2024-06-182023/24:KrU7 · p.13KrUCulture
Foreign financing
Ban on foreign financing of religious communities and civil-society organizations
What's at stake: A delay in setting up the inquiry postpones any new rules and oversight on how religious communities and civil-society organizations linked to islamism and extremism are financed from abroad, an issue tied to national security and to trust in how funds are used within civil society.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the government should promptly set up the announced inquiry into a ban on foreign financing of religious communities and other civil-society organizations linked to islamism and extremism, or whether it is enough that work on the inquiry's directives is already under way.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee notes that work is already under way to draft directives for an inquiry into a ban on foreign financing of religious communities and other civil-society organizations linked to islamism and extremism, and on that basis rejects the motion calling for such an inquiry to be set up promptly.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 14 (S)
The reservation (S) welcomes an inquiry into a ban on foreign financing of religious communities and civil-society organizations linked to islamism and extremism, along with tighter rules and oversight, and urges the government to set it up promptly, noting that a preliminary study on the issue was already reported in early 2023 without any inquiry yet being established.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 14 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have gone the other way
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: LLiberalerna, SDSverigedemokraterna
Ja 208–93Nej 133–168
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | Yes | Yes 20/0/0/4 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| S | No | No 1/92/0/13 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | Yes | Yes 14/0/0/4 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | Yes | Yes 21/0/0/3 | match | confidence: low | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 12/0/0/4 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | No | Yes 60/0/0/8 | differs | confidence: high | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 63/0/0/9 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
Broke with the party line
| SMattias Jonsson (S, Göteborgs kommun) | Yes — party line: No |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects motion 2023/24:2686 by Lawen Redar et al. (S) demand 25.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motion 2023/24:2686 av Lawen Redar m.fl. (S) yrkande 25.
Riksdag decision: The government has proposed new rules on state grants to religious communities. The new legislation shall include provisions on when a religious community other than the Church of Sweden is entitled to state grants, state fee assistance, and that the definition of religious community is changed. The new regulation also means that a democracy condition shall apply to support for religious communities and to support from the General Heritage Fund. Parliament said yes to the government's legislative proposal and no to proposals in motions, of which approximately 40 are from the general motion period of 2023. The new rules enter into force on 1 January 2025.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants the government to establish an investigation into foreign financing of religious communities. (S) — Reservation 14
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan is based on religious communities, popular education and civil society having strong independence from political control, and explicitly warns that conservative forces are trying to control civil society.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan is based on religious communities, popular education and civil society having strong independence from political control, and explicitly warns that conservative forces are trying to control civil society. It also states that religious freedom should be guaranteed by a secular state and that Muslims should not be singled out when forces want to shut someone out. A ban on foreign funding targeting communities with alleged links to Islamism therefore goes against the plan's line, and driving such an investigation quickly is rejected.
Original (Swedish)
Planen bygger på att trossamfund, folkbildning och föreningsliv ska ha en stark självständighet gentemot politisk styrning, och varnar uttryckligen för att konservativa krafter försöker kontrollera det civila samhället. Den slår också fast att religionsfriheten ska garanteras av en sekulär stat och att muslimer inte ska pekas ut när krafter vill stänga någon ute. Ett förbud mot utländsk finansiering riktat mot samfund med påstådda kopplingar till islamism går därför emot planens linje, och att skyndsamt driva fram en sådan utredning avvisas.
- independent civil societydecisive»folkbildning, konst, kultur- och föreningsliv.« (party programme ↗)“popular education, art, culture and civil society.”
- resistance to political control»Det är just därför konservativa politiska krafter försöker kontrollera« (party programme ↗)“That is precisely why conservative political forces try to control”
- religious freedom and secular state»staten ska vara sekulär, det vill säga inte ha några band« (party programme ↗)“the state should be secular, that is, have no ties”
flags: citat_blockerat
The election manifesto wants to crack down hard on organized crime's financing and stop money laundering, and the party programme sees democracy as undermined when non-democratic groups get space.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto wants to crack down hard on organized crime's financing and stop money laundering, and the party programme sees democracy as undermined when non-democratic groups get space. Investigating a ban on foreign financing of religious communities and organizations with links to Islamism and extremism, and stricter regulations and oversight, therefore lie in the plan's direction. The plan's protection of a strong civil society qualifies but does not change the position.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet vill slå hårt mot den organiserade brottslighetens finansiering och stoppa penningtvätt, och partiprogrammet ser demokratin som undergrävd när icke-demokratiska grupper får utrymme. Att utreda förbud mot utländsk finansiering av trossamfund och organisationer med kopplingar till islamism och extremism, samt skärpt regelverk och tillsyn, ligger därför i planens riktning. Planens värn om ett starkt civilsamhälle kvalificerar men ändrar inte ställningstagandet.
- crack down on crime's financingdecisive»Slå hårt mot den organiserade brottslighetens finansiering och organisation.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Crack down hard on organized crime's financing and organization.”
- counteract non-democratic groups»Demokratin undergrävs när rasistiska och andra ickedemokratiska grupper sprider sitt hat« (party programme ↗)“Democracy is undermined when racist and other non-democratic groups spread their hatred”
- stop money laundering»Skattefusk, välfärdsbrottslighet och penningtvätt ska stoppas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Tax evasion, welfare crime and money laundering shall be stopped.”
- strong civil society is valued»Ett starkt och levande civilsamhälle är demokratins underbyggnad.« (party programme ↗)“A strong and living civil society is the foundation of democracy.”
The programme states that crime and terrorism prevention must not happen at the expense of human rights and that everyone has the right to practise their faith.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The programme states that crime and terrorism prevention must not happen at the expense of human rights and that everyone has the right to practise their faith. A ban on foreign financing directed at faith communities and civil society organisations with alleged links to Islamism affects religious freedom and civil society freedom, which the plan instead wants to support and protect from discrimination on the basis of faith. The plan therefore speaks against the counter-proposal's demand to promptly establish such an inquiry and tighten supervision.
Original (Swedish)
Programmet slår fast att brotts- och terrorbekämpning inte får ske på bekostnad av mänskliga rättigheter och att alla har rätt att utöva sin tro. Ett förbud mot utländsk finansiering riktat mot trossamfund och civilsamhällesorganisationer med påstådda kopplingar till islamism träffar religionsfriheten och civilsamhällets frihet, som planen i stället vill stödja och skydda från diskriminering på grund av tro. Planen talar därför mot motförslagets krav på att skyndsamt tillsätta en sådan utredning och skärpa tillsynen.
- rights before terrorism preventiondecisive»Brotts- och terrorbekämpning är viktigt men ska inte ske på bekostnad av mänskliga rättigheter.« (party programme ↗)“Crime and terrorism prevention is important but shall not happen at the expense of human rights.”
- religious freedom for all»Alla ska ha rätt att utöva sin tro, eller att avstå från religionsutövning.« (party programme ↗)“Everyone shall have the right to practise their faith, or to refrain from religious practice.”
- protection against discrimination on grounds of faith»I vårt Sverige ska ingen utsättas för rasism eller diskriminering på grund av till exempel tro, sexuell läggning eller funktionsvariation.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“In our Sweden, no one shall be subjected to racism or discrimination on the basis of, for example, faith, sexual orientation or functional variation.”
- support for civil society efforts»Politiken bör på olika vis synliggöra, stödja och uppmuntra sådana insatser.« (party programme ↗)“Politics should in various ways make visible, support and encourage such efforts.”
The election manifesto explicitly says no to collective punishment and to restrictions on religious freedom, and requires that policy maintains arm's length distance from civil society, which the party programme sees as a fundamental and independent part of democracy.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly says no to collective punishment and to restrictions on religious freedom, and requires that policy maintains arm's length distance from civil society, which the party programme sees as a fundamental and independent part of democracy. A ban targeting faith communities based on alleged ideological links runs counter to this. The plan's response to external influence is tightened financing rules for political parties and increased transparency, which pulls in the opposite direction and makes the assessment uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet säger uttryckligen nej till kollektiv bestraffning och till inskränkningar av religionsfriheten, och kräver att politiken håller armlängds avstånd till civilsamhället, som idéprogrammet ser som en fundamental och självständig del av demokratin. Ett förbud riktat mot trossamfund utifrån påstådda ideologiska kopplingar går på tvärs mot detta. Planens svar på yttre påverkan är skärpta finansieringsregler för de politiska partierna och ökad transparens, vilket drar i motsatt riktning och gör bedömningen osäker.
- no to collective punishmentdecisive»Vi säger därför nej till visitationszoner, kollektiv bestraffning, omvänd bevisbörda, anonyma vittnen, preventiv avlyssning och inskränkningar av religionsfriheten.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore we say no to stop-and-search zones, collective punishment, reverse burden of proof, anonymous witnesses, preventive wiretapping, and restrictions on religious freedom.”
- arm's length distance»Politiken ska bidra till goda förutsättningar men hålla armlängds avstånd.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Policy should contribute to good conditions but maintain arm's length distance.”
- civil society's independence»Det civila samhället, människornas frivilliga organisering, är en fundamental del av varje väl fungerande demokrati och välfärdsstat.« (party programme ↗)“Civil society, people's voluntary organization, is a fundamental part of every well-functioning democracy and welfare state.”
- resistance to external influence»Reglerna för finansiering av politiska partier bör skärpas och deras motståndskraft mot yttre påverkan och infiltration rustas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Rules for financing political parties should be tightened and their resistance to external influence and infiltration strengthened.”
The election manifesto explicitly promises to stop secret financing of religious communities and strengthen monitoring of grants so that communities do not become tools for extremist forces.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly promises to stop secret financing of religious communities and strengthen monitoring of grants so that communities do not become tools for extremist forces. The counter-proposal's demand to promptly appoint an investigation on prohibiting foreign financing of Islamist and extremist actors, with tightened regulations and supervision, is precisely what the plan calls for. The party programme furthermore establishes that no tax funds shall go to anti-democratic activities.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet lovar uttryckligen att stoppa dold finansiering av trossamfund och stärka uppföljningen av bidragsgivning så att samfunden inte blir verktyg för extremistiska krafter. Motförslagets krav på att skyndsamt tillsätta en utredning om förbud mot utländsk finansiering av islamistiska och extremistiska aktörer, med skärpt regelverk och tillsyn, är precis det planen efterlyser. Partiprogrammet slår dessutom fast att inga skattemedel ska gå till antidemokratiska verksamheter.
- stop secret financing of religious communitiesdecisive»Vi vill både stärka uppföljningen av bidragsgivning och stoppa dold finansiering av trossamfund så att de inte blir verktyg för extremistiska krafter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We wish both to strengthen monitoring of grants and stop secret financing of religious communities so that they do not become tools for extremist forces.”
- stop financing of extremism»När Säpo säger att flera organisationer från extremistmiljöer finansieras av skattepengar måste mycket mer göras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“When Säpo [Swedish Security Service] says that several organizations from extremist milieus are financed by tax money, much more must be done.”
- no funds for anti-democrats»Inga skattemedel ska gå till verksamheter som vill förändra det demokratiska samhället med våld« (party programme ↗)“No tax funds shall go to activities that wish to change the democratic society through violence”
- combat separatism»Vi vill ta tillbaka makten från separatister i utsatta områden« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We wish to take back power from separatists in vulnerable areas”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto explicitly points out that Islamist extremists have decisive influence on social life in certain areas and requires that security be restored and crime prevention work be strengthened.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly points out that Islamist extremists have decisive influence on social life in certain areas and requires that security be restored and crime prevention work be strengthened. The party programme conditions support for religious congregations on the activity's character and purpose being in accordance with the human dignity principle, and establishes that religious freedom may never be used to violate others. That swiftly investigating a ban on foreign funding of extremism-linked congregations is thereby in line with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet pekar uttryckligen ut att islamistiska extremister har avgörande påverkan på samhällslivet i vissa områden och kräver att tryggheten återupprättas och det brottsförebyggande arbetet stärks. Partiprogrammet villkorar stödet till trossamfund till att verksamhetens karaktär och ändamål stämmer med människovärdesprincipen, och slår fast att trosfriheten aldrig får användas för att kränka andra. Att skyndsamt utreda förbud mot utländsk finansiering av extremistkopplade samfund ligger därmed i planens linje.
- counter Islamist extremismdecisive»Det finns också områden där islamistiska extremister har en avgörande påverkan på samhällslivet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“There are also areas where Islamist extremists have a decisive influence on social life.”
- restored security»Tryggheten på gator och torg måste återupprättas, brottsförebyggande arbetet måste stärkas, brottslingar dömas och brottsoffer få upprättelse.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Security in streets and squares must be restored, crime prevention work must be strengthened, criminals sentenced and crime victims get redress.”
- conditional support for religious congregations»verksamhet vars karaktär och ändamål står i överensstämmelse med grundläggande principer om att varje« (party programme ↗)“activity whose character and purpose are in accordance with fundamental principles that every”
- the bounds of religious freedom»att utöva sin religiösa tro får dock aldrig medföra att man« (party programme ↗)“exercising one's religious faith may never however mean that one”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants to stop disbursement of tax funds to extremists and to organizations that threaten people's freedom, prohibit participation in violence-advocating organizations and strengthen the Security Police's ability to protect democracy.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to stop disbursement of tax funds to extremists and to organizations that threaten people's freedom, prohibit participation in violence-advocating organizations and strengthen the Security Police's ability to protect democracy. To quickly investigate a ban on foreign financing of associations with links to Islamism and extremism, with tightened supervision, is in line with these commitments. The foreign origin of financing is however not mentioned explicitly.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill stoppa utbetalningar av skattemedel till extremister och till organisationer som hotar människors frihet, förbjuda deltagande i våldsbejakande organisationer och stärka Säkerhetspolisens förmåga att skydda demokratin. Att skyndsamt utreda ett förbud mot utländsk finansiering av samfund med kopplingar till islamism och extremism, med skärpt tillsyn, ligger i linje med dessa åtaganden. Finansieringens utländska ursprung berörs dock inte uttryckligen.
- no funds to extremistsdecisive»Stoppa utbetalningar av skattemedel till extremister« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop disbursement of tax funds to extremists”
- democracy condition for grants»Stoppa utbetalningar av skattepengar till organisationer som inte delar det svenska samhällets grundläggande demokratiska värderingar utan som hotar människors frihet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop disbursement of tax money to organizations that do not share the Swedish society's fundamental democratic values but threaten people's freedom”
- ban violence-advocating organizations»Förbjuda deltagande i organisationer med våldsbejakande verksamhet samt förbjuda deltagande i kriminella gäng« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Prohibit participation in organizations with violence-advocating activities as well as prohibit participation in criminal gangs”
- strengthened Security Police against extremism»Stärka Säkerhetspolisen för att öka deras förmåga att skydda den liberala demokratin och landets alla medborgare« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen the Security Police to increase their ability to protect the liberal democracy and the country's all citizens”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto explicitly commits to preventing foreign financing of extremist religious communities and organisations and states that Islamist extremism is financed through foreign donations and state funds.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly commits to preventing foreign financing of extremist religious communities and organisations and states that Islamist extremism is financed through foreign donations and state funds. The plan also establishes that religious communities that work for extremism shall receive neither public grants nor funds from foreign regimes. The counter-proposal's requirement to promptly appoint an investigation into a ban on such financing and stricter supervision is thus wholly in line with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet åtar sig uttryckligen att hindra utländsk finansiering av extremistiska trossamfund och organisationer och konstaterar att den islamistiska extremismen finansieras genom utländska donationer och statliga medel. Planen slår också fast att trossamfund som verkar för extremism varken ska få offentliga bidrag eller medel från utländska regimer. Motförslagets krav på att skyndsamt tillsätta en utredning om förbud mot sådan finansiering och skärpt tillsyn ligger därmed helt i linje med planen.
- stop foreign financingdecisive»Hindra utländsk finansiering av extremistiska trossamfund och organisationer« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Prevent foreign financing of extremist religious communities and organisations.”
- no grants to extremism»Moskéer och andra trossamfund eller organisationer som verkar för extremism ska vare sig få bidrag från det offentliga eller utländska regimer.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Mosques and other religious communities or organisations that work for extremism shall receive neither grants from the public nor from foreign regimes.”
- financing of Islamism»Samtidigt vet vi att den islamistiska extremismen finansieras både genom statliga medel, och utländska donationer.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Meanwhile we know that Islamist extremism is financed both through state funds and foreign donations.”
- combat Islamism»Bekämpa islamism« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Combat Islamism.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2023/24:KrU7)
- Committee report full text (HB01KrU7)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2023/24:1396 — Ingen plats för hederskultur i ett demokratiskt och jämställt samhälle av Ann-Sofie Alm (M)
- Motion 2023/24:1579 — Sekulär stat på riktigt av Noria Manouchi (M)
- Motion 2023/24:1993 — Föreningsfriheten av Lena Hallengren (S)
- Motion 2023/24:2483 — Kultur, civilsamhälle, idrott och medier i hela landet av Catarina Deremar m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2023/24:2484 — Rättspolitik av Ulrika Liljeberg m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2023/24:2531 — Slopat skattefinansierat stöd och utökad granskning av trossamfund av Markus Wiechel m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:2533 — Samlad satsning för den svenska diasporan av Markus Wiechel m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:2617 — Utgiftsområde 9 Hälsovård, sjukvård och social omsorg av Fredrik Lundh Sammeli m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:2661 — Stockholm som en hållbar tillväxtmotor av Mattias Vepsä m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:2686 — Utgiftsområde 17 Kultur, medier, trossamfund och fritid av Lawen Redar m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2023/24:2734 — Djurrättsaktivism av Anders W Jonsson och Helena Vilhelmsson (båda C)
- Motion 2023/24:2869 — med anledning av prop. 2023/24:119 Statens stöd till trossamfund och civilsamhället - enhetliga och rättssäkra villkor av Vasiliki Tsouplaki m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2023/24:2875 — med anledning av prop. 2023/24:119 Statens stöd till trossamfund och civilsamhället - enhetliga och rättssäkra villkor av Amanda Lind m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2023/24:2877 — med anledning av prop. 2023/24:119 Statens stöd till trossamfund och civilsamhället - enhetliga och rättssäkra villkor av Catarina Deremar m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2023/24:353 — Kulturmiljöfrågor av Runar Filper m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:357 — Trossamfundsfrågor av Alexander Christiansson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:359 — Åtgärder mot extremism i civilsamhället av Jonas Andersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:361 — Politik för ett starkt och oberoende civilsamhälle av Jonas Andersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:485 — Vissa frågor rörande Mellanöstern och Afrika av Markus Wiechel m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2023/24:884 — Åtgärder för att förebygga hedersbrott och stötta utsatta av Markus Wiechel (SD)
Source: The Swedish Parliament