2023-05-032022/23:JuU20 · p.1JuUJustice

A special penalty provision for participation in a terrorist organization

New criminal offence for participation in a terrorist organization

What's at stake: The question concerns how far criminal liability for terrorism-related acts should extend and where the line falls against constitutionally protected freedom of association. It affects people active in organizations that could be classified as terrorist organizations.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

Whether to introduce a new criminal offence for participating in a terrorist organization's activities, or reject the government's bill outright.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee supports the government's proposal for a new criminal offence covering participation in a terrorist organization's activities in a way intended to promote, strengthen or support the organization, with an exception for minor or excusable acts of association. The committee considers the legislation well balanced and compatible with freedom of association.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 1 (V, MP)

The government's bill should be rejected in its entirety; the reasons are set out in separate statements.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: adopting the government's legislative proposal and rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by V, MP.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
Vown reservationNoNo 0/20/0/4follows the planconfidence: highexplicit
SYesYes 94/0/0/13follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
MPown reservationNoNo 0/14/0/4follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
CYesYes 21/0/0/3follows the planconfidence: lowderived
LYesYes 13/0/0/3follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
KDYesYes 16/0/0/3follows the planconfidence: highderived
MYesYes 60/0/0/8follows the planconfidence: highexplicit
SDYesYes 63/0/0/9follows the planconfidence: highexplicit

Committee proposal

Parliament adopts the government's proposal for 1. act amending the Terrorist Crimes Act (2022:666), 2. act amending the Code of Judicial Procedure, 3. act amending the Act (2007:979) on measures to prevent certain particularly serious crimes. Thereby Parliament approves Government Bill 2022/23:73 points 1-3 and rejects the motions 2022/23:1811 by Christian Carlsson (KD) motion 6, 2022/23:2356 by Gudrun Nordborg et al. (V) motion 1 and 2022/23:2357 by Bassem Nasr et al. (MP) motion 1.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen antar regeringens förslag till 1. lag om ändring i terroristbrottslagen (2022:666), 2. lag om ändring i rättegångsbalken, 3. lag om ändring i lagen (2007:979) om åtgärder för att förhindra vissa särskilt allvarliga brott. Därmed bifaller riksdagen proposition 2022/23:73 punkterna 1-3 och avslår motionerna 2022/23:1811 av Christian Carlsson (KD) yrkande 6, 2022/23:2356 av Gudrun Nordborg m.fl. (V) yrkande 1 och 2022/23:2357 av Bassem Nasr m.fl. (MP) yrkande 1.

Riksdag decision: Parliament said yes to the government's proposal to introduce a new crime in the Terrorist Crimes Act, participation in a terrorist organization. The new crime means a special criminal liability for the person who participates in a terrorist organization in a way that is designed to promote, strengthen or support the organization. The scale of punishment shall be imprisonment of at most four years. If the crime is serious, the scale of punishment shall be imprisonment of at least two and at most eight years. If the perpetrator has led the terrorist organization, the scale of punishment shall be imprisonment for a fixed period, at least two and at most eighteen years, or for life. It shall also be a criminal offence to finance participation in a terrorist organization, to publicly incite and recruit to the crime and to travel abroad with the intention of committing the crime. The legislative changes come into effect on 1 June 2023.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoNofollows the planexplicit

The plan explicitly rejects specific terrorism legislation and means that violent crimes should be prosecuted within ordinary legal frameworks, and opposes politically motivated organizational bans.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan explicitly rejects specific terrorism legislation and means that violent crimes should be prosecuted within ordinary legal frameworks, and opposes politically motivated organizational bans. Freedom of association is counted among democracy's most important building blocks and rule-of-law principles should be upheld. Rejecting a specific criminal provision for participation in a terrorist organization is thus the plan's own conclusion.

Original (Swedish)

Planen avvisar uttryckligen en särskild terroristlagstiftning och menar att våldsbrott ska lagföras inom ordinarie rättsramar, samt motsätter sig politiskt motiverade organisationsförbud. Föreningsfriheten räknas till demokratins viktigaste byggstenar och rättsstatens principer ska värnas. Att avslå en särskild straffbestämmelse för deltagande i en terroristorganisation är därmed planens egen slutsats.

  • no specific terrorism legislationdecisive»avvisar en särskild terroristlagstiftning och menar att våldsbrott ska« (party programme ↗)“rejects specific terrorism legislation and means that violent crimes should”
  • no to organizational bans»politiskt motiverade organisationsförbud« (party programme ↗)“politically motivated organizational bans”
  • freedom of association»föreningsfriheten, yttrande- och tryckfriheten, offentlighetsprincipen« (party programme ↗)“freedom of association, freedom of speech and press, the principle of public access”
  • rule-of-law principles»En fördjupad demokrati innebär också att vi slår vakt om den« (party programme ↗)“A deeper democracy also means that we stand guard over”
SSocialdemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The party programme establishes that every form of terrorist act must always be rejected, and the election manifesto wants to toughen sentences for those who support organised crime and points out terrorism as a threat requiring common strength.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme establishes that every form of terrorist act must always be rejected, and the election manifesto wants to toughen sentences for those who support organised crime and points out terrorism as a threat requiring common strength. Rejecting a criminal provision against participation in a terrorist organisation entirely therefore goes against the plan, even though the party programme also values civil society and civil rights.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet slår fast att varje form av terrorhandling alltid måste avvisas, och valmanifestet vill skärpa straffen för den som understödjer organiserad kriminalitet samt pekar ut terrorismen som ett hot som kräver gemensam kraft. Att avslå en straffbestämmelse mot deltagande i en terroristorganisation i sin helhet går därför emot planen, även om partiprogrammet också värnar föreningslivet och de medborgerliga rättigheterna.

  • terrorism shall always be rejecteddecisive»Varje form av terrorhandling, liksom organiserat våld riktat« (party programme ↗)“Every form of terrorist act, as well as organised violence directed”
  • sentences for support»Vi vill skärpa straffen bland annat för gängrelaterad brottslighet, för den som begår upprepade och allvarliga brott och för den som understödjer organiserad kriminalitet. Vi vill fördubbla straffet för grova vapenbrott.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to toughen sentences among others for gang-related crime, for those who commit repeated and serious crimes and for those who support organised crime. We want to double the sentence for serious weapons offences.”
  • terrorism threat requires action»Inte minst klimatfrågan, migrationen och hotet från terrorism och gränsöverskridande brottslighet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Not least the climate issue, migration and the threat from terrorism and cross-border crime.”
  • freedom of association valued»Ett starkt och levande civilsamhälle är demokratins underbyggnad.« (party programme ↗)“A strong and living civil society is the foundation of democracy.”
MPMiljöpartietNoNofollows the planderived

The plan opposes legislation that involves disproportionate interference and states that terrorism prevention must not occur at the expense of human rights, which is the basis for rejecting a broad criminalized participation crime.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan opposes legislation that involves disproportionate interference and states that terrorism prevention must not occur at the expense of human rights, which is the basis for rejecting a broad criminalized participation crime. The plan also protects freedom of opinion formation and wants to ensure that constitutionally protected rights are not changed hastily. The conclusion is uncertain as the plan at the same time wants to give the judiciary tools against serious crime.

Original (Swedish)

Planen motsätter sig lagar som innebär oproportionerliga ingrepp och slår fast att terrorbekämpning inte får ske på bekostnad av mänskliga rättigheter, vilket är grunden för att avslå ett brett kriminaliserat deltagandebrott. Planen värnar också den fria åsiktsbildningen och vill att grundlagsskyddade rättigheter inte ändras i hast. Slutsatsen är osäker eftersom planen samtidigt vill ge rättsväsendet verktyg mot grov brottslighet.

  • against disproportionate interferencedecisive»alla lagar som innebär oproportionerliga ingrepp i« (party programme ↗)“all legislation that involves disproportionate interference in”
  • rights before terrorism prevention»viktigt men ska inte ske på bekostnad av mänskliga« (party programme ↗)“important but must not occur at the expense of human”
  • freedom of expression and association»fria åsiktsbildningen är ovärderliga.« (party programme ↗)“freedom of opinion formation are invaluable.”
  • caution with freedoms and rights»skydda Sveriges grundlag mot snabba förändringar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“protect Sweden's constitution against rapid changes.”
CCenterpartietYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan lists the rule-of-law restrictions it says no to — search zones, anonymous witnesses, preventive wiretapping and others — and criminal responsibility for participation in a terrorist organisation is not among them.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan lists the rule-of-law restrictions it says no to — search zones, anonymous witnesses, preventive wiretapping and others — and criminal responsibility for participation in a terrorist organisation is not among them. At the same time, the plan requires that society be armed against threats to democracy. Thus rejecting the bill in its entirety has no support in the plan, even though inviolable freedom of association requires balance.

Original (Swedish)

Planen räknar upp de rättsstatliga inskränkningar den säger nej till — visitationszoner, anonyma vittnen, preventiv avlyssning med flera — och ett straffansvar för deltagande i en terroristorganisation finns inte bland dem. Samtidigt kräver planen att samhället rustas mot hot mot demokratin. Att avslå lagförslaget i sin helhet har därför inte stöd i planen, även om den orubbliga föreningsfriheten kräver avvägning.

  • exhaustive no-listdecisive»Rättsstaten och individens rättigheter gentemot staten måste försvaras. Vi säger därför nej till visitationszoner, kollektiv bestraffning, omvänd bevisbörda, anonyma vittnen, preventiv avlyssning och inskränkningar av religionsfriheten.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The rule of law and individuals' rights against the state must be defended. We therefore say no to search zones, collective punishment, reversed burden of proof, anonymous witnesses, preventive wiretapping and restrictions on freedom of religion.”
  • protection against threats to democracy»Sverige måste rustas snabbt och fokuserat; ingen ska kunna ta vårt demokratiska samhälle ifrån oss.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden must be armed quickly and purposefully; no one shall be able to take our democratic society from us.”
  • inviolable freedom of association»Yttrandefrihet, religionsfrihet och föreningsfrihet är därför orubbliga« (party programme ↗)“Freedom of speech, freedom of religion and freedom of association are therefore inviolable”
LLiberalernaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan establishes that Islamic and other violence-affirming extremism poses a threat to democracy, that no tax funds shall go to activities that wish to change society through violence and that much more must be done against extremist milieus.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that Islamic and other violence-affirming extremism poses a threat to democracy, that no tax funds shall go to activities that wish to change society through violence and that much more must be done against extremist milieus. Rejecting a criminal provision against participation in a terrorist organization therefore contradicts the plan. The plan simultaneously requires that protection for civil rights and freedoms be strengthened, which sets requirements on the balance.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att den islamistiska och annan våldsbejakande extremism utgör ett hot mot demokratin, att inga skattemedel ska gå till verksamheter som vill förändra samhället med våld och att mycket mer måste göras mot extremistmiljöer. Att avslå en straffbestämmelse mot deltagande i en terroristorganisation strider därför mot planen. Planen kräver samtidigt att skyddet för de medborgerliga fri- och rättigheterna förstärks, vilket sätter krav på avvägningen.

  • extremism threatens democracydecisive»extremismen utgör ett hot mot demokratin.« (party programme ↗)“extremism poses a threat to democracy.”
  • no support for violence-affirming [groups]»Inga skattemedel ska gå till verksamheter som vill förändra det demokratiska samhället med våld eller på« (party programme ↗)“No tax funds shall go to activities that wish to change the democratic society through violence or by [other means]”
  • stronger action against extremist milieus»När Säpo säger att flera organisationer från extremistmiljöer finansieras av skattepengar måste mycket mer göras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“When Säpo [Swedish Security Service] says that several organizations from extremist milieus are financed by tax money, much more must be done.”
  • legal certainty in the balance»Rättssäkerheten och skyddet för de medborgerliga fri- och rättigheterna behöver förstärkas.« (party programme ↗)“Legal certainty and protection for civil rights and freedoms need to be strengthened.”
KDKristdemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan requires that Sweden can meet attacks from international crime and terrorism and that all crimes are effectively and without exception dealt with, with firmness in prosecution.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires that Sweden can meet attacks from international crime and terrorism and that all crimes are effectively and without exception dealt with, with firmness in prosecution. Rejecting a penal provision against participation in a terrorist organization's activities goes directly against these commitments. The plan's strong protection of freedom of assembly and association, by contrast, justifies that exceptions for minor and defensible acts remain.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver att Sverige kan möta angrepp från internationell kriminalitet och terrorism och att alla brott effektivt och utan undantag beivras, med fasthet i lagföringen. Att avslå en straffbestämmelse mot deltagande i en terroristorganisations verksamhet går rakt emot dessa åtaganden. Planens starka skydd för mötes- och föreningsfriheten motiverar däremot att undantag för ringa och försvarliga gärningar finns kvar.

  • terrorism shall be metdecisive»möta angrepp från internationell kriminalitet, terrorism, cyberkrigföring« (party programme ↗)“meet attacks from international crime, terrorism, cyber warfare”
  • crimes shall be dealt with»Alla brott ska effektivt och utan undantag beivras« (party programme ↗)“All crimes shall be effectively and without exception dealt with”
  • the law is upheld with firmness»med fasthet och förövare av brott ska skyndsamt lagföras« (party programme ↗)“with firmness and offenders of crimes shall be swiftly prosecuted”
  • freedom of association is valued»samt anonymitetsskyddet, liksom för mötes- och före- ningsfriheten, är av stor vikt för en levande demokrati.« (party programme ↗)“and anonymity protection, as well as freedom of assembly and association, are of great importance for a living democracy.”

flags: citat_migrerat

MModeraternaYesYesfollows the planexplicit

The plan explicitly requires a ban on participation in organizations with violent activities and wants to strengthen democracy's protection against violent extremism, with a strengthened security police.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan explicitly requires a ban on participation in organizations with violent activities and wants to strengthen democracy's protection against violent extremism, with a strengthened security police. The counter-proposal wants to reject the entire bill on a criminal provision for participation in a terrorist organization, which is the opposite of the plan's commitment. The plan's weighing against freedom of association is therefore in favor of criminalization.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver uttryckligen ett förbud mot deltagande i organisationer med våldsbejakande verksamhet och vill stärka demokratins skydd mot våldsbejakande extremism, med en förstärkt säkerhetspolis. Motförslaget vill avslå hela lagförslaget om en straffbestämmelse för deltagande i en terroristorganisation, vilket är motsatsen till planens åtagande. Planens avvägning mot föreningsfriheten görs alltså till förmån för kriminalisering.

  • criminalize participationdecisive»Förbjuda deltagande i organisationer med våldsbejakande verksamhet samt förbjuda deltagande i kriminella gäng« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Ban participation in organizations with violent activities and ban participation in criminal gangs”
  • protection against extremism»Vi måste också stärka demokratins skydd mot våldsbejakande extremism och andra kriminella hot.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We must also strengthen democracy's protection against violent extremism and other criminal threats.”
  • strengthened security police»Stärka Säkerhetspolisen för att öka deras förmåga att skydda den liberala demokratin och landets alla medborgare« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen the Security Police to increase their ability to protect liberal democracy and the country's all citizens”
  • criminal participation»Göra det straffbart att vara med i ett kriminellt gäng« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Make it criminal to be part of a criminal gang”
SDSverigedemokraternaYesYesfollows the planexplicit

The plan explicitly requires that participation in and contact with terrorist organizations be prohibited and states that it cannot be permitted to participate in or support such organizations.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan explicitly requires that participation in and contact with terrorist organizations be prohibited and states that it cannot be permitted to participate in or support such organizations. The counter-proposal wants to reject precisely that criminal provision in its entirety, which directly contradicts the plan. The plan also wants to deport terror-convicted individuals and combat international terrorism and Islamism.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver uttryckligen att deltagande i och samröre med terrororganisationer förbjuds och slår fast att det inte kan vara tillåtet att delta i eller stödja sådana organisationer. Motförslaget vill avslå just den straffbestämmelsen i sin helhet, vilket direkt strider mot planen. Planen vill dessutom utvisa terrordömda och bekämpa internationell terrorism och islamism.

  • prohibition on terrorist participationdecisive»Förbjuda deltagande i, och samröre med, terrororganisationer.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Prohibit participation in, and contact with, terrorist organizations.”
  • participation should be punishable»Det kan inte vara tillåtet att delta i, eller stödja, terrororganisationer.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It cannot be permitted to participate in, or support, terrorist organizations.”
  • deportation of terror-convicted»Utvisa terrordömda och återkalla medborgarskap där det är möjligt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Deport terror-convicted individuals and revoke citizenship where possible.”
  • combat terrorism»Bekämpa internationell terrorism och islamism« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Combat international terrorism and Islamism”

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament