2026-01-212025/26:JuU18 · p.1JuUJustice
Review of the suitability assessment in firearms license matters
Review of the suitability assessment for weapon licences
What's at stake: A tightened assessment could make it harder for unsuitable or potentially violence-prone individuals to obtain weapon permits, but requires new rules for information-sharing between authorities, while waiting for the ongoing legislative process means no new measures are taken until the new weapons law is in place.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the government should be given a specific mandate to tighten the suitability assessment for weapon permits - for example through better register checks to detect warning signs - or whether the ongoing legislative work based on the Weapons Inquiry's proposals is already sufficient.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motion calling for a review of the suitability assessment. Given the preparatory work already under way within the Government Offices, based on the Weapons Inquiry's proposals and a referral to the Council on Legislation on a new weapons law, the committee sees no reason for the Riksdag to take further action.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 1 (S, V, MP)
The reservation (S, V, MP) holds that today's suitability assessments need to be tightened, including through an analysis of how register checks can be improved to detect warning signs, and by ensuring that information about warning signs known to, for example, the Defence Recruitment Agency or the Swedish Hunters' Association reaches the police authority. It wants this addressed as part of a broader review, in order to prevent violence-prone individuals from gaining access to firearms.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by S, V, MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/19/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| S | No | No 0/92/0/14 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | No 0/16/0/2 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| C | No | Yes 20/0/0/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 17/0/0/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | Yes | Yes 59/0/0/9 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | Yes | Yes 61/0/0/10 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | explicit |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects motion 2025/26:3586 by Teresa Carvalho et al. (S) request 106.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motion 2025/26:3586 av Teresa Carvalho m.fl. (S) yrkande 106.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 30 proposals on firearms issues in motions from the general motion period 2025. The proposals concern, among other things, suitability for possessing firearms, handling of firearms license matters and firearms amnesty. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to the work being carried out following the 2022 weapons investigation.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to tighten suitability assessments for firearm licenses through improved register checks and more personal interviews. (S, V, MP) — Reservation 1
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The election manifesto makes the fight against access to firearms part of crime prevention and highlights concern about gun violence.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto makes the fight against access to firearms part of crime prevention and highlights concern about gun violence. Stricter suitability assessments preventing violent individuals from obtaining firearms permits follow directly from that commitment and from the plan's requirement that no one should have to suffer crime. The plan does not address licensing review as such, so the conclusion is derived from the weapons and safety principles.
Original (Swedish)
Valplattformen gör kampen mot tillgången till skjutvapen till en del av brottsbekämpningen och lyfter oron för skjutvapenvåld. Skärpta lämplighetsbedömningar som hindrar våldsbenägna personer från vapentillstånd följer direkt av det åtagandet och av planens krav på att ingen ska behöva utsättas för brott. Planen behandlar inte licensprövningen som sådan, så slutsatsen härleds ur vapen- och trygghetsprinciperna.
- limited firearms accessdecisive»kamp mot tillgången till illegala skjutvapen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“fight against access to illegal firearms”
- prevent crime effectively»Ingen människa ska behöva utsättas för brott.« (party programme ↗)“No person should have to suffer crime.”
- safety from gun violence»Föräldrar ska inte behöva oroa sig över skjutvapenvåld och drömma mardrömmar om att deras barn ska drabbas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Parents should not have to worry about gun violence and have nightmares about their children being harmed.”
- fewer weapons in circulation»Världen behöver gå mot fred, nedrustning« (party programme ↗)“The world needs to move toward peace, disarmament”
The plan wants to remove secrecy barriers between authorities so that the police can do their job and give the police more tools, which is exactly what sharpened weapons registration and information flows in weapons cases are about.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to remove secrecy barriers between authorities so that the police can do their job and give the police more tools, which is exactly what sharpened weapons registration and information flows in weapons cases are about. It furthermore requires strong measures against weapons and that the state's monopoly on violence be maintained. Stricter suitability assessments therefore follow from the plan's weapons and police line.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill riva sekretesshinder mellan myndigheter så att polisen kan göra sitt jobb och ge polisen fler verktyg, vilket är precis vad skärpta registerslagningar och informationsflöden i vapenärenden handlar om. Den kräver dessutom krafttag mot vapen och att statens våldsmonopol upprätthålls. Skärpta lämplighetsbedömningar följer därmed av planens vapen- och polislinje.
- removed secrecy barriersdecisive»Polisen behöver också fler verktyg, som bättre möjligheter till avlyssning och husrannsakan. Sekretesshinder mellan myndigheter ska rivas så att polisen och andra yrkesgrupper kan göra sitt jobb.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The police also needs more tools, such as better opportunities for wiretapping and house searches. Secrecy barriers between authorities shall be removed so that the police and other professions can do their job.”
- strong measures against weapons»Vi vill ta krafttag mot införsel av vapen och narkotika, bland annat genom stärkt gränskontroll.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to take strong measures against the import of weapons and drugs, among other things through strengthened border control.”
- state's monopoly on violence»Statens våldsmonopol upprätthålls.« (party programme ↗)“The state's monopoly on violence is maintained.”
- police with the right tools»Poliskår med god förmåga som återspeglar hela befolkningen, med stark lokal närvaro,« (party programme ↗)“Police force with good capacity that reflects the entire population, with strong local presence,”
The plan requires law enforcement agencies that prevent crime before it happens and wants to strengthen information sharing between authorities.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires law enforcement agencies that prevent crime before it happens and wants to strengthen information sharing between authorities. Stricter suitability assessments with better record checks to prevent violent persons from obtaining weapons is an application of that principle. The plan at the same time emphasizes that such methods must be weighed against personal integrity.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver brottsbekämpande myndigheter som förebygger brott innan de sker och vill förstärka informationsdelningen mellan myndigheter. Skärpta lämplighetsbedömningar med bättre registerslagningar för att hindra våldsbenägna personer från att få vapen är en tillämpning av den principen. Planen betonar samtidigt att sådana metoder ska vägas mot den personliga integriteten.
- prevent crime before it happensdecisive»Ett tryggt samhälle kräver närvarande brottsbekämpande myndigheter som verkar i hela landet, skyddar individens rättigheter och förebygger brott innan de sker.« (party programme ↗)“A safe society requires present law enforcement agencies that operate throughout the country, protect individuals' rights and prevent crime before it happens.”
- strengthened information sharing»Samarbetet och informationsdelningen mellan myndigheter för att stoppa penningtvätt, välfärdsbrott och organiserad ekonomisk brottslighet ska förstärkas.« (party programme ↗)“Cooperation and information sharing between authorities to stop money laundering, welfare fraud and organized economic crime shall be strengthened.”
- balance against integrity»Tvångsmedel och övervakningsmetoder behövs för att komma åt den samhällshotande brottsligheten. Dessa måste samtidigt vägas mot den personliga integriteten.« (party programme ↗)“Coercive measures and surveillance methods are needed to address crime that threatens society. These must at the same time be weighed against personal integrity.”
The party programme establishes that criminal policy shall both prevent and deter from crime, and the election manifesto wants to lead Sweden towards an end to men's violence against women where men who beat shall not escape.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme establishes that criminal policy shall both prevent and deter from crime, and the election manifesto wants to lead Sweden towards an end to men's violence against women where men who beat shall not escape. Catching warning signals before a violent person receives a firearms permit is a preventive measure in that spirit. However, the plan does not address firearms legislation as such, and requires that privacy intrusions be weighed against the purpose.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att kriminalpolitiken både ska förebygga och avskräcka från brott, och valmanifestet vill leda Sverige mot ett slut på mäns våld mot kvinnor där män som slår inte ska komma undan. Att varningssignaler fångas upp innan en våldsbenägen person får vapentillstånd är en förebyggande åtgärd i den andan. Planen behandlar dock inte vapenlagstiftningen som sådan, och kräver att integritetsintrång vägs mot syftet.
- preventive criminal policydecisive»Kriminalpolitiken ska därför både förebygga och avskräcka från brott, stödja brottsdrabbade och stimulera dem som har begått olagliga handlingar till en ny livssituation utan brottslighet.« (party programme ↗)“Criminal policy shall therefore both prevent and deter from crime, support crime victims and encourage those who have committed illegal acts to a new situation without crime.”
- stop men's violence against women»Vi ska leda Sverige mot ett slut på mäns våld mot kvinnor. Män som slår ska inte komma undan.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We shall lead Sweden towards an end to men's violence against women. Men who beat shall not escape.”
- increased security in daily life»Tryggheten ska förbättras i hela landet och fler brott som drabbar folk i deras vardag ska klaras upp.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Security shall be improved throughout the country and more crimes affecting people in their daily lives shall be solved.”
- proportionality with regard to privacy»Det måste finnas en proportionalitet mellan lagstiftningens inskränkning av medborgarnas integritet och lagarnas syfte.« (party programme ↗)“There must be proportionality between the legislation's restriction of citizens' privacy and the laws' purpose.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires that secrecy restrictions be removed so that information can be shared more smoothly between agencies and that agencies can effectively share information in crime prevention work.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that secrecy restrictions be removed so that information can be shared more smoothly between agencies and that agencies can effectively share information in crime prevention work. Stricter suitability assessments with better record-flagging and signals reaching the police is an application of this, in line with the plan's tough stance against illegal weapons. The plan's privacy requirements simultaneously set the framework for how the controls can be designed.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att sekretesshinder undanröjs så att information smidigare kan delas mellan myndigheter och att myndigheter effektivt kan dela information i det brottsförebyggande arbetet. Skärpta lämplighetsbedömningar med bättre registerslagningar och signaler som når polisen är en tillämpning av det, i linje med planens hårda hållning mot illegala vapen. Planens integritetskrav sätter samtidigt ramen för hur kontrollerna får utformas.
- removed secrecy restrictionsdecisive»Samarbetet mellan polis och socialtjänst behöver utvecklas, sekretesshinder undanröjas så att information smidigare kan delas mellan myndigheter« (party programme ↗)“Cooperation between police and social services needs to be developed, secrecy restrictions removed so that information can be shared more smoothly between agencies”
- effective information sharing»Det förutsätter att myndigheter effektivt kan dela information med varandra.« (party programme ↗)“This requires that agencies can effectively share information with each other.”
- tough stance on weapons crimes»skärpa straffen för bland annat vapenbrott, våldtäkt och utpressning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“increase sentences for, among other things, weapons crimes, rape, and extortion”
- proportionality in controls»Åtgärder som påverkar den personliga integriteten negativt är endast berättigade om ett motstående intresse väger uppenbart tyngre och åtgärden är effektiv.« (party programme ↗)“Measures that negatively impact personal privacy are only justified if a competing interest outweighs them clearly and the measure is effective.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto demands a comprehensive review of secrecy regulations so that authorities can share information with each other to prevent and clarify crimes — exactly what the counter-proposal wants to achieve when warning signals shall reach the police in weapons licensing matters.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto demands a comprehensive review of secrecy regulations so that authorities can share information with each other to prevent and clarify crimes — exactly what the counter-proposal wants to achieve when warning signals shall reach the police in weapons licensing matters. The plan gives the police an explicit crime prevention mandate and takes a hard line on weapons crimes. Stricter suitability assessments are therefore in line with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet kräver en total översyn av sekretessreglerna så att myndigheter kan dela uppgifter med varandra för att förebygga och klara upp brott — precis det motförslaget vill åstadkomma när varningssignaler ska nå polisen i vapenlicensärenden. Planen ger polisen ett uttryckligt brottsförebyggande uppdrag och tar en hård linje mot vapenbrott. Skärpta lämplighetsbedömningar ligger därför i linje med planen.
- authorities shall share informationdecisive»Total översyn av sekretessreglerna, så att myndigheter kan dela uppgifter mellan sig för att förebygga och klara upp brott.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Comprehensive review of secrecy regulations so that authorities can share information with each other to prevent and clarify crimes.”
- the police's crime prevention mandate»Polisens uppgift är att förebygga brott, upprätthålla ordning samt att utreda« (party programme ↗)“The police's task is to prevent crimes, maintain order and investigate”
- hard line on weapons crimes»Skärp straffet för vapenbrott till lägst fem års fängelse.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase the penalty for weapons crimes to at least five years' imprisonment.”
- preventive measures most important»Det viktigaste sättet att bekämpa brottslighet är genom förebyggande insatser och det är« (party programme ↗)“The most important way to combat crime is through preventive measures and it is”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wishes to shorten processing times for weapon licenses and establishes that weapon regulations must not be designed in such a way that hunters, sport shooters and weapons collectors are negatively affected.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wishes to shorten processing times for weapon licenses and establishes that weapon regulations must not be designed in such a way that hunters, sport shooters and weapons collectors are negatively affected. Tightened suitability assessments with expanded background checks instead place a heavier burden on legal weapon owners. The plan's measures against weapons in criminal environments consist instead of stricter penalties for weapons crimes and a stronger customs service.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill korta handläggningstiderna för vapenlicenser och slår fast att vapenregler inte får utformas så att jägare, sportskyttar och vapensamlare drabbas negativt. Skärpta lämplighetsprövningar med utökade registerslagningar lägger tvärtom en tyngre prövning på legala vapenägare. Planens åtgärder mot vapen i kriminella miljöer består i stället av skärpta straff för vapenbrott och en starkare tull.
- simpler weapon licensesdecisive»Arbeta för kortade handläggningstider för vapenlicenser« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Work to shorten processing times for weapon licenses”
- no restrictions for hunters»Det är viktigt att EU:s vapendirektiv inte genomförs i svensk lagstiftning så att du som är jägare, sportskytt eller vapensamlare drabbas negativt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is important that the EU's weapon directive is not implemented in Swedish legislation in such a way that you as a hunter, sport shooter or weapons collector are negatively affected.”
- stricter weapons crime penalties»Skärpa minimistraffen för grova vapenbrott från dagens 2 års fängelse till 6 års fängelse« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase minimum sentences for serious weapons crimes from today's 2 years imprisonment to 6 years imprisonment”
- stop weapons smuggling»Stärka tullen med mer resurser och kraftfulla befogenheter för att stoppa stöldligor och vapensmugglare« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Strengthen customs with more resources and powerful authority to stop theft gangs and weapons smugglers”
The plan requires that the witch hunt against hunters and lawful gun owners be stopped and criticizes that political measures that should have been directed at illegal weapons have instead been directed at lawful gun ownership.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that the witch hunt against hunters and lawful gun owners be stopped and criticizes that political measures that should have been directed at illegal weapons have instead been directed at lawful gun ownership. The counter-proposal's demand for stricter suitability assessments with expanded record checks and reporting from organizations places new obstacles on legal license applicants. The plan also considers today's license management to be unreasonably burdensome.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att hetsjakten på jägare och legala vapeninnehavare stoppas och kritiserar att politiska åtgärder som borde riktats mot illegala vapen i stället riktats mot legalt vapeninnehav. Motförslagets krav på skärpta lämplighetsbedömningar med utökade registerslagningar och inrapportering från organisationer lägger nya hinder på just legala tillståndssökande. Planen anser dessutom att dagens licenshantering redan är orimligt betungande.
- direct measures at illegal weaponsdecisive»Samtidigt har politiska åtgärder som borde riktats mot illegala vapen och gängbrottslighet istället riktats mot legalt vapeninnehav, svenska jägare och sportskyttar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Meanwhile, political measures that should have been directed at illegal weapons and gang crime have instead been directed at lawful gun ownership, Swedish hunters and sport shooters.”
- protection for lawful gun ownership»Stoppa hetsjakten på jägare och legala vapeninnehavare« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop the witch hunt against hunters and lawful gun owners”
- faster license processing»De långa handläggningstiderna kring vapenlicenshantering är orimliga.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The long processing times regarding gun license management are unreasonable.”
- protected hunting rights»Möjligheten att äga jaktvapen och att ägna sig åt jakt ska värnas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The opportunity to own hunting weapons and to engage in hunting should be protected.”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:JuU18)
- Committee report full text (HD01JuU18)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:1119 — En säker, samlad digital tjänst för jaktspecifika personliga handlingar av Anne-Li Sjölund (C)
- Motion 2025/26:1368 — Vapenlicens och digital teknik av Johan Löfstrand m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:143 — Vapenfrågor av Per Söderlund (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1469 — Digital vapenlicens av Magnus Jacobsson (KD)
- Motion 2025/26:1491 — Förvaring av vapen på annan adress än folkbokföringsadressen av Eric Westroth (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1522 — Förvaring som grund för vapeninnehav utan tillstånd av Emma Ahlström Köster m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1671 — Ansvarig myndighet för inspektion av landets skjutbanor av Katarina Tolgfors och Marléne Lund Kopparklint (båda M)
- Motion 2025/26:1772 — Ändring i knivlagen av Crister Carlsson och Lars Beckman (båda M)
- Motion 2025/26:1938 — Fler skjutbanor för ökad försvarsförmåga av Boriana Åberg (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2385 — Samkörning mellan vårdregister och polisregister vid prövning av vapenlicens av Markus Wiechel (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:2386 — Svenska för vapenlicens av Markus Wiechel (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:2788 — Rättsväsendet av Gudrun Nordborg m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2833 — Jord, skog, jakt av Helena Lindahl m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2025/26:2862 — Tydliggörande av bestämmelser om återkallande av vapenlicens av Crister Carlsson och Malin Höglund (båda M)
- Motion 2025/26:2892 — Relevant lagstiftning för legala vapenägare av Lars Beckman och Marléne Lund Kopparklint (båda M)
- Motion 2025/26:3081 — Tydliggörande av bestämmelser för återkallande av vapenlicens av Crister Carlsson och Malin Höglund (båda M)
- Motion 2025/26:3115 — Rättsfall mot jägare av Lars Beckman m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2025/26:3124 — Digitala vapenlicenser av Kjell-Arne Ottosson (KD)
- Motion 2025/26:3353 — Förvaring av vapen i annans vapenskåp av Helena Storckenfeldt (M)
- Motion 2025/26:3390 — Förtydligande av vapenlagens tillämpning för sportskyttar och jägare av Marléne Lund Kopparklint (M)
Source: The Swedish Parliament