2025-04-242024/25:SkU15 · p.4SkUTaxation
Road tax etc.
Road tax: a distance-based charge for heavy goods transport and passenger cars
What's at stake: The decision affects costs for haulage firms and cross-border freight traffic, the terms of competition between Swedish and foreign trucks, and how much freight shifts from road to rail and sea, particularly on longer routes where other modes of transport are a realistic alternative.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether Sweden should now introduce a distance-based road tax (kilometre tax) for heavy goods traffic and examine a geographically adapted road tax for passenger cars, or whether this should wait for ongoing EU regulation and a government inquiry already under preparation.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motions, noting that a revised EU directive is already phasing out time-based road tolls for heavy vehicles on the trans-European core network, that the government judges that taxation of heavy goods traffic will need reviewing in the long run, and that a government inquiry favouring a distance-based system is being processed within the Government Offices. Against that background, the committee sees no reason for the Riksdag to now direct the government to introduce a distance-based road tax or to examine a geographically adapted road tax for passenger cars.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 10 (V)
The reservation (V) wants a kilometre tax or road-wear charge for heavy road freight implemented now, shifting taxation from time-based to distance-based and differentiating it geographically by urban/rural area and access to alternative modes of transport. The reasoning is that this would make road haulage bear more of its external costs, contribute to infrastructure funding and compete on equal terms with foreign trucks, while shifting some longer-distance transport to sea and rail and making it easier for authorities to detect violations through automated monitoring.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 10 by V.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/19/0/5 | follows the plan | confidence: high | not addressed |
| S | No | Yes 91/0/0/15 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/13/5 | departs from the plan | confidence: high | not addressed |
| C | Yes | Yes 21/0/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 12/0/0/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| KD | Yes | Yes 14/0/0/5 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | Yes | Yes 58/0/0/10 | follows the plan | confidence: high | not addressed |
| SD | Yes | Abstain 0/0/63/9 | departs from the plan | confidence: high | not addressed |
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motions 2024/25:193 by Nooshi Dadgostar et al. (V) demand 9, 2024/25:1045 by Denis Begic (S) demand 1, 2024/25:1165 by Gudrun Brunegård (KD), 2024/25:1454 by Tobias Andersson et al. (SD) demand 4, 2024/25:1772 by Linus Lakso et al. (MP) demand 15, 2024/25:1921 by Ilona Szatmári Waldau et al. (V) demands 10 and 11 and 2024/25:2613 by Elin Söderberg et al. (MP) demand 131.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:193 av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V) yrkande 9, 2024/25:1045 av Denis Begic (S) yrkande 1, 2024/25:1165 av Gudrun Brunegård (KD), 2024/25:1454 av Tobias Andersson m.fl. (SD) yrkande 4, 2024/25:1772 av Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP) yrkande 15, 2024/25:1921 av Ilona Szatmári Waldau m.fl. (V) yrkandena 10 och 11 samt 2024/25:2613 av Elin Söderberg m.fl. (MP) yrkande 131.
Riksdag decision: Parliament rejected approximately 80 proposals in motions on excise taxes. The majority of the proposals were submitted during the general motion period 2024. However, two proposals are in follow-up motions raised in connection with the bill The path to reliable transport infrastructure – for all of Sweden to function. Parliament refers primarily to the fact that work is already ongoing in the areas covered by the proposals and to previous decisions.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to introduce a kilometer tax or road wear charge for heavy transport, geographically differentiated, to move freight to rail and shipping. (V) — Reservation 10
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan wants to steer heavy transport to railways and maritime shipping and for the costs of emissions to increase gradually and predictably.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to steer heavy transport to railways and maritime shipping and for the costs of emissions to increase gradually and predictably. A distance-based and geographically differentiated tax on heavy road traffic is a direct way to let freight traffic bear its costs and shift long-distance transport to railways. The plan's investment programme with expanded railways also presumes such financing and governance.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill styra tunga transporter till järnväg och sjöfart och att kostnaderna för utsläpp ökar långsiktigt och förutsägbart. En avståndsbaserad och geografiskt differentierad skatt på tung vägtrafik är ett direkt sätt att låta godstrafiken bära sina kostnader och flytta över långa transporter till järnväg. Planens investeringsplan med utbyggd järnväg förutsätter dessutom finansiering och styrning av det slaget.
- freight to railways and maritime shippingdecisive»Tunga transporter behöver styras till järnväg och hållbar sjöfart.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Heavy transport needs to be steered to railways and sustainable maritime shipping.”
- emissions shall cost more»Kostnaderna för utsläpp behöver öka långsiktigt« (party programme ↗)“The costs of emissions need to increase gradually”
- expanded railway»som bland annat innehåller en utbyggnad av järnvägen.« (party programme ↗)“which among other things contains an expansion of the railway.”
- against wage dumping and fraud»Lönedumpning, ekonomisk brottslighet och utnyttjande är centrala hot idag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Wage dumping, economic crime and exploitation are central threats today.”
The party programme wants road transport to be replaced by rail transport and sea freight and sees economic instruments as one of the most important tools in environmental policy, and the election manifesto commits to the principle that the polluter pays.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme wants road transport to be replaced by rail transport and sea freight and sees economic instruments as one of the most important tools in environmental policy, and the election manifesto commits to the principle that the polluter pays. A distance-based road tax for heavy goods traffic realizes this precisely. The counter-proposal's geographical differentiation also comes close to the plan's requirement for a fairer rural profile.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet vill att vägtransporter ersätts med järnvägstransporter och sjötrafik och ser ekonomiska styrmedel som ett av de viktigaste instrumenten i miljöpolitiken, och valmanifestet bekänner sig till principen att förorenaren betalar. En avståndsbaserad vägskatt för tung godstrafik förverkligar just detta. Motförslagets geografiska differentiering ligger dessutom nära planens krav på rättvisare landsbygdsprofil.
- goods by rail and sea freightdecisive»vägtransporter ersätts med järnvägstransporter och sjötrafik« (party programme ↗)“road transport is replaced by rail transport and sea freight”
- the polluter pays»Vi ska verka för att ett globalt koldioxidpris införs med principen att förorenaren betalar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We must work for a global carbon price to be introduced with the principle that the polluter pays.”
- economic instruments»forskningssatsningar, lagstiftning och olika ekonomiska styrmedel är de viktigaste« (party programme ↗)“research investments, legislation and various economic instruments are the most important”
- fair rural profile»Ett nytt reseavdrag ska förbättra möjligheterna att få avdrag också för mer klimatsmarta resor, och med rättvisare landsbygdsprofil.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“A new travel deduction must improve the possibilities for deductions also for more climate-smart travel, and with a fairer rural profile.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan is based on the principle that the polluter shall pay and that costs affecting the environment shall be included in the price through taxes and fees.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan is based on the principle that the polluter shall pay and that costs affecting the environment shall be included in the price through taxes and fees. It also wants to move goods from road to railway and maritime transport. A distance-based road tax for heavy traffic is precisely such a policy instrument, which is why the plan supports the counter-proposal's requirement.
Original (Swedish)
Planen bygger på att förorenaren ska betala och att kostnader som drabbar miljön ska läggas in i priset genom skatter och avgifter. Den vill dessutom flytta gods från väg till järnväg och sjöfart. En avståndsbaserad vägskatt för tung trafik är precis ett sådant styrmedel, varför planen stöder motförslagets krav.
- the polluter paysdecisive»bygger på principen om att det är förorenaren som« (party programme ↗)“is based on the principle that it is the polluter who”
- goods from road to railway and maritime»godstransporter på väg kan minska.« (party programme ↗)“goods transport on road can decrease.”
- instruments for climate goals»Lagar och ekonomiska styrmedel ska användas för« (party programme ↗)“Laws and economic policy instruments shall be used for”
- expanded railway»bygga ut och rusta upp järnvägsnätet för snabba tåg i hela landet och skynda på bygget av nya stambanor för höghastighetståg.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“expand and upgrade the railway network for fast trains across the entire country and speed up the construction of new main lines for high-speed rail.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The manifesto promises that the total tax burden shall come down and that the party will not participate in tax increases that harm jobs, which a new kilometre tax on heavy transport would do.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The manifesto promises that the total tax burden shall come down and that the party will not participate in tax increases that harm jobs, which a new kilometre tax on heavy transport would do. The plan further requires that political decisions pay particular attention to the long distances in a sparsely populated country. The line for transport is instead to lower the cost of sustainable fuels.
Original (Swedish)
Manifestet lovar att det totala skattetrycket ska ner och att partiet inte medverkar till skattehöjningar som skadar jobben, vilket en ny kilometerskatt på tunga transporter skulle göra. Planen kräver dessutom att politiska beslut tar särskild hänsyn till de långa avstånden i ett glesbefolkat land. Linjen för transporterna är i stället att sänka kostnaden för hållbara drivmedel.
- reduced total tax burdendecisive»Det totala skattetrycket måste ner nästa mandatperiod. Vi kommer inte att medverka till några skattehöjningar som skadar jobben, det egna sparandet eller gör det dyrare att bo.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The total tax burden must come down in the next electoral term. We will not participate in any tax increases that harm jobs, personal savings or make it more expensive to live.”
- consideration for long distances»Sverige är EU:s näst mest glesbefolkade land och det innebär särskilda utmaningar för gles- och landsbygden som politiska beslut måste ta hänsyn till« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden is the EU's second most sparsely populated country and that entails particular challenges for sparse and rural areas that political decisions must take into account”
- lower tax on sustainable transport»Sänk skatten maximalt på biodrivmedel som blandas in i bensin och diesel.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce the tax on biofuels blended into petrol and diesel as much as possible.”
The plan's decisive commitment is that dependence on fossil fuels must be broken and that all transport modes shall bear their climate costs, which is precisely what the counter-proposal's distance-based road fee aims at for freight traffic.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's decisive commitment is that dependence on fossil fuels must be broken and that all transport modes shall bear their climate costs, which is precisely what the counter-proposal's distance-based road fee aims at for freight traffic. The principle that the polluter – no one else – shall pay points in the same direction, as does the possibility for more projects to be financed by fees. The plan also accepts geographically differentiated policy instruments based on access to public transport.
Original (Swedish)
Planens avgörande åtagande är att beroendet av fossila bränslen måste brytas och att alla transportslag ska stå för sina klimatkostnader, vilket är just vad motförslagets avståndsbaserade vägskatt syftar till för godstrafiken. Principen att förorenaren – ingen annan – ska betala pekar åt samma håll, liksom att fler projekt ska kunna avgiftsfinansieras. Planen accepterar också geografiskt differentierade styrmedel utifrån tillgången till kollektivtrafik.
- transports bear their costsdecisive»Beroendet av fossila bränslen måste brytas och alla transportslag måste stå för sina klimatkostnader.« (party programme ↗)“Dependence on fossil fuels must be broken and all transport modes must bear their climate costs.”
- the polluter pays»Det är den som förorenar – ingen annan – som ska betala.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is the one who pollutes – no one else – who shall pay.”
- fee-financed infrastructure»För att höja investeringstakten ska fler nya projekt kunna avgiftsfinansieras.« (party programme ↗)“To raise investment rates, more new projects shall be able to be financed by fees.”
- geographically adapted policy instruments»Reseavdraget ska vara begränsat där det finns en fungerande kollektivtrafik, generöst där kollektivtrafik saknas.« (party programme ↗)“The commuting deduction shall be limited where there is functioning public transport, generous where public transport is lacking.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto, which carries the most weight, points out that trucking companies and local businesses are already facing tougher times and want to reduce fuel costs significantly rather than add new charges.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto, which carries the most weight, points out that trucking companies and local businesses are already facing tougher times and want to reduce fuel costs significantly rather than add new charges. A distance-based road tax on heavy goods traffic increases costs precisely for these transports, which the plan moreover describes as a necessary part of the transport system. The principle that each mode of transport shall bear its own costs points in the other direction but must yield to the election manifesto's clearer line.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet, som väger tyngst, pekar ut att åkerier och lokala företag redan har det allt tuffare och vill sänka drivmedelskostnaderna rejält snarare än lägga på nya pålagor. En avståndsbaserad vägskatt på tung godstrafik ökar kostnaderna för just dessa transporter, som planen dessutom beskriver som en nödvändig del av transportsystemet. Principen att varje transportslag ska bära sina egna kostnader talar åt andra hållet men får ge vika för valmanifestets tydligare linje.
- relief for the trucking industrydecisive»lokala företag, jordbruk och åkerier får det allt tuffare« (2022 manifesto ↗)“local businesses, agriculture and trucking companies are having an increasingly difficult time”
- reduced transport costs»Sänk bensin- och dieselpriserna rejält för alla, främst genom minskad inblandningen av dyrt biobränsle.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce petrol and diesel prices significantly for everyone, primarily through reduced blending of expensive biofuel.”
- truck necessary»Lastbilen utgör en nödvändig del av transportsystemet.« (party programme ↗)“The truck is an essential part of the transport system.”
- transport modes bear own costs»Målet ska vara att respektive transportslag bär sina egna samhällsekonomiska« (party programme ↗)“The goal should be that each mode of transport bears its own socio-economic”
The plan promises a tax rise freeze meaning total taxes will not be raised, and states that more tax is not a solution in a country with among the world's highest tax burden.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan promises a tax rise freeze meaning total taxes will not be raised, and states that more tax is not a solution in a country with among the world's highest tax burden. A mileage tax for heavy road transport is a new burden on transport and therefore conflicts with that commitment. The plan instead wishes to lower fuel costs and repair roads.
Original (Swedish)
Planen lovar ett skattehöjarstopp som innebär att de samlade skatterna inte höjs, och slår fast att mer skatt inte är någon lösning i ett land med bland världens högsta skattetryck. En kilometerskatt för tunga vägtransporter är en ny pålaga på transporterna och strider därför mot det åtagandet. Planen vill i stället sänka drivmedelskostnaderna och laga vägarna.
- tax rise freezedecisive»Införa ett skattehöjarstopp under den kommande mandatperioden som innebär att de samlade skatterna inte höjs« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce a tax rise freeze during the coming electoral period meaning total taxes will not be raised”
- no more taxes(2022 manifesto)
- lower fuel costs»Sänka priset på bensin och diesel så att du klarar din vardagsekonomi« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Lower the price of petrol and diesel so you can manage your everyday economy”
- maintenance before new burdens»Laga Sveriges vägar så att du kan komma fram säkert och i tid« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Repair Sweden's roads so you can get there safely and on time”
flags: citat_ej_verifierat
The plan wants to lower taxes on transport and keep tax levels so that they do not hinder Swedish companies in international competition, while goods should be able to be transported throughout the country.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to lower taxes on transport and keep tax levels so that they do not hinder Swedish companies in international competition, while goods should be able to be transported throughout the country. A new distance-based road tax on heavy goods traffic is a further burden in precisely the opposite direction. The plan also sees all modes of transport as necessary and opposes individual transport modes being taxed extremely hard.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill sänka skatterna på transporter och hålla skattenivåerna så att de inte hämmar svenska företag i den internationella konkurrensen, samtidigt som gods ska kunna transporteras i hela landet. En ny avståndsbaserad vägskatt på tung godstrafik är en ytterligare pålaga i rakt motsatt riktning. Planen ser dessutom samtliga transportslag som nödvändiga och vänder sig mot att enskilda trafikslag beskattas extremt hårt.
- competitive tax levelsdecisive»Ha skatter på en nivå som inte hämmar svenska företag i den internationella konkurrensen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Have taxes at a level that does not hinder Swedish companies in international competition”
- functioning goods transport»Gods måste kunna transporteras och medarbetare måste kunna ta sig till arbetet inom rimlig tid i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Goods must be able to be transported and employees must be able to get to work within reasonable time throughout the country.”
- lower fuel tax»Sänka skatten på drivmedel« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Lower tax on fuel”
- all transport modes needed»Sverigedemokraterna anser att samtliga transportslag, inklusive bil och flyg, är viktiga för att samhället ska fungera.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats believe that all transport modes, including car and air, are important for society to function.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2024/25:SkU15)
- Committee report full text (HC01SkU15)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:1028 — Införande av en ny Lidingöregel av Kerstin Lundgren (C)
- Motion 2024/25:1045 — Vägavgifter av Denis Begic (S)
- Motion 2024/25:1112 — Kemikalieskattens effekter av Marléne Lund Kopparklint (M)
- Motion 2024/25:1123 — Utvärdering av miljönyttan av dagens elektronikskatt av Lars Püss (M)
- Motion 2024/25:1165 — Vägavgift för utländska lastbilar på svenska vägar av Gudrun Brunegård (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1191 — Sveriges 13 sämsta lagar av Rickard Nordin och Niels Paarup-Petersen (båda C)
- Motion 2024/25:1351 — Punktskatt av Per Söderlund m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1394 — Kemikaliepolitik av Martin Kinnunen m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:14 — Avskaffande av kemikalieskatten av Nima Gholam Ali Pour (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1454 — Regional utveckling - för ett levande Sverige av Tobias Andersson m.fl. (SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1472 — Kemikalieskatten av Larry Söder (KD)
- Motion 2024/25:1547 — Beskattning av snus av Jörgen Grubb och Patrik Jönsson (båda SD)
- Motion 2024/25:1557 — Väsentlig lättnad av den statliga skatte- och regelbördan för svenskt jordbruk av Helena Lindahl och Daniel Bäckström (båda C)
- Motion 2024/25:1744 — Utredning om avgift eller skatt på jungfruliga råvaror av Elin Söderberg m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:1771 — Flyget i en ohållbar tid av Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:1772 — Ett utsläppsfritt och transporteffektivt samhälle av Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:1773 — Decentralisering av trängselskatten av Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:1779 — Sänkt skatt på spel för en ökad kanalisering av Carl Nordblom (M)
- Motion 2024/25:1859 — Differentierade trängselskatter av Kristina Axén Olin (M)
- Motion 2024/25:1921 — Ett rättvist skattesystem m.m. av Ilona Szatmári Waldau m.fl. (V)
Source: The Swedish Parliament