original (Swedish)

Planen behandlar inte gränsvärden för statsbidrag till trossamfund, men den avvisar uttryckligen inskränkningar av religionsfriheten och vill stärka minoritetsskyddet. En högre gräns på 2500 betjänade utesluter mindre samfund, medan den lägre gränsen på 1000 håller stödet öppet för fler och mindre religiösa gemenskaper. Utifrån planens värn om religionsfrihet, minoritetsskydd och civilsamhällets roll ligger motförslagets krav närmast partiets linje.

  • no to restricted religious freedomdecisive»Vi säger därför nej till visitationszoner, kollektiv bestraffning, omvänd bevisbörda, anonyma vittnen, preventiv avlyssning och inskränkningar av religionsfriheten.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We therefore say no to stop-and-search zones, collective punishment, reverse burden of proof, anonymous witnesses, preventive surveillance and restrictions on freedom of religion.”
  • strengthened minority protection»Vi vill stärka bland annat äganderätten, diskrimineringsförbudet, minoritetsskyddet och minoritetsspråkens ställning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to strengthen, among other things, the right to property, the prohibition on discrimination, minority protection and the status of minority languages”
  • protection for religious communities»Vi ska stärka skyddet för personer verksamma bland annat i media, religiösa samfund och offentlig förvaltning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We shall strengthen protection for people working, among other things, in media, religious communities and public administration.”
  • civil society's value»Civilsamhällets roll för att binda samman människor och förbättra integrationen är ovärderlig.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Civil society's role in bringing people together and improving integration is invaluable.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

LLiberalernaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan says nothing about which size threshold should apply to state grants to faith communities, but the only direction the election manifesto provides is tightening: the monitoring of grant-giving shall be strengthened and hidden financing stopped.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan says nothing about which size threshold should apply to state grants to faith communities, but the only direction the election manifesto provides is tightening: the monitoring of grant-giving shall be strengthened and hidden financing stopped. A lower threshold that widens the circle of grant-eligible communities goes against that direction. The party programme's principle is furthermore that the state shall not take a stand for certain communities, which gives no support for lowering the threshold precisely.

Original (Swedish)

Planen säger ingenting om vilken storleksgräns som bör gälla för statsbidrag till trossamfund, men den enda riktning valmanifestet ger är skärpning: uppföljningen av bidragsgivning ska stärkas och dold finansiering stoppas. En lägre gräns som vidgar kretsen bidragsberättigade samfund går mot den riktningen. Partiprogrammets princip är dessutom att staten inte ska ta ställning för vissa samfund, vilket inte ger något stöd för att just sänka tröskeln.

  • tightened control of grantsdecisive»Vi vill både stärka uppföljningen av bidragsgivning och stoppa dold finansiering av trossamfund så att de inte blir verktyg för extremistiska krafter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to both strengthen the monitoring of grant-giving and stop hidden financing of faith communities so that they do not become tools for extremist forces.”
  • faith communities in civil society»Trossamfunden är en central del av det civila samhället.« (party programme ↗)“Faith communities are a central part of civil society.”
  • conditional tax funds»Inga skattemedel ska gå till verksamheter som vill förändra det demokratiska samhället med våld« (party programme ↗)“No tax funds shall go to activities that want to change the democratic society by force”
KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The party programme establishes that religious congregations shall be given good opportunities to operate and develop in freedom and that the public shall be supportive and complementary rather than controlling.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme establishes that religious congregations shall be given good opportunities to operate and develop in freedom and that the public shall be supportive and complementary rather than controlling. The condition for state support is linked in the plan to the nature and purpose of the activities, not to the congregation's size. A lower threshold of 1,000 persons served is therefore closer to the plan's line than a higher threshold that excludes smaller congregations.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet slår fast att religiösa samfund ska ges goda möjligheter att verka och utvecklas i frihet och att det offentliga ska vara stödjande och kompletterande snarare än styrande. Villkoret för statligt stöd knyts i planen till verksamhetens karaktär och ändamål, inte till samfundets storlek. En lägre gräns om 1000 betjänade ligger därför närmare planens linje än en högre tröskel som utesluter mindre samfund.

  • freedom for congregations to operatedecisive»styrande och ersättande. Det innebär att religiösa samfund ska ges goda möjligheter att verka och utvecklas i« (party programme ↗)“controlling and providing. This means that religious congregations shall be given good opportunities to operate and develop in”
  • support for faith communities»Stöd ska därför utgå till de trossamfund som bedriver« (party programme ↗)“Support shall therefore go to those faith communities that conduct”
  • subsidiarity as support principle»vill säga vara stödjande och kompletterande istället för« (party programme ↗)“want to say be supportive and complementary instead of”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan says nothing about size thresholds for state subsidies to faith communities, but its consistent line is stricter control of which organizations get tax funds: payments to extremists and to organizations that threaten people's freedom should be stopped.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan says nothing about size thresholds for state subsidies to faith communities, but its consistent line is stricter control of which organizations get tax funds: payments to extremists and to organizations that threaten people's freedom should be stopped. A lower threshold that broadens the circle of eligible communities goes in the opposite direction from the stricter scrutiny the plan requires. Communities' security is valued in the plan, but through protection against threats, not through further subsidy-giving. The conclusion is therefore that the plan rejects the demand for a lower threshold.

Original (Swedish)

Planen säger inget om storleksgränser för statsbidrag till trossamfund, men den genomgående linjen är hårdare kontroll av vilka organisationer som får skattemedel: utbetalningar till extremister och till organisationer som hotar människors frihet ska stoppas. En lägre tröskel som vidgar kretsen bidragsberättigade samfund går i motsatt riktning mot den strängare prövning planen kräver. Samfundens säkerhet värnas i planen, men genom skydd mot hot, inte genom vidare bidragsgivning. Slutsatsen är därför att planen avvisar kravet på en lägre gräns.

  • stricter subsidy reviewdecisive»Stoppa utbetalningar av skattemedel till extremister« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop payments of tax funds to extremists”
  • subsidies require democratic worldview»Stoppa utbetalningar av skattepengar till organisationer som inte delar det svenska samhällets grundläggande demokratiska värderingar utan som hotar människors frihet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop payments of tax money to organizations that do not share Swedish society's fundamental democratic values but threaten people's freedom”
  • faith communities' security»Slå vakt om trossamfundens säkerhet för alla ska kunna utöva sin tro utan att känna sig hotade« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Safeguard the security of faith communities so that all can practice their faith without feeling threatened”
SDSverigedemokraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan's line is that public support for religious communities should be subject to stricter conditions, not expanded: communities working for extremism or segregation should not receive subsidies and foreign financing should be prevented.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's line is that public support for religious communities should be subject to stricter conditions, not expanded: communities working for extremism or segregation should not receive subsidies and foreign financing should be prevented. Lowering the threshold from 2500 to 1000 served expands instead the circle of eligible faith communities. The plan does not specify an exact number, but its direction speaks against the counter-proposal's requirement.

Original (Swedish)

Planens linje är att offentligt stöd till trossamfund ska villkoras hårdare, inte breddas: samfund som verkar för extremism eller segregation ska inte få bidrag och utländsk finansiering ska hindras. Att sänka gränsen från 2500 till 1000 betjänade vidgar tvärtom kretsen av bidragsberättigade samfund. Planen anger inget exakt antal, men dess riktning talar emot motförslagets krav.

  • no subsidies to extremist communitiesdecisive»Moskéer och andra trossamfund eller organisationer som verkar för extremism ska vare sig få bidrag från det offentliga eller utländska regimer.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Mosques and other religious communities or organisations working for extremism should neither receive subsidies from the public nor from foreign regimes.”
  • stop segregating support»Stoppa statligt stöd till extremistiska organisationer och andra grupper som verkar segregerande« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop state support for extremist organisations and other groups working segregatingly”
  • prevent foreign financing»Hindra utländsk finansiering av extremistiska trossamfund och organisationer« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Prevent foreign financing of extremist religious communities and organisations”

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament