2023-11-082023/24:SfU5 · p.1SfUMigration & social insurance

Rejection of the proposition

Rejection of the bill on tightened conditions for family immigration and humanitarian-grounds residence permits

What's at stake: The outcome determines whether an entire package of tightening measures - maintenance requirements, humanitarian grounds and the age limit for relationship-based residence - is implemented together, which could particularly affect children, quota refugees and other vulnerable groups.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether the government's entire bill on tightened conditions for family immigration and limited humanitarian-grounds residence permits should be adopted, or whether the bill should be rejected in its entirety due to risks to family reunification, vulnerable children, and Sweden's treaty commitments.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee endorses the government's proposal in the bill as a whole, in line with earlier preparatory work, for a more restrictive migration policy and better-functioning integration.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 1 (V, MP)

The reserving members (V, MP) want to reject the entire bill: the narrowed exemption from the maintenance requirement would separate more children from their parents for longer and hinder family reunification, hit vulnerable groups such as women and people with disabilities hardest, and worsen the situation for quota refugees, and they question whether the proposal complies with the European Convention on Human Rights and the Convention on the Rights of the Child. The tightening of humanitarian grounds would conflict with the spirit of the Convention on the Rights of the Child and harm rooted or sick children while creating unpredictability for adults, and the raised age limit for relationship-based residence lacks, in the reserving members' view, support for reducing forced marriages while extending reunification waiting times by up to three years.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by V, MP.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
Vown reservationNoNo 0/17/0/7follows the planconfidence: highderived
SYesYes 92/0/0/15follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
MPown reservationNoNo 0/16/0/2follows the planconfidence: highexplicit
CNoYes 21/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: highderived
LYesYes 10/0/0/6follows the planconfidence: mediumderived
KDYesYes 16/0/0/3follows the planconfidence: highnot addressed
MYesYes 57/0/0/11follows the planconfidence: highexplicit
SDYesYes 62/0/0/10follows the planconfidence: highexplicit

Committee proposal

Parliament rejects the motions 2023/24:2745 by Tony Haddou et al. (V) and 2023/24:2746 by Annika Hirvonen et al. (MP).

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2023/24:2745 av Tony Haddou m.fl. (V) och 2023/24:2746 av Annika Hirvonen m.fl. (MP).

Riksdag decision: Parliament approved the government's proposal for amendments to the Aliens Act. The legislative amendments entail certain stricter conditions for family immigration and limited possibilities for residence permits on humanitarian grounds. The legislative amendments enter into force on 1 December 2023.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoNofollows the planderived

The plan requires a humane refugee and asylum policy with generous criteria, rejects temporary and conditional residence permits, and puts children's best interests first.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires a humane refugee and asylum policy with generous criteria, rejects temporary and conditional residence permits, and puts children's best interests first. A proposal that tightens the support requirement, narrows humanitarian grounds, and raises the age limit for family reunification conflicts with all these commitments, so the plan supports rejection in its entirety. The plan also refutes the committee's claim that restrictiveness improves integration.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver en human flykting- och asylpolitik med generösa kriterier, avvisar tillfälliga och villkorade uppehållstillstånd och sätter barnens bästa först. Ett förslag som skärper försörjningskravet, snävar in de humanitära skälen och höjer åldersgränsen för anknytning strider mot samtliga dessa åtaganden, varför planen stöder ett avslag i sin helhet. Planen bemöter också utskottets påstående att restriktivitet förbättrar integrationen.

  • uphold the right to asylumdecisive»Rätten att söka asyl kan aldrig tummas på, vi kräver att endast permanenta uppehållstillstånd ska utfärdas vid beviljad asyl.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The right to seek asylum can never be compromised on, we demand that only permanent residence permits shall be issued upon granted asylum.”
  • humane refugee policy»Vänsterpartiet anser att den inhumana flyktingpolitik som råder, med tillfälliga och villkorade uppehållstillstånd, är en form av psykologiskt våld mot en redan utsatt grupp.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party believes that the inhumane refugee policy that prevails, with temporary and conditional residence permits, is a form of psychological violence against an already vulnerable group.”
  • children's best interests first»Vänsterpartiets politik ska utformas så att barnens bästa kommer i första rummet.« (party programme ↗)“The Left Party's policy must be designed so that the best interests of the child come first.”
  • security improves integration»Det är inte genom tidsbegränsade uppehållstillstånd som integrationen förbättras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is not through time-limited residence permits that integration is improved.”
SSocialdemokraternaYesYesfollows the planderived

Rejecting the bill in its entirety would mean that the tightening of immigration policy that the election manifesto explicitly says remains firm is not carried out.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

Rejecting the bill in its entirety would mean that the tightening of immigration policy that the election manifesto explicitly says remains firm is not carried out. The plan furthermore links stricter migration to breaking segregation and to better integration, and itself sets sharpened requirements such as language requirements for permanent residence permits. The party programme's protection for children and for a regulated but generous immigration softens the picture without outweighing it.

Original (Swedish)

Att avslå propositionen i sin helhet skulle innebära att den åtstramning av migrationspolitiken som valmanifestet uttryckligen säger ligger fast inte fullföljs. Planen kopplar dessutom stramare migration till att bryta segregationen och till bättre integration, och ställer själv skärpta krav som språkkrav för permanent uppehållstillstånd. Partiprogrammets skydd för barn och för en reglerad men generös invandring mildrar bilden utan att väga över.

  • firm tightened immigration policydecisive»Vi har stramat åt migrationspolitiken, och denna linje ligger fast.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We have tightened immigration policy, and this line remains firm.”
  • migration and poor integration»Sverige hade under lång tid en stor migration, samtidigt som integrationen inte har fungerat tillräckligt bra.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden had for a long time large migration, while integration has not functioned well enough.”
  • sharpened requirements for residence permits»Det bör även ställas språkkrav för att få permanent uppehållstillstånd.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Language requirements should also be set for obtaining permanent residence permits.”
  • generous and regulated immigration»Vi vill ha en generös och reglerad invandring.« (party programme ↗)“We want to have generous and regulated immigration.”
MPMiljöpartietNoNofollows the planexplicit

The plan's position is that the right of asylum should be defended, that families should be able to reunite and that no asylum-seeking children shall be separated from their parents.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan's position is that the right of asylum should be defended, that families should be able to reunite and that no asylum-seeking children shall be separated from their parents. A proposal that narrows the exception from the maintenance requirement, tightens the humanitarian grounds and raises the age limit for family reunification conflicts with these commitments, as well as with the requirement for child impact analysis and legal certainty in the asylum process. Rejecting the proposal in its entirety is therefore the plan's position.

Original (Swedish)

Planens linje är att asylrätten ska försvaras, att familjer ska kunna återförenas och att inga asylsökande barn ska skiljas från sina föräldrar. Ett förslag som snävar in undantaget från försörjningskravet, skärper de humanitära skälen och höjer åldersgränsen för anknytning strider mot dessa åtaganden, liksom mot kravet på barnkonsekvensanalys och rättssäkerhet i asylprocessen. Att avslå förslaget i sin helhet är därför planens ståndpunkt.

  • defend the right of asylumdecisive»försvara asylrätten och kvotflyktingsystemet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“defend the right of asylum and the resettlement programme.”
  • no separated families»att fler familjer ska kunna återförenas i Sverige. Inga asylsökande barn ska kunna skiljas från sina föräldrar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“that more families should be able to reunite in Sweden. No asylum-seeking children shall be separated from their parents.”
  • child impact analysis of decisions»beslut bör föregås av en barnkonsekvensanalys.« (party programme ↗)“decisions should be preceded by a child impact analysis.”
  • legally secure asylum process»stärka rättssäkerheten i asylprocessen och stödet för hbtqi-flyktingar och andra sårbara grupper.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“strengthen legal certainty in the asylum process and support for LGBTQI refugees and other vulnerable groups.”

flags: citat_migrerat

CCenterpartietNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan establishes a generous and humane refugee and immigration policy and that the opportunity to seek asylum is a human right, which speaks against a tightening that separates children from parents for extended periods and limits humanitarian grounds.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes a generous and humane refugee and immigration policy and that the opportunity to seek asylum is a human right, which speaks against a tightening that separates children from parents for extended periods and limits humanitarian grounds. The plan's requirement that every child's rights be protected and that openness be defended when group is set against group underlies the rejection. The plan therefore supports the counter-proposal's demands substantively.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast en generös och human flykting- och invandringspolitik och att möjligheten att söka fristad är en mänsklig rättighet, vilket talar mot en skärpning som separerar barn från föräldrar under längre tid och begränsar humanitära grunder. Planens krav att varje barns rätt ska värnas och att öppenheten ska försvaras när grupp ställs mot grupp bär avslagsyrkandet. Planen stöder därför motförslagets krav i sak.

  • generous and humane immigration policydecisive»Centerpartiet strävar efter öppna gränser, fri rörlighet samt en generös och human flykting- och invandringspolitik.« (party programme ↗)“The Centre Party strives for open borders, free movement and a generous and humane refugee and immigration policy.”
  • the child's rights are protected»Särskilt viktigt är att värna varje barns rätt att bli respekterad och att bli sedd för den man är.« (party programme ↗)“It is particularly important to protect every child's right to be respected and to be seen for who they are.”
  • asylum as a human right»Att få söka sig en fristad och en försörjning, inte bara inom det land där man är född, utan också utanför landets gränser, är en mänsklig rättighet.« (party programme ↗)“The opportunity to seek asylum and a livelihood, not only within the country where one is born, but also outside the country's borders, is a human right.”
  • openness against xenophobia»När andra ställer människa mot människa, grupp mot grupp, försvarar vi öppenheten, demokratin och principen om allas lika värde.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“When others set person against person, group against group, we defend openness, democracy and the principle of everyone's equal value.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

LLiberalernaYesYesfollows the planderived

The election manifesto requires that Sweden adopt immigration policy with legislation in line with other EU countries and that more contribute to their own self-support; to reject the entire proposition goes against that commitment.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The election manifesto requires that Sweden adopt immigration policy with legislation in line with other EU countries and that more contribute to their own self-support; to reject the entire proposition goes against that commitment. The raised age limit for family reunification also lies close to the plan's requirements for sharpened measures against honor-based thinking, virginity tests, and forced marriage trips. The party programme's protection of family reunification qualifies the assessment but does not justify a complete rejection.

Original (Swedish)

Valmanifestet kräver att Sverige får en migrationspolitik med en lagstiftning i linje med andra EU-länder och att fler bidrar till sin egen försörjning; att avslå hela propositionen går emot det åtagandet. Den höjda åldersgränsen vid anknytning ligger dessutom nära planens krav på skärpta åtgärder mot hederstänkande, oskuldskontroller och uppfostringsresor. Partiprogrammets skydd för familjeåterförening kvalificerar bedömningen men motiverar inte ett totalavslag.

  • EU-aligned immigration legislationdecisive»Ska integrationen lyckas måste Sverige få en migrationspolitik med en lagstiftning i linje med andra EU-länder.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“For integration to succeed, Sweden must adopt immigration policy with legislation in line with other EU countries.”
  • sharpened fight against honor-based oppression»straffen för hedersrelaterade brott skärpas och kriminaliseringen breddas till uttryck för hederstänkande såsom oskuldskontroller och uppfostringsresor« (2022 manifesto ↗)“sentences for honor-related crimes are increased and criminalization is expanded to include expressions of honor-based thinking such as virginity tests and forced marriage trips”
  • requirement for self-support»Fler måste bidra – färre måste gå på bidrag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More must contribute – fewer must rely on grants.”
  • family reunification as asylum right»Familjeåterförening är en viktig del av asylrätten. Barn ska kunna återförenas med sina föräldrar.« (party programme ↗)“Family reunification is an important part of asylum rights. Children should be able to reunite with their parents.”
KDKristdemokraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The counter-proposal demands that the entire government bill be rejected, that is, that stricter requirements for livelihood support, humanitarian grounds and age limits are not introduced.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The counter-proposal demands that the entire government bill be rejected, that is, that stricter requirements for livelihood support, humanitarian grounds and age limits are not introduced. The election manifesto's stated line is a strict migration policy, which speaks against a total rejection. The party programme's requirement that families not be separated and that child perspective be considered mitigates but does not override that line.

Original (Swedish)

Motförslaget kräver att hela propositionen avslås, det vill säga att skärpningarna av försörjningskrav, humanitära skäl och åldersgräns uteblir. Valmanifestets uttalade linje är en stram migrationspolitik, vilket talar mot ett totalavslag. Principprogrammets krav på att familjer inte splittras och att barnperspektivet beaktas mildrar men upphäver inte den linjen.

  • strict migration policydecisive»Stram migrationspolitik krävs för att ta itu med integrationsproblem och utanförskap.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strict migration policy is required to address integration problems and exclusion.”
  • strict migration as an election promise»EN STRAM MIGRATION« (2022 manifesto ↗)“A STRICT MIGRATION”
  • protection against family separation»Utvisnings- och avvisningsbeslut som leder till familjesplittring ska inte fattas eller verkställas, såvida inte synnerliga skäl finns.« (party programme ↗)“Expulsion and rejection decisions that lead to family separation shall not be made or enforced unless there are special grounds.”
  • legally certain asylum process»åstadkomma korta handläggningstider, rättssäkerhet« (party programme ↗)“achieve short processing times, legal certainty”

flags: dokumentkonflikt_valmanifest_partiprogram

MModeraternaYesYesfollows the planexplicit

The counter-proposal demands that the entire tightening be rejected, while the plan demands the opposite: reduced immigration, asylum legislation at the EU legal minimum level and clear requirements for those who come here.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The counter-proposal demands that the entire tightening be rejected, while the plan demands the opposite: reduced immigration, asylum legislation at the EU legal minimum level and clear requirements for those who come here. The plan also drives a zero tolerance against honour-based oppression and a ban on cousin marriages, which supports stricter family-link requirements rather than their preservation. The plan therefore provides no support for a rejection.

Original (Swedish)

Motförslaget kräver att hela skärpningen avslås, medan planen kräver det motsatta: minskad invandring, asyllagstiftning på EU-rättslig miniminivå och tydliga krav på den som kommer hit. Planen driver också en nolltolerans mot hedersförtryck och förbud mot kusinäktenskap, vilket stöder skärpta anknytningsregler snarare än bevarade. Planen ger därför inget stöd för ett avslag.

  • significantly reduced asylum receptiondecisive»Antalet asylsökande till Sverige behöver minska betydligt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The number of asylum seekers to Sweden needs to decrease significantly.”
  • asylum law at the EU's minimum level»Anpassa asyllagstiftningen efter den rättsliga miniminivån enligt EU-rätten« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Adapt asylum legislation to the legal minimum level according to EU law”
  • counteract forced and honour-based marriage»Förbjuda kusinäktenskap« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Prohibit cousin marriages”
  • zero tolerance against honour-based oppression»Moderaterna vill införa en nolltolerans mot hedersbrott.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Moderaterna will introduce zero tolerance against honour crimes.”
SDSverigedemokraternaYesYesfollows the planexplicit

The counter-proposal requires that the entire bill be rejected, that is, that no tightening of subsistence requirements, humanitarian grounds or age limits for family reunification be implemented.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The counter-proposal requires that the entire bill be rejected, that is, that no tightening of subsistence requirements, humanitarian grounds or age limits for family reunification be implemented. The plan requires the opposite: the strictest possible immigration legislation within the framework of European asylum rules and tightened requirements for family immigration. The plan also itself designates EU law as the outer limit, which does not support rejecting the tightening with reference to the conventions.

Original (Swedish)

Motförslaget kräver att hela propositionen avslås, det vill säga att inga skärpningar av försörjningskrav, humanitära skäl eller åldersgräns för anknytning genomförs. Planen kräver motsatsen: striktast möjliga utlänningslagstiftning inom ramen för de europeiska asylreglerna och skärpta krav för anhöriginvandring. Planen anger också själv EU-rätten som yttre gräns, vilket inte ger stöd för att avslå skärpningarna med hänvisning till konventionerna.

  • striktast möjliga lagstiftningdecisive»Utifrån dessa principer vill Sverigedemokraterna utforma den striktast möjliga utlänningslagstiftningen som är möjlig inom ramen för de europeiska asylreglerna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Based on these principles, Sweden Democrats want to formulate the strictest possible immigration legislation possible within the framework of European asylum rules.”
  • skärpta anhörigkrav»Skärpa kraven för anhöriginvandring« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Tighten requirements for family immigration”
  • skärpta integrationskrav»Kraven på invandrare att integreras i den svenska kulturen och samhället ska skärpas och medborgarskapet ska knytas till strikta villkor.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The requirements for immigrants to integrate into Swedish culture and society shall be tightened and citizenship shall be tied to strict conditions.”
  • anhörigregler mot segregation»Reglerna för anhöriginvandring måste vara utformade på ett sådant sätt att de inte bidrar till att skapa« (party programme ↗)“The rules for family immigration must be designed in such a way that they do not contribute to creating”

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament