2024-04-112023/24:FöU4 · p.3FöUDefence

Defense Music

Organisation of Armed Forces music and a new music corps in northern Sweden

What's at stake: The outcome affects access to Armed Forces music activity in northern Sweden, where none of the army's full-time music corps are currently based, and the potential to strengthen the region's cultural and musical life as new military units are established there.

Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.

What the vote decides

The question is whether a new, full-time military music corps based in northern Sweden is needed to meet growing demand for Armed Forces music, or whether the Armed Forces' current organisation of its music activities is sufficient.

Yes Yes — the committee proposal

The committee opposes all the claims concerning Armed Forces music and points to its recurring position that the Armed Forces itself decides on its organisation in matters not regulated by its instruction, and therefore sees no reason for parliament to decide on a new music corps.

No No — the reservations

Reservation 4 (MP)

The reservation (MP) wants to establish a further professional military music corps, based in northern Sweden, arguing that demand for Armed Forces music has grown alongside the defence build-up, that none of the army's full-time music corps is currently based in the north, and that a new corps would strengthen the region's cultural and musical life.

Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.

VSMPCLKDMSD
YesNoAbstainAbsent

What do the votes mean here?

Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).

No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 4 by MP.

Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.

What each plan points to — and how the party voted

For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.

PlanVoteConfidenceEvidence
VYesYes 20/0/0/4follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
SNoYes 92/0/0/14departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
MPown reservationYesNo 0/13/0/5departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
CNoYes 19/0/0/5departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed
LYesYes 13/0/0/3follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
KDNoYes 14/0/0/5departs from the planconfidence: lowderived
MYesYes 59/0/0/9follows the planconfidence: lownot addressed
SDNoYes 61/0/0/11departs from the planconfidence: lownot addressed

Committee proposal

Parliament rejects motion 2023/24:904 by Amanda Lind et al. (MP) propositions 1-4.

Original (Swedish)

Riksdagen avslår motion 2023/24:904 av Amanda Lind m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 1-4.

Riksdag decision: Parliament said no to approximately 40 proposals in motions about military matters from the general motion period in 2023. The motions concern, among other things, the Armed Forces' organization and capacity and the Armed Forces' cooperation with other agencies. Parliament refers, among other things, to ongoing work.

Counter-proposals

Plan vs actual vote

Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.

VVänsterpartietYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan says nothing about defence music.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan says nothing about defence music. The closest principle is that Sweden shall be a voice for peace and not for increased militarization, and that resources should go to welfare, climate and jobs instead; the counter-proposal justifies the new corps precisely with defence expansion. The plan's demand for culture throughout the country pulls in the other direction but weighs less, because it concerns free culture and not a military institution.

Original (Swedish)

Planen säger ingenting om försvarsmusiken. Närmast liggande princip är att Sverige ska vara en röst för fred och inte för ökad militarisering, och att resurserna hellre ska gå till välfärd, klimat och jobb; motförslaget motiverar den nya kåren just med försvarets utbyggnad. Planens krav på kultur i hela landet drar åt andra hållet men väger lättare, eftersom det gäller en fri kultur och inte en militär institution.

  • no to increased militarizationdecisive»Vänsterpartiet anser att Sverige ska vara en röst för fred och rättvisa, inte för ökad militarisering.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Left Party considers that Sweden shall be a voice for peace and justice, not for increased militarization.”
  • resources to welfare»Att vi i Vänsterpartiet anser att mycket mer resurser ska och kan satsas på välfärd, klimatinvesteringar, vård och jobbpolitik än vad de andra partierna gör« (2022 manifesto ↗)“That we in the Left Party consider that much more resources should and can be invested in welfare, climate investments, healthcare and job policy than what the other parties do”
  • free culture throughout the country»Det är viktigt att kulturen står fri från såväl kommersiell som politisk styrning och finns i hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It is important that culture is free from both commercial and political control and exists throughout the country.”
SSocialdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan says nothing about Defence Music.

Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan says nothing about Defence Music. The closest commitments are that institutions for professional cultural life shall exist throughout the country, that the whole country shall be able to live and develop, and that defence rearmament shall provide strengthened military presence throughout the country. The counter-proposal's demand for a music corps in the north is in line with these, but the evidence is weak and the support is derived.

Original (Swedish)

Planen säger ingenting om Försvarsmusiken. Närmast liggande åtaganden är att institutioner för det professionella kulturlivet ska finnas över hela landet, att hela landet ska kunna leva och utvecklas, och att försvarsupprustningen ska ge förstärkt militär närvaro över hela landet. Motförslagets krav på en musikkår i norr ligger i linje med dessa, men underlaget är svagt och stödet härlett.

  • cultural institutions throughout the countrydecisive»Institutioner för det professionella kulturlivet ska därför finnas över hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“Institutions for professional cultural life shall therefore exist throughout the country.”
  • military presence throughout the country»Vi vill att ökningen ska omsättas i bland annat fler värnpliktiga, modern materiel samt förstärkt militär närvaro över hela landet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want the increase to be converted into, among other things, more conscripts, modern equipment and strengthened military presence throughout the country.”
  • the whole country shall thrive»Alla har ett gemensamt intresse av att hela landet kan leva och utvecklas.« (party programme ↗)“Everyone has a common interest in the whole country being able to live and develop.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MPMiljöpartietYesNodeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan says nothing about military music corps.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan says nothing about military music corps. The closest commitment is that a larger share of defence spending should go to civil defence and that Sweden should contribute to military disarmament, which speaks against expanding the Armed Forces' organization with a new corps. The party's support for cultural life throughout the country is channeled in the plan through regional cultural activities, not through the armed forces.

Original (Swedish)

Planen säger inget om militärmusikkårer. Närmast liggande åtagande är att en större andel av försvarets pengar ska gå till det civila försvaret och att Sverige ska bidra till militär nedrustning, vilket talar emot att bygga ut Försvarsmaktens organisation med en ny kår. Partiets stöd till kulturliv i hela landet kanaliseras i planen genom regional kulturverksamhet, inte genom försvaret.

  • civil defence is prioritizeddecisive»satsa en större andel av försvarets pengar på det civila försvaret, och öka anslagen till krisberedskap.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“allocate a larger share of defence spending to civil defence, and increase appropriations for crisis preparedness.”
  • military disarmament»Sverige ska bidra till militär nedrustning i världen.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden shall contribute to military disarmament in the world.”
  • regional cultural activities»Därför satsar vi på regional kulturverksamhet som till exempel museer och folkbibliotek.« (party programme ↗)“Therefore we invest in regional cultural activities such as museums and public libraries.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

CCenterpartietNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan makes culture throughout the country an explicit starting point, and the party programme states that state cultural institutions should spread their activities throughout the country.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan makes culture throughout the country an explicit starting point, and the party programme states that state cultural institutions should spread their activities throughout the country. That no full-time military music band exists in northern Sweden is at odds with that principle, and a new band in the north would strengthen the region's cultural and musical life. However, the plan does not address defence music, and at the same time it requires that public funds be used sparingly, which is why the conclusion is uncertain.

Original (Swedish)

Planen gör kultur i hela landet till en uttalad utgångspunkt, och partiprogrammet slår fast att statliga kulturinstitutioner ska sprida sin verksamhet över landet. Att ingen heltidsanställd militärmusikkår finns i norra Sverige står i strid med den principen, och en ny kår i norr skulle stärka regionens kultur- och musikliv. Planen behandlar dock inte försvarsmusiken, och den kräver samtidigt att skattemedel används sparsamt, varför slutsatsen är osäker.

  • culture throughout the countrydecisive»Att tillhandahålla kultur i hela landet är en viktig utgångspunkt för Centerpartiet. Kulturen ska vara fri och oberoende, idrotten jämlik och inkluderande.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Providing culture throughout the country is an important starting point for the Centre Party. Culture should be free and independent, sport should be fair and inclusive.”
  • state culture spread geographically»Statliga kulturinstitutioner ska sprida sin verksamhet i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“State cultural institutions should spread their activities throughout the country.”
  • be economical with tax revenue»Politiken ska hushålla med skattebetalarnas pengar. Mer pengar ska läggas på välfärdens kärna, mindre på bidrag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Policy should be economical with taxpayers' money. More money should go to the core of welfare, less to subsidies.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

LLiberalernaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan says nothing about military music.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan says nothing about military music. Closest lying commitments point away from the proposal: culturally the plan wants the state to control less and that cultural creators, not politicians, make decisions about support, and defense-wise the entire budget increase is bound to strengthening the army's, navy's and air force's capabilities. That a politician decides on a new music corps lies outside both these lines.

Original (Swedish)

Planen säger ingenting om militärmusiken. Närmast liggande åtaganden pekar bort från förslaget: kulturpolitiskt vill planen att staten ska styra mindre och att kulturskapare, inte politiker, fattar besluten om stöd, och försvarspolitiskt är hela anslagsökningen bunden till att stärka arméns, marinens och flygvapnets förmåga. Att politiskt besluta om en ny musikkår ligger utanför båda dessa linjer.

  • politicians should not control culturedecisive»Därför vill vi att staten ska styra mindre och att det ska vara kulturskapare och inte politiker som fattar besluten om stöd.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore we want the state to control less and it shall be cultural creators and not politicians who make decisions about support.”
  • defense budget for combat capability»Vi vill därför redan 2025 se ett försvarsanslag om 2 procent av BNP och därmed skapa tillräckliga förutsättningar att stärka både armen, marinen och flygvapnet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We therefore want to see as early as 2025 a defense budget of 2 percent of GDP and thereby create sufficient conditions to strengthen both the army, navy and air force.”
  • culture's accessibility»Det offentliga ska på alla nivåer gynna mångfalden av kulturuttryck, öka kulturens tillgänglighet« (party programme ↗)“The public shall at all levels promote the diversity of cultural expression, increase access to culture”
KDKristdemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the planderived

The plan does not address defence music, but it gives the public responsibility for the arts to have good conditions and for culture to actively reach citizens, and establishes that the whole of Sweden shall live.

Plan documents: party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan does not address defence music, but it gives the public responsibility for the arts to have good conditions and for culture to actively reach citizens, and establishes that the whole of Sweden shall live. A professional music corps in the north, where no full-time corps exists, is in that direction. At the same time, the subsidiarity principle speaks to the activity itself getting to decide its organisation, so the foundation is weak.

Original (Swedish)

Planen behandlar inte försvarsmusiken, men den ger det offentliga ansvar för att konstarterna får goda villkor och för att kulturen aktivt kommer medborgarna till del, och slår fast att hela Sverige ska leva. En professionell musikkår i norr, där ingen heltidskår finns, ligger i den riktningen. Samtidigt talar subsidiaritetsprincipen för att verksamheten själv bör få avgöra sin organisation, varför underlaget är svagt.

  • public responsibility for the artsdecisive»Det offentliga har ansvar för att konstarterna får goda villkor att verka.« (party programme ↗)“The public has responsibility for the arts to have good conditions to operate.”
  • culture shall reach citizens»Det offentliga ska inte bara garantera kulturell frihet, utan också aktivt bidra till att kulturen kommer medborgarna till del.« (party programme ↗)“The public shall not only guarantee cultural freedom, but also actively contribute to culture reaching citizens.”
  • the whole country shall live»Målet är att hela Sverige ska leva och att varje kommun och region ska vara ett fungerande samhälle, där människor kan få sina grundläggande behov av arbete och service tillgodosedda.« (party programme ↗)“The goal is that the whole of Sweden shall live and that every municipality and region shall be a functioning society, where people can have their basic needs for work and services met.”
  • subsidiarity in organisation»Det en gemenskap på ett ändamålsenligt sätt kan sköta ska den också få sköta.« (party programme ↗)“What a community can manage in an appropriate way shall it also be allowed to manage.”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

MModeraternaYesYesfollows the plannot addressed

The plan says nothing about defence music.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme

Reasoning and quotes

The plan says nothing about defence music. The closest principle is that the major needs in defence place heavy demands on prioritizations and that politics must be able to rule out; the plan even wants to establish an efficiency office to free up agency resources for defence. A new military band is not such a prioritized capability increase, which is why the requirement lacks support.

Original (Swedish)

Planen säger ingenting om försvarsmusik. Den närmast liggande principen är att de stora behoven inom försvaret ställer hårda krav på prioriteringar och att politiken måste kunna välja bort; planen vill till och med inrätta ett effektiviseringskansli för att frigöra myndighetsmedel till försvaret. En ny militärmusikkår är inte en sådan prioriterad förmågehöjning, varför kravet saknar stöd.

  • hard prioritizationsdecisive»De stora behoven inom rättsväsendet, försvaret och välfärden ställer stora krav på prioriteringar under åren som kommer.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The major needs in justice, defence and welfare place heavy demands on prioritizations in the years to come.”
  • free up resources for defence»Inrätta ett effektiviseringskansli som ska gå inom alla myndigheters ekonomi för att frigöra resurser till försvaret« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Establish an efficiency office that shall review all agencies' budgets to free up resources for defence”
  • prioritize and rule out»Politiken har en viktig uppgift att prioritera och välja bort« (party programme ↗)“Politics has an important task to prioritize and rule out”
  • what can wait»Vi vet vad som måste göras – och vad som får vänta.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We know what must be done – and what can wait.”
SDSverigedemokraternaNoYesdeparts from the plannot addressed

The plan says nothing about the Defence Music.

Plan documents: 2022 manifesto

Reasoning and quotes

The plan says nothing about the Defence Music. The nearest principle is that Swedish culture should be protected, cared for and shown, that defence will and civil society's resilience should be strengthened and that policy should be conducted for all of Sweden. A new professional military music corps in northern Sweden aligns with these principles, but the evidence is weak.

Original (Swedish)

Planen säger ingenting om Försvarsmusiken. Den närmast liggande principen är att svensk kultur ska värnas, vårdas och visas, att försvarsviljan och civilsamhällets uthållighet ska stärkas och att politiken ska bedrivas för hela Sverige. En ny professionell militärmusikkår i norra Sverige ligger i linje med dessa principer, men underlaget är svagt.

  • protect Swedish culturedecisive»Sverigedemokraterna vill värna, vårda och visa svensk kultur.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Sweden Democrats want to protect, care for and show Swedish culture.”
  • strengthened defence will»Sverigedemokraterna vill också stärka Hemvärnet och frivilligorganisationer som utgör viktiga komponenter för försvarsviljan och civilsamhällets uthållighet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Sweden Democrats also want to strengthen the Home Guard and volunteer organizations that constitute important components for defence will and civil society's resilience.”
  • policy for the whole country»Bedriva en politik för hela Sverige« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Conduct a policy for all of Sweden”

The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.

Share and embed

Embed as a widget (iframe): previewSizeLanguage

Sources and documents

Documents under consideration

Source: The Swedish Parliament