Charging facilities in joint ownership properties

The plan states that it is the responsibility of policy and not the individual to create opportunities to choose simple and cheap climate-smart alternatives, and that the road network should be electrified as part of the transition. An expensive and time-consuming requirement for reconsideration proceedings for charging points is precisely such an obstacle. Exempting joint property arrangements from the requirement thus follows from the plan's climate commitments, even if the regulations are not mentioned.

• policy should remove obstaclesdecisive»Det är politikens, och inte individens, ansvar att skapa möjligheter för människor att välja enkla och billiga klimatsmarta alternativ« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is the responsibility of policy, and not the individual, to create opportunities for people to choose simple and cheap climate-smart alternatives”
• electrification of transport»För att göra såväl person- som godstransporter hållbara behöver vägnätet både elektrifieras och kompletteras med infrastruktur för andra hållbara drivmedel« (2022 manifesto ↗)“To make both passenger and freight transport sustainable, the road network needs to be electrified and complemented with infrastructure for other sustainable fuels”
• the transition is urgent»Omställningen behöver ske omgående och alla politiska beslut behöver ta hänsyn till den akuta kris som vi befinner oss i« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The transition needs to happen immediately and all political decisions need to take into account the acute crisis we are in”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

The plan wants to double the number of charging stations by 2030 to make it easier for those who have an electric car and explicitly tear down bureaucratic barriers and speed up slow permit processes. A requirement for expensive re-application proceedings even when property owners agree is precisely such a barrier. The plan also wants to make it easier for property owners to take action in shared facilities.

• double the charging stationsdecisive»Vi vill dubbla antalet laddstolpar till 2030 för att underlätta för den som har elbil.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to double the number of charging stations by 2030 to make it easier for those who have an electric car.”
• tear down bureaucratic barriers»Riv de byråkratiska hindren för mer el. Långsamma tillståndsprocesser ska snabbas på. Vi vill minst fördubbla takten i utbyggnaden av elnätet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Tear down the bureaucratic barriers for more electricity. Slow permit processes shall be sped up. We want to at least double the pace of electricity network expansion.”
• make it easier for households»Underlätta familjers energieffektivisering.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Make it easier for families to improve energy efficiency.”

The plan wants to invest in charging throughout the country and for vehicles to be able to run on electricity everywhere, with only fossil-free cars sold from 2025. Demands for new land surveying procedures that increase the cost of charging points in jointly held properties counteract that goal, and the plan wants to avoid unnecessary bureaucracy. Exempting such associations from re-evaluation requirements is thereby in the plan's direction.

• charging infrastructure throughout the countrydecisive»investera i laddning i hela landet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“invest in charging throughout the country”
• electrified car fleet»att den som behöver bil ska ha råd med ett klimatsmart alternativ, och att bara fossilfria bilar ska säljas från 2025« (2022 manifesto ↗)“that those who need a car shall be able to afford a climate-smart alternative, and that only fossil-free cars shall be sold from 2025”
• simplification of rules»Onödig byråkrati ska undvikas genom ett aktivt« (party programme ↗)“Unnecessary bureaucracy shall be avoided through an active”

The plan requires that it shall be simple and inexpensive to install charging for electric cars regardless of housing type and that climate action should not have to wait for expensive and complicated regulations. A requirement for new land surveying when property owners have already agreed is precisely such an obstacle. The plan also wants to lighten the financial burden for joint property arrangements and promote electric cars with more charging points, which supports the counter-proposal's requirement.

• simple to build chargingdecisive»Det ska vara enkelt och billigt att installera solpaneler, bygga laddning till elbilar och minska energianvändningen hemma — vare sig man bor i hus eller lägenhet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It shall be simple and inexpensive to install solar panels, build charging for electric cars and reduce energy use at home — whether one lives in a house or an apartment.”
• faster permits for green investments»Klimatet kan inte vänta på dyra och krångliga regelverk. Det är dags att halvera tiden det tar att få tillstånd för gröna investeringar och reformera miljöbalken så att ett projekts klimatnytta ges större vikt i miljöprövningen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Climate action cannot wait for expensive and complicated regulations. It is time to halve the time it takes to get permits for green investments and reform the Environmental Code so that a project's climate benefit is given greater weight in environmental review.”
• lighten the burden for joint property arrangements»Därför vill vi införa ett avdrag för avgifterna till väg-, brygg- och bredbandssamfälligheter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore we want to introduce a deduction for fees to road, dock and broadband joint property arrangements.”
• more charging points»Elbilarna ska främjas med hjälp av fler laddplatser, differentierade trängselskatter som gynnar miljöbilar och bättre parkeringsmöjligheter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Electric cars shall be promoted with the help of more charging points, differentiated congestion charges that favour environmental cars and better parking facilities.”

The plan states that we need charging stations where we live, work and travel, that more people shall choose electric cars and that electrification of the transport sector shall be accelerated. It also wants to simplify rules and processes in building. The counter-proposal's requirement to remove the requirement for review proceedings for charging points in joint property arrangements therefore follows directly from the plan.

• charging stations where we livedecisive»Det behövs laddstolpar där vi bor, arbetar och reser.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We need charging stations where we live, work and travel.”
• faster electrification»Elektrifieringen av transportsektorn ska påskyndas.« (party programme ↗)“Electrification of the transport sector shall be accelerated.”
• more electric cars»Fler ska välja elbilen och en inblandning av fossilfria bränslen ska fortsätta.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More people shall choose electric cars and a mixture of fossil-free fuels shall continue.”
• simplified rules and processes»Byggnormerna bör förenklas, överklagandeprocessen förkortas« (party programme ↗)“Building standards should be simplified, appeals processes shortened”

The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.

The party programme establishes that bureaucracy and unnecessary rules shall not stand in the way of individuals' opportunities to develop their housing and that policy with economic and legal policy instruments shall accelerate the use of energy-efficient vehicles and non-fossil fuels. Residents shall have real opportunities to influence their housing environment. That associations be exempted from the requirement for review proceedings for charging points follows from this.

• bureaucracy shall not hinder housingdecisive»Krångel och onödiga regler får inte stå i vägen för en kommun att leva upp till sitt ansvar eller för enskildas möjligheter att utveckla sitt boende.« (party programme ↗)“Bureaucracy and unnecessary rules shall not stand in the way of a municipality fulfilling its responsibility or individuals' opportunities to develop their housing.”
• accelerate non-fossil vehicles»För att minska vägtrafikens utsläpp bör politiken nationellt och på EU-nivå understödja och påskynda utveckling« (party programme ↗)“To reduce road traffic emissions, policy at national and EU level should support and accelerate development”
• resident influence»Boende ska ha reella möjligheter att påverka sin boendemiljö och sina boendekostnader genom medansvar och inflytande.« (party programme ↗)“Residents shall have real opportunities to influence their housing environment and their housing costs through co-responsibility and influence.”
• counter bureaucracy»Byråkrati och krångliga regler ska motverkas.« (party programme ↗)“Bureaucracy and complicated rules shall be countered.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

The plan commits to expanding charging stations and charging points throughout the country and quickly getting a network of charging points, while regulatory red tape shall be removed and authorities' handling times shortened with an outer time limit. A demand for re-examination procedure that delays and makes charging points more expensive in joint properties is precisely such an obstacle. Therefore the plan supports the counter-proposal's demand for simplification.

• more charging stationsdecisive»Förbättra tillgången på laddstationer för elbilar« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Improve access to charging stations for electric vehicles”
• fast charging infrastructure»Vi vill snabbt bygga ett nätverk av laddstationer för personbilar och lastbilar i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to quickly build a network of charging stations for cars and trucks throughout the country.”
• shorter handling times»Korta myndigheternas handläggningstider genom en bortre tidsgräns« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Shorten authorities' handling times through an outer time limit”
• reduced regulatory red tape»Ta bort en tredjedel av företagens administrationskostnader och en tredjedel av regelkrånglet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Remove a third of businesses' administrative costs and a third of regulatory red tape”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

The plan wants to expand charging infrastructure and establishes that charging stations need to be available throughout the country as the vehicle fleet is electrified, while rules and processes shall be simplified. Exempting co-ownership associations from the requirement for costly reconsideration proceedings is such a simplification that enables charging points. The plan is silent on the committee's reason that the problems can be solved within existing rules through ongoing work.

• expanded charging infrastructuredecisive»Bygga ut laddinfrastrukturen för elbilar« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Expand charging infrastructure for electric cars.”
• charging stations throughout the country»När elektrifieringen av fordonsflottan tar fart så behövs en strategi för att laddstationer ska finnas tillgängliga i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“When electrification of the vehicle fleet takes off, a strategy is needed for charging stations to be available throughout the country.”
• simplified rules»Anpassa och förenkla regler och processer för planering och byggnation« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Adapt and simplify rules and processes for planning and construction.”
• electrification of motoring»Elektrifiering är framtiden för bilismen, men elektrifiering kräver å sin sida god tillgång på pålitlig, billig och miljövänlig el genom kärnkraft.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Electrification is the future for motoring, but electrification requires on its part good access to reliable, cheap and environmentally friendly electricity through nuclear power.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.