2026-04-162025/26:TU15 · p.6TUTransport & infrastructure
Night trains
Night trains - the state's responsibility for night-train services
What's at stake: Night trains are often the only alternative to flying for journeys between northern and southern Sweden and contribute to the climate transition and the country's preparedness, so how the state prioritises them affects accessibility for people in sparsely populated areas and the country's resilience in a crisis.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether the government and the Swedish Transport Administration, beyond the ongoing inquiry into the state's commitment to night-train services, should already be required to safeguard and expand night-train connections between northern and southern Sweden and ensure better quality trains.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee rejects the motions and shares the government's starting point that the whole of Sweden should function. The committee notes that the Transport Administration already procures transport-policy-motivated interregional services where commercial conditions are lacking, and welcomes that the government has commissioned the Agency to examine the state's commitment to night-train services, including preparedness aspects, preferring to await that report.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 12 (S, V, C, MP)
The reservation (S, V, C, MP) calls for the Transport Administration to work swiftly to introduce new night trains that keep existing functionality and good quality, and for the government to safeguard and expand night-train connections between northern and southern Sweden and take steps to ensure night trains continue running on the same routes as today. The reasoning is that night trains are a climate-smart alternative to domestic flying and an important part of the country's resilience, but that connections have deteriorated and quality needs to improve.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 12 by S, V, C, MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
What each plan points to — and how the party voted
For each party: the vote its own election manifesto and party programme point to in this case, next to how the party actually voted. A plan can only point to Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| Plan | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/18/0/4 | follows the plan | confidence: high | not addressed |
| S | No | No 0/88/0/18 | follows the plan | confidence: high | not addressed |
| MP | No | No 0/15/0/3 | follows the plan | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | No | No 0/18/0/6 | follows the plan | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 13/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | departs from the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| M | Yes | Yes 53/0/0/13 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
| SD | Yes | Yes 59/0/0/11 | follows the plan | confidence: low | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2025/26:32 by Josef Fransson (SD), 2025/26:534 by Isak From and Björn Wiechel (both S), 2025/26:991 by Helena Lindahl and Anne-Li Sjölund (both C), 2025/26:2061 by Anders Ådahl (C), 2025/26:2695 by Mattias Jonsson and Gunilla Carlsson (both S), 2025/26:2780 by Nooshi Dadgostar et al. (V) motion 25, 2025/26:3274 by Linus Lakso et al. (MP) motion 44, 2025/26:3653 by Aylin Nouri et al. (S) motion 36 and 2025/26:3728 by Ulrika Heie et al. (C) motion 42.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:32 av Josef Fransson (SD), 2025/26:534 av Isak From och Björn Wiechel (båda S), 2025/26:991 av Helena Lindahl och Anne-Li Sjölund (båda C), 2025/26:2061 av Anders Ådahl (C), 2025/26:2695 av Mattias Jonsson och Gunilla Carlsson (båda S), 2025/26:2780 av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V) yrkande 25, 2025/26:3274 av Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP) yrkande 44, 2025/26:3653 av Aylin Nouri m.fl. (S) yrkande 36 och 2025/26:3728 av Ulrika Heie m.fl. (C) yrkande 42.
Riksdag decision: The Riksdag rejected approximately 120 proposals concerning railway and public transport issues in motions from the general motion period 2025. The proposals address matters such as the organization of railway maintenance, the railway's signal system, track fees, night trains, targets for public transport and paratransit services. The Riksdag refers, among other things, to already implemented measures and ongoing investigation and preparation work.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to establish a crisis commission for railways and consolidate railway operations into a state-owned organization. (S, V, C, MP) — Reservation 12
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan demands a long-term investment plan with expanded railways and that the state takes greater responsibility when expansion goes too slowly, while aviation is singled out as one of the transition's major challenges.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan demands a long-term investment plan with expanded railways and that the state takes greater responsibility when expansion goes too slowly, while aviation is singled out as one of the transition's major challenges. The counter-proposal's demands for new night trains and valued night train connections between northern and southern Sweden follow directly from that.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver en långsiktig investeringsplan med utbyggd järnväg och att staten tar ett större ansvar när utbyggnaden går för långsamt, samtidigt som flyget pekas ut som en av omställningens stora utmaningar. Motförslagets krav på nya nattåg och värnade nattågsförbindelser mellan norra och södra Sverige följer direkt av det.
- expanded railwaysdecisive»Det behövs en omfattande och långsiktig investeringsplan för det, som bland annat innehåller en utbyggnad av järnvägen.« (party programme ↗)“An extensive and long-term investment plan is needed for that, which among other things includes expansion of the railways.”
- state responsibility for rail traffic»Utbyggnaden av transportinfrastruktur och fiber går alldeles för sakta, staten behöver gå in och ta ett större ansvar för utbyggnaden.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The expansion of transport infrastructure and fibre is going far too slowly, the state needs to intervene and take greater responsibility for expansion.”
- reduce domestic flights»Flygtrafiken är en av de stora utmaningarna i omställningen.« (party programme ↗)“Air traffic is one of the major challenges in the transition.”
- functioning rail traffic»Renare storstadsluft, billig och fungerande tåg- och kollektivtrafik.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Cleaner city air, cheap and functioning rail and public transport.”
The election manifesto promises massive investments in both new and existing railway so that more people can travel climate-smartly by train, and the party programme wants to increase opportunities to travel collectively throughout the country.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto promises massive investments in both new and existing railway so that more people can travel climate-smartly by train, and the party programme wants to increase opportunities to travel collectively throughout the country. The counter-proposal's requirement for preserved and expanded night train connections between northern and southern Sweden follows directly from these commitments. The programme furthermore links infrastructure to preparedness, which the counter-proposal also invokes.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet lovar massiva investeringar i både ny och befintlig järnväg så att fler kan resa klimatsmart med tåg, och partiprogrammet vill öka möjligheterna att resa kollektivt i hela landet. Motförslagets krav på bevarade och utbyggda nattågsförbindelser mellan norra och södra Sverige följer direkt av dessa åtaganden. Programmet kopplar dessutom infrastrukturen till beredskapen, vilket motförslaget också åberopar.
- investments in railwaydecisive»Genom massiva investeringar i både ny och befintlig järnväg kommer fler att kunna resa klimatsmart med tåg.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Through massive investments in both new and existing railway, more will be able to travel climate-smartly by train.”
- travel collectively throughout the country»Ökade möjligheter för människor att resa kollektivt i hela landet.« (party programme ↗)“Increased opportunities for people to travel collectively throughout the country.”
- climate-smart travel»Klimatsmart resande som det billigare alternativet.« (party programme ↗)“Climate-smart travel as the cheaper alternative.”
- infrastructure for preparedness»Stark infrastruktur för stärkt beredskap.« (party programme ↗)“Strong infrastructure for strengthened preparedness.”
The election manifesto explicitly promises that night train traffic throughout Sweden shall be secured and developed with more departures, which is exactly what the counter-proposal demands.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly promises that night train traffic throughout Sweden shall be secured and developed with more departures, which is exactly what the counter-proposal demands. Night trains are also the plan's alternative to the domestic flights that should decrease. The party programme strengthens the conclusion through the requirement that trains shall be cheaper than flights and through the requirement for strong civil defence.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet lovar uttryckligen att nattågstrafiken i hela Sverige ska säkras och utvecklas med fler avgångar, vilket är precis vad motförslaget kräver. Nattåget är också planens alternativ till det inrikesflyg som ska minska. Partiprogrammet stärker slutsatsen genom att tåget ska vara billigare än flyget och genom kravet på ett starkt civilt försvar.
- secured and developed night train trafficdecisive»säkra och utveckla nattågstrafiken i hela Sverige« (2022 manifesto ↗)“secure and develop night train traffic throughout Sweden”
- reduced domestic air travel»höja flygskatten, minska flygresandet« (2022 manifesto ↗)“increase the flight tax, reduce air travel”
- train over plane»Tåget ska vara snabbare än bilen och billigare än flyget.« (party programme ↗)“The train shall be faster than the car and cheaper than the plane.”
- train traffic as a preparedness resource»civilt försvar för att effektivt skydda Sverige mot angrepp och kriser.« (party programme ↗)“civil defence to effectively protect Sweden against attacks and crises.”
The plan's commitment is to invest heavily in tomorrow's rail traffic and raise the standard of the trunk rail network throughout the country, which supports the counter-proposal's requirements for new and preserved night train connections between northern and southern Sweden.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's commitment is to invest heavily in tomorrow's rail traffic and raise the standard of the trunk rail network throughout the country, which supports the counter-proposal's requirements for new and preserved night train connections between northern and southern Sweden. The plan also requires that transport emissions be eliminated and that new emission-free infrastructure be put in place, which strengthens the night train as an alternative to domestic flights. The preparedness argument is supported by the requirement to strengthen civil defence and society's preparedness.
Original (Swedish)
Planens åtagande är att storsatsa på morgondagens tågtrafik och höja standarden på stambanenätet i hela landet, vilket bär motförslagets krav på nya och bevarade nattågsförbindelser mellan norra och södra Sverige. Planen kräver också att transporternas utsläpp ska bort och att ny utsläppsfri infrastruktur kommer på plats, vilket stärker nattåget som alternativ till inrikesflyget. Beredskapsargumentet stöds av kravet att rusta civilförsvaret och samhällets beredskap.
- major investment in rail trafficdecisive»Vi vill rusta upp regionala järnvägar, bygga nya stambanor från norr till söder, höja standarden på det nationella stambanenätet i hela landet och storsatsa på morgondagens tågtrafik« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to upgrade regional railways, build new trunk railways from north to south, raise the standard of the national trunk rail network throughout the country and invest heavily in tomorrow's rail traffic”
- emission-free transport»Transporternas utsläpp ska bort och ny utsläppsfri infrastruktur ska komma på plats.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Transport emissions must be eliminated and new emission-free infrastructure must be put in place.”
- preparedness in the transport system»Även det civila försvaret är livsviktigt. Vi måste rusta civilförsvaret och samhällets beredskap inför krig och kris.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Civil defence is also vital. We must strengthen civil defence and society's preparedness for war and crisis.”
The election manifesto establishes that fossil emissions from the transport sector shall go away, and the party programme wants to facilitate mobility throughout the country and makes continued major infrastructure investments a commitment.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto establishes that fossil emissions from the transport sector shall go away, and the party programme wants to facilitate mobility throughout the country and makes continued major infrastructure investments a commitment. Night trains as a climate-smart alternative to domestic flights and as part of resilience align with that line. The plan, however, prioritizes removing bottlenecks here and now rather than new rail initiatives, so the support is derived and uncertain.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår fast att fossilutsläppen från transportsektorn ska bort, och partiprogrammet vill underlätta rörligheten i hela landet och gör fortsatta stora infrastrukturinvesteringar till ett åtagande. Nattåg som klimatsmart alternativ till inrikesflyget och som del av motståndskraften ligger i den linjen. Planen prioriterar dock att bygga bort flaskhalsar här och nu snarare än nya tågsatsningar, så stödet är härlett och osäkert.
- fossil-free transportdecisive»Fossilutsläppen från transportsektorn ska bort.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Fossil emissions from the transport sector shall go away.”
- mobility nationwide»Rörligheten för människor, idéer, kapital, varor och tjänster ska underlättas, såväl i städer som på landsbygden.« (party programme ↗)“Mobility for people, ideas, capital, goods and services shall be facilitated, both in cities and in the countryside.”
- infrastructure investments»Sverige behöver fortsatt stora investeringar i infrastruktur.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden needs continued major infrastructure investments.”
- prioritize existing railway»Vi vill bygga bort järnvägsnätets flaskhalsar och så att tågen går i tid här och nu i stället för att lägga hundratals miljarder på en höghastighetsjärnväg som inte är klar ens om 20 år.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to remove the railway network's bottlenecks so that trains run on time here and now instead of spending hundreds of billions on a high-speed railway that is not even ready in 20 years.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan gives the state responsibility for keeping investment levels in railway infrastructure high in the long term for regional balance, and wants alternatives to road transport to be developed.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan gives the state responsibility for keeping investment levels in railway infrastructure high in the long term for regional balance, and wants alternatives to road transport to be developed. The election manifesto's demand that the whole of Sweden functions supports maintained and expanded night train connections between northern and southern Sweden. At the same time, the election manifesto prioritises road investments over expensive railway investments, which makes support less clear-cut.
Original (Swedish)
Planen ger staten ansvar för att investeringsnivån i järnvägens infrastruktur hålls långsiktigt hög för regional balans, och vill att alternativen till vägtransporter utvecklas. Valmanifestets krav på att hela Sverige ska fungera talar för bevarade och utbyggda nattågsförbindelser mellan norra och södra Sverige. Samtidigt prioriterar valmanifestet vägsatsningar framför dyra tågsatsningar, vilket gör stödet mindre entydigt.
- develop alternatives to roaddecisive»Alternativen till vägtransporter ska utvecklas, inte minst för« (party programme ↗)“Alternatives to road transport shall be developed, not least for”
- state responsibility for railways»kommunikationssystemens infrastruktur såsom vägar, järnvägar och elektroniska« (party programme ↗)“communications systems' infrastructure such as roads, railways and electronic”
- the whole country shall function»Hela Sverige ska fungera och det ska gå att bo och verka även utanför de stora städerna.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The whole of Sweden shall function and it shall be possible to live and work even outside the large cities.”
- road before expensive railway investments»Miljardsatsning för att rusta eftersatta vägar i hela landet - istället för att bygga dyra höghastighetståg.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Billion investment to upgrade neglected roads throughout the country - instead of building expensive high-speed trains.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan's rail line is to upgrade the railway that already exists instead of expensive and unprofitable ventures, and it emphasizes hard prioritizations when justice, defence and welfare need the money.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's rail line is to upgrade the railway that already exists instead of expensive and unprofitable ventures, and it emphasizes hard prioritizations when justice, defence and welfare need the money. The counter-proposal's requirement for expanded and new night train connections is a new state expense that the plan does not make room for. The plan does not mention night trains at all, so the conclusion is drawn from the prioritization and maintenance principle.
Original (Swedish)
Planens järnvägslinje är att rusta upp den järnväg som redan finns i stället för dyra och olönsamma satsningar, och den betonar hårda prioriteringar när rättsväsende, försvar och välfärd kräver pengarna. Motförslagets krav på utbyggda och nya nattågsförbindelser är en ny statlig utgift som planen inte gör plats för. Planen nämner inte nattåg alls, så slutsatsen dras ur prioriterings- och underhållsprincipen.
- maintenance before new venturesdecisive»I stället för dyra och olönsamma skrytbyggen som höghastighetståg kommer Moderaterna rusta upp den järnväg som redan finns, så att tågen kan gå i tid och du slipper stå och frysa på perrongen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Instead of expensive and unprofitable prestige projects like high-speed trains, the Moderates will upgrade the railway that already exists, so that trains can run on time and you don't have to stand and freeze on the platform.”
- hard prioritizations are required»De stora behoven inom rättsväsendet, försvaret och välfärden ställer stora krav på prioriteringar under åren som kommer.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The major needs in justice, defence and welfare place heavy demands on prioritizations in the years to come.”
- reforms must be financed»Alla nya löften och reformer – som till exempel våra inkomstskattesänkningar – behöver finansieras eller rymmas inom överskottsmålet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“All new promises and reforms – such as our income tax cuts – need to be financed or fit within the budget surplus target.”
- upgrade existing railway»Rusta upp dagens järnväg i stället för att satsa på höghastighetståg som riskerar att vara omoderna redan innan de är klara« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Upgrade today's railway instead of investing in high-speed trains that risk being outdated before they are completed”
The plan prioritizes maintenance and renovation of existing infrastructure over new state rail initiatives and wants explicitly to preserve domestic aviation against aviation-hostile policy.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan prioritizes maintenance and renovation of existing infrastructure over new state rail initiatives and wants explicitly to preserve domestic aviation against aviation-hostile policy. The counter-proposal requires that the state rapidly expands night train traffic, including as a climate-smart alternative to domestic aviation. This runs counter to the plan's reallocation away from prestige rail projects and its defence of aviation. The evidence is, however, weak and the conclusion drawn.
Original (Swedish)
Planen prioriterar underhåll och upprustning av befintlig infrastruktur framför nya statliga tågsatsningar och vill uttryckligen bevara inrikesflyget mot en flygfientlig politik. Motförslaget kräver att staten skyndsamt bygger ut nattågstrafiken, bland annat som klimatsmart alternativ till inrikesflyget. Det går på tvärs mot planens omprioritering bort från prestigesatsningar på tåg och dess försvar av flyget. Underlaget är dock svagt och slutsatsen härledd.
- maintenance before new rail projectsdecisive»Sverigedemokraterna vill rikta om prestigesatsningar på höghastighetståg till snabbare och mer trängande behov av att rusta upp transportinfrastrukturen inom alla trafikslag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The Sweden Democrats want to redirect prestige projects on high-speed rail to faster and more pressing needs to upgrade transport infrastructure within all traffic modes.”
- preserved domestic aviation»Bevara inrikesflyget och Bromma flygplats« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Preserve domestic aviation and Bromma airport”
- against aviation-hostile policy»Regeringens flygfientliga politik hotar landets sammanhållning och konkurrenskraft.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The government's aviation-hostile policy threatens the country's cohesion and competitiveness.”
- welfare before prestige projects»Satsa på välfärden istället för politiska prestigeprojekt« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Invest in welfare instead of political prestige projects”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:TU15)
- Committee report full text (HD01TU15)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:1050 — Ett hållbart och tillgängligt transportsystem för framtiden av Jamal El-Haj (-)
- Motion 2025/26:1113 — Samordning av färdtjänst över regiongränser av Anne-Li Sjölund (C)
- Motion 2025/26:1160 — Avgiftsfri kollektivtrafik för alla under 18 år och studenter av Adrian Magnusson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1202 — Persontågstrafiken i Skåne av Ulrika Heindorff m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1244 — Upphandling av trafik av Anna-Caren Sätherberg och Lena Bäckelin (båda S)
- Motion 2025/26:1480 — Spårspring av Eva Lindh (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1644 — Stärkt kommunal rätt att anordna lokal kollektivtrafik av Charlotte Nordström (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1695 — Översyn av färdtjänsten av Staffan Eklöf och Ann-Christine Frohm (båda SD)
- Motion 2025/26:1817 — Punktligheten på järnväg av Peter Hultqvist m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1840 — Rikstäckande kollektivtrafikbiljett av Monica Haider och Robert Olesen (båda S)
- Motion 2025/26:1963 — Kollektivtrafikens ojämna tillgänglighet av Mikael Dahlqvist och Lars Mejern Larsson (båda S)
- Motion 2025/26:2061 — Fler nattågsförbindelser för hela landet och för Sveriges beredskap av Anders Ådahl (C)
- Motion 2025/26:2132 — Spårspring av Jörgen Berglund och Viktor Wärnick (båda M)
- Motion 2025/26:2556 — Kamerabevakning inom offentlig kollektivtrafik av Mattias Eriksson Falk och Roger Hedlund (båda SD)
- Motion 2025/26:2586 — Utrop på tågstationer av Mattias Eriksson Falk och Roger Hedlund (båda SD)
- Motion 2025/26:2695 — Nattåg av Mattias Jonsson och Gunilla Carlsson (båda S)
- Motion 2025/26:2756 — Likvärdig färdtjänst av Azadeh Rojhan (S)
- Motion 2025/26:2758 — Längre färdtjänsttillstånd vid varaktiga funktionsnedsättningar av Azadeh Rojhan (S)
- Motion 2025/26:2778 — En funktionsrättspolitik för trygghet och delaktighet av Nadja Awad m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2780 — Transporteffektivt och hållbart samhälle av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
Source: The Swedish Parliament