2025-05-142024/25:JuU17 · p.1JuUJustice
Suitability of firearms for hunting
Semi-automatic weapons with a military appearance for hunting
What's at stake: The decision affects which types of weapons hunters can be licensed for and carry outdoors, and involves a trade-off between hunters' access to a certain type of weapon and concerns that weapons with a military appearance are associated with armed violence and insecurity.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether it should remain possible to obtain a licence for and use semi-automatic weapons with a military appearance, such as the AR-15 type, for hunting, or whether the law should be changed to ban such possession.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee refers to the fact that the Firearms Inquiry has already examined the suitability of allowing possession of semi-automatic weapons with a military appearance, such as the AR-15, for hunting purposes, and has proposed an explicit ban. In light of this ongoing work, the committee finds no reason for its own initiative and rejects the motion.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 1 (S, V, MP)
The reservation (S, V, MP) holds that military weapons do not belong in the woods and that the law should be changed so that semi-automatic weapons with a military appearance, such as the AR-15, can no longer be licensed or used for hunting. It points out that such weapons are associated with school shootings and serious violence, and wants the government to bring forward a legislative proposal for a ban.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by S, V, MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/21/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| S | No | No 0/93/0/13 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | No 0/15/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | Yes | Yes 21/0/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| KD | Yes | Yes 16/0/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | Yes | Yes 63/0/0/9 | follows the plan | confidence: high | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects motion 2024/25:3045 by Emma Nohrén et al. (MP) demand 4.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motion 2024/25:3045 av Emma Nohrén m.fl. (MP) yrkande 4.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 20 proposals concerning weapons issues in motions from the general motion period 2024. The proposals concern, among other things, the suitability of firearms for hunting, requirements for shooting ranges, and the right for hunters to carry a knife in the car. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to the fact that work is already underway within the Government Offices in response to proposals submitted by the 2022 weapons investigation.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants the law to be changed so that semi-automatic weapons with military appearance cannot be licensed for hunting. (S, V, MP) — Reservation 1
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan makes the fight against access to firearms a part of crime prevention and wants the world to move towards fewer weapons in circulation.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan makes the fight against access to firearms a part of crime prevention and wants the world to move towards fewer weapons in circulation. An explicit ban on licensing semi-automatic weapons with military appearance for hunting follows from that line. The plan also highlights gun violence as one of the insecurities society must eliminate.
Original (Swedish)
Planen gör kampen mot tillgången till skjutvapen till en del av brottsbekämpningen och vill att världen går mot färre vapen i cirkulation. Ett uttryckligt förbud mot att licensiera halvautomatiska vapen med militärt utseende för jakt följer av den linjen. Planen lyfter dessutom skjutvapenvåldet som en av de otryggheter samhället måste få bort.
- limited access to firearmsdecisive»kamp mot tillgången till illegala skjutvapen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“fight against access to illegal firearms”
- fewer weapons in circulation»och färre vapen i cirkulation.« (party programme ↗)“and fewer weapons in circulation.”
- safety from gun violence»Föräldrar ska inte behöva oroa sig över skjutvapenvåld och drömma mardrömmar om att deras barn ska drabbas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Parents should not have to worry about gun violence and dream nightmares about their children being affected.”
- no to militarization»och deeskalering. Vi vänder oss emot militarisering och kapprustning.« (party programme ↗)“and de-escalation. We oppose militarization and arms races.”
The election manifesto wants to double the penalty for serious weapons crimes and take decisive action against weapon smuggling as part of an uncompromising fight against serious crime.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto wants to double the penalty for serious weapons crimes and take decisive action against weapon smuggling as part of an uncompromising fight against serious crime. That semi-automatic weapons with military appearance should not be able to be licensed for hunting lies in that line of fewer such weapons in circulation. The party programme also highlights the fight against illegal weapons trafficking. The plan does not mention hunting weapons, so the conclusion is derived.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet vill fördubbla straffet för grova vapenbrott och ta krafttag mot införsel av vapen som ett led i en kompromisslös kamp mot den grova brottsligheten. Att halvautomatiska vapen med militärt utseende inte ska kunna licensieras för jakt ligger i den linjen om färre sådana vapen i omlopp. Partiprogrammet lyfter också kampen mot den illegala vapenhandeln. Planen nämner inte jaktvapen, så slutsatsen är härledd.
- tougher action on weapons crimesdecisive»Vi vill fördubbla straffet för grova vapenbrott.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to double the penalty for serious weapons crimes.”
- limit weapons in circulation»Vi vill ta krafttag mot införsel av vapen och narkotika, bland annat genom stärkt gränskontroll.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to take decisive action against smuggling of weapons and drugs, among other things through strengthened border control.”
- uncompromising crime prevention»Kampen mot kriminaliteten ska vara kompromisslös.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The fight against crime shall be uncompromising.”
- against illegal weapons trafficking»Det gör också kampen mot den illegala vapenhandeln.« (party programme ↗)“It also applies to the fight against illegal weapons trafficking.”
The plan states that the ecological perspective shall be placed in focus in hunting and that hunting forms that subject animals to unnecessary suffering shall not be permitted — hunting shall be guided by nature conservation and animal welfare considerations, not by weapon types.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that the ecological perspective shall be placed in focus in hunting and that hunting forms that subject animals to unnecessary suffering shall not be permitted — hunting shall be guided by nature conservation and animal welfare considerations, not by weapon types. The plan also sees serious organised crime as a threat to people's freedom, which argues against weapons associated with serious violence being licensed for hunting. An explicit ban is thereby in line with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att det ekologiska perspektivet ska sättas i fokus vid jakt och att jaktformer som utsätter djur för onödigt lidande inte ska vara tillåtna — jakten ska styras av naturvårds- och djurskyddshänsyn, inte av vapentyper. Planen ser också den grova organiserade brottsligheten som ett hot mot människors frihet, vilket talar mot att vapen förknippade med grovt våld licensieras för jakt. Ett uttryckligt förbud ligger därmed i linje med planen.
- ecological perspective in huntingdecisive»Det är viktigt att det ekologiska perspektivet sätts i« (party programme ↗)“It is important that the ecological perspective is placed in”
- no unnecessary animal suffering in hunting»Jaktformer som utsätter djur för onödigt lidande« (party programme ↗)“Hunting forms that subject animals to unnecessary suffering”
- counteract serious gun violence»grova organiserade brottsligheten utgör ett hot mot« (party programme ↗)“serious organised crime is a threat to”
The plan says nothing about weapons legislation or licensing of hunting weapons.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan says nothing about weapons legislation or licensing of hunting weapons. Nearest principles are that superfluous rules burdening the countryside shall be cleared, that wildlife management shall be active and that property rights are central. A ban based on a weapon's appearance rather than its function appears against that background as such a regulatory burden, but the ground is weak.
Original (Swedish)
Planen säger ingenting om vapenlagstiftning eller licensiering av jaktvapen. Närmast liggande principer är att överflödiga regler som belastar landsbygden ska rensas bort, att viltförvaltningen ska vara aktiv och att äganderätten är central. Ett förbud grundat på ett vapens utseende snarare än dess funktion framstår mot den bakgrunden som en sådan regelbörda, men underlaget är svagt.
- no superfluous rulesdecisive»Vi ska rensa upp bland överflödiga regler och byråkrati.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We shall clear away superfluous rules and bureaucracy.”
- active wildlife management»aktiv förvaltning av rovdjur och klövvilt« (party programme ↗)“active management of predators and cloven-hoofed animals”
- central property rights»Äganderätten är central för ett samhälle där människor kan förverkliga sig själva och sina drömmar.« (party programme ↗)“Property rights are central to a society where people can realise themselves and their dreams.”
The plan does not take a position on which types of weapons may be licensed for hunting.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not take a position on which types of weapons may be licensed for hunting. The nearest line is a tightened attitude toward weapons in criminal environments, with tightened sentences for weapons offences and a stated concern about serious violence with firearms, which speaks for limiting access to semi-automatic weapons with military appearance. The plan at the same time wishes that the state cooperate with landowners and local people in wildlife management, which pulls in the opposite direction and makes the conclusion uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Planen tar inte ställning till vilka vapentyper som får licensieras för jakt. Den närmast liggande linjen är en skärpt hållning mot vapen i kriminella miljöer, med skärpta straff för vapenbrott och en uttalad oro för det grova våldet med skjutvapen, vilket talar för att begränsa tillgången till halvautomatiska vapen med militärt utseende. Planen vill samtidigt att staten samverkar med markägare och lokalbefolkning i viltförvaltningen, vilket drar åt motsatt håll och gör slutsatsen osäker.
- increased sentences for weapons offencesdecisive»Vi vill avskaffa dagens mängdrabatt på brott, slopa den närmast automatiska frigivningen från fängelsestraff och skärpa straffen för bland annat vapenbrott, våldtäkt och utpressning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We wish to abolish today's sentence reduction for multiple offences, abolish the near-automatic release from prison sentences and increase sentences for, among other things, weapons offences, rape and extortion.”
- weapons in criminal environments»Polisen rapporterar om sjuåringar som är knarkkurirer och tolvåringar som bär vapen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Police report on seven-year-olds who are drug runners and twelve-year-olds who carry weapons.”
- strong rule of law and security»Rättsstaten ska stärkas. Sverige ska vara ett tryggt land att leva i.« (party programme ↗)“The rule of law shall be strengthened. Sweden shall be a secure country to live in.”
- cooperation in wildlife management»markägare och lokalbefolkning i naturvård och viltförvaltning.« (party programme ↗)“landowners and local people in nature conservation and wildlife management.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan does not address which types of weapons may be licensed for hunting.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not address which types of weapons may be licensed for hunting. The closest principle is that hunting, fishing and game management shall be valued as applied stewardship and that hunting rights are linked to land ownership, which argues against new restrictions that affect legal hunters and sport shooters. The election manifesto's stricter penalties for weapons crimes are directed at criminals' weapons, not at licensed hunting weapons.
Original (Swedish)
Planen behandlar inte vilka vapentyper som får licensieras för jakt. Närmast liggande princip är att jakt, fiske och viltvård ska värnas som tillämpat förvaltarskap och att jakträtten är kopplad till markägandet, vilket talar mot nya begränsningar som träffar legala jägare och sportskyttar. Valmanifestets skärpta straff för vapenbrott riktar sig mot kriminellas vapen, inte mot licensierade jaktvapen.
- hunting shall be valueddecisive»Jakt, fiske och viltvård är en del i bevarandet av den biologiska mångfalden.« (party programme ↗)“Hunting, fishing and game management are part of the conservation of biological diversity.”
- hunting rights linked to land ownership»bör kopplingen mellan markägande och jakt- och fiskerätt finnas.« (party programme ↗)“should the connection between land ownership and hunting and fishing rights exist.”
- tough penalties for weapons crimes»Skärp straffet för vapenbrott till lägst fem års fängelse.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Tighten the penalty for weapons crimes to at least five years' imprisonment.”
The plan's commitment is that legal hunters, sport shooters and weapons collectors shall not be negatively affected by weapons regulations and that license handling shall be simplified rather than restricted.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's commitment is that legal hunters, sport shooters and weapons collectors shall not be negatively affected by weapons regulations and that license handling shall be simplified rather than restricted. A ban on licensing semi-automatic weapons with military appearance for hunting is such a restriction for legal weapons owners. The plan's tightenings are instead directed at serious weapons crimes and criminals, not at hunters.
Original (Swedish)
Planens åtagande är att legala jägare, sportskyttar och vapensamlare inte ska drabbas negativt av vapenregleringar och att licenshanteringen ska förenklas snarare än inskränkas. Ett förbud mot att licensiera halvautomatiska vapen med militärt utseende för jakt är en sådan inskränkning för legala vapenägare. Planens skärpningar riktas i stället mot grova vapenbrott och kriminella, inte mot jägarna.
- no restrictions for legal weapons ownersdecisive»Det är viktigt att EU:s vapendirektiv inte genomförs i svensk lagstiftning så att du som är jägare, sportskytt eller vapensamlare drabbas negativt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is important that the EU's weapons directive is not implemented in Swedish legislation so that you as a hunter, sport shooter or weapons collector are negatively affected.”
- stop the hunt on hunters»Vi ska stoppa jakten på jägarna och rädda fiskerinäringen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We shall stop the hunt on hunters and save the fishing industry”
- simpler license handling»Arbeta för kortade handläggningstider för vapenlicenser« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Work for shortened handling times for weapons licenses”
- harder action on weapons crimes»Skärpa minimistraffen för grova vapenbrott från dagens 2 års fängelse till 6 års fängelse« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Tighten minimum sentences for serious weapons crimes from today's 2 years in prison to 6 years in prison”
The plan points to magazine restrictions and similar requirements as examples of measures taken to make legal gun ownership difficult, and establishes that political measures that should have been directed against illegal weapons have instead been directed at hunters and sport shooters.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan points to magazine restrictions and similar requirements as examples of measures taken to make legal gun ownership difficult, and establishes that political measures that should have been directed against illegal weapons have instead been directed at hunters and sport shooters. A license ban on semi-automatic hunting weapons with military appearance is exactly such a restriction on legal gun ownership. The plan therefore argues against the counter-proposal's requirement.
Original (Swedish)
Planen pekar ut magasinsreglering och liknande krav som exempel på åtgärder som görs för att försvåra legalt vapenägande, och slår fast att politiska åtgärder som borde riktats mot illegala vapen i stället riktats mot jägare och sportskyttar. Ett licensförbud mot halvautomatiska jaktvapen med militärt utseende är just en sådan inskränkning av det legala vapeninnehavet. Planen talar därför emot motförslagets krav.
- against hassle for legal gun ownersdecisive»Magasinsreglering och förbud mot bly i ammunition är exempel på åtgärder som görs för att försvåra legalt vapenägande.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Magazine restrictions and bans on lead in ammunition are examples of measures taken to make legal gun ownership difficult.”
- direct measures against illegal weapons»Samtidigt har politiska åtgärder som borde riktats mot illegala vapen och gängbrottslighet istället riktats mot legalt vapeninnehav, svenska jägare och sportskyttar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Meanwhile political measures that should have been directed against illegal weapons and gang crime have instead been directed at legal gun ownership, Swedish hunters and sport shooters.”
- protect legal gun owners»Stoppa hetsjakten på jägare och legala vapeninnehavare« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop the witch-hunt against hunters and legal gun owners.”
- value hunting weapons»Möjligheten att äga jaktvapen och att ägna sig åt jakt ska värnas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The possibility to own hunting weapons and to engage in hunting shall be valued.”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2024/25:JuU17)
- Committee report full text (HC01JuU17)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:1532 — Sportskytte och jakt av Marléne Lund Kopparklint (M)
- Motion 2024/25:1535 — Förvaring av vapen i annans vapenskåp av Helena Storckenfeldt (M)
- Motion 2024/25:1539 — Vapenlagen för jakt- och sportskyttar av Marléne Lund Kopparklint (M)
- Motion 2024/25:1820 — En uppdaterad vapenlag för jägare och sportskyttar av Emma Ahlström Köster (M)
- Motion 2024/25:1825 — Förvaring av äldre vapen utan vapentillstånd av Emma Ahlström Köster m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2024/25:1929 — Rättsväsendet av Gudrun Nordborg m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2024/25:1995 — Etablerandet av en ny myndighet för jakt- och viltförvaltningsfrågor av Erik Ottoson (M)
- Motion 2024/25:2114 — Jakt på egen hand från det år man fyller 16 år av Lars Beckman (M)
- Motion 2024/25:2306 — Vapenlicens och digital teknik av Johan Löfstrand m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:2584 — Tydliggörande av bestämmelser för återkallande av vapenlicens av Crister Carlsson och Malin Höglund (båda M)
- Motion 2024/25:271 — Digitala vapenlicenser som ett komplement till papperslicenser av Kjell-Arne Ottosson (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:2953 — Jord, skog och jakt av Helena Lindahl m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2024/25:3045 — Jaktetik och ekosystembaserad jakt av Emma Nohrén m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:3111 — Utgiftsområde 4 Rättsväsendet av Teresa Carvalho m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:3120 — Förvaring av vapen på annan adress än folkbokföringsadressen av Eric Westroth (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:3133 — Kraven runt skjutbanor av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2024/25:376 — Fler vapen i vapengarderoben av Mathias Bengtsson (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:382 — Licens på enhandsvapen för eftersök och jakt av Magnus Persson (SD)
Source: The Swedish Parliament