2026-04-292025/26:JuU10 · p.4JuUJustice

The five-year permits

Five-year licenses or new supervision for especially dangerous weapons

What's at stake: The choice determines how the police will check that owners of especially dangerous weapons still have a need for them, and affects both the authority's workload and weapon owners' confidence in the system.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether today's time-limited five-year licenses for fully automatic weapons and multi-shot handguns should be abolished in favour of a new supervision procedure, or whether the five-year licenses should be kept as a more appropriate way of checking on ownership.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee backs the government's proposal to replace the five-year licenses with a supervision procedure in which police check continued need through formal orders, and therefore rejects the motion calling for the time-limited license system to be kept.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 3 (S, V, MP)

The reserving parties (S, V, MP) want to keep the five-year licenses for fully automatic weapons and multi-shot handguns, citing the police authority's own assessment that the new supervision arrangement is less appropriate and more burdensome for both the public and the authority.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 3 by S, V, MP.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
Vown reservationNoNo 0/13/0/8follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
Sown reservationNoNo 0/92/0/14follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
MPown reservationNoNo 0/15/0/3follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
CYesYes 20/0/0/4follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
LNoYes 9/0/0/7departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
KDNoYes 16/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: lowderived
MYesYes 57/0/0/9follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
SDYesYes 60/0/0/10follows the planconfidence: mediumderived

Committee proposal

Parliament rejects motion 2025/26:3919 by Teresa Carvalho et al. (S) demand 3.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motion 2025/26:3919 av Teresa Carvalho m.fl. (S) yrkande 3.

Riksdag decision: Parliament approved the government's proposal for a new weapons act. The new rules include, among other things, a ban on certain types of semi-automatic rifles for hunting. The new weapons act includes, among other things, that requirements for possession of firearms are clarified regulatory easements are introduced, such as more flexible storage rules and the EU's simplified rules for importing weapons for sport shooters and hunters the five-year permits for fully automatic weapons and single-hand weapons for multiple shots are abolished and replaced with a supervisory procedure a ban is introduced against granting new permits for certain types of semi-automatic rifles for hunting and culling of trapped animals a clearer division is made of the criminal law provisions in the weapons act between crimes that are typically committed by illegal weapons holders and other criminalized violations of the weapons act. The new rules enter into force on June 1, 2026.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The plan says nothing about permit forms for weapons, but requires that access to firearms be combated and that the world move towards fewer weapons in circulation.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan says nothing about permit forms for weapons, but requires that access to firearms be combated and that the world move towards fewer weapons in circulation. Retaining time-limited five-year permits for particularly dangerous weapons means a recurring, active assessment of the need and thus tighter control than a supervisory procedure. Based on the plan's weapons-limiting principle the counter-proposal is therefore supported.

Original (Swedish)

Planen säger inget om tillståndsformer för vapen, men kräver att tillgången till skjutvapen bekämpas och att världen går mot färre vapen i cirkulation. Att behålla tidsbegränsade femårstillstånd för särskilt farliga vapen innebär en återkommande, aktiv prövning av behovet och därmed en stramare kontroll än ett tillsynsförfarande. Utifrån planens vapenbegränsande princip stöds därför motförslaget.

  • limit weapon accessdecisive»kamp mot tillgången till illegala skjutvapen och ett effektivt avhopparprogram« (2022 manifesto ↗)“fight against access to illegal firearms and an effective exit programme.”
  • fewer weapons in circulation»Världen behöver gå mot fred, nedrustning och färre vapen i cirkulation.« (party programme ↗)“The world needs to move towards peace, disarmament and fewer weapons in circulation.”
  • safety from firearms violence»Föräldrar ska inte behöva oroa sig över skjutvapenvåld och drömma mardrömmar om att deras barn ska drabbas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Parents should not have to worry about firearms violence and have nightmares about their children being hit.”
SSocialdemokraternaNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The plan does not take a position on the permit form for weapons, but the election manifesto establishes that the fight against crime shall be uncompromising and that the police shall have the tools required.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan does not take a position on the permit form for weapons, but the election manifesto establishes that the fight against crime shall be uncompromising and that the police shall have the tools required. The counter-proposal wishes to retain the time-limited five-year permits for particularly dangerous weapons, which means continued stricter control of access. This comes closest to the plan's line on measures against weapons, but the conclusion is derived.

Original (Swedish)

Planen tar inte ställning till tillståndsformen för vapen, men valmanifestet slår fast att kampen mot kriminaliteten ska vara kompromisslös och att polisen ska ha de verktyg som krävs. Motförslaget vill behålla de tidsbegränsade femårstillstånden för särskilt farliga vapen, vilket innebär en fortsatt striktare kontroll av tillgången. Det ligger närmast planens linje om krafttag mot vapen, men slutsatsen är härledd.

  • uncompromising crime preventiondecisive»Kampen mot kriminaliteten ska vara kompromisslös.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The fight against crime shall be uncompromising.”
  • measures against weapons»Vi vill ta krafttag mot införsel av vapen och narkotika, bland annat genom stärkt gränskontroll.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We wish to take measures against the import of weapons and narcotics, among other things through strengthened border control.”
  • police shall have tools»Polisen behöver också fler verktyg, som bättre möjligheter till avlyssning och husrannsakan.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The police also need more tools, such as better possibilities for wiretapping and house searches.”
  • combat organised crime»Kraftfullt bekämpande av organiserad kriminell verksamhet.« (party programme ↗)“Vigorous combating of organised criminal activity.”
MPMiljöpartietNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The plan does not address the design of weapon permits.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan does not address the design of weapon permits. The nearest lying principle is that the state is responsible for protecting people from crime and that crime-fighting authorities shall have sufficient resources and appropriate tools. Since the counter-proposal wants to retain the order that the responsible authority itself considers most appropriate for particularly dangerous weapons, it lies closest to the plan's protection orientation.

Original (Swedish)

Planen behandlar inte vapentillståndens utformning. Närmast liggande princip är att staten har ansvar för att skydda människor från brott och att brottsbekämpande myndigheter ska ha tillräckliga resurser och ändamålsenliga verktyg. Eftersom motförslaget vill behålla den ordning som den ansvariga myndigheten själv anser mest ändamålsenlig för särskilt farliga vapen, ligger det närmast planens skyddsinriktning.

  • state protection responsibilitydecisive»Staten har ansvar både för att skydda människor från brott och för att respektera människors personliga integritet.« (party programme ↗)“The state is responsible both for protecting people from crime and for respecting people's personal integrity.”
  • well-resourced justice system»Miljöpartiet vill att rättsväsendet ska ha tillräckliga resurser för att skydda utsatta och lagföra dem som begår brott.« (party programme ↗)“The Green Party wants the justice system to have sufficient resources to protect the vulnerable and prosecute those who commit crimes.”
  • police shall prevent crime»Polisen och andra brottsbekämpande myndigheter ska ha förmåga att både bekämpa och förebygga brott.« (party programme ↗)“Police and other law enforcement authorities shall have the ability to both combat and prevent crime.”
CCenterpartietYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The documents say nothing about firearms permits or their oversight.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The documents say nothing about firearms permits or their oversight. The closest principle is that redundant rules and bureaucracy shall be swept away, that lead times for government action shall be shortened and that the state is for people, not the other way around. To keep recurring five-year permits instead of a surveillance order goes against that principle, so the plan speaks against the counter-proposal's requirement.

Original (Swedish)

Dokumenten säger ingenting om vapentillstånd eller tillsynen av dem. Närmast liggande princip är att överflödiga regler och byråkrati ska rensas bort, att ledtiderna för myndighetsutövning ska kortas och att staten är till för människan och inte tvärtom. Att behålla återkommande femårstillstånd i stället för en tillsynsordning går emot den principen, varför planen talar emot motförslagets krav.

  • sweep away redundant bureaucracydecisive»Dyra, krångliga och innovationshämmande regelverk ligger som en våt filt över delar av landsbygden. Vi ska rensa upp bland överflödiga regler och byråkrati.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Expensive, complicated and innovation-hindering regulations lie like a wet blanket over parts of rural areas. We shall sweep up among redundant rules and bureaucracy.”
  • shorter processing times»Ledtiderna för handläggning och myndighetsutövning i domstolar och myndigheter måste kortas och tillgången till ombud förbättras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Lead times for handling and government action in courts and authorities must be shortened and access to representation improved.”
  • the state serves people»Staten är till för människan, inte tvärtom.« (party programme ↗)“The state is for people, not the other way around.”
LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan pursues a hard line against weapons in the wrong hands, with stricter penalties for weapons crimes and demands to improve the justice system's capability and efficiency.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan pursues a hard line against weapons in the wrong hands, with stricter penalties for weapons crimes and demands to improve the justice system's capability and efficiency. Maintaining time-limited five-year permits for particularly dangerous weapons provides tighter control of continuing need and aligns most closely with the plan's line, especially when the responsible authority itself sees the new arrangement as less appropriate. However, the plan does not address permit forms in the weapons law.

Original (Swedish)

Planen driver en hård linje mot vapen i orätta händer, med skärpta straff för vapenbrott och krav på att rättsväsendets förmåga och effektivitet förbättras. Att behålla tidsbegränsade femårstillstånd för särskilt farliga vapen ger en tätare kontroll av att behovet består och ligger därmed närmast planens linje, särskilt när den ansvariga myndigheten själv ser den nya ordningen som mindre ändamålsenlig. Planen behandlar dock inte tillståndsformerna i vapenlagen.

  • increased penalties for weapons crimesdecisive»Vi vill avskaffa dagens mängdrabatt på brott, slopa den närmast automatiska frigivningen från fängelsestraff och skärpa straffen för bland annat vapenbrott, våldtäkt och utpressning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to abolish today's quantity discount on crimes, abolish the almost automatic release from prison sentences and increase penalties for, among other things, weapons crimes, rape and extortion.”
  • efficient justice system»Rättsväsendets förmåga och effektivitet behöver förbättras så att« (party programme ↗)“The justice system's capability and efficiency needs to be improved so that”
  • hard line against crime»Återfall och upprepad brottslighet ska ge strängare straff, liksom medverkan i organiserad« (party programme ↗)“Reoffending and repeated crime shall result in stricter penalties, as shall participation in organized”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan wants to streamline the police's task so that the authority can concentrate on crime prevention, and pursues a restrictive line against weapons in criminal environments with sharply increased penalties for weapons crimes.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to streamline the police's task so that the authority can concentrate on crime prevention, and pursues a restrictive line against weapons in criminal environments with sharply increased penalties for weapons crimes. That to keep the time-limited permits for particularly dangerous weapons, instead of a supervisory procedure that the authority itself considers more burdensome, is in line with this. The plan's demand to counter complicated rules points the other way, however.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill renodla polisens uppdrag så att myndigheten kan koncentrera sig på brottsbekämpning, och driver en restriktiv linje mot vapen i brottslig miljö med kraftigt skärpta straff för vapenbrott. Att behålla de tidsbegränsade tillstånden för särskilt farliga vapen, i stället för ett tillsynsförfarande som myndigheten själv anser mer betungande, ligger i linje med detta. Planens krav på att motverka krångliga regler talar dock åt andra hållet.

  • streamline the police's taskdecisive»Renodla polisens uppdrag. Polisen fokuserar idag alldeles för mycket på annat än brottsbekämpning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Streamline the police's task. The police today focus far too much on things other than crime prevention.”
  • restrictive weapons policy»Skärp straffet för vapenbrott till lägst fem års fängelse.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Tighten the penalty for weapons crimes to at least five years' imprisonment.”
  • the police's core task»Polisens uppgift är att förebygga brott, upprätthålla ordning samt att utreda« (party programme ↗)“The police's task is to prevent crimes, maintain order and to investigate”
  • counter complicated rules»Byråkrati och krångliga regler ska« (party programme ↗)“Bureaucracy and complicated rules shall”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan wants to shorten processing times for weapon licenses and states that weapon regulation shall not negatively impact hunters, sport shooters and weapon collectors.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to shorten processing times for weapon licenses and states that weapon regulation shall not negatively impact hunters, sport shooters and weapon collectors. Retaining recurring five-year permits means exactly the repeated license burden the plan wants to reduce. The plan also wants to focus the police's role on investigating and clearing up crimes, which argues against the authority being tied up by reviews of already-granted permits.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill korta handläggningstiderna för vapenlicenser och slår fast att vapenregleringen inte ska drabba jägare, sportskyttar och vapensamlare negativt. Att behålla återkommande femårstillstånd innebär just den upprepade licensbörda planen vill minska. Planen vill dessutom renodla polisens uppdrag mot att utreda och klara upp brott, vilket talar emot att myndigheten binds upp av omprövningar av redan beviljade tillstånd.

  • simpler license handlingdecisive»Arbeta för kortade handläggningstider för vapenlicenser« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Work for shortened processing times for weapon licenses”
  • weapon owners shall not be harmed»Det är viktigt att EU:s vapendirektiv inte genomförs i svensk lagstiftning så att du som är jägare, sportskytt eller vapensamlare drabbas negativt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is important that the EU's weapons directive is not implemented in Swedish legislation so that you as a hunter, sport shooter or weapon collector are not negatively affected.”
  • streamlined police role»Renodla Polisens uppdrag med fokus på att upptäcka, utreda och klara upp brott« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Focus the Police's role with focus on detecting, investigating and clearing up crimes”
  • efficient agency administration»Korta myndigheternas handläggningstider genom en bortre tidsgräns« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Shorten authorities' processing times through a deadline”
SDSverigedemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan establishes that the long processing times for gun license handling are unreasonable and that measures that should have been directed against illegal weapons have instead affected law-abiding hunters and sport shooters.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that the long processing times for gun license handling are unreasonable and that measures that should have been directed against illegal weapons have instead affected law-abiding hunters and sport shooters. The counter-proposal wants to keep the time-limited five-year permits, that is a recurring administrative examination of legal owners, which goes against the plan's commitment to value legal gun ownership and simplify license handling.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att de långa handläggningstiderna kring vapenlicenshantering är orimliga och att åtgärder som borde riktats mot illegala vapen i stället drabbat laglydiga jägare och sportskyttar. Motförslaget vill behålla de tidsbegränsade femårstillstånden, alltså en återkommande administrativ prövning av legala innehavare, vilket går emot planens åtagande att värna legalt vapenägande och förenkla licenshanteringen.

  • simpler license handlingdecisive»De långa handläggningstiderna kring vapenlicenshantering är orimliga.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The long processing times for gun license handling are unreasonable.”
  • valued legal gun ownership»Stoppa hetsjakten på jägare och legala vapeninnehavare« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop the witch-hunt against hunters and legal gun owners.”
  • focus on illegal weapons»Samtidigt har politiska åtgärder som borde riktats mot illegala vapen och gängbrottslighet istället riktats mot legalt vapeninnehav, svenska jägare och sportskyttar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Meanwhile political measures that should have been directed against illegal weapons and gang crime have instead been directed at legal gun ownership, Swedish hunters and sport shooters.”
  • the right to own hunting weapons»Möjligheten att äga jaktvapen och att ägna sig åt jakt ska värnas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The possibility to own hunting weapons and to engage in hunting shall be valued.”

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament