2025-06-182024/25:FiU20 · p.1FiUEconomy & finance

Guidelines for economic policy and fiscal policy

What's at stake: The decision sets the overall framework for how the state responds to a prolonged economic downturn, rising unemployment and uncertainty around international trade, affecting household finances, municipal welfare and business conditions.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether the Riksdag should approve the government's guidelines for economic policy, focused on households' purchasing power, work incentives and growth, or instead give economic policy a different direction, including higher state grants to welfare and targeted support for low-income earners.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee backs the government's guidelines that economic policy should focus on strengthening households and supporting the recovery, restoring work incentives and pushing down unemployment, and increasing growth and investment, against a backdrop of economic downturn, rising unemployment and a worsened security situation.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 1 (S)

The dissenter wants to give economic policy a different direction with reforms that strengthen purchasing power for those with the lowest incomes and the construction sector, increase general state grants to municipalities in line with inflation, and strengthen welfare, arguing that households are getting poorer, growth is low and unemployment is at a record high while inequality is widening.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: approving what the committee proposes and rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by S.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VNoAbstain 0/0/20/4departs from the planconfidence: highexplicit
Sown reservationNoNo 0/92/0/14follows the planconfidence: highexplicit
MPNoAbstain 0/0/15/3departs from the planconfidence: highexplicit
CYesAbstain 0/0/20/4departs from the planconfidence: mediumexplicit
LYesYes 14/0/0/2follows the planconfidence: highexplicit
KDYesYes 16/0/0/3follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
MYesYes 59/0/0/9follows the planconfidence: highexplicit
SDYesYes 63/0/0/9follows the planconfidence: mediumderived

Committee proposal

The Riksdag approves the guidelines for economic policy and fiscal policy proposed by the government. The Riksdag thereby approves proposition 2024/25:100 point 1 and rejects the motions 2024/25:91 by Magnus Jacobsson (KD), 2024/25:346 by Markus Kallifatides (S), 2024/25:1640 by Anders Karlsson (C), 2024/25:2382 by Jesper Skalberg Karlsson and Johan Hultberg (both M), 2024/25:2613 by Elin Söderberg et al. (MP) points 20 and 21, 2024/25:2627 by Elin Söderberg et al. (MP) point 36, 2024/25:2629 by Rasmus Ling (MP) points 1 and 2, 2024/25:3413 by Nooshi Dadgostar et al. (V), 2024/25:3415 by Magdalena Andersson et al. (S), 2024/25:3417 by Daniel Helldén et al. (MP) and 2024/25:3420 by Martin Ådahl et al. (C).

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen godkänner de riktlinjer för den ekonomiska politiken och budgetpolitiken som regeringen föreslår. Därmed bifaller riksdagen proposition 2024/25:100 punkt 1 och avslår motionerna 2024/25:91 av Magnus Jacobsson (KD), 2024/25:346 av Markus Kallifatides (S), 2024/25:1640 av Anders Karlsson (C), 2024/25:2382 av Jesper Skalberg Karlsson och Johan Hultberg (båda M), 2024/25:2613 av Elin Söderberg m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 20 och 21, 2024/25:2627 av Elin Söderberg m.fl. (MP) yrkande 36, 2024/25:2629 av Rasmus Ling (MP) yrkandena 1 och 2, 2024/25:3413 av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V), 2024/25:3415 av Magdalena Andersson m.fl. (S), 2024/25:3417 av Daniel Helldén m.fl. (MP) och 2024/25:3420 av Martin Ådahl m.fl. (C).

Riksdag decision: The Riksdag said yes to the government's proposal for guidelines for economic policy and fiscal policy in the spring proposition. Uncertainty and unpredictability regarding trade policy and economic development have led the government to revise forecasts for GDP and unemployment compared to the spring proposition. The economic downturn in which the Swedish economy finds itself is expected as a result to be more prolonged than assessed in the spring proposition. The Riksdag agrees with the government that Sweden should continue to be built stronger and safer through reforms that promote growth, welfare and security. The Riksdag also shares the government's assessment that economic policy should be focused on three areas: to strengthen households and support recovery, to restore the work line and reduce unemployment, and to increase growth and investments. The Riksdag also decided to lay the government's statement regarding the National Audit Office's scrutiny report on the application of the fiscal framework 2024 to papers, that is, to close the case. The Riksdag also said no to proposals in motions, of which nine are from the regular motion period 2024.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the planexplicit

The plan's economic direction is redistribution: higher incomes for those with lowest incomes create demand, and resources to municipalities and regions must increase so welfare can be built up.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's economic direction is redistribution: higher incomes for those with lowest incomes create demand, and resources to municipalities and regions must increase so welfare can be built up. The counter-proposal's demands for strengthened purchasing power at the bottom, increased general government grants, and strengthened welfare are therefore the plan's own policy. The plan furthermore demands investment support and a state building company for increased housing construction, which supports the demand to strengthen the building sector.

Original (Swedish)

Planens ekonomiska inriktning är omfördelning: högre inkomster för dem med lägst inkomster skapar efterfrågan, och resurserna till kommuner och regioner måste öka så att välfärden kan byggas upp. Motförslagets krav på stärkt köpkraft i botten, uppräknade generella statsbidrag och stärkt välfärd är därmed planens egen politik. Planen kräver dessutom investeringsstöd och statligt byggbolag för ökat bostadsbyggande, vilket bär kravet på att stärka byggsektorn.

  • strengthened purchasing power at the bottomdecisive»Genom en politik för högre löner för dem med lägst inkomster så skapas efterfrågan.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Through a policy of higher wages for those with the lowest incomes demand is created.”
  • increased resources to municipalities»Omfördelningen från stat till region och kommun måste öka och särskild hänsyn ska tas till de många kommuner och regioner som idag inte får ihop sin ekonomi samtidigt som de redan har bland landets högsta skatter totalt sett.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Redistribution from state to region and municipality must increase and special consideration must be given to the many municipalities and regions that today cannot make ends meet while already having among the country's highest total taxes.”
  • support for housing construction»Vänsterpartiet vill se ett statligt byggbolag, investeringsstöd för ökat bostadsbyggande och en aktiv markpolitik.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party wants to see a state building company, investment support for increased housing construction and an active land policy.”
  • redistribution and major investments»Men då krävs stora satsningar, omfördelning och massiva investeringar för att ge människor goda levnadsvillkor, ta itu med klimatkrisen och skapa jobb i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“But then major investments, redistribution and massive investments are needed to give people good living conditions, tackle the climate crisis and create jobs throughout the country.”

The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.

SSocialdemokraternaNoNofollows the planexplicit

The election manifesto explicitly promises continued increased state grants to municipalities and regions to strengthen welfare, which is the counter-proposal's core demand.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto explicitly promises continued increased state grants to municipalities and regions to strengthen welfare, which is the counter-proposal's core demand. It also promises targeted support to those hardest hit by price increases, which corresponds to the demand for strengthened purchasing power for those with the lowest incomes, and the party programme wants state support to address the housing shortage, which carries the construction initiative. Full employment is the plan's overarching goal against high unemployment.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet lovar uttryckligen fortsatt ökade statsbidrag till kommuner och regioner för att stärka välfärden, vilket är motförslagets kärnkrav. Det utlovar också riktade stöd till dem som drabbas hårdast av prisökningarna, vilket motsvarar kravet på stärkt köpkraft för dem med lägst inkomster, och partiprogrammet vill ha statligt stöd för att häva bostadsbristen, vilket bär byggsatsningen. Full sysselsättning är planens överordnade mål mot den höga arbetslösheten.

  • increased state grants to welfaredecisive»Vi vill fortsätta öka statens bidrag till kommuner och regioner.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to continue increasing state grants to municipalities and regions.”
  • targeted support to those hardest hit»Med riktade och smarta stöd kan vi stötta människor utan att driva på inflationen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“With targeted and smart support we can support people without driving up inflation.”
  • state support for building»Statligt stöd för att häva bostadsbristen, särskilt för unga.« (party programme ↗)“State support to address the housing shortage, especially for young people.”
  • full employment as the main goal»Full sysselsättning är det övergripande målet för socialdemokratisk ekonomisk politik.« (party programme ↗)“Full employment is the overarching goal for Social Democratic economic policy.”

Worldstate weighed in: Inflation down to 0.2 percent — The plan's warning against inflation-driving support carries less weight, the scope for purchasing power reforms increases; Unemployment 8.6 percent and zero growth — The goal of full employment justifies active stimulus and strengthened welfare

MPMiljöpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the planexplicit

The election manifesto is explicit: those with the fewest resources should get more public services, lower taxes and more support, while the richest should contribute more – precisely the redistribution towards lower incomes that the counter-proposal wants to embed in economic policy's direction.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto is explicit: those with the fewest resources should get more public services, lower taxes and more support, while the richest should contribute more – precisely the redistribution towards lower incomes that the counter-proposal wants to embed in economic policy's direction. The plan also wants to develop and expand investment support to build more rental apartments, which corresponds to the demand for support for the construction sector. The party programme's demands for reduced economic inequality and equivalent conditions for municipal services throughout the country support the demand for indexed general state grants and strengthened welfare.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet är uttryckligt: de med minst resurser ska få mer samhällsservice, lägre skatt och mer stöd, medan de rikaste ska bidra mer – precis den omfördelning mot låga inkomster som motförslaget vill lägga i den ekonomiska politikens inriktning. Planen vill också utveckla och utöka investeringsstödet för att bygga fler hyresrätter, vilket motsvarar kravet på stöd till byggsektorn. Partiprogrammets krav på minskade ekonomiska klyftor och likvärdiga förutsättningar för kommunal service i hela landet bär kravet på uppräknade generella statsbidrag och stärkt välfärd.

  • redistribution to low-income earnersdecisive»De med minst resurser ska få mer samhällsservice, lägre skatt och mer stöd i omställningen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Those with the fewest resources should get more public services, lower taxes and more support in the transition.”
  • investment support for housing construction»bygga fler klimatsmarta hyresrätter med rimliga hyror, utveckla och utöka investeringsstödet som gjorde det billigare att bygga och se till att fler kan äga sin bostad.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“build more climate-smart rental apartments with reasonable rents, develop and expand investment support that made it cheaper to build and ensure that more can own their homes.”
  • equivalent municipal services»Ett väl fungerande skattesystem ska ge likvärdiga ekonomiska förutsättningar att bedriva kommunal service i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“A well-functioning tax system should provide equivalent economic conditions for delivering municipal services throughout the country.”
  • reduced economic inequality»De ekonomiska klyftorna ska minska.« (party programme ↗)“Economic inequality should decrease.”

The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.

CCenterpartietYesAbstaindeparts from the planexplicit

The plan's economic direction is that total tax pressure shall come down, that the fiscal policy framework shall be protected and that more money shall be put on welfare's core and less on benefits.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's economic direction is that total tax pressure shall come down, that the fiscal policy framework shall be protected and that more money shall be put on welfare's core and less on benefits. The counter-proposal instead wants to emphasize listed state grants and expanded welfare, which pulls in the opposite direction. The plan certainly wants to strengthen households with lower incomes, but does so through lower taxes and a protected work ethic, not through higher expenditures. The plan therefore rejects the counter-proposal's direction.

Original (Swedish)

Planens ekonomiska inriktning är att det totala skattetrycket ska ner, att det finanspolitiska ramverket ska värnas och att mer pengar ska läggas på välfärdens kärna och mindre på bidrag. Motförslaget vill i stället lägga tyngdpunkten på uppräknade statsbidrag och utbyggd välfärd, vilket drar åt motsatt håll. Planen vill visserligen stärka hushåll med lägre inkomster, men gör det genom sänkta skatter och en värnad arbetslinje, inte genom höjda utgifter. Planen avvisar därför motförslagets inriktning.

  • reduced total tax pressuredecisive»Det totala skattetrycket måste ner nästa mandatperiod. Vi kommer inte att medverka till några skattehöjningar som skadar jobben, det egna sparandet eller gör det dyrare att bo.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Total tax pressure must come down next term. We will not take part in any tax increases that damage jobs, personal savings or make housing more expensive.”
  • protected fiscal policy framework»Det finanspolitiska ramverket ska värnas och förstärkas, och Sveriges långsiktiga ekonomiska stabilitet ska försvaras. Politiken ska hushålla med skattebetalarnas pengar. Mer pengar ska läggas på välfärdens kärna, mindre på bidrag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The fiscal policy framework shall be protected and strengthened, and Sweden's long-term economic stability shall be defended. Policy shall be economical with taxpayers' money. More money shall be put on welfare's core, less on benefits.”
  • protected work ethic»Arbetslinjen måste värnas, och den som kan jobba ska inte leva på skattebetalarnas pengar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The work ethic must be protected, and those who can work shall not live on taxpayers' money.”
  • tax cuts for low incomes»Därför vill vi sänka skatten, särskilt för dem med lägre inkomster och för de viktiga småföretagen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore we want to cut taxes, especially for those with lower incomes and for the important small businesses.”

Worldstate weighed in: Inflation is down to 0.2 percent — The plan's commitments to mitigate inflation's effects no longer justify a purchasing power package; Unemployment is 8.6 percent — The plan's work ethic and tax cuts on jobs become the most directly applicable answer rather than higher state grants

The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.

LLiberalernaYesYesfollows the planexplicit

The plan's economic main line is to restore the work line through a broad job tax deduction and a benefit cap, not to raise benefits and state grants.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's economic main line is to restore the work line through a broad job tax deduction and a benefit cap, not to raise benefits and state grants. It also wants to abolish today's expensive building subsidies. The counter-proposal's direction towards increased purchasing power through transfers, indexed general state grants and support for the building sector thus conflicts with the plan's commitments.

Original (Swedish)

Planens ekonomiska huvudlinje är att återupprätta arbetslinjen genom ett brett jobbskatteavdrag och ett bidragstak, inte att räkna upp bidrag och statsbidrag. Den vill dessutom avskaffa dagens dyra byggsubventioner. Motförslagets inriktning på höjd köpkraft via transfereringar, indexerade generella statsbidrag och stöd till byggsektorn strider därmed mot planens åtaganden.

  • restored work linedecisive»vill vi skyndsamt genomföra ett nytt brett jobbskatteavdrag« (2022 manifesto ↗)“we want quickly to introduce a new broad job tax deduction”
  • benefit cap»de samlade bidragen ska inte kunna vara högre än de lägsta kollektivavtalade lönerna« (2022 manifesto ↗)“aggregate benefits shall not be higher than the lowest collective agreement wages”
  • abolished building subsidies»Dagens dyra byggsubventioner ska avskaffas« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Today's expensive building subsidies shall be abolished”
  • stable public finances»Stabila offentliga finanser och låg statsskuld skapar utrymme för Sverige att möta kriser utan att« (party programme ↗)“Stable public finances and low government debt create room for Sweden to face crises without”
KDKristdemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan makes the creation of new jobs the most important distributive policy issue and demands that tax and benefit systems counteract benefit dependency and restraint in public spending.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan makes the creation of new jobs the most important distributive policy issue and demands that tax and benefit systems counteract benefit dependency and restraint in public spending. The counter-proposal's focus on increased purchasing power through transfers and inflation-adjusted general state grants is a different path than the plan's employment line. That the state shall support weak municipalities is in the plan, but as targeted support rather than as general indexation.

Original (Swedish)

Planen gör tillkomsten av nya jobb till den viktigaste fördelningspolitiska frågan och kräver att skatte- och bidragssystem motverkar bidragsberoende samt återhållsamhet i de offentliga utgifterna. Motförslagets inriktning på höjd köpkraft via transfereringar och inflationsuppräknade generella statsbidrag är en annan väg än planens arbetslinje. Att staten ska stödja svaga kommuner finns i planen, men som riktat stöd snarare än som generell uppräkning.

  • jobs as distributive policydecisive»Därför är tillkomsten av nya jobb den i särklass viktigaste fördelningspolitiska frågan.« (party programme ↗)“Therefore, the creation of new jobs is by far the most important distributive policy issue.”
  • counteract benefit dependency»Skatte- och bidragssystemen måste utformas så att människors egen kraft och engagemang uppmuntras, och att bidragsberoende motverkas.« (party programme ↗)“Tax and benefit systems must be designed so that people's own initiative and commitment are encouraged and benefit dependency is counteracted.”
  • restraint in public spending»Sparandet i den svenska ekonomin måste hållas högt genom hushållssparande och genom återhållsamhet i de offentliga utgifterna.« (party programme ↗)“Savings in the Swedish economy must be kept high through household savings and through restraint in public spending.”
  • state support to weak municipalities»Det är en statlig uppgift att stödja kommuner som inte har ett tillräckligt skatteunderlag för att klara sina lagstadgade skyldigheter mot kommunens invånare.« (party programme ↗)“It is a state task to support municipalities that do not have sufficient tax base to meet their statutory obligations to the municipality's residents.”

Worldstate weighed in: Unemployment 8.6 percent and zero growth in the GDP indicator — sharpens the plan's requirement for employment policy and job creation before increased transfers; Inflation down to 0.2 percent — weakens the argument for inflation-adjusted general state grants as an acute measure

MModeraternaYesYesfollows the planexplicit

The plan establishes that the surplus target should be protected and that all new reforms must be financed, and that economic policy should be based on restored work line with reduced tax on work and a benefit ceiling.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that the surplus target should be protected and that all new reforms must be financed, and that economic policy should be based on restored work line with reduced tax on work and a benefit ceiling. The counter-proposal's direction with strengthened purchasing power for the lowest incomes, inflation-adjusted general government grants and expanded welfare goes directly against this and lacks financing within the plan's framework. The plan therefore speaks against the counter-proposal's demands.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att överskottsmålet ska värnas och att alla nya reformer måste finansieras, samt att den ekonomiska politiken ska bygga på återupprättad arbetslinje med sänkt skatt på arbete och ett bidragstak. Motförslagets inriktning med stärkt köpkraft för de lägsta inkomsterna, inflationsuppräknade generella statsbidrag och utbyggd välfärd går tvärtemot detta och saknar finansiering inom planens ram. Planen talar därför emot motförslagets krav.

  • protected surplus targetdecisive»Överskottsmålet ska värnas och det är inte aktuellt att övergå till ett balansmål.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The surplus target shall be protected and it is not current to move to a balance target.”
  • financed reforms»Alla nya löften och reformer – som till exempel våra inkomstskattesänkningar – behöver finansieras eller rymmas inom överskottsmålet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“All new commitments and reforms – such as our income tax reductions – need to be financed or fit within the surplus target.”
  • lower tax on work»Sänka skatten på arbete så att din ansträngning lönar sig bättre« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Lower taxes on work so that your effort pays off better”
  • benefit ceiling and work line»Införa ett bidragstak så att de samlade bidragen aldrig kan bli högre än lönen från ett arbete« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce a benefit ceiling so that total benefits can never be higher than wages from work”
SDSverigedemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

The plan's main economic line is that work should pay and that prosperity is created in businesses, with a reprioritisation of public spending rather than increased purchasing power through benefits and inflation-adjusted government grants.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's main economic line is that work should pay and that prosperity is created in businesses, with a reprioritisation of public spending rather than increased purchasing power through benefits and inflation-adjusted government grants. The party programme explicitly warns that overly extensive redistribution policy can have negative consequences. The counter-proposal's focus on purchasing power for those with the lowest incomes and inflation-adjusted government grants therefore lies outside the plan's commitments.

Original (Swedish)

Planens ekonomiska huvudlinje är att det ska löna sig att arbeta och att välståndet skapas i företagen, med omprioritering av offentliga utgifter snarare än höjd köpkraft via bidrag och uppräknade statsbidrag. Partiprogrammet varnar uttryckligen för att en alltför långtgående fördelningspolitik kan få negativa konsekvenser. Motförslagets inriktning på köpkraft för dem med lägst inkomster och inflationsuppräknade statsbidrag ligger därför vid sidan av planens åtaganden.

  • the work linedecisive»Göra det lönsamt att arbeta och bidra till samhället« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Make it rewarding to work and contribute to society”
  • limit to redistribution policy»Samtidigt är det viktigt att poängtera att en alltför långtgående fördelningspolitik också kan få negativa konsekvenser.« (party programme ↗)“At the same time, it is important to emphasise that overly extensive redistribution policy can also have negative consequences.”
  • businesses bear welfare»Grunden för välfärden skapas i företagen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The foundation for welfare is created in businesses.”
  • reprioritisation to welfare»Se över offentliga utgifter och rikta om medel till välfärden och rättsväsendet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Review public spending and redirect funds to welfare and the justice system”

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament