2026-02-252025/26:KrU4 · p.1KrUCulture
Museum conditions
Terms for museums: phasing out the cost-based rent model and support for cultural institutions
What's at stake: The decision affects major national cultural institutions whose rents are being renegotiated, as well as the roughly 1,500 volunteer-run industrial heritage museums across the country, which depend on stable conditions to contribute to public education, regional development and children's access to culture.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the government's ongoing review of the cost-based rent model for cultural institutions, together with investment in new museums and cultural activities, is enough, or whether parliament should issue a formal call ensuring the new rent model does not disadvantage cultural institutions and that volunteer-run industrial heritage museums are also safeguarded.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee welcomes the government's decision to review the cost-based rent model and its instruction to the National Property Board to renegotiate the leases, as well as the investments being made in new museums and local and regional cultural activities, and notes that digitisation of the museum sector is progressing. With reference to this ongoing work, the committee rejects the motions.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 1 (S)
The reservation (S) welcomes the phase-out of the cost-based rent model but wants parliament to call on the government to ensure the new rent model does not harm cultural institutions and that the recommendations of a recently presented inquiry are taken into account. It also wants the government to safeguard the roughly 1,500 volunteer-run industrial heritage museums nationwide, which contribute to public education, regional development, social cohesion, tourism and children's right to culture.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by S.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 18/0/0/4 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| S | No | No 0/93/0/13 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/16/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| C | No | Yes 21/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 13/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 17/0/0/2 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | No | Yes 62/0/0/9 | departs from the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2025/26:291 by Björn Söder and Markus Wiechel (both SD), 2025/26:1864 by Sanne Lennström (S), 2025/26:3459 by Björn Wiechel et al. (S) motions 50 and 56 and 2025/26:3775 by Amanda Lind et al. (MP) motions 53-57.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:291 av Björn Söder och Markus Wiechel (båda SD), 2025/26:1864 av Sanne Lennström (S), 2025/26:3459 av Björn Wiechel m.fl. (S) yrkandena 50 och 56 samt 2025/26:3775 av Amanda Lind m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 53-57.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag said no to 103 proposals on cultural heritage and cultural environment. The proposals were submitted during the general motion period of 2025 and concern, among other things, museum issues, cultural environment conservation, preparedness within the cultural heritage sector and national minorities. The Riksdag primarily refers to the fact that work is already underway in the areas covered by the proposals.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to ensure that the new rental model for cultural institutions does not negatively affect them and to preserve labor-life museums. (S) — Reservation 1
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan demands good economic conditions for both institutions and free culture and that culture exists throughout the country.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan demands good economic conditions for both institutions and free culture and that culture exists throughout the country. A statement ensuring that a new rental model does not harm cultural institutions, and continued support for nonprofit workers' history museums with popular education role, follows directly from that commitment. The plan does not address the rental model as such, but its demands for stable conditions for cultural institutions and popular education point towards the counter-proposal.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver goda ekonomiska villkor för både institutioner och den fria kulturen och att kulturen finns i hela landet. Ett uttalande som säkerställer att en ny hyresmodell inte skadar kulturinstitutionerna, och fortsatt stöd till idéburna arbetslivsmuseer med folkbildande roll, följer direkt av det åtagandet. Planen behandlar inte hyresmodellen som sådan, men dess krav på stabila villkor för kulturinstitutioner och folkbildning pekar åt motförslagets håll.
- good conditions for cultural institutionsdecisive»Kulturpolitiken behöver skapa goda ekonomiska villkor för såväl« (party programme ↗)“Cultural policy needs to create good economic conditions for both”
- culture throughout the country»Det är viktigt att kulturen står fri från såväl kommersiell som politisk styrning och finns i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is important that culture stands free from both commercial and political control and exists throughout the country.”
- invest in popular education»Därför är det särskilt viktigt att satsa på och utveckla folkbiblioteken, folkbildningen och public services oberoende ställning.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“That is why it is especially important to invest in and develop public libraries, popular education and public service's independent standing.”
- counter depleted culture»Även kulturen och idrotten har utarmats när skolbibliotek läggs ned, simskolan blivit dyrare och biografer finns på färre orter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Culture and sports have also been depleted when school libraries are closed, swimming pools become more expensive and cinemas exist in fewer places.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan binds the party to a living and free cultural life and to adult education as democratic infrastructure, which supports the counter-proposal's demand for continued support to the idea-driven work-life museums.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan binds the party to a living and free cultural life and to adult education as democratic infrastructure, which supports the counter-proposal's demand for continued support to the idea-driven work-life museums. The party programme establishes that access to culture shall not be a class issue and that children shall encounter professional culture, which speaks for a statement that protects the institutions when the lease model is reformed. The plan says nothing about the lease model's technical design.
Original (Swedish)
Planen binder partiet vid ett levande och fritt kulturliv och vid folkbildningen som demokratisk infrastruktur, vilket bär motförslagets krav på fortsatt stöd till de idéburna arbetslivsmuseerna. Partiprogrammet slår fast att tillgången till kultur inte ska vara en klassfråga och att barn ska möta professionell kultur, vilket talar för ett uttalande som skyddar institutionerna när hyresmodellen görs om. Planen säger däremot inget om hyresmodellens tekniska utformning.
- free and independent cultural lifedecisive»Sverige ska ha ett levande, fritt och obundet kulturliv som både stärker samhörigheten och utmanar.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden shall have a living, free and independent cultural life that both strengthens unity and challenges.”
- culture not a class issue»Tillgången till kultur och bildning ska inte vara en klassfråga.« (party programme ↗)“Access to culture and education shall not be a class issue.”
- adult education's role for democracy»Folkbildning ger stark demokrati och möjligheter till personlig utveckling vid sidan av den formella utbildningen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Adult education provides strong democracy and opportunities for personal development alongside formal education.”
- children's access to culture»Alla elever i skola och förskola möter professionell kultur minst en gång om året.« (party programme ↗)“All pupils in school and preschool encounter professional culture at least once a year.”
The election manifesto promises a broad recovery plan for cultural life that explicitly includes non-profit actors, which is precisely the group labour-life museums belong to.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto promises a broad recovery plan for cultural life that explicitly includes non-profit actors, which is precisely the group labour-life museums belong to. The party programme moreover places a public responsibility for access to culture and for making cultural heritage accessible via museums. Ensuring that a new rental model does not damage institutions follows from the same commitment.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet lovar en bred återhämtningsplan för kulturlivet som uttryckligen omfattar även ideella aktörer, vilket är precis den grupp arbetslivsmuseerna tillhör. Partiprogrammet lägger dessutom ett offentligt ansvar för tillgången till kultur och för att tillgängliggöra kulturarvet via museerna. Att säkra att en ny hyresmodell inte skadar institutionerna följer av samma åtagande.
- support also for non-profit cultural actorsdecisive»satsa på en bred återhämtningsplan för kulturlivet i hela landet, som omfattar både offentliga, fria, professionella och ideella aktörer.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“invest in a broad recovery plan for cultural life throughout the country, which includes both public, free, professional and non-profit actors.”
- museums' role for cultural heritage»Museer spelar en viktig roll i att tillgängliggöra vårt kulturarv för allmänheten.« (party programme ↗)“Museums play an important role in making our cultural heritage accessible to the public.”
- public responsibility for culture»Kulturen är en del av vår välfärd – därför har det offentliga ett ansvar för att säkerställa en rik och rättvis tillgång till kultur.« (party programme ↗)“Culture is part of our welfare – therefore the state has a responsibility to ensure rich and fair access to culture.”
- long-term conditions for civil society»Stöd och villkor för civilsamhället måste vara långsiktiga och tydliga.« (party programme ↗)“Support and conditions for civil society must be long-term and clear.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan makes culture throughout the country an explicit starting point and emphasises the importance of popular education and civil society for democracy.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan makes culture throughout the country an explicit starting point and emphasises the importance of popular education and civil society for democracy. The counter-proposal's requirements that the new rental model does not harm cultural institutions and that ideologically-driven workplace museums receive continued support are in line with this. However, the plan does not address the technical design of the rental model, so the support is derived from cultural policy commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Planen gör kultur i hela landet till en uttrycklig utgångspunkt och lyfter folkbildningens och civilsamhällets betydelse för demokratin. Motförslagets krav på att den nya hyresmodellen inte får skada kulturinstitutionerna och att de idéburna arbetslivsmuseerna får fortsatt stöd ligger i linje med detta. Planen talar dock inte om hyresmodellens tekniska utformning, varför stödet härleds ur de kulturpolitiska åtagandena.
- culture throughout the countrydecisive»Att tillhandahålla kultur i hela landet är en viktig utgångspunkt för Centerpartiet. Kulturen ska vara fri och oberoende, idrotten jämlik och inkluderande.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Providing culture throughout the country is an important starting point for the Centre Party. Culture shall be free and independent, sport equal and inclusive.”
- dispersed cultural activities»Statliga kulturinstitutioner ska sprida sin verksamhet i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“State cultural institutions shall spread their activities throughout the country.”
- independent popular education»En fristående folkbildning har mycket stor betydelse i tider då demokratiska värden ifrågasätts.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Independent popular education is of great importance in times when democratic values are questioned.”
- civil society's role»Det civila samhället, människornas frivilliga organisering, är en fundamental del av varje väl fungerande demokrati och välfärdsstat.« (party programme ↗)“Civil society, people's voluntary organising, is a fundamental part of every well-functioning democracy and welfare state.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan establishes that the role of museums as educational institutions shall be strengthened and that civil society funding shall be improved through broader tax deductions for donations and long-term government grants.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan establishes that the role of museums as educational institutions shall be strengthened and that civil society funding shall be improved through broader tax deductions for donations and long-term government grants. The idea-driven labor museums fall under that commitment, and the plan also wishes culture's intrinsic value to be protected against purely utilitarian purposes. The counter-proposal's demand that the new rental model not damage the institutions and for continued support to labor museums therefore follows from the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att museernas roll som bildningsinstitutioner ska stärkas och att civilsamhällets finansiering ska förbättras genom bredare gåvoavdrag och långsiktiga statsbidrag. De idéburna arbetslivsmuseerna faller under det åtagandet, och planen vill dessutom att kulturens eget värde värnas gentemot rena nyttoändamål. Motförslagets krav på att den nya hyresmodellen inte får skada institutionerna och på fortsatt stöd till arbetslivsmuseerna följer därför av planen.
- long-term support for civil societydecisive»Vi vill fortsätta förbättra civilsamhällets finansiering genom både bredare skatteavdrag för gåvor och långsiktiga statsbidrag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We wish to continue improving civil society funding through both broader tax deductions for donations and long-term government grants.”
- strengthened museums»Museernas roll som bildningsinstitutioner och deras forskningsanknytning ska stärkas. Statliga museer ska ha fri entré.« (party programme ↗)“The role of museums as educational institutions and their research connection shall be strengthened. State museums shall have free admission.”
- culture's intrinsic value»Kulturpolitiken ska värna kulturens eget värde gentemot rena nyttoändamål.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Cultural policy shall protect culture's intrinsic value against purely utilitarian purposes.”
- children's access to culture»Sverige ska vara ett föredöme på området kultur av och för barn och ungdomar.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden shall be a model in the field of culture of and for children and youth.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires that the public give the arts good conditions and support, but not control, the cultural activities that civil society conducts - which is exactly what the idea-driven working-life museums are.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires that the public give the arts good conditions and support, but not control, the cultural activities that civil society conducts - which is exactly what the idea-driven working-life museums are. The state is moreover responsible for cultural infrastructure throughout the country and for stewardship of cultural heritage. The counter-proposal's requirements for continued support and that the new rental model does not damage the institutions follow from these commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Planen ålägger det offentliga att ge konstarterna goda villkor och att stödja, men inte styra, den kulturverksamhet som civilsamhället bedriver - vilket är precis vad de idéburna arbetslivsmuseerna är. Staten ansvarar dessutom för en kulturell infrastruktur i hela landet och för att förvalta kulturarvet. Motförslagets krav på fortsatt stöd och på att den nya hyresmodellen inte skadar institutionerna följer av dessa åtaganden.
- public responsibility for the artsdecisive»Det offentliga har ansvar för att konstarterna får goda villkor att verka.« (party programme ↗)“The public has responsibility for the arts to have good conditions to operate.”
- support for civil society culture»samhället ska stödjas av det offentliga, men inte styras« (party programme ↗)“society shall be supported by the public, but not controlled”
- cultural infrastructure throughout the country»brukar benämnas en kulturell infrastruktur, i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“is usually called cultural infrastructure, throughout the country.”
- stewardship of cultural heritage»En god kulturpolitik måste sträva efter att ta tillvara det värdefulla kulturella arv som tidigare« (party programme ↗)“A good cultural policy must strive to preserve the valuable cultural heritage that previously”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan contains no commitments about museums' rental model or targeted support for work-life museums.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan contains no commitments about museums' rental model or targeted support for work-life museums. The party programme instead warns that public funding and political ambitions pose a risk to cultural life's independence, and the election manifesto identifies courts, defence and welfare as what requires prioritization during the term. Based on the closest principle, the plan therefore speaks against the counter-proposal's demands for new statements and continued targeted museum support.
Original (Swedish)
Planen innehåller inga åtaganden om museernas hyresmodell eller riktat stöd till arbetslivsmuseer. Idéprogrammet varnar tvärtom för att offentlig finansiering och politiska ambitioner utgör en risk för kulturlivets självständighet, och valmanifestet pekar ut rättsväsende, försvar och välfärd som det som kräver prioritering under mandatperioden. Utifrån närmast liggande princip talar planen därför mot motförslagets krav på nya uttalanden och fortsatt riktat museistöd.
- risk with political cultural fundingdecisive»offentlig finansiering och politiska ambitioner utgör en risk« (party programme ↗)“public funding and political ambitions pose a risk”
- independent cultural institutions»Målet ska vara självständiga institutioner som i sin verksamhet« (party programme ↗)“The goal should be independent institutions that in their operations”
- prioritization of core tasks»De stora behoven inom rättsväsendet, försvaret och välfärden ställer stora krav på prioriteringar under åren som kommer.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The large needs in courts, defence and welfare place large demands on prioritization in the years to come.”
- prioritize and exclude»Politiken har en viktig uppgift att prioritera och välja bort« (party programme ↗)“Politics has an important task to prioritize and exclude”
The plan states that the party wants to protect, cherish and display Swedish culture and that preservation of cultural heritage belongs to what should be financed by the public.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that the party wants to protect, cherish and display Swedish culture and that preservation of cultural heritage belongs to what should be financed by the public. Labour museums are idea-driven cultural heritage bearers, and continued support to them and a guarantee that the new rental model does not damage cultural institutions align with this. The plan also protects cultural institutions' independence, which speaks for securing their economic conditions.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att partiet vill värna, vårda och visa svensk kultur och att kulturarvets bevarande hör till det som ska finansieras av det offentliga. Arbetslivsmuseerna är idéburna kulturarvsbärare, och ett fortsatt stöd till dem samt en garanti för att den nya hyresmodellen inte skadar kulturinstitutionerna ligger i linje med detta. Planen värnar också kulturinstitutionernas oberoende, vilket talar för att säkra deras ekonomiska villkor.
- protect Swedish cultural heritagedecisive»Sverigedemokraterna vill värna, vårda och visa svensk kultur.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Sweden Democrats want to protect, cherish and display Swedish culture.”
- publicly financed cultural heritage»bevarandet av kulturarvet, utbildningen och omhändertagandet av svaga och sjuka« (party programme ↗)“preservation of cultural heritage, education and care of vulnerable and sick”
- cultural institutions' independence»Samtidigt ska oberoende kulturinstitutioners frihet från politiska pekpinnar värnas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“At the same time, the freedom of independent cultural institutions from political interference must be protected.”
- citizen-oriented cultural funds»Fördela offentliga kulturmedel och utforma offentliga miljöer med ett större medborgarinflytande« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Allocate public cultural funds and design public environments with greater citizen participation”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:KrU4)
- Committee report full text (HD01KrU4)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:1009 — Världsarvet Hälsingegårdar av Daniel Persson (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:101 — Museum för varvs- och industrihistoria i Göteborg av Björn Tidland (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:104 — Avveckling av Världskulturmuseet och inrättande av ett museum för runstenar av Björn Tidland (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:106 — Bevarandeprogram för runstenar av Björn Tidland (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1181 — Höjning av den kyrkoantikvariska ersättningen av Kerstin Lundgren (C)
- Motion 2025/26:1255 — Arkivens betydelse för demokratin av Denis Begic m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1258 — Modernisering av kulturmiljölagen av Inga-Lill Sjöblom och Ardalan Shekarabi (båda S)
- Motion 2025/26:129 — Skärpta straff för plundring, skadegörelse och illegal handel med svenska fornminnen och kulturarv av Rashid Farivar (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1475 — Kyrkoantikvarisk ersättning av Mirja Räihä m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1483 — Bevarande av minnet av varvsindustrin av Niklas Karlsson (S)
- Motion 2025/26:167 — Skydd av kristna palestinier samt bevarande av kyrkor och kristna institutioner i Palestina och Israel av Jamal El-Haj (-)
- Motion 2025/26:168 — al-Aqsamoskéns betydelse och behovet av svensk markering av Jamal El-Haj (-)
- Motion 2025/26:1704 — Möjlighet att förvara och visa vissa kulturarvsföremål i deras hemort av Staffan Eklöf (SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1740 — Kulturarvet Uppåkra av Boriana Åberg m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1800 — Krafttag mot antisemitism av Magnus Jacobsson (KD)
- Motion 2025/26:1864 — Likvärdiga ekonomiska förutsättningar för museer av Sanne Lennström (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1880 — Minnesmonument över folkmordet i Srebrenica av Laila Naraghi m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1968 — Höga kostnader för arkeologiska undersökningar av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2000 — Etablering av ett nationellt seyfocenter i Sverige av Yusuf Aydin (KD)
- Motion 2025/26:2001 — Stöd till det kristna kulturarvet i Turkiet av Yusuf Aydin (KD)
Source: The Swedish Parliament