2025-05-142024/25:CU16 · p.3CUCivil law & housing
Segregation
Segregation and the state's responsibility in the new urban development strategy
What's at stake: How urban planning addresses differences between residential areas - in employment, school results, health and safety - affects living conditions for residents of disadvantaged areas and, in turn, cohesion within cities.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the government's new urban development strategy does enough to counter segregation and social gaps between residential areas, or whether the government should return with a strategy that explicitly aims to reduce segregation.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee welcomes the government's new strategy and notes that it contains 13 focus areas to strengthen municipalities', regions' and other actors' ability to develop lively, safe urban environments, and that the government is already pursuing broad work across several policy areas - including planning, building and environmental legislation - to support sustainable urban development. Against that background, the committee sees no need for further measures and rejects the motions.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 3 (S, MP)
The reservation (S, MP) argues that the government has struck out the ambitions to counter segregation in the new strategy, even though residential areas within the same city can differ sharply in unemployment, school results, health and exposure to crime. It wants urban planning to be actively used to narrow the gaps - through mixed housing, more homes for different groups and non-commercial meeting places - and for the government to return with a strategy that includes concrete measures against segregation.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 3 by S, MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have gone the other way
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: KDKristdemokraterna, LLiberalerna, VVänsterpartiet
Ja 195–109Nej 144–160
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Yes 21/0/0/3 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| S | No | No 0/93/0/13 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| MP | No | No 0/15/0/3 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | No | Yes 21/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: medium | explicit |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | Yes | Yes 63/0/0/9 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2024/25:3342 by Jennie Nilsson et al. (S) demand 2 and 2024/25:3346 by Märta Stenevi et al. (MP) demand 5.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2024/25:3342 av Jennie Nilsson m.fl. (S) yrkande 2 och 2024/25:3346 av Märta Stenevi m.fl. (MP) yrkande 5.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag has considered the government's statement on a new strategy for lively and safe cities. The statement concerns a new direction for urban development policy with a new national goal for urban development. The statement contains 13 focus areas for national urban development policy that aim to ensure that Sweden's cities, based on their conditions, develop into lively, safe and robust cities. The Riksdag welcomes the government's new strategy and the new national goal for urban development. The Riksdag sent the government's statement to the records, that is, concluded the matter.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants the state to take greater responsibility for urban development with tools to reduce societal divisions. (S, MP) — Reservation 3
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan explicitly says that segregation shall be broken up through a mixing of house types and tenure forms, so that people meet in everyday life, and that housing shall be part of urban development with greenery, meeting places and services.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly says that segregation shall be broken up through a mixing of house types and tenure forms, so that people meet in everyday life, and that housing shall be part of urban development with greenery, meeting places and services. The counter-proposal's demand that urban planning be actively used against divides and that the strategy contain concrete measures against segregation is the same commitment. The plan moreover demands massive housing construction for different groups.
Original (Swedish)
Planen säger uttryckligen att segregationen ska brytas upp genom en blandning av hustyper och upplåtelseformer, så att människor möts i vardagen, och att bostäderna ska vara del av ett samhällsbygge med grönska, mötesplatser och service. Motförslagets krav på att stadsplaneringen aktivt används mot klyftorna och att strategin innehåller konkreta åtgärder mot segregation är samma åtagande. Planen kräver dessutom massivt bostadsbyggande för olika grupper.
- mixed tenure forms against segregationdecisive»Vi vill bryta upp segregationen och skapa en blandning av hustyper och« (party programme ↗)“We want to break up segregation and create a mix of house types and”
- non-commercial meeting places»skapar goda boendemiljöer med skyddande grönska, mötesplatser,« (party programme ↗)“creates good living environments with protective greenery, meeting places,”
- massive housing construction»Vänsterpartiets nästa steg handlar om en politik för massivt bostadsbyggande, klimatsmarta renoveringar och sänkta hyror som går hand i hand med den gröna omställningen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party's next step concerns a policy for massive housing construction, climate-smart renovations and lower rents that go hand in hand with the green transition.”
- welfare as a tool against segregation»Sverige utvecklas. Full sysselsättning, bostäder och välfärd är kraftfulla verktyg för att bryta upp segregation och rasistiska strukturer.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden develops. Full employment, housing and welfare are powerful tools for breaking up segregation and racist structures.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto makes it a main task to get to the bottom of the causes of housing segregation and demands that housing and tenancy forms shall be mixed – exactly what the counter-proposal wants urban planning to be used for.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto makes it a main task to get to the bottom of the causes of housing segregation and demands that housing and tenancy forms shall be mixed – exactly what the counter-proposal wants urban planning to be used for. The party programme wants urban development that creates integrated and varied living environments and points to public housing's role in countering segregation.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet gör det till en huvuduppgift att gå till botten med orsakerna till boendesegregationen och kräver att boende- och upplåtelseformer ska vara blandade – exakt det motförslaget vill att stadsplaneringen används till. Partiprogrammet vill ha ett stadsbyggande som skapar integrerade och variationsrika livsmiljöer och pekar på allmännyttans roll för att motverka segregation.
- mixed tenancy formsdecisive»Boende- och upplåtelseformer ska vara blandade.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Housing and tenancy forms shall be mixed.”
- break housing segregation»Gå till botten med orsakerna till boendesegrega tionen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Get to the bottom of the causes of housing segregation.”
- integrated living environments»framtidsinriktat stadsbyggande som skapar integrerade, variationsrika och transportsnåla« (party programme ↗)“forward-looking urban development that creates integrated, varied and climate-smart”
- public housing against segregation»för att hålla nere boendekostnaderna och för att motverka segregation.« (party programme ↗)“to keep down housing costs and to counter segregation.”
flags: citat_migrerat
The plan states that housing policy shall counter segregation and that new construction shall be seen as a tool to reduce segregation, rather than increase divisions between parts of the city.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that housing policy shall counter segregation and that new construction shall be seen as a tool to reduce segregation, rather than increase divisions between parts of the city. The counter-proposal's requirement for mixed building, more housing for different groups and non-commercial meeting places is the same policy in strategic form. The plan moreover wants to build more rental apartments with reasonable rents and more green space in cities.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att bostadspolitiken ska motverka segregation och att nyproduktion ska ses som ett verktyg för att minska segregationen, i stället för att öka klyftorna mellan stadens delar. Motförslagets krav på blandad bebyggelse, fler bostäder för olika grupper och icke-kommersiella mötesplatser är samma politik i strategiform. Planen vill dessutom bygga fler hyresrätter med rimliga hyror och mer grönska i städerna.
- housing policy against segregationdecisive»Miljöpartiets bostadspolitik ska motverka segregation och främja lika rättigheter.« (party programme ↗)“The Green Party's housing policy shall counter segregation and promote equal rights.”
- planning against segregation»ses som ett verktyg för att minska segregationen« (party programme ↗)“be seen as a tool to reduce segregation”
- mixed tenure forms»bygga fler klimatsmarta hyresrätter med rimliga hyror, utveckla och utöka investeringsstödet som gjorde det billigare att bygga och se till att fler kan äga sin bostad.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“build more climate-smart rental apartments with reasonable rents, develop and expand the investment support that made it cheaper to build and ensure that more can own their home.”
- vibrant urban environments»investera i mer natur och grönska i städer och tätorter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“invest in more nature and green space in cities and towns.”
The plan states that Sweden is segregated and that reversing this must be a main priority for the next term, and the party programme requires a more open housing market where no one is forced to live segregated.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that Sweden is segregated and that reversing this must be a main priority for the next term, and the party programme requires a more open housing market where no one is forced to live segregated. That urban planning is actively used with mixed buildings and housing for different groups follows from that commitment, as does the goal of equal opportunities throughout the country. The plan therefore supports the requirement for a strategy with concrete measures against segregation.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att Sverige är segregerat och att vända detta måste vara en huvudprioritet nästa mandatperiod, och partiprogrammet kräver en öppnare bostadsmarknad där ingen tvingas bo segregerat. Att stadsplaneringen används aktivt med blandad bebyggelse och bostäder för olika grupper följer av det åtagandet, liksom av målet om likvärdiga möjligheter i hela landet. Planen stödjer därför kravet på en strategi med konkreta åtgärder mot segregation.
- break segregationdecisive»Sverige är segregerat mellan dem med och utan jobb, mellan de som är födda här och i andra länder, mellan dem med och utan utbildning. Att vända detta måste vara en huvudprioritet inför nästa mandatperiod.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden is segregated between those with and without jobs, between those born here and in other countries, between those with and without education. Reversing this must be a main priority for the next term.”
- more open housing market»Även bostadsmarknaden måste bli öppnare.« (party programme ↗)“The housing market must also become more open.”
- equal opportunities»Ett centralt mål för Centerpartiet är att det ska finnas likvärdiga möjligheter att växa upp, gå i skolan, arbeta, bo och driva företag i hela vårt land.« (party programme ↗)“A central goal for the Centre Party is that there be equal opportunities to grow up, go to school, work, live and run a business throughout our country.”
- living urban environments»Vi vill att varje invånare har närhet till grönska, med hög biologisk mångfald, fler parker och renare vatten.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want every resident to have proximity to greenery, with high biological diversity, more parks and cleaner water.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan sets as its most important goal that Sweden shall not have a single disadvantaged area in 2030 and specifies explicitly the built environment as the tool: disadvantage shall be built away with safer neighborhoods where more can own their housing.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan sets as its most important goal that Sweden shall not have a single disadvantaged area in 2030 and specifies explicitly the built environment as the tool: disadvantage shall be built away with safer neighborhoods where more can own their housing. The counter-proposal's demand that urban planning is actively used against disparities, with mixed construction and housing for different groups, is the same commitment. The plan also emphasizes that attractive public spaces increase security, which supports the demand for meeting places.
Original (Swedish)
Planen sätter som viktigaste mål att Sverige inte ska ha ett enda utsatt område 2030 och anger uttryckligen bebyggelsen som verktyget: utsattheten ska byggas bort med tryggare kvarter där fler kan äga sitt boende. Motförslagets krav på att stadsplaneringen aktivt används mot klyftorna, med blandad bebyggelse och bostäder för olika grupper, är samma åtagande. Planen betonar också att attraktiva offentliga rum ökar tryggheten, vilket stödjer kravet på mötesplatser.
- build away disadvantagedecisive»Därför måste vi också bygga bort utsattheten med tryggare kvarter där fler kan äga sitt boende och där fastighetsägare och det offentliga samarbetar långsiktigt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore we must also build away disadvantage with safer neighborhoods where more can own their housing and where property owners and the public cooperate long-term.”
- no disadvantaged areas 2030»Vårt viktigaste mål är detta: Sverige ska år 2030 inte ha ett enda utsatt område.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Our most important goal is this: Sweden shall in 2030 not have a single disadvantaged area.”
- mixed tenure forms»Kommunala bostadsbolag ska både arbeta för att fler hyresrätter i utsatta områden omvandlas till bostadsrätter och för att få fler med egen försörjning och färre med försörjningsstöd att flytta till utsatta områden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Municipal housing companies shall both work for more rental apartments in disadvantaged areas to be converted to owner-occupied apartments and for more with own support and fewer with support allowance to move to disadvantaged areas.”
- attractive public spaces»Attraktiva offentliga rum ökar känslan av trygghet.« (party programme ↗)“Attractive public spaces increase the sense of security.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The party programme establishes that all city districts and residential areas should have varied tenure forms to achieve a natural mix of people, and that ethnic, social and economic segregation is thereby counteracted.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme establishes that all city districts and residential areas should have varied tenure forms to achieve a natural mix of people, and that ethnic, social and economic segregation is thereby counteracted. The counter-proposal's requirements for mixed development, more housing for different groups and concrete measures against segregation are exactly this. The plan also wants housing area planning to create spaces for people to meet.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att det i alla stadsdelar och bostadsområden bör finnas varierande upplåtelseformer för att få en naturlig blandning av människor, och att etnisk, social och ekonomisk segregation därigenom motverkas. Motförslagets krav på blandad bebyggelse, fler bostäder för olika grupper och konkreta åtgärder mot segregation är just detta. Planen vill dessutom att bostadsområdesplanering skapar utrymmen för människor att mötas.
- mixed tenure forms against segregationdecisive»Strävan bör vara att det i alla stadsdelar och bostadsområden ska finnas varierande upplåtelseformer, för att därigenom få till stånd en naturlig blandning av åldrar och människor med olika bakgrund och ekonomiska förutsättningar. Därigenom motverkas etnisk, social och ekonomisk segregation.« (party programme ↗)“The aim should be that in all city districts and residential areas there should be varied tenure forms, to thereby achieve a natural mix of ages and people with different backgrounds and economic conditions. Thereby ethnic, social and economic segregation is counteracted.”
- meeting places in residential areas»Ett sådant synsätt medför att man vid bostadsområdesplanering skapar utrymmen för människor att mötas i små gemenskaper« (party programme ↗)“Such an approach means that when planning residential areas, spaces are created for people to meet in small communities”
- planning for small communities»allt samhällsbyggande ska ske utifrån människans behov av de små gemenskaperna« (party programme ↗)“all community building should take place based on people's need for small communities”
- improved integration»FÖRBÄTTRAD INTEGRATION« (2022 manifesto ↗)“IMPROVED INTEGRATION”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan's answer to segregation is the quality of teaching, the Swedish language and replacing the benefit line with the work line, not using urban planning as a distribution tool.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's answer to segregation is the quality of teaching, the Swedish language and replacing the benefit line with the work line, not using urban planning as a distribution tool. It explicitly rejects large-scale social experiments for mixing groups and wants to simplify planning processes rather than imposing new societal goals on them. The plan therefore speaks against the counter-proposal's requirement for a strategy that actively directs built development toward reduced segregation.
Original (Swedish)
Planens svar på segregationen är undervisningens kvalitet, det svenska språket och att bidragslinjen ersätts av arbetslinjen, inte att stadsplaneringen används som fördelningsinstrument. Den avvisar uttryckligen storskaliga sociala experiment för att blanda grupper och vill förenkla planprocesserna snarare än att lägga nya samhällsmål på dem. Planen talar därför emot motförslagets krav på en strategi som aktivt styr bebyggelsen mot minskad segregation.
- school and language break segregationdecisive»De enskilt viktigaste åtgärderna för att bryta segregationen handlar om kvaliteten i undervisningen och det svenska språket.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The single most important measures to break segregation are about the quality of teaching and the Swedish language.”
- no to social experiments»Vi säger därför bestämt nej till storskaliga experiment med kvotering, lottning eller tvångsbussning av elever.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We therefore firmly say no to large-scale experiments with quotas, lotteries or compulsory bussing of pupils.”
- simpler planning processes»Ersätta avancerade detaljplaner med enklare byggplaner« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Replace advanced detailed plans with simpler building plans”
- work-line breaks exclusion»Där bidragslinjen ersätts av arbetslinjen så att fler kan komma till sin rätt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Where the benefit line is replaced by the work line so that more can come into their own.”
The plan states that extensive investments in schools, welfare and housing in segregated areas have failed and wants to stop student bussing and other integration experiments.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that extensive investments in schools, welfare and housing in segregated areas have failed and wants to stop student bussing and other integration experiments. Segregation should instead be met by reduced immigration and return migration that eases pressure on the housing market. Building an urban development strategy around mixed development and non-commercial meeting places is precisely the kind of area-focused measure the plan rejects.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att omfattande satsningar på skola, välfärd och bostäder i segregerade områden misslyckats och vill stoppa bussning av elever och andra integrationsexperiment. Segregationen ska i stället mötas genom minskad invandring och återvandring som lättar trycket på bostadsmarknaden. Att bygga en stadsutvecklingsstrategi kring blandad bebyggelse och icke-kommersiella mötesplatser är just en sådan områdesinriktad åtgärd som planen underkänner.
- failed area investmentsdecisive»Trots att kostnaden för integrationspolitiska åtgärder och för satsningar på skola, välfärd och bostäder i segregerade områden varit omfattande, har politiken misslyckats i sådan grad att andra generationens invandrare är mer benägna att begå brott än sina föräldrar och i stor grad utgör rekryteringsbasen för gängen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Despite integration policy measures and investments in schools, welfare and housing in segregated areas having been extensive in cost, the policy has failed to such a degree that second-generation immigrants are more likely to commit crimes than their parents and to a large extent form the recruitment base for gangs.”
- return migration against segregation»Minska migrationens påfrestning på bostadsmarknaden genom återvandring« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce pressure on the housing market through return migration”
- against integration experiments»Stoppa bussning av elever och andra integrationsexperiment« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Stop student bussing and other integration experiments”
- safe and pleasant areas»Sverigedemokraterna vill verka för trivsamma och trygga områden med klassisk arkitektur.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Sweden Democrats want to work for pleasant and safe areas with classical architecture.”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2024/25:CU16)
- Committee report full text (HC01CU16)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2024/25:3342 — med anledning av skr. 2024/25:96 Ny strategi för levande och trygga städer av Jennie Nilsson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2024/25:3346 — med anledning av skr. 2024/25:96 Ny strategi för levande och trygga städer av Märta Stenevi m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2024/25:3347 — med anledning av skr. 2024/25:96 Ny strategi för levande och trygga städer av Alireza Akhondi m.fl. (C)
- Regeringens skrivelse 2024/25:96 — Ny strategi för levande och trygga städer
Source: The Swedish Parliament