2025-04-232024/25:SkU13 · p.14SkUTaxation

Tonnage Tax

Tonnage tax for shipping

What's at stake: A more favourable tonnage tax system could increase the number of Swedish-flagged vessels and strengthen the Swedish merchant fleet's competitiveness, with implications for trade and national resilience, though changes also involve public-finance trade-offs.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether Sweden's tonnage tax system for shipping should be revised now to align more closely with neighbouring countries' systems, or whether current rules should stand while an ongoing review is completed.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee notes that an inquiry into developing the tonnage tax system is already under preparation and therefore rejects the motions calling for revising the rules now.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 23 (S)

The reservation wants the tonnage tax revised now, with a changed speed requirement, the inclusion of special vessels, and a lower minimum vessel size, because the Swedish system is less permissive than the tonnage systems in the Nordic neighbouring countries.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 23 by S.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VYesYes 21/0/0/3follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
Sown reservationNoNo 0/93/0/13follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
MPYesYes 14/1/0/3follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
CNoYes 20/0/0/4departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
LNoYes 14/0/0/2departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
KDNoYes 16/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MNoYes 60/0/0/8departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
SDNoAbstain 0/1/61/10departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed

Broke with the party line

MPEmma Nohrén (MP, Göteborgs kommun)No — party line: Yes
SDRichard Jomshof (SD, Blekinge län)No — party line: Abstain

MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects the motions 2024/25:1351 by Per Söderlund et al. (SD) demands 4 and 6 as well as 2024/25:3192 by Niklas Karlsson et al. (S) demands 3 and 4.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:1351 av Per Söderlund m.fl. (SD) yrkandena 4 och 6 samt 2024/25:3192 av Niklas Karlsson m.fl. (S) yrkandena 3 och 4.

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag said no to approximately 90 proposals in motions from the general motion period 2024 within the area of business, capital and property. The motions concern, among other things, enterprise and investments, property tax and property fee and forest account. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to previous positions and that investigations and preparations are already underway.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The documents do not address tonnage taxation.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The documents do not address tonnage taxation. The nearest principle is the demand for a simple, stable and solidary tax system where tax levels again need to increase, which speaks against now widening a favorable special arrangement for shipping companies. That the plan wants to steer heavy transport to sustainable shipping pulls partly in another direction, but concerns transport modes and not corporate taxation.

Original (Swedish)

Dokumenten behandlar inte tonnagebeskattningen. Närmast liggande princip är kravet på ett enkelt, stabilt och solidariskt skattesystem där skattenivåerna åter behöver öka, vilket talar emot att nu vidga en förmånlig särordning för rederier. Att planen vill styra tunga transporter till hållbar sjöfart drar delvis åt andra hållet, men rör transportslag och inte bolagsbeskattningen.

  • solidary tax systemdecisive»skattesystem där de rikaste åter börjar betala sin del.« (party programme ↗)“tax system where the richest again begin paying their share.”
  • sustainable shipping»Tunga transporter behöver styras till järnväg och hållbar sjöfart.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Heavy transport needs to be steered toward rail and sustainable shipping.”
SSocialdemokraternaNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The party programme wishes to restructure transport systems so that road transport is replaced by rail and shipping, and the election manifesto wishes to strengthen the long-term conditions for business in an export-dependent country.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme wishes to restructure transport systems so that road transport is replaced by rail and shipping, and the election manifesto wishes to strengthen the long-term conditions for business in an export-dependent country. A revision of the tonnage tax that makes the system as permissive as our neighbours' can be derived from these commitments. The plan however does not address tonnage taxation, which is why the assessment is uncertain.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet vill lägga om transportsystemen så att vägtransporter ersätts med järnväg och sjötrafik, och valmanifestet vill stärka de långsiktiga förutsättningarna för företagande i ett exportberoende land. En revidering av tonnageskatten som gör systemet lika tillåtande som grannländernas kan härledas ur dessa åtaganden. Planen behandlar dock inte tonnagebeskattningen, varför bedömningen är osäker.

  • more goods by seadecisive»vägtransporter ersätts med järnvägstransporter och sjötrafik« (party programme ↗)“road transport is replaced by rail transport and shipping”
  • long-term business conditions»Stärk de långsiktiga förutsättningarna för företagande och innovation« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen the long-term conditions for business and innovation”
  • export-dependent economy»För ett litet och exportberoende land som Sverige är den globala handeln helt avgörande« (2022 manifesto ↗)“For a small and export-dependent country like Sweden global trade is absolutely crucial”
MPMiljöpartietYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan demands that maritime shipping emissions be included in emissions trading and that the real environmental costs be reflected in the price.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan demands that maritime shipping emissions be included in emissions trading and that the real environmental costs be reflected in the price. To now expand the tonnage tax's favourable scheme to more ship types and smaller vessels without environmental conditions goes against that principle. The plan certainly wants to move goods from road to sea, but it does not support a general eased tax collection for shipping.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver att sjöfartens utsläpp inkluderas i utsläppshandeln och att de verkliga miljökostnaderna återspeglas i priset. Att nu vidga tonnagebeskattningens förmånliga schablon till fler fartygstyper och mindre fartyg utan miljövillkor går emot den principen. Planen vill visserligen flytta gods från väg till sjö, men den bär inte ett generellt lättat skatteuttag för sjöfarten.

  • shipping shall bear its emissionsdecisive»höja priset på utsläppsrätter i EU, inkludera utsläpp från flyg och sjöfart i systemet och införa klimattullar på varor från länder utanför EU.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“raise the price of emission allowances in the EU, include emissions from aviation and shipping in the system and introduce climate tariffs on goods from countries outside the EU.”
  • the polluter pays»De verkliga kostnaderna för att utvinna råvaror« (party programme ↗)“The real costs for extracting raw materials”
  • goods from road to sea»utveckla järnväg, sjöfart och kombiterminaler så att« (party programme ↗)“develop railways, shipping and combined transport terminals so that”
CCenterpartietNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan requires globally competitive taxes and that Sweden's competitive strength as an entrepreneurial nation is reinforced.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires globally competitive taxes and that Sweden's competitive strength as an entrepreneurial nation is reinforced. Revising the tonnage tax so that speed requirements, specialized vessels and minimum vessel size do not make the system narrower than in neighbouring countries is an application of that, as is the requirement for simpler rules for companies. The plan therefore supports the motion point.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver globalt konkurrenskraftiga skatter och att Sveriges konkurrenskraft som företagarnation förstärks. Att revidera tonnageskatten så att fartkrav, specialfartyg och minsta fartygsstorlek inte gör systemet snävare än grannländernas är en tillämpning av det, liksom av kravet på enklare regler för företag. Planen stöder därför kravet.

  • competitive taxesdecisive»Våra skatter behöver vara globalt konkurrenskraftiga, stimulera till innovationer och entreprenörskap« (party programme ↗)“Our taxes need to be globally competitive, stimulate innovation and entrepreneurship”
  • strengthened competitiveness»Vår konkurrenskraft som företagarnation måste därför förstärkas« (party programme ↗)“Our competitive strength as an entrepreneurial nation must therefore be reinforced”
  • lower tax on enterprise»Sänk skatten på jobb och företagande, särskilt för småföretag och egenföretagare.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Lower tax on jobs and enterprise, especially for small businesses and the self-employed.”
  • deregulation»Rensa upp i regelträsket för entreprenörer, stora som små.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Clean up the bureaucratic jungle for entrepreneurs, large and small.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The election manifesto requires competitive and easy to understand tax levels to encourage business and investment, and the party programme highlights maritime transport's importance for infrastructure and that tax policy shall promote wealth-creating forces.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto requires competitive and easy to understand tax levels to encourage business and investment, and the party programme highlights maritime transport's importance for infrastructure and that tax policy shall promote wealth-creating forces. Revising tonnage tax so it is no more restrictive than neighbouring countries' is in line with this. However, tonnage taxation is not mentioned in the plan, so the conclusion is derived.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet kräver konkurrenskraftiga och lättförståeliga skattenivåer för att uppmuntra företagande och investeringar, och partiprogrammet framhåller sjötransporternas betydelse för infrastrukturen samt att skattepolitiken ska gynna de välståndsbildande krafterna. Att revidera tonnageskatten så att den inte är mindre tillåtande än grannländernas ligger i linje med detta. Tonnagebeskattningen nämns dock inte i planen, så slutsatsen är härledd.

  • internationally competitive taxesdecisive»Sveriges skattenivåer ska vara konkurrenskraftiga och lättförståeliga för att uppmuntra till företagande, utbildning och investeringar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden's tax levels shall be competitive and easy to understand to encourage business, education and investment.”
  • maritime transport's importance»Goda möjligheter till sjötransporter är ett viktigt inslag i infrastrukturen.« (party programme ↗)“Good opportunities for maritime transport are an important part of infrastructure.”
  • tax promotes business»Skattepolitiken ska gynna de välståndsbildande krafterna« (party programme ↗)“Tax policy shall promote the wealth-creating forces”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan requires that Sweden's position as a maritime nation be strong through long-term and competitive conditions, and that taxes be competitive and rules as simple as possible.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires that Sweden's position as a maritime nation be strong through long-term and competitive conditions, and that taxes be competitive and rules as simple as possible. The counter-proposal's requirements to expand the tonnage tax - changed speed requirements, special ships and lower minimum ship size - follow from that commitment when the current system is less permissive than neighbouring countries'. The plan therefore speaks for a revision.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver att Sveriges ställning som sjöfartsnation ska vara stark genom långsiktiga och konkurrenskraftiga villkor, och att skatterna ska vara konkurrenskraftiga och reglerna så enkla som möjligt. Motförslagets krav på att vidga tonnageskatten - ändrat fartkrav, specialfartyg och lägre minsta fartygsstorlek - följer av det åtagandet när nuvarande system är mindre tillåtande än grannländernas. Planen talar därför för en revidering.

  • strong Swedish maritime industrydecisive»Sveriges ställning som sjöfartsnation bör« (party programme ↗)“Sweden's position as a maritime nation should”
  • competitive taxation»Kapitalskatterna måste därför vara konkurrenskraftiga.« (party programme ↗)“Capital taxes must therefore be competitive.”
  • simple tax rules»skattereglerna utformas så enkelt som möjligt« (party programme ↗)“tax rules are designed as simply as possible”
  • small businesses at the centre»De små och medelstora företagen, som ofta är familjeföretag« (party programme ↗)“The small and medium-sized businesses, which are often family businesses”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan requires that the tax system become simpler and that corporate taxes are competitive and encourage investment in Sweden, and points out high taxes and complicated rules as obstacles to business.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires that the tax system become simpler and that corporate taxes are competitive and encourage investment in Sweden, and points out high taxes and complicated rules as obstacles to business. The counter-proposal's demand that the tonnage tax be revised now, since the system is less permissive than our neighbors', is precisely a matter of tax competitiveness. The plan also generally wants to lower taxes on business and reduce the regulatory burden.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver att skattesystemet blir enklare och att företagsskatterna är konkurrenskraftiga och uppmuntrar investeringar i Sverige, och pekar ut höga skatter och krångliga regler som hinder för näringslivet. Motförslagets krav på att tonnageskatten revideras nu, eftersom systemet är mindre tillåtande än grannländernas, är just en fråga om skattemässig konkurrenskraft. Planen vill också generellt sänka skatterna på företagande och minska regelbördan.

  • competitive corporate taxesdecisive»Ska det ske måste skattesystemet bli enklare, och bolags-, kunskaps- och kapitalskatter vara konkurrenskraftiga och uppmuntra till investeringar i Sverige.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“If that is to happen, the tax system must become simpler, and corporate, knowledge and capital taxes must be competitive and encourage investment in Sweden.”
  • obstacles to business must be removed»Sveriges välstånd bygger på ett dynamiskt och livskraftigt näringsliv. Men höga skatter, krångliga tillståndsprocesser och byråkrati sätter käppar i hjulet för innovation och tillväxt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden's prosperity is built on a dynamic and viable business sector. But high taxes, complicated approval processes and bureaucracy put obstacles in the way of innovation and growth.”
  • lower tax on business»Stärka drivkrafterna för investeringar, forskning och entreprenörskap, genom lägre skatter på företagande« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen incentives for investment, research and enterprise through lower taxes on business”
  • reduced regulatory burden»Ta bort en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och en tredjedel av regelkrånglet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove a third of companies' administrative costs and a third of red tape”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SDSverigedemokraternaNoAbstaindeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan commits to strengthening Swedish shipping, both for employment and education opportunities and as part of total defence.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan commits to strengthening Swedish shipping, both for employment and education opportunities and as part of total defence. It furthermore requires taxes that do not deviate too much from the world and do not hamper Swedish companies in international competition. Revising the tonnage tax so that it is at least as permissive as neighbouring countries' follows from these commitments.

Original (Swedish)

Planen åtar sig att stärka den svenska sjöfarten, både för arbets- och utbildningstillfällen och som del av totalförsvaret. Den kräver dessutom skatter som inte avviker för mycket från omvärlden och inte hämmar svenska företag i den internationella konkurrensen. Att revidera tonnageskatten så att den blir minst lika tillåtande som grannländernas följer av dessa åtaganden.

  • strengthened Swedish shippingdecisive»Vi behöver även stärka den svenska sjöfarten för att säkra arbets- och utbildningstillfällen men inte minst för att sjöfarten är en del av totalförsvaret.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We also need to strengthen Swedish shipping to secure employment and education opportunities but not least because shipping is part of total defence.”
  • taxes in line with the world»Skattepolitiken måste därför syfta till konkurrenskraftiga skatter som inte avviker för mycket från omvärlden, framförallt de skatter som läggs på företagen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Tax policy must therefore aim at competitive taxes that do not deviate too much from the world, especially the taxes placed on companies.”
  • competitive taxes»Ha skatter på en nivå som inte hämmar svenska företag i den internationella konkurrensen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Have taxes at a level that does not hamper Swedish companies in international competition”
  • shipping carries trade»Hamnar och sjöfarten är en viktig del i Sveriges import och export.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Ports and shipping are an important part of Sweden's imports and exports.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament