2025-11-192025/26:UbU4 · p.2UbUEducation
The right to sfi
Time limit for the entitlement to sfi: three years or four
What's at stake: The decision affects how much time newly arrived immigrants with different educational backgrounds have to learn Swedish within the system before risking the loss of their entitlement to continued sfi instruction. It particularly concerns people with little or no prior schooling, who may need more time than those with an academic background, and can affect their prospects for further study, employment and participation in society.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the entitlement to sfi should be limited to three years, with the possibility of six-month extensions for special reasons, as the government proposes, or whether the entitlement should instead run for four years with the possibility of one-year extensions, in line with an earlier inquiry's proposal.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motions calling for a four-year limit. The reason is that, in the committee's assessment - in line with the government's - a clear three-year limit contributes to better quality and throughput through more cohesive instruction, while the possibility of six-month extensions provides sufficient flexibility for students who need more time.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 1 (S, V, MP)
The reservation (S, V, MP) calls for the entitlement to sfi to run for four years, with the possibility of one-year extensions, instead of the government's three-year limit. The reasoning is that too short and rigid a time limit risks undermining both throughput and equity, and could create a two-tier system in which students with strong study experience manage within the time limit while those who need the most support are left behind.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by S, V, MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 1/17/0/4 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| S | No | No 0/93/0/13 | follows the plan | confidence: low | derived |
| MP | No | No 0/15/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | Yes | Yes 19/0/0/5 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| L | Yes | Yes 13/0/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | derived |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
| SD | Yes | Yes 61/0/0/11 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | derived |
Broke with the party line
| VIlona Szatmári Waldau (V, Uppsala län) | Yes — party line: No |
MPs whose vote differs from their party's majority position in this division. Marked with a dark ring in the chamber view.
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects motions 2025/26:319 by Åsa Westlund et al. (S) amendment 1, 2025/26:357 by Camilla Hansén et al. (MP) amendment 1, and 2025/26:3810 by Anders Ygeman et al. (S) amendment 74.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:319 av Åsa Westlund m.fl. (S) yrkande 1, 2025/26:357 av Camilla Hansén m.fl. (MP) yrkande 1 och 2025/26:3810 av Anders Ygeman m.fl. (S) yrkande 74.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag approved the government's proposal to strengthen requirements in municipal adult education in Swedish for immigrants (sfi). The proposals entail essentially the following: The right to participate in sfi shall apply for three years from the time the person was first admitted to the education, with certain possibilities for extension. The municipality shall establish an action plan for its efforts to reach the persons in the municipality who have the right to sfi. A person who has the right to sfi shall have the right to participate in the education in another municipality than their home municipality, if the person based on their personal circumstances has special grounds. When a person is admitted to sfi, their knowledge shall be assessed, unless such an assessment is obviously unnecessary. The result of the assessment shall form the basis for the individual study plan. The individual study plan for a student in sfi shall contain information about the time the student was first admitted to the education. The purpose of the government's proposal is, among other things, to make sfi education more efficient and coherent so that more individuals acquire sufficient knowledge of Swedish for further studies or to establish themselves in the labor market. The legislative changes come into force on January 1, 2026.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants the right to sfi to extend for four years with the possibility of extension by one year at a time. (S, V, MP) — Reservation 1
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan requires a welfare society that gives everyone language skills and practical opportunities to work on the same secure conditions as others, and an education system that compensates for class differences and other differences in circumstances.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires a welfare society that gives everyone language skills and practical opportunities to work on the same secure conditions as others, and an education system that compensates for class differences and other differences in circumstances. A strict three-year limit hits hardest those with short school background and creates exactly the division the plan wants to counteract. Four years with extension one year at a time therefore lies closer to the plan's equivalence requirements.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver ett välfärdssamhälle som ger alla språkkunskaper och praktiska möjligheter att arbeta på samma trygga villkor som andra, och ett utbildningssystem som kompenserar för klasskillnader och andra skillnader i förutsättningar. En stram treårsgräns slår hårdast mot dem med kort skolbakgrund och skapar just den uppdelning planen vill motverka. Fyra år med förlängning ett år i taget ligger därför närmare planens likvärdighetskrav.
- language skills for everyonedecisive»För att det ska fungera praktiskt behövs också ett starkt välfärdssamhälle som ger alla språkkunskaper och praktiska möjligheter att arbeta och leva på samma trygga villkor som andra.« (party programme ↗)“For it to work practically, a strong welfare society is also needed that gives everyone language skills and practical opportunities to work and live on the same secure conditions as others.”
- compensatory education»Den har en viktig roll att spela i att kompensera för klasskillnader och andra skillnader i förutsättningar.« (party programme ↗)“It has an important role to play in compensating for class differences and other differences in circumstances.”
- learning throughout life»Utbildningsystemet behöver svara mot människors långsiktiga behov i ett föränderligt arbetsliv, med breda kunskaper under uppväxten och goda möjligheter till lärande genom hela livet.« (party programme ↗)“The education system needs to meet people's long-term needs in a changing working life, with broad knowledge during childhood and good opportunities for learning throughout life.”
flags: citat_migrerat
The plan requires better opportunities for foreign-born to learn Swedish and achieve self-support, and emphasizes that learning good Swedish is central.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires better opportunities for foreign-born to learn Swedish and achieve self-support, and emphasizes that learning good Swedish is central. A three-year limit risks hitting hardest those with short schooling background, which contradicts the plan's ambition for equity. At the same time, the plan builds integration on both obligation and rights with requirements on the individual, which makes the assessment uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver bättre möjligheter för utlandsfödda att lära sig svenska och nå självförsörjning, och lyfter att det är centralt att lära sig god svenska. En treårsgräns riskerar att slå hårdast mot dem med kort skolbakgrund, vilket strider mot planens ambition om likvärdighet. Samtidigt bygger planen integrationen på både plikt och rätt med krav på individen, vilket gör bedömningen osäker.
- Swedish and self-supportdecisive»Bättre möjligheter för utlandsfödda att lära sig svenska och nå självförsörjning.« (party programme ↗)“Better opportunities for foreign-born to learn Swedish and achieve self-support.”
- better support in language learning»Bättre stöd och högre krav för att alla i Sverige ska lära sig svenska och få god« (party programme ↗)“Better support and higher demands for everyone in Sweden to learn Swedish and get good”
- good Swedish is central»Att lära sig god svenska, delta i arbetsmarknadsinsatser och studier är centralt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Learning good Swedish, participating in labour market measures and studies is central.”
- integration with obligation and rights»Integration byggd på både plikt och rätt, med tydligt ansvar också för individen« (party programme ↗)“Integration based on both obligation and rights, with clear responsibility also on the individual”
The election manifesto wants to extend the establishment programme for newly arrived to at least four years to create better conditions for establishment.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto wants to extend the establishment programme for newly arrived to at least four years to create better conditions for establishment. The counter-proposal's demand for four years' right to Swedish for immigrants (SFI) with extension one year at a time, instead of a three-year limit, corresponds to that commitment. The plan also emphasizes that language is the key to becoming part of the community and that the education system must not contain dead ends.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet vill förlänga etableringsprogrammet för nyanlända till minst fyra år för att skapa bättre förutsättningar för etablering. Motförslagets krav på fyra års rätt till sfi med förlängning ett år i taget, i stället för en treårsgräns, motsvarar det åtagandet. Planen betonar dessutom att språket är nyckeln till samhällsgemenskapen och att utbildningssystemet inte ska innehålla återvändsgränder.
- at least four years of establishmentdecisive»förlänga etableringsprogrammet för nyanlända till minst fyra år« (2022 manifesto ↗)“extend the establishment programme for newly arrived to at least four years”
- language as the key»språket är en nyckel för att bli en del av samhällsgemenskapen« (party programme ↗)“language is a key to becoming part of the community”
- no dead ends in education»återvändsgränder i utbildningssystemet – alla ska ha möjlighet att byta bana under olika« (party programme ↗)“dead ends in the education system – everyone must have the opportunity to change direction during”
- strengthened establishment through SFI»stärk utrikesfödda kvinnors etablering genom SFI kombinerad med praktik och yrkesutbildning« (2022 manifesto ↗)“strengthen foreign-born women's establishment through SFI combined with internship and vocational training”
The plan's integration line is that anyone granted residence should be rapidly integrated and able to support themselves through an intensive year characterized by hard work and high expectations.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's integration line is that anyone granted residence should be rapidly integrated and able to support themselves through an intensive year characterized by hard work and high expectations. An extension of the right to Swedish language training from three to four years with annual extensions pulls in the opposite direction and shifts the emphasis from intensity to extended study time. The plan therefore speaks against the counter-proposal's requirement.
Original (Swedish)
Planens integrationslinje är att den som får uppehållstillstånd snabbt ska integreras och kunna försörja sig själv, genom ett intensivår präglat av hårt arbete och höga förväntningar. En förlängning av rätten till sfi från tre till fyra år med årsvisa förlängningar drar åt motsatt håll och förskjuter tyngdpunkten från intensitet till utsträckt studietid. Planen talar därför emot motförslagets krav.
- intensive year for rapid integrationdecisive»Skapa ett intensivår för snabbare integration. Den som får uppehållstillstånd ska snabbt integreras och ges möjlighet att försörja sig själv.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Create an intensive year for faster integration. Anyone granted residence should be rapidly integrated and given the opportunity to support themselves.”
- high expectations in integration»Integrationsinsatser ska präglas av hårt arbete och höga förväntningar. Nyanlända bör kvalificera sig in i trygghetssystemen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Integration measures should be characterized by hard work and high expectations. Newly arrived should qualify into the security systems.”
- rapid language learning»Att snabbt kunna få tillgång till språk,« (party programme ↗)“To quickly gain access to language,”
The plan wants to increase demands and quality in SFI and affirms that the newly arrived both have responsibility and right to acquire knowledge in Swedish, with incentives to self-provision coupled to the teaching.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to increase demands and quality in SFI and affirms that the newly arrived both have responsibility and right to acquire knowledge in Swedish, with incentives to self-provision coupled to the teaching. An extension of the right to SFI from three to four years with one-year extensions pulls in the opposite direction to the plan's requirement for higher tempo and clear demands. The counter-proposal's demands therefore do not receive support in the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill öka kraven och kvaliteten i sfi och slår fast att den nyanlände både har ansvar och rättighet att skaffa sig kunskaper i svenska, med drivkrafter till egen försörjning kopplade till undervisningen. En förlängning av rätten till sfi från tre till fyra år med ettårsförlängningar drar åt motsatt håll än planens krav på högre tempo och tydliga krav. Motförslagets krav får därför inte stöd i planen.
- raised demands in SFIdecisive»öka kraven och kvaliteten i SFI« (2022 manifesto ↗)“increase demands and quality in SFI”
- own responsibility for Swedish»Den som är nyanländ har både ansvar och rättighet att skaffa sig kunskaper i svenska.« (party programme ↗)“The person who is newly arrived has both responsibility and right to acquire knowledge in Swedish.”
- incentives to self-provision»svenskundervisningen kombineras med drivkrafter till egen försörjning« (party programme ↗)“Swedish teaching is combined with incentives to self-provision”
- language determines integration»Bristande språkkunskaper permanentar utanförskap.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Insufficient language skills perpetuate exclusion.”
The plan guarantees immigrants good opportunities for Swedish language teaching and requires that studies be individually tailored, which speaks against a rigid limit for those needing longer.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan guarantees immigrants good opportunities for Swedish language teaching and requires that studies be individually tailored, which speaks against a rigid limit for those needing longer. Solidarity with the weak and vulnerable supports that those with the poorest study conditions are not left behind. The plan says nothing about time limits' length however, so the position is derived and uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Planen garanterar invandrare goda möjligheter till undervisning i svenska språket och kräver att studierna är individanpassade, vilket talar emot en rigid gräns för dem som behöver längre tid. Solidariteten med svaga och utsatta stödjer att den med sämst studieförutsättningar inte lämnas efter. Planen säger dock ingenting om tidsgränsers längd, varför ställningstagandet är härlett och osäkert.
- guaranteed Swedish language teachingdecisive»Invandrare ska garanteras goda möjligheter till undervisning i svenska språket och om det« (party programme ↗)“Immigrants shall be guaranteed good opportunities for Swedish language teaching and if”
- individually tailored studies»Studierna bör vara individanpassade och kombineras med praktik på« (party programme ↗)“Studies should be individually tailored and combined with practice at”
- solidarity with the weak»Solidaritet med svaga och utsatta« (party programme ↗)“Solidarity with the weak and vulnerable”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan wants to make SFI more efficient with individual performance plans and clear knowledge goals, and emphasizes that the policy of low expectations must end.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to make SFI more efficient with individual performance plans and clear knowledge goals, and emphasizes that the policy of low expectations must end. Extending the right to continued teaching from three to four years pulls in the opposite direction and lowers the requirement for throughput. The plan therefore speaks against the counter-proposal's requirement.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill göra sfi effektivare med individuella prestationsplaner och tydliga kunskapsmål, och slår fast att de låga förväntningarnas politik måste upphöra. Att förlänga rätten till fortsatt undervisning från tre till fyra år drar åt motsatt håll och sänker kravet på genomströmning. Planen talar därför emot motförslagets krav.
- more efficient SFIdecisive»Moderaterna vill därför göra SFI effektivare.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Moderate Party therefore wants to make SFI more efficient.”
- higher requirements in SFI»Ställa högre krav på den som deltar i SFIundervisning – om individuella kunskapsmål inte uppnås ska bidragen kunna minska« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Set higher requirements for those participating in SFI teaching - if individual knowledge goals are not met, benefits can be reduced”
- high expectations»Det måste bli ett slut på de låga förväntningarnas politik.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“There must be an end to the policy of low expectations.”
- individual performance plan»Varje person som läser SFI ska få en individuell prestationsplan med kunskapsmål som han eller hon ska uppnå i sin utbildning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Each person studying SFI shall receive an individual performance plan with knowledge goals that they should achieve in their education.”
flags: citat_migrerat
The plan is based on a demands-based integration policy and an integration policy outer boundary, where someone who does not learn Swedish should not be able to linger in the system.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan is based on a demands-based integration policy and an integration policy outer boundary, where someone who does not learn Swedish should not be able to linger in the system. The counter-proposal wants to extend the right to Swedish for immigrants from three to four years with further extensions, which loosens precisely that outer boundary. The plan requires instead raised demands on those who are to be integrated.
Original (Swedish)
Planen bygger på en kravbaserad integrationspolitik och en integrationspolitisk bortre gräns, där den som inte lär sig svenska inte ska kunna dröja kvar i systemet. Motförslaget vill förlänga rätten till sfi från tre till fyra år med ytterligare förlängningar, vilket luckrar upp just den bortre gränsen. Planen kräver i stället höjda krav på den som ska integreras.
- outer boundary in integrationdecisive»Sverigedemokraterna strävar också efter en integrationspolitisk bortre gräns, som innebär att personer som inte lär sig svenska, inte vill arbeta och inte vill anpassa sig till våra normer och värderingar ska hjälpas att återvända hem.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Sweden Democrats also strive for an integration policy outer boundary, which means that people who do not learn Swedish, do not want to work and do not want to adapt to our norms and values should be helped to return home.”
- demands-based integration»Införa en kravbaserad integrationspolitik« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce a demands-based integration policy”
- clear demands on newly arrived»Den som är ny i Sverige ska mötas av tydligt normerande samhällsinformation som förklarar vad som krävs för att passa in och lyckas i Sverige.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Those who are new to Sweden should be met with clear norm-setting societal information that explains what is required to fit in and succeed in Sweden.”
- raised demands for employability»Öka kraven på icke integrerade att göra sig anställningsbara« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Increase demands on non-integrated to make themselves employable”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:UbU4)
- Committee report full text (HD01UbU4)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:319 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:10 Skärpta krav i kommunal vuxenutbildning i svenska för invandrare (sfi) av Åsa Westlund m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:357 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:10 Skärpta krav i kommunal vuxenutbildning i svenska för invandrare (sfi) av Camilla Hansén m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2025/26:3810 — Utgiftsområde 16 Utbildning och universitetsforskning av Anders Ygeman m.fl. (S)
- Proposition 2025/26:10 — Skärpta krav i kommunal vuxenutbildning i svenska för invandrare (sfi)
Source: The Swedish Parliament