2023-06-072022/23:MJU16 · p.24MJUEnvironment & agriculture
The Reduction Obligation
The fuel reduction obligation
What's at stake: The outcome affects how much renewable fuel must be blended into petrol and diesel, which in turn affects fuel prices and the ability of sectors such as heavy transport and work machinery to meet their own climate targets.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is how the fuel reduction obligation should be handled going forward: whether it is enough to await the government's announced proposal to lower it, supported by expanded charging infrastructure and electrification, or whether the obligation should instead be safeguarded to secure access to sustainable biofuels for sectors where electrification is not yet mature.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee notes that the government has announced a lowering of the reduction obligation and welcomes the fact that the forthcoming government bill will include a full impact assessment in line with parliament's request. The committee is also very positive about investments in charging infrastructure and support for electrifying heavy transport, and with reference to this ongoing work rejects the motions.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 42 (MP)
The reservation (MP) stresses that the reduction obligation matters greatly for sectors, such as work machinery and heavy vehicles, where technological development has not progressed as far as for passenger cars, and that it affects companies' ability to meet their own climate targets linked to Agenda 2030 and the Paris Agreement. Access to sustainably produced pure biofuels, such as HVO100 and renewable drop-in fuels, should be supported since it strengthens both companies' sustainability work and competitiveness and contributes to domestic production chains, jobs and crisis preparedness.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 42 by MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: LLiberalerna, SSocialdemokraterna
Ja 269–15Ja 161–123
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 21/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| S | No | Yes 94/0/0/13 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| MP | No | No 0/15/0/3 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| C | No | Abstain 0/0/21/3 | differs | confidence: high | explicit |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: medium | explicit |
| KD | Yes | Yes 16/0/0/3 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | match | confidence: medium | derived |
| SD | Yes | Yes 63/0/0/9 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2022/23:853 by Ulrika Heie et al. (C) points 36, 37 and 53, 2022/23:2170 by Elin Söderberg et al. (MP) point 3 and 2022/23:2190 by Annie Lööf et al. (C) points 73 and 75.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2022/23:853 av Ulrika Heie m.fl. (C) yrkandena 36, 37 och 53, 2022/23:2170 av Elin Söderberg m.fl. (MP) yrkande 3 och 2022/23:2190 av Annie Lööf m.fl. (C) yrkandena 73 och 75.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag said no to approximately 120 motions concerning climate issues that arrived during the general petition period 2022. The proposals concern, among other things, international climate work, climate work within the EU, overarching Swedish climate policy, negative emissions and supplementary measures, national climate investments, transport sector climate transition, climate adaptation. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to ongoing work in the areas covered by the motions.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to expand measures to rapidly reduce greenhouse gas emissions. (MP) — Reservation 42
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan requires that the transition happen immediately and that heavy transport be steered to railways whilst the road network be both electrified and complemented with infrastructure for other sustainable fuels.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that the transition happen immediately and that heavy transport be steered to railways whilst the road network be both electrified and complemented with infrastructure for other sustainable fuels. Safeguarding the reduction obligation's importance and supply of sustainably produced pure biofuels for work machines and heavy vehicles is therefore supported by the plan. The plan does however set the condition that only residual products from felled forest may become biofuel.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver att omställningen sker omgående och att tunga transporter styrs till järnväg samtidigt som vägnätet både elektrifieras och kompletteras med infrastruktur för andra hållbara drivmedel. Att värna reduktionspliktens betydelse och tillgången till hållbart producerade rena biodrivmedel för arbetsmaskiner och tunga fordon stöds därför av planen. Planen sätter dock villkoret att endast restprodukter från avverkad skog får bli biobränsle.
- sustainable fuels neededdecisive»För att göra såväl person- som godstransporter hållbara behöver vägnätet både elektrifieras och kompletteras med infrastruktur för andra hållbara drivmedel.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“To make both passenger and freight transport sustainable, the road network needs both to be electrified and complemented with infrastructure for other sustainable fuels.”
- transition immediately»Omställningen behöver ske omgående och alla politiska beslut behöver ta hänsyn till den akuta kris som vi befinner oss i.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The transition needs to happen immediately and all political decisions need to take account of the acute crisis we are in.”
- biofuel from residual products»Den skog som avverkas måste användas klokt där endast restprodukter ska användas till biobränsle.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Felled forest must be used wisely with only residual products used for biofuel.”
- freight to railways»Tunga transporter behöver styras till järnväg och hållbar sjöfart.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Heavy transport needs to be steered to railways and sustainable maritime shipping.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan explicitly states that access to fuel must be secured and that Swedish production of renewable fuels must increase so that it becomes easier to refuel with fossil-free fuels, which is the same requirement that the counter-proposal raises about clean sustainable biofuels and domestic production chains.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly states that access to fuel must be secured and that Swedish production of renewable fuels must increase so that it becomes easier to refuel with fossil-free fuels, which is the same requirement that the counter-proposal raises about clean sustainable biofuels and domestic production chains. The party programme points in the same direction through investments in alternative fuels. The plan also links the transition to jobs with Swedish wages and collective agreements, which strengthens the counter-proposal's competitiveness argument.
Original (Swedish)
Planen säger uttryckligen att tillgången till bränsle ska säkras och att den svenska produktionen av förnybara drivmedel ska öka så att det blir lättare att tanka fossilfritt, vilket är samma krav som motförslaget reser om rena hållbara biodrivmedel och inhemska produktionskedjor. Partiprogrammet pekar i samma riktning genom satsningar på alternativa drivmedel. Planen kopplar också omställningen till jobb med svenska löner och kollektivavtal, vilket stärker motförslagets konkurrenskraftsargument.
- increase renewable fuelsdecisive»Vi vill öka den svenska produktionen av förnybara drivmedel, så att det blir lättare att tanka fossilfritt i Sverige.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to increase Swedish production of renewable fuels, so that it becomes easier to refuel with fossil-free fuels in Sweden.”
- secured fuel supply»Säkra tillgången till bränsle.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Secure access to fuel.”
- investment in alternative fuels»på att utveckla bränslesnåla motorer, alternativa drivmedel och bättre reningsteknik.« (party programme ↗)“on developing fuel-efficient engines, alternative fuels and better purification technology.”
- transition creates jobs»Det skapar tusentals jobb över hela landet här och nu – jobb med svenska löner och kollektivavtal.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It creates thousands of jobs across the country here and now – jobs with Swedish wages and collective agreements.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan states that necessary vehicle transports shall use renewable fuels and that Sweden should be an important producer of biofuels for fuel, which supports the counter-proposal's demand for support for sustainable pure biofuels.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that necessary vehicle transports shall use renewable fuels and that Sweden should be an important producer of biofuels for fuel, which supports the counter-proposal's demand for support for sustainable pure biofuels. The election manifesto furthermore explicitly wants fossil-free work machinery, namely those sectors where electrification has not advanced as far. Electrification is the plan's main approach but does not exclude renewable fuels where electricity is insufficient.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att nödvändiga biltransporter ska ske med förnybara bränslen och att Sverige ska vara en viktig producent av biobränsle för drivmedel, vilket bär motförslagets krav på stöd för hållbara rena biodrivmedel. Valmanifestet vill dessutom uttryckligen ha fossiloberoende arbetsmaskiner, alltså just de sektorer där elektrifieringen inte kommit lika långt. Elektrifieringen är planens huvudspår men utesluter inte förnybara bränslen där el inte räcker.
- renewable fuelsdecisive»biltransporter ska ske med förnybara bränslen.« (party programme ↗)“vehicle transports shall use renewable fuels.”
- fossil-free work machinery»stärka det svenska jordbruket för ökad självförsörjning med baslivsmedel, och stödja övergången till ett ekologiskt och hållbart jordbruk med fossiloberoende arbetsmaskiner.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“strengthen Swedish agriculture for increased self-sufficiency in basic foodstuffs, and support the transition to ecological and sustainable agriculture with fossil-free work machinery.”
- domestic biofuel production»viktig producent av biobränsle, både för uppvärmning och för att framställa drivmedel till fordon.« (party programme ↗)“important producer of biofuel, both for heating and to produce fuel for vehicles.”
- charging infrastructure for heavy transport»investera i laddning i hela landet — staten ska ta ansvar där marknaden inte räcker till, så att bilar och lastbilar kan köra på el oavsett vart i landet de ska.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“invest in charging throughout the country — the state should take responsibility where the market falls short, so that cars and lorries can run on electricity regardless of where in the country they go.”
The plan wants to lower the tax as much as possible on biofuels, multiply the production of biofuels and biogas and do more to enable sectors where electrification is insufficient to switch to renewable fuels.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to lower the tax as much as possible on biofuels, multiply the production of biofuels and biogas and do more to enable sectors where electrification is insufficient to switch to renewable fuels. The counter-proposal's demand that access to sustainable clean biofuels be supported, with domestic supply chains and crisis preparedness, coincides with this. The commitment explicitly applies to both climate benefit and competitiveness.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill sänka skatten maximalt på biodrivmedel, mångdubbla produktionen av biobränslen och biogas och göra mer för att sektorer där elektrifieringen inte räcker ska kunna ställa om till förnybara drivmedel. Motförslagets krav på att tillgången till hållbara rena biodrivmedel stöds, med inhemska produktionskedjor och krisberedskap, sammanfaller med detta. Åtagandet gäller uttryckligen både klimatnytta och konkurrenskraft.
- promote biofuelsdecisive»Sänk skatten maximalt på biodrivmedel som blandas in i bensin och diesel. Det skulle sänka bilisternas kostnader, gynna klimatet, skapa jobb och minska Sveriges oljeberoende.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Lower the tax as much as possible on biofuels mixed into petrol and diesel. This would reduce motorists' costs, benefit the climate, create jobs and reduce Sweden's oil dependence.”
- multiplied biofuel production»Sveriges energioberoende måste stärkas, bland annat genom att mångdubbla produktionen av biobränslen och biogas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden's energy independence must be strengthened, among other things by multiplying the production of biofuels and biogas.”
- transition in heavy sectors»Mer behöver göras för att flyget, sjöfarten och jordbruket ska kunna ställa om till förnybara drivmedel med stärkt konkurrenskraft.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More needs to be done so that aviation, shipping and agriculture can switch to renewable fuels with strengthened competitiveness.”
- biofuel premium for agriculture»En långsiktigt hållbar livsmedelsförsörjning med ökad försörjningstrygghet och ökad matproduktion kräver regelförenklingar och skattesänkningar, inklusive ett kraftfullt jordbruksavdrag och en biodrivmedelspremie som gör det hållbara lantbruket mer lönsamt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“A long-term sustainable food supply with increased supply security and increased food production requires simplification of regulations and tax cuts, including a strong agricultural deduction and a biofuel premium that makes sustainable agriculture more profitable.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto establishes that fossil emissions from the transport sector must be eliminated and that use of fossil-free fuels should continue, alongside electrification.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto establishes that fossil emissions from the transport sector must be eliminated and that use of fossil-free fuels should continue, alongside electrification. This directly addresses the counter-proposal's point that pure and blended biofuels are needed in those segments – work equipment and heavy vehicles – where electrification is not yet sufficient. The party programme's requirement that all transport modes bear their climate costs points in the same direction.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår fast att fossilutsläppen från transportsektorn ska bort och att en inblandning av fossilfria bränslen ska fortsätta, parallellt med elektrifiering. Det talar direkt till motförslagets poäng att rena och inblandade biodrivmedel behövs i de segment – arbetsmaskiner och tunga fordon – där elektrifieringen ännu inte räcker. Partiprogrammets krav att alla transportslag ska bära sina klimatkostnader pekar i samma riktning.
- continued blending of biofuelsdecisive»Fossilutsläppen från transportsektorn ska bort. Fler ska välja elbilen och en inblandning av fossilfria bränslen ska fortsätta.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Fossil emissions from the transport sector must be eliminated. More people should choose electric vehicles and continued use of fossil-free fuels.”
- break fossil dependence»Beroendet av fossila bränslen måste brytas och alla transportslag måste stå för sina klimatkostnader.« (party programme ↗)“Dependence on fossil fuels must be broken and all transport modes must bear their climate costs.”
- accelerated electrification»Elektrifieringen av transportsektorn ska påskyndas.« (party programme ↗)“Electrification of the transport sector should be accelerated.”
- technology and competitiveness»Medan andra gröna partier grundades för att stoppa tillväxten vet vi att ny teknik och nya lösningar är en del av lösningen på klimatutmaningen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“While other green parties were founded to stop growth, we know that new technology and new solutions are part of the solution to the climate challenge.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto explicitly promises significantly reduced petrol and diesel prices primarily through reduced blending of expensive biofuel, which is the same as a reduced blending obligation.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly promises significantly reduced petrol and diesel prices primarily through reduced blending of expensive biofuel, which is the same as a reduced blending obligation. The counter-proposal wants instead to protect the importance of the blending obligation and support pure biofuels. The party programme's support for renewable fuels weighs less than the more recent manifesto.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet lovar uttryckligen kraftigt sänkta bensin- och dieselpriser främst genom minskad inblandning av dyrt biobränsle, vilket är detsamma som en sänkt reduktionsplikt. Motförslaget vill i stället slå vakt om reduktionspliktens betydelse och stödja rena biodrivmedel. Partiprogrammets stöd för förnybara bränslen väger lättare än det färskare manifestet.
- reduced biofuel blendingdecisive»Sänk bensin- och dieselpriserna rejält för alla, främst genom minskad inblandningen av dyrt biobränsle.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce petrol and diesel prices significantly for everyone, primarily through reduced blending of expensive biofuel.”
- lower fuel costs»Det är rekorddyrt att tanka bilen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is record expensive to fill up the car”
- domestic renewable fuels»Inhemsk produktion ska stimuleras.« (party programme ↗)“Domestic production shall be stimulated.”
- competitive energy regulations»Energiskatter och regelverk behöver utformas med« (party programme ↗)“Energy taxes and regulations need to be designed with”
The plan's decisive commitment in this area is to lower the price of petrol and diesel and to sweep away the price increases that press households and farming.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's decisive commitment in this area is to lower the price of petrol and diesel and to sweep away the price increases that press households and farming. The counter-proposal instead wishes to protect the reduction obligation's importance and support access to clean biofuels, which in practice keeps fuel cost up. The plan certainly supports biofuel production, but the price promise carries more weight and points towards rejection.
Original (Swedish)
Planens avgörande åtagande på det här området är att sänka priset på bensin och diesel och att städa undan de prishöjningar som pressar hushåll och lantbruk. Motförslaget vill i stället slå vakt om reduktionspliktens betydelse och stödja tillgången till rena biodrivmedel, vilket i praktiken håller uppe drivmedelskostnaden. Planen stöder visserligen tillverkning av biodrivmedel, men prislöftet väger tyngre och pekar mot avvisande.
- lower fuel pricesdecisive»Sänka priset på bensin och diesel så att du klarar din vardagsekonomi« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Lower the price of petrol and diesel so you can manage your everyday economy”
- diesel price as problem»Världens högsta dieselpriser.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The world's highest diesel prices.”
- lower fuel taxes»Moderaterna vill förbättra förutsättningarna att driva lantbruk genom att sänka skatterna, vilket vi redan börjat göra på drivmedel, och minska regelkrånglet så att kostnaderna för administration går ner.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Moderates wish to improve the conditions for running farms by lowering taxes, which we have already begun doing on fuel, and reduce regulatory burden so administration costs drop.”
- domestic biofuels»Satsa på tillverkning av biodrivmedel« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Invest in biofuel production”
The election manifesto wants to lower the price at the pump through reduced fuel tax and reduced blending mandate, and states that requirements for blending of inefficient biofuels need to decrease.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto wants to lower the price at the pump through reduced fuel tax and reduced blending mandate, and states that requirements for blending of inefficient biofuels need to decrease. The counter-proposal instead wants to protect the importance of the blending mandate and support the supply of biofuels, which goes directly against the plan's commitment. The fact that the plan simultaneously wants to promote Swedish biofuel production does not change the stance toward the blending mandate itself.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet vill sänka priset vid pump genom sänkt bränsleskatt och minskad reduktionsplikt och slår fast att kraven på inblandning av ineffektiva biodrivmedel behöver minska. Motförslaget vill i stället värna reduktionspliktens betydelse och stödja tillgången på biodrivmedel, vilket går rakt emot planens åtagande. Att planen samtidigt vill främja svensk biobränsleproduktion ändrar inte hållningen till själva reduktionsplikten.
- minskad reduktionspliktdecisive»Sänka bensin- och dieselpriset genom sänkt bränsleskatt och minskad reduktionsplikt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Lower petrol and diesel prices through reduced fuel tax and reduced blending mandate.”
- minskade inblandningskrav»Kraven på inblandning av ineffektiva biodrivmedel som höjer priset vid pump och vars miljöeffekter är osäkra behöver minska.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Requirements for blending of ineffective biofuels that raise the price at the pump and whose environmental effects are uncertain need to decrease.”
- mot importerade biodrivmedel»Bensin- och dieselpriset vid pump måste minska där särskilt dieseln idag påverkas av en radikal svensk biodrivmedelspolitik som till stor del handlar om att importera ohållbara biodrivmedel från utlandet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Petrol and diesel prices at the pump must decrease, where especially diesel today is affected by a radical Swedish biofuel policy that largely involves importing unsustainable biofuels from abroad.”
- svensk biobränsleproduktion»Främja svensk biobränsleproduktion« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Promote Swedish biofuel production”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2022/23:MJU16)
- Committee report full text (HA01MJU16)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2022/23:1246 — Hållbart skogsbruk för biologisk mångfald och klimatet av Kajsa Fredholm m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2022/23:1318 — Sveriges klimatpolitik av Aylin Fazelian (S)
- Motion 2022/23:148 — Acceleration av klimatomställningen av Lawen Redar (S)
- Motion 2022/23:151 — Hållbart grönt guld av Hanna Westerén (S)
- Motion 2022/23:155 — Jämlik klimatpolitik av Hanna Westerén (S)
- Motion 2022/23:1673 — Jämställdhet för hållbar utveckling av Annie Lööf m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:1879 — En fokuserad utvecklingsagenda bortom 2030 av Kerstin Lundgren m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:2029 — Klimatomställning av Anna Vikström m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:2062 — En politik för ekonomisk resiliens och stärkt konkurrenskraft av Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:2073 — Utgiftsområde 20 Allmän miljö- och naturvård av Anna-Caren Sätherberg m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:2110 — En kraftfull naturpolitik för starka ekosystem, biologisk mångfald och ökad klimatnytta av Per Bolund m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2022/23:2140 — Utgiftsområde 22 Kommunikationer av Gunilla Svantorp m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2022/23:2170 — För en stark grön näringslivsutveckling av Elin Söderberg m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2022/23:2175 — En klimatpolitik som står upp för Parisavtalet av Per Bolund m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2022/23:2190 — Ledarskap för klimat och grön omställning av Annie Lööf m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:2262 — Stärk det civila försvaret och krisberedskapen av Emma Berginger m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2022/23:36 — Åtgärder för att ge Sverige EU:s billigaste och miljövänligaste energi av Per Bolund m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2022/23:834 — Hållbara transporter med hög tillgänglighet i hela landet av Ulrika Heie m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:849 — Internationellt samarbete i en ny tid av Kerstin Lundgren m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2022/23:853 — Grön omställning av transportsektorn av Ulrika Heie m.fl. (C)
Source: The Swedish Parliament