2023-03-152022/23:UU3 · p.3UUForeign affairs

Other matters concerning priorities

Sustainability in World Bank and IMF lending to developing countries

What's at stake: The issue concerns how much weight ecological sustainability should be given compared to purely economic development when large international institutions lend money to developing countries, affecting both the climate and living conditions in the borrowing countries.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The vote concerns whether Sweden should work for updated rules for World Bank and IMF lending to developing countries so that climate and environmental considerations carry more weight, or whether the current direction of multilateral aid priorities should remain unchanged.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The Committee rejects the motions, pointing to the good results achieved by Swedish multilateral aid within the prioritised areas and to Sweden's strategic engagement already giving impact to its political priorities.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 4 (MP)

Sustainable global development has ecological, social and economic dimensions that must all be respected, but large institutions such as the IMF and World Bank currently focus more on economic development. Sweden should therefore work for updated rules on loans to developing countries that strengthen governance toward sustainability from a climate and environmental perspective.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 4 by MP.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VNoAbstain 0/0/20/4departs from the planconfidence: highexplicit
SNoYes 92/0/0/15departs from the planconfidence: mediumnot addressed
MPown reservationNoNo 0/13/0/5follows the planconfidence: highnot addressed
CNoYes 18/0/0/6departs from the planconfidence: highnot addressed
LNoYes 13/0/0/3departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
KDNoYes 15/0/0/4departs from the planconfidence: mediumderived
MNoYes 58/0/0/10departs from the planconfidence: lowderived
SDYesYes 62/0/0/11follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed

Committee proposal

The Riksdag rejects the motions 2022/23:1 by Lotta Johnsson Fornarve et al. (V) proposals 3, 4, 6 and 7 and 2022/23:2261 by Janine Alm Ericson et al. (MP) proposal 8.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2022/23:1 av Lotta Johnsson Fornarve m.fl. (V) yrkandena 3, 4, 6 och 7 samt 2022/23:2261 av Janine Alm Ericson m.fl. (MP) yrkande 8.

Riksdag decision: Every other year, the government submits a memorandum with a consolidated report of development cooperation and humanitarian aid through multilateral organisations. That is, support to international organisations, such as various UN bodies. In the memorandum focusing on the years 2019 and 2020, it appears that aid channelled through multilateral organisations increased significantly during that period. From approximately 59 per cent of the Swedish aid budget in 2019 to approximately 67 per cent in 2020. The Riksdag filed the memorandum with the documents, that is, closed the case. At the same time, the Riksdag said no to follow-up motions and eight proposals in motions from the general motion period 2022 concerning multilateral aid. This with reference to ongoing work.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietNoAbstaindeparts from the planexplicit

The plan establishes that social, democratic and ecological considerations should come before capital interests, and explicitly criticises that international financial institutions take little account of environmental impact and have exploited poor countries' indebtedness.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan establishes that social, democratic and ecological considerations should come before capital interests, and explicitly criticises that international financial institutions take little account of environmental impact and have exploited poor countries' indebtedness. It also wants Sweden to work for international debt cancellation so that poor countries can develop on their own terms. Updated rules that govern lending towards sustainability are therefore the plan's line.

Original (Swedish)

Planen slår fast att sociala, demokratiska och ekologiska hänsyn ska gå före kapitalintressen, och kritiserar uttryckligen att internationella finansorgan tar lite hänsyn till miljöpåverkan och har utnyttjat fattiga länders skuldsättning. Den vill också att Sverige verkar för internationell skuldavskrivning så att fattiga länder kan utvecklas på egna villkor. Uppdaterade regler som styr utlåningen mot hållbarhet är därför planens linje.

  • sustainability before capital interestsdecisive»demokratiska och ekologiska hänsyn ska gå före kapitalintressen.« (party programme ↗)“democratic and ecological considerations should come before capital interests.”
  • criticism of financial institutions' environmental considerations»tar dessutom lite hänsyn till miljöpåverkan« (party programme ↗)“also take little account of environmental impact”
  • debt cancellation for poor countries»Sverige ska verka för en internationell skuldavskrivning« (party programme ↗)“Sweden should work for international debt cancellation”
  • conditions should not serve capital»tvinga fram en politik i kapitalets intresse« (party programme ↗)“force through a policy in capital's interests”

The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.

SSocialdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan requires that international institutions become tools for sustainability and justice and that Sweden works for a global economic framework with environmental consideration.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires that international institutions become tools for sustainability and justice and that Sweden works for a global economic framework with environmental consideration. It also wants to double climate aid and drive other countries in climate transformation. That Sweden works for updated lending rules that steer toward climate and environmental sustainability follows directly from these commitments.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver att internationella institutioner blir redskap för hållbarhet och rättvisa och att Sverige verkar för ett globalt ekonomiskt regelverk med miljöhänsyn. Den vill dessutom dubblera klimatbiståndet och driva på andra länder i klimatomställningen. Att Sverige verkar för uppdaterade utlåningsregler som styr mot klimat- och miljöhållbarhet följer direkt av dessa åtaganden.

  • globalt regelverk med miljöhänsyndecisive»ekonomiskt regelverk, som bygger på respekt för demokratin, social rättvisa och hänsyn till« (party programme ↗)“economic framework, which is built on respect for democracy, social justice and regard for”
  • styr de globala institutionerna»De internationella institutionerna måste ha kraft att kontrollera och balansera det globala« (party programme ↗)“International institutions must have the power to control and balance the global”
  • dubblerat klimatbistånd»Därför vill vi dubblera klimatbiståndet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore we want to double climate aid.”
  • internationellt klimatansvar»Klimatfrågan är en global utmaning som kräver internationellt ansvarstagande« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The climate question is a global challenge that requires international responsibility”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MPMiljöpartietNoNofollows the plannot addressed

The plan requires coherent development policy where Sweden cannot support environment-destructive activities while pursuing sustainable development, and that development cooperation shall contribute to managing climate change.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires coherent development policy where Sweden cannot support environment-destructive activities while pursuing sustainable development, and that development cooperation shall contribute to managing climate change. It also wants to reform the World Bank and IMF. That Sweden pushes for loan terms that steer towards sustainability from a climate and environmental perspective follows directly from this.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver en samstämmig utvecklingspolitik där Sverige inte kan stödja miljöförstörande verksamheter samtidigt som hållbar utveckling eftersträvas, och att utvecklingssamarbetet ska bidra till att hantera klimatförändringarna. Den vill dessutom reformera Världsbanken och IMF. Att Sverige driver på för lånevillkor som styr mot hållbarhet ur klimat- och miljöperspektiv följer direkt av detta.

  • coherent development policydecisive»Sveriges utvecklingspolitik ska vara samstämmig« (party programme ↗)“Sweden's development policy shall be coherent”
  • climate in development cooperation»att utvecklingssamarbetet ska bidra till att bekämpa fattigdom, förebygga och hantera klimatförändringarna« (2022 manifesto ↗)“that development cooperation shall contribute to combating poverty, preventing and managing climate change”
  • reform lending institutions»Världsbanken ska reformeras och demokratiseras« (party programme ↗)“The World Bank shall be reformed and democratized”
  • sustainability drives aid policy»att biståndet ska hjälpa till att bygga hållbara, klimatsmarta samhällen, skydda hav, främja biologisk mångfald och ekosystemtjänster« (2022 manifesto ↗)“that aid shall help build sustainable, climate-smart societies, protect oceans, promote biodiversity and ecosystem services”
CCenterpartietNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The party programme states that the world's wealthy countries must contribute to developing countries achieving sustainable development faster and that climate work and poverty reduction must go hand in hand, which supports the requirement for sustainability governance of loans to developing countries.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme states that the world's wealthy countries must contribute to developing countries achieving sustainable development faster and that climate work and poverty reduction must go hand in hand, which supports the requirement for sustainability governance of loans to developing countries. The election manifesto further demands stricter requirements on environment and climate in international agreements. That the poorest are hit hardest by climate change is the principle that decides the question.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet slår fast att världens rika länder måste bidra till att utvecklingsländer snabbare når en hållbar utveckling och att klimatarbete och fattigdomsbekämpning måste gå hand i hand, vilket bär kravet på hållbarhetsstyrning av lån till utvecklingsländer. Valmanifestet kräver dessutom hårdare krav på miljö och klimat i internationella avtal. Att de fattigaste drabbas hårdast av klimatförändringarna är den princip som avgör frågan.

  • wealthy countries support sustainable developmentdecisive»Världens rika länder måste bidra till att utvecklingsländer snabbare kan nå en hållbar utveckling.« (party programme ↗)“The world's wealthy countries must contribute to developing countries achieving sustainable development faster.”
  • sustainability requirements in agreements»Ställ hårdare krav på arbetsvillkor, miljö och klimat i handelsavtal.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Set stricter requirements on working conditions, environment and climate in trade agreements.”
  • the poor are hit hardest»Det är världens fattiga som drabbas allra hårdast« (party programme ↗)“It is the world's poor who are hit hardest”
  • greater multilateral responsibility»måste FN och dess medlemsstater ta ett större ansvar« (party programme ↗)“the UN and its member states must take greater responsibility”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

LLiberalernaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The party programme demands that the ambitions in international climate cooperation are raised and that climate aspects are integrated in trade policy, and the election manifesto wants to increase European climate aid.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The party programme demands that the ambitions in international climate cooperation are raised and that climate aspects are integrated in trade policy, and the election manifesto wants to increase European climate aid. That Sweden works for updated rules for lending to developing countries that steer towards sustainability follows from these commitments. The plan's own aid prioritization is however democracy, equality and reduced corruption, which makes the support derived.

Original (Swedish)

Partiprogrammet kräver att ambitionerna i det internationella klimatsamarbetet höjs och att klimataspekterna integreras i handelspolitiken, och valmanifestet vill öka det europeiska klimatbiståndet. Att Sverige verkar för uppdaterade regler för utlåning till utvecklingsländer som styr mot hållbarhet följer av dessa åtaganden. Planens egen biståndsprioritering är dock demokrati, jämställdhet och minskad korruption, vilket gör stödet härlett.

  • raised international climate ambitionsdecisive»Ambitionerna för det internationella samarbetet i klimatfrågor måste höjas« (party programme ↗)“The ambitions for international cooperation in climate questions must be raised”
  • climate integrated in trade policy»Klimataspekterna ska integreras i EU:s handelspolitik.« (party programme ↗)“Climate aspects shall be integrated in the EU's trade policy.”
  • increased climate aid»samtidigt som det europeiska klimatbiståndet ökar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“at the same time as European climate aid increases.”
  • aid reform with democracy focus»Den svenska biståndspolitiken måste genomgå stora reformer med fokus på demokrati, jämställdhet och minskad korruption.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Swedish aid policy must go through major reforms with focus on democracy, equality and reduced corruption.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan requires that international financial institutions such as the World Bank and IMF set high standards in their operations, that aid be directed towards sustainable development in all three dimensions and towards building national environmental protection, and that there be clear instruments for governance and monitoring.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan requires that international financial institutions such as the World Bank and IMF set high standards in their operations, that aid be directed towards sustainable development in all three dimensions and towards building national environmental protection, and that there be clear instruments for governance and monitoring. Updated lending rules that strengthen sustainability governance respond to this.

Original (Swedish)

Planen kräver att internationella finansinstitutioner som Världsbanken och IMF ställer höga krav i sin verksamhet, att biståndet inriktas på hållbar utveckling i alla tre dimensionerna och på uppbyggnad av nationellt miljöskydd, samt att det finns tydliga instrument för styrning och uppföljning. Uppdaterade regler för utlåning som stärker hållbarhetsstyrningen svarar mot detta.

  • requirements on international financial institutionsdecisive»bankerna måste också ställa höga krav på respekt för« (party programme ↗)“the banks must also set high standards for respect for”
  • sustainable development in three dimensions»ekonomiskt, socialt och miljömässigt hållbar utveckling« (party programme ↗)“economically, socially and environmentally sustainable development”
  • aid for environmental protection»internationellt bistånd inriktas på stöd till uppbyggande« (party programme ↗)“international aid be directed towards support for building”
  • governance and monitoring of aid»Det måste finnas tydliga instrument för styrning,« (party programme ↗)“There must be clear instruments for governance,”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan wants to redirect aid so that it reduces emissions in other countries and help other countries to transform through effective international cooperation.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to redirect aid so that it reduces emissions in other countries and help other countries to transform through effective international cooperation. To work for updated rules for development loans with stronger climate and environmental governance is in line with that direction and with the plan's demand for reformed multilateral bodies. At the same time, the plan emphasises focusing and results rather than new commitments, which makes support weak.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill rikta om biståndet så att det minskar utsläppen i andra länder och hjälpa andra länder att ställa om genom effektivt internationellt samarbete. Att verka för uppdaterade regler för utvecklingslån med starkare klimat- och miljöstyrning ligger i linje med den inriktningen och med planens krav på reformerade multilaterala organ. Samtidigt betonar planen fokusering och resultat snarare än nya åtaganden, vilket gör stödet svagt.

  • increased climate aiddecisive»Öka klimatbiståndets andel av det totala biståndet för att minska utsläppen utomlands« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase the share of climate aid of total aid to reduce emissions abroad”
  • international climate action»Samtidigt ska vi hjälpa andra länder att minska sina utsläpp genom effektivt internationellt samarbete.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“At the same time we shall help other countries reduce their emissions through effective international cooperation.”
  • reformed multilateral bodies»Verka för ett reformerat FN« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Work for a reformed UN”
  • focused aid»Fokusera det svenska biståndet till de länder, organisationer och tematiska områden där det gör störst nytta« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Focus Swedish aid to the countries, organisations and thematic areas where it does the most good”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

SDSverigedemokraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan wants to significantly reduce aid and focus it on humanitarian disaster assistance and basic needs, with reciprocity towards Swedish interests and measurable effect as distribution principles.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan wants to significantly reduce aid and focus it on humanitarian disaster assistance and basic needs, with reciprocity towards Swedish interests and measurable effect as distribution principles. That Sweden should drive forward new sustainability and climate conditions for lending to developing countries lies outside this direction and adds governance instead of streamlining. The basis is thin, but the closest principle speaks against the demand.

Original (Swedish)

Planen vill kraftigt minska biståndet och fokusera det på humanitärt katastrofbistånd och grundläggande behov, med ömsesidighet mot svenska intressen och mätbar effekt som fördelningsprinciper. Att Sverige ska driva fram nya hållbarhets- och klimatvillkor för utlåningen till utvecklingsländer ligger utanför denna inriktning och lägger till styrning i stället för effektivisering. Underlaget är tunt, men närmast liggande princip talar mot kravet.

  • aid for basic needsdecisive»Sverigedemokraterna vill att biståndet fokuseras kring direkta insatser för att tillgodose grundläggande behov och insatser vid katastrofer och krig« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats want aid to be focused on direct measures to meet basic needs and measures in disasters and war”
  • aid according to Swedish interests»Bistånd ska också fördelas utifrån en ömsesidighet i förhållande till Sveriges intressen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Aid should also be distributed on the basis of reciprocity in relation to Sweden's interests.”
  • humanitarian focus»Fokusera biståndet till humanitärt katastrofbistånd« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Focus aid on humanitarian disaster assistance”
  • efficiency before new goals»Effektivisera och utvärdera det svenska biståndet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Streamline and evaluate Swedish aid”

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament