2026-04-012025/26:JuU11 · p.8JuUJustice
Repeated Petty Thefts
Assessment of repeated petty thefts (shoplifting)
What's at stake: According to the motion's authors, the threshold for petty theft is exploited by both individuals and organized crime for repeated thefts; the issue concerns what tools law enforcement should have to address habitual theft and how retailers are affected by repeated small-scale theft.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether repeated thefts below the threshold for petty theft, so-called shoplifting, should be assessed as ordinary-grade theft when committed habitually, or whether current practice - which already allows other circumstances to raise the assessment - is sufficient, as the committee holds.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee notes that work is already under way on the rules for sentencing multiple offences and that existing rules already allow circumstances other than value to result in a theft being assessed as ordinary-grade rather than petty, and therefore sees no reason for an initiative; the motion is rejected.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 8 (C)
The reservation (C) stresses that petty theft, formerly called shoplifting, is a major problem for retailers because thefts of property worth up to SEK 1,500 are in practice routinely assessed as petty theft regardless of how many such thefts occur, which is exploited by both individuals and organized crime; to address habitual offenders, the reservation wants such repeated thefts, seen in context, to instead be assessed as ordinary-grade theft, which would give law enforcement more tools against continued crime.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 8 by C.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have gone the other way
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: LLiberalerna, MModeraterna, SSocialdemokraterna, SDSverigedemokraterna
Ja 270–19Nej 54–235
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | Yes | Yes 17/0/0/5 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| S | No | Yes 90/0/0/16 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| MP | Yes | Yes 15/0/0/3 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | No | No 0/19/0/5 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 12/0/0/4 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: high | not addressed |
| M | No | Yes 55/0/0/11 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| SD | No | Yes 59/0/0/11 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects motion 2025/26:3581 by Ulrika Liljeberg et al. (C) request 2.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motion 2025/26:3581 av Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C) yrkande 2.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected 122 proposals in motions from the general motion period 2025 on criminal law matters. The proposals dealt with, among other things, crimes against person and others' property, measures against certain types of crimes as well as sanctions and special legal effects of crimes. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to that work is already underway in the areas that the proposals address.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants repeated taking of property to be assessed as theft when seen in context regardless of value. (C) — Reservation 8
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The counter-proposal wants to address habitual taking by reclassifying it as theft of normal degree, that is, through increased repression.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wants to address habitual taking by reclassifying it as theft of normal degree, that is, through increased repression. The plan says that repression and tougher action far too often are put forward instead of seriously addressing the problems, and that penalties must be carefully designed to actually lead to lower crime. The plan opens for certain penalties to be raised, but places emphasis on root causes, which speaks against the counter-proposal's demands.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill komma åt vanemässiga tillgrepp genom att rubricera upp dem till stöld av normalgraden, alltså genom skärpt repression. Planen säger att repression och hårdare tag alltför ofta lyfts fram i stället för att problemen tas på allvar, och att påföljder ska vara noggrant utformade för att faktiskt leda till lägre brottslighet. Planen öppnar för att vissa straff höjs, men lägger tyngdpunkten på orsakerna, vilket talar mot motförslagets krav.
- repression does not solve the problemsdecisive»Alltför ofta lyfts repression och hårdare tag upp som lösningar istället för att ta itu med problemen på allvar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Far too often repression and tougher action are put forward as solutions instead of seriously addressing the problems.”
- carefully designed penalties»Straff och andra påföljder för brott behöver vara noggrant« (party programme ↗)“Penalties and other sanctions for crime need to be carefully”
- prevention before increased penalties»Vissa straff kan behöva höjas men mycket mer fokus måste riktas mot att förhindra rekryteringen av nya barn till gängkriminalitet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Certain penalties may need to be raised but much more focus must be directed toward preventing the recruitment of new children into gang crime.”
- well-considered view of people»Vägen till ett samhälle med låg brottslighet går genom en genomtänkt« (party programme ↗)“The path to a society with low crime goes through a well-considered”
The plan wishes to explicitly increase sentences for those who commit repeated crimes and for those who support organised crime, and particularly points out theft gangs' concern throughout the country.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wishes to explicitly increase sentences for those who commit repeated crimes and for those who support organised crime, and particularly points out theft gangs' concern throughout the country. That repeated minor thefts are instead assessed as theft of normal degree is precisely such an increase for habitual offenders. The plan also demands sentences in parity with the severity of crimes.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill uttryckligen skärpa straffen för den som begår upprepade brott och för den som understödjer organiserad kriminalitet, och pekar särskilt ut stöldligornas oro i hela landet. Att upprepade ringa stölder i stället bedöms som stöld av normalgraden är precis en sådan skärpning mot vanemässiga gärningsmän. Planen kräver också straff i paritet med brottens allvar.
- increased sentences for repeated crimedecisive»Vi vill skärpa straffen bland annat för gängrelaterad brottslighet, för den som begår upprepade och allvarliga brott och för den som understödjer organiserad kriminalitet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We wish to increase sentences among other things for gang-related crime, for those who commit repeated and serious crimes and for those who support organised crime.”
- theft crime as a problem»Stöldligor skapar oro i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Theft gangs create concern throughout the country.”
- proportional sentences»Straff i paritet med brottens allvar.« (party programme ↗)“Sentences in parity with the severity of crimes.”
- combat organised crime»Kraftfullt bekämpande av organiserad kriminell verksamhet.« (party programme ↗)“Vigorous combating of organised criminal activity.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan's line in criminal policy is that the most powerful measure against crime is to prevent them from occurring and that probation sentences should be the first choice for lesser offences, with rehabilitation to prevent reoffending.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's line in criminal policy is that the most powerful measure against crime is to prevent them from occurring and that probation sentences should be the first choice for lesser offences, with rehabilitation to prevent reoffending. The counter-proposal instead wants to upgrade repeated minor thefts to theft of normal grade, that is, increased penal value as the main tool. This goes against the plan's prioritization of preventive measures and milder sentences for less serious offences.
Original (Swedish)
Planens linje i rättspolitiken är att den mest kraftfulla åtgärden mot brott är att förebygga att de sker och att frivårdspåföljder ska vara förstahandsval vid lindrigare brott, med rehabilitering för att förebygga återfall. Motförslaget vill i stället uppgradera upprepade ringa stölder till stöld av normalgraden, alltså skärpt straffvärde som huvudverktyg. Det går mot planens prioritering av förebyggande insatser och lindrigare påföljder vid mindre allvarliga brott.
- probation for lesser offencesdecisive»Frivårdspåföljder ska användas som förstahandsval vid lindrigare brott.« (party programme ↗)“Probation sentences shall be used as the first choice for lesser offences.”
- prevention before punishment»mot brott är att förebygga att de sker och stöd måste ges i tid.« (party programme ↗)“against crime is to prevent them from occurring and support must be provided in time.”
- rehabilitation against reoffending»med rehabilitering – för att förebygga återfall och ge dömda en verklig chans till ett nytt« (party programme ↗)“with rehabilitation – to prevent reoffending and give convicted persons a real chance at a new”
- preventive work is prioritized»storsatsa på det förebyggande arbetet i socioekonomiskt eftersatta områden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“invest heavily in preventive work in socio-economically disadvantaged areas.”
The election manifesto promises action against crimes that affect companies and that more everyday crimes shall be solved, as well as stricter penalties against organized crime.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto promises action against crimes that affect companies and that more everyday crimes shall be solved, as well as stricter penalties against organized crime. To let repeated thefts be assessed as theft of normal degree instead of petty theft is an application of this line against habitual and organized offenders. The plan does not, however, mention the graduation of theft itself.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet lovar krafttag mot brott som drabbar företag och att fler vardagsbrott ska klaras upp, samt strängare straff mot organiserad brottslighet. Att låta upprepade tillgrepp bedömas som stöld av normalgraden i stället för ringa stöld är en tillämpning av den linjen mot vanemässiga och organiserade gärningsmän. Planen nämner dock inte gradindelningen av stöld i sig.
- action against crime against companiesdecisive»en pålitlig infrastruktur i hela landet, satsningar på forskning och utveckling och krafttag mot brott emot företag« (2022 manifesto ↗)“[for world-class delivery requires] reliable infrastructure across the country, investments in research and development and action against crime against companies”
- everyday crimes shall be solved»Tryggheten ska förbättras i hela landet och fler brott som drabbar folk i deras vardag ska klaras upp.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Security shall improve across the country and more crimes that affect people in their daily lives shall be solved.”
- stricter penalties against organized crime»För att besegra dem krävs bättre insatser som förebygger nyrekrytering, mer resurser till polis, åklagare, domstolar och kriminalvården och strängare straff.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“To defeat them requires better measures that prevent new recruitment, more resources to police, prosecutors, courts and prisons and stricter penalties.”
- deterrence and rehabilitation»Kriminalpolitiken ska därför både förebygga och avskräcka från brott, stödja brottsdrabbade och stimulera dem som har begått olagliga handlingar till en ny livssituation utan brottslighet.« (party programme ↗)“Criminal policy shall therefore both prevent and deter from crime, support those affected by crime and encourage those who have committed illegal acts to a new situation without criminality.”
The plan explicitly states that reoffending and repeated crime shall result in stricter penalties and that today's quantity discount shall be abolished.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly states that reoffending and repeated crime shall result in stricter penalties and that today's quantity discount shall be abolished. That repeated petty theft seen in context shall be assessed as theft of normal grade is precisely such a tightening of how serial crime is valued. The plan also generally considers that penalties are too low.
Original (Swedish)
Planen säger uttryckligen att återfall och upprepad brottslighet ska ge strängare straff och att dagens mängdrabatt ska avskaffas. Att upprepade ringa stölder sedda i sitt sammanhang ska bedömas som stöld av normalgraden är just en sådan skärpning av hur seriebrottslighet värderas. Planen anser dessutom generellt att straffen är för låga.
- stricter penalties for repeated crimedecisive»Återfall och upprepad brottslighet ska ge strängare straff« (party programme ↗)“Reoffending and repeated crime shall result in stricter penalties”
- abolished quantity discount»Vi vill avskaffa dagens mängdrabatt på brott, slopa den närmast automatiska frigivningen från fängelsestraff och skärpa straffen för bland annat vapenbrott, våldtäkt och utpressning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to abolish today's quantity discount on crimes, abolish the almost automatic release from prison sentences and increase penalties for, among other things, weapons crimes, rape and extortion.”
- penalties are too low»Straffen är för låga« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Penalties are too low”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan requires that all crime be effectively and without exception prosecuted, including those that can be dismissed as minor crimes and offences, and that respect for the law be maintained with firmness.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that all crime be effectively and without exception prosecuted, including those that can be dismissed as minor crimes and offences, and that respect for the law be maintained with firmness. That repeated petty thefts are seen in their context and assessed as theft of normal degree is precisely such a tightening. The plan also establishes that violations of fellow citizens' property can never be tolerated, and the election manifesto consistently drives stricter sentences.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att alla brott effektivt och utan undantag beivras, också sådana som kan avfärdas som smärre brott och förseelser, och att respekten för lagarna upprätthålls med fasthet. Att upprepade ringa stölder ses i sitt sammanhang och bedöms som stöld av normalgraden är just en sådan skärpning. Planen slår också fast att kränkningar av medmänniskors egendom aldrig kan tolereras, och valmanifestet driver genomgående skärpta straff.
- even minor crimes must be prosecuteddecisive»också sådana som kan avfärdas som smärre brott och förseelser.« (party programme ↗)“also those that can be dismissed as minor crimes and offences.”
- firm prosecution»därför upprätthållas med fasthet och förövare av brott ska skyndsamt lagföras.« (party programme ↗)“shall therefore be maintained with firmness and perpetrators of crime shall be prosecuted promptly.”
- protection of property»medmänniskors integritet och egendom kan aldrig tolereras.« (party programme ↗)“fellow citizens' integrity and property can never be tolerated.”
- stricter sentences»Skärp straffet för vapenbrott till lägst fem års fängelse.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase the sentence for weapons crime to at least five years' imprisonment.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan explicitly promises to abolish today's quantity discounts and to introduce strong sentence enhancements for repeat offenses — precisely the logic the counter-proposal wants to see when repeated minor thefts are assessed in context.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly promises to abolish today's quantity discounts and to introduce strong sentence enhancements for repeat offenses — precisely the logic the counter-proposal wants to see when repeated minor thefts are assessed in context. The plan also particularly points out crime against trade and theft gangs as a problem the justice system must get tools against. The counter-proposal's demand thus lies within the plan's sentence enhancement line.
Original (Swedish)
Planen lovar uttryckligen att slopa dagens mängdrabatter och att införa kraftiga straffskärpningar vid återfall — precis den logik som motförslaget vill se när upprepade ringa stölder bedöms i sitt sammanhang. Planen pekar dessutom särskilt ut brottsligheten mot handeln och stöldligorna som ett problem rättsväsendet måste få verktyg mot. Motförslagets krav ligger därmed inom planens straffskärpningslinje.
- abolished quantity discountsdecisive»Ta bort alla straffrabatter för den som fyllt 18 år och slopa dagens mängdrabatter« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove all sentence reductions for those who have reached 18 years and abolish today's quantity discounts”
- sentence enhancement for repeat offenses»Införa ett system med kraftiga straffskärpningar vid återfall« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce a system of strong sentence enhancements for repeat offenses”
- combat theft crime»Sverige har samtidigt blivit hårt drabbat av utländska stöldligor« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden has at the same time been hard hit by foreign theft gangs”
- protect commerce against crime»Ge Brå i uppdrag att kartlägga brott mot företag« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Task the National Council for Crime Prevention with mapping crimes against businesses”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan requires zero tolerance for crime so that even less serious crimes are investigated and prosecuted, and that sentence reductions for those who have committed multiple crimes be removed.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires zero tolerance for crime so that even less serious crimes are investigated and prosecuted, and that sentence reductions for those who have committed multiple crimes be removed. The counter-proposal's requirement that repeated minor thefts seen in their context shall be assessed as theft of ordinary degree is exactly such a sharpening against habitual multiple crime. The plan moreover particularly highlights the vulnerability of retail to thefts.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver nolltolerans mot brott så att även mindre allvarliga brott utreds och lagförs, och att straffrabatter för den som begått flerfaldig brottslighet tas bort. Motförslagets krav på att upprepade ringa stölder sedda i sitt sammanhang ska bedömas som stöld av normalgraden är just en sådan skärpning mot vanemässig flerfaldig brottslighet. Planen lyfter dessutom särskilt handelns utsatthet för stölder.
- zero tolerance for less serious crimedecisive»Införa nolltolerans mot brott så att även mindre allvarliga brott utreds och lagförs« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce zero tolerance for crime so that even less serious crimes are investigated and prosecuted.”
- away with reductions for multiple crime»Straffrabatter för den som begått flerfaldig brottslighet eller begått en rå gärning som ung ska tas bort och hela strafftiden ska tjänas av innan villkor kan ställas för frigivning för den som döms till fängelse.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sentence reductions for those who have committed multiple crimes or committed a violent act when young shall be removed and the full sentence shall be served before conditions can be set for release for those sentenced to prison.”
- protect retail against thefts»Ytterligare ett stort orosmoln är att många företag, inte minst inom handeln, vittnar om ökande brottslighet i form av stölder, hot, våld och bedrägerier.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Another major concern is that many companies, especially in retail, report increasing crime in the form of thefts, threats, violence and fraud.”
- all crimes shall be investigated»Utgångspunkten bör vara att alla brott, även sådana som inte skapar rubriker, ska utredas och att polisen ska finnas nära i hela Sverige.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The starting point should be that all crimes, even those that do not make headlines, shall be investigated and that police shall be present close by throughout Sweden.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:JuU11)
- Committee report full text (HD01JuU11)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:1012 — Straffskärpning för olagliga vägblockader av Daniel Persson (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1090 — Tillträdesförbud till butiker i praktiken av Peder Björk m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1098 — Tillträdesförbud till en kommun för dömda i gängrelaterad brottslighet av Anna Lasses (C)
- Motion 2025/26:1135 — Fullgott skydd för barn och unga mot alla former av sexuella övergrepp och sexuell exploatering av Martina Johansson (C)
- Motion 2025/26:114 — Utvidgning av brottet olaga integritetsintrång av Angelica Lundberg (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1162 — Undantag från kravet på dubbel straffbarhet vid köp av sexuella tjänster utomlands av Adrian Magnusson och Sofia Skönnbrink (båda S)
- Motion 2025/26:1256 — Utredning om fängelsestraff för män som köper sex av Denis Begic (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1328 — Vårdnadstvister och konsekvenser av Runar Filper (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1354 — Stärk lagstiftningen till skydd för tjänstehundar och tjänstehästar av Roger Hedlund och Mattias Eriksson Falk (båda SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1397 — Djurs rätt i tjänst av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1399 — Skydd av minderåriga från att utnyttjas sexuellt av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1401 — Upprepad brottslighet av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1405 — Slopad preskriptionstid för sexualbrott av Johanna Rantsi (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1411 — Störande av demokratiskt arbete av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1441 — Avskaffande av pubertetsrekvisitet av Patrik Lundqvist m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1543 — Barnens rätt av Alireza Akhondi (C)
- Motion 2025/26:1600 — Eftersupning som ett särskilt brott av Gustaf Lantz (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1649 — Reformering av lagen om hets mot folkgrupp av Leonid Yurkovskiy och Jonas Andersson (båda SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1672 — Skärpt lagstiftning mot gromning och införande av bestämmelse om lockbete av Katarina Tolgfors m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1742 — Skärpt lagstiftning mot samhällsfarlig aktivism av Jan Ericson (M)
Source: The Swedish Parliament