2023-06-212022/23:KU41 · p.1KUConstitution
A temporary public flag day to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the King's accession to the throne
Temporary flag day marking the King's 50 years on the throne
What's at stake: The decision concerns a single flag day without major practical consequences, but reflects a broader question about the monarchy's symbolic role and how parliament's time should be used relative to more pressing issues such as food prices, mortgage rates and healthcare.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether parliament should approve a temporary general flag day to mark the King's 50 years as monarch, or reject the proposal and prioritize other issues instead.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee backs the bill for a temporary general flag day, arguing that it can highlight the monarchy's role in Sweden's history while also marking the King's long reign.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 1 (V)
The dissenter believes the monarchy should be replaced by a democratic system of government and therefore sees no need for a new flag day linked to the royal house, arguing that the government should not spend time on the proposal when other issues, such as rising food prices, high mortgage rates and healthcare, are more pressing.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: approving what the committee proposes and rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 1 by V.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: SSocialdemokraterna
Ja 282–21Ja 189–114
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/21/0/3 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| S | No | Yes 93/0/0/14 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| MP | No | Yes 15/0/0/3 | differs | confidence: high | derived |
| C | Yes | Yes 21/0/0/3 | match | confidence: low | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 14/0/0/2 | differs | confidence: low | not addressed |
| KD | Yes | Yes 16/0/0/3 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| M | Yes | Yes 60/0/0/8 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| SD | Yes | Yes 63/0/0/9 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag approves what the Government proposes, that September 15, 2023 shall be a temporary public flag day to commemorate the 50th anniversary of H.M. King Carl XVI Gustaf's accession to the throne. The Riksdag thereby approves proposition 2022/23:123 and rejects motion 2022/23:2396 by Jessica Wetterling et al. (V).
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen godkänner det regeringen föreslår om att den 15 september 2023 ska vara en tillfällig allmän flaggdag för att högtidlighålla 50- årsdagen av H.M. Konung Carl XVI Gustafs trontillträde. Därmed bifaller riksdagen proposition 2022/23:123 och avslår motion 2022/23:2396 av Jessica Wetterling m.fl. (V).
Riksdag decision: September 15, 2023 will be a temporary public flag day to commemorate the 50th anniversary of King Carl XVI Gustaf's accession to the throne. The Riksdag said yes to the Government's proposal.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to reject the government's proposal for a temporary flag day. (V) — Reservation 1
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan states that the monarchy should be replaced with a republican constitution where the head of state is appointed in a democratic manner and that the people's political power should be exercised by the Riksdag.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that the monarchy should be replaced with a republican constitution where the head of state is appointed in a democratic manner and that the people's political power should be exercised by the Riksdag. A temporary flag day that highlights the monarchy's role contradicts that commitment. The plan furthermore explicitly prioritizes resources to healthcare and people's finances, which the counter-proposal's reference to more urgent matters relates to.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att monarkin ska ersättas med en republikansk författning där statschefen tillsätts i demokratisk ordning och att folkets politiska makt ska utövas av riksdagen. En tillfällig flaggdag som lyfter fram monarkins roll strider mot det åtagandet. Planen prioriterar dessutom uttryckligen resurser till sjukvården och människors ekonomi, vilket motförslagets hänvisning till angelägnare frågor knyter an till.
- republic instead of monarchydecisive»Monarkin ska ersättas med en republikansk författning där statschefen tillsätts i demokratisk ordning.« (party programme ↗)“The monarchy should be replaced with a republican constitution where the head of state is appointed in a democratic manner.”
- democracy»Folkets politiska makt ska utövas av riksdagen« (party programme ↗)“The people's political power should be exercised by the Riksdag”
- healthcare is more urgent»Därför vill Vänsterpartiet satsa mer resurser på hälso- och sjukvården och äldreomsorgen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore, the Left Party wants to invest more resources in healthcare and elder care”
The party programme explicitly establishes that the head of state shall be elected through democratic process and that the monarchy shall be abolished, which directly supports the counter-proposal's stance that a new flag day linked to the monarchy is not needed.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme explicitly establishes that the head of state shall be elected through democratic process and that the monarchy shall be abolished, which directly supports the counter-proposal's stance that a new flag day linked to the monarchy is not needed. The plan also identifies rising prices and healthcare as the pressing issues for households. The counter-proposal's demand is thus supported in substance.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår uttryckligen fast att statschefen ska utses i demokratisk ordning och att monarkin ska avskaffas, vilket direkt bär motförslagets ståndpunkt att en ny flaggdag kopplad till kungahuset inte behövs. Planen pekar också ut stigande priser och vården som de angelägna frågorna för hushållen. Motförslagets krav stöds därför i sak.
- the monarchy shall be abolisheddecisive»monarkin ska avskaffas.« (party programme ↗)“the monarchy shall be abolished.”
- democratically elected head of state»linje med detta har vi uppfattningen att statschefen ska utses i demokratisk ordning och att« (party programme ↗)“in line with this we hold the view that the head of state shall be elected through democratic process and”
- price increases are the pressing issue»Prisökningarna äter sig in i människors plånböcker, vid bensinmacken och vid kassan i matbutiken.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Price increases eat into people's wallets, at the petrol station and at the checkout in the grocery store.”
- healthcare is prioritized»Ingen ska behöva känna oro över att få vård i tid.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“No one should have to feel anxiety about getting healthcare in time.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The party programme states that no one in a democracy shall be born to a public office and that the monarchy should in the long term be abolished.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme states that no one in a democracy shall be born to a public office and that the monarchy should in the long term be abolished. A temporary flag day whose stated purpose is to highlight the monarchy's role goes against that stance, which is why the counter-proposal's rejection is supported. The plan instead prioritizes people's economic security, which is close to the counter-proposal's reference to food prices, mortgage rates and healthcare.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår fast att ingen i en demokrati ska födas till ett offentligt ämbete och att monarkin på sikt bör avskaffas. En tillfällig flaggdag vars uttalade syfte är att lyfta fram monarkins roll går emot den hållningen, varför motförslagets avvisande stöds. Planen prioriterar i stället människors ekonomiska trygghet, vilket ligger nära motförslagets hänvisning till matpriser, boräntor och sjukvård.
- the monarchy should be abolisheddecisive»samhälle och anser att den på sikt bör avskaffas.« (party programme ↗)“society and considers that it should in the long term be abolished.”
- no inherited offices»I en demokrati ska ingen födas till ett« (party programme ↗)“In a democracy no one shall be born to a”
- popular sovereignty»Demokrati betyder folkstyre.« (party programme ↗)“Democracy means government by the people.”
- prioritize people's security»Vi vill bygga skyddsnäten starka så att alla kan vara trygga och ingen lämnas utanför.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to build strong safety nets so that everyone can feel secure and no one is left out.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan does not take a position on the form of government.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not take a position on the form of government. The closest principle is that democratic institutions and the constitutional order should remain stable and that constitutional amendments should be made more difficult, which does not support replacing the monarchy. The position is therefore derived from weak grounds and says nothing about flag day as such.
Original (Swedish)
Planen tar inte ställning till statsformen. Den närmast liggande principen är att de demokratiska institutionerna och grundlagens ordning ska stå stabila och att grundlagsändringar bör göras svårare, vilket inte ger stöd för att ersätta monarkin. Ställningstagandet är därför härlett ur en svag grund och säger inget om flaggdagen som sådan.
- stable constitutional orderdecisive»Våra demokratiska institutioner behöver skydd. Vi vill göra det svårare att ändra grundlagen, skydda oppositionens ställning i riksdagen och stärka domstolarnas oberoende.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Our democratic institutions need protection. We want to make it more difficult to amend the constitution, protect the opposition's position in the Riksdag, and strengthen the independence of the courts.”
- liberal democracy as ideal»Den liberala demokratin är en av människans bästa skapelser, kanske den främsta.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Liberal democracy is one of humanity's greatest creations, perhaps the greatest.”
The plan does not take a position on the monarchy or flag days.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan does not take a position on the monarchy or flag days. The nearest principle is that political power shall be limited and exercised through democracy, a line the plan derives from the liberal struggle for parliamentarism and universal suffrage. Based on that principle, an arrangement that highlights the monarchy's role carries little weight. The conclusion is, however, weakly supported, since the plan at the same time wants to constitutionally protect the current form of government.
Original (Swedish)
Planen tar inte ställning till monarkin eller till flaggdagar. Närmast liggande princip är att den politiska makten ska vara begränsad och utövas genom folkstyre, en linje planen härleder ur den liberala kampen för parlamentarism och allmän rösträtt. Utifrån den principen väger ett arrangemang som lyfter fram monarkins roll lätt. Slutsatsen är dock svagt underbyggd, eftersom planen samtidigt vill grundlagsskydda det nuvarande statsskicket.
- democracy as foundationdecisive»Den politiska makten ska vara begränsad och utövas genom« (party programme ↗)“Political power shall be limited and exercised through”
- parliamentarism and suffrage»Det var den liberala statsministern Nils Edén som åstadkom att parlamentarism och allmän och lika rösträtt« (party programme ↗)“It was the liberal prime minister Nils Edén who brought about parliamentarism and universal and equal suffrage”
- protect democratic form of government»Vi vill se ett förstärkt grundlagsskydd för vårt demokratiska statsskick, öka domstolarnas oberoende och verka för en författningsdomstol« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to see strengthened constitutional protection for our democratic form of government, increase the independence of courts and work for a constitutional court”
flags: svagt_underlag
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan explicitly states that the monarchy has strong popular support, is an important identity-forming part of Swedish society and that Sweden should therefore continue to be a constitutional monarchy.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly states that the monarchy has strong popular support, is an important identity-forming part of Swedish society and that Sweden should therefore continue to be a constitutional monarchy. The counter-proposal wants to replace the monarchy and thus rejects flag day. The plan's stewardship of cultural heritage strengthens the reasons for honouring the monarchy's historical role.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår uttryckligen fast att monarkin har stark folklig förankring, är en viktig identitetsskapande del av det svenska samhället och att Sverige därför ska fortsätta vara en konstitutionell monarki. Motförslaget vill ersätta monarkin och avvisar därför flaggdagen. Planens förvaltarskap av kulturarvet stärker skälen för att uppmärksamma monarkins historiska roll.
- preserved monarchydecisive»Monarkin har en stark folklig förankring och är en« (party programme ↗)“The monarchy has strong popular support and is an”
- monarchy as identity»viktig identitetsskapande del av det svenska samhället.« (party programme ↗)“important identity-forming part of Swedish society.”
- stewarded cultural heritage»En god kulturpolitik måste sträva efter att ta tillvara det värdefulla kulturella arv« (party programme ↗)“Good cultural policy must strive to preserve the valuable cultural heritage”
The party programme explicitly establishes that the constitutional monarchy has served Sweden well and constitutes a unifying force beyond the swings of party politics, and that continuity in the Swedish nation is valued.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme explicitly establishes that the constitutional monarchy has served Sweden well and constitutes a unifying force beyond the swings of party politics, and that continuity in the Swedish nation is valued. The counter-proposal is built on the monarchy being replaced by another form of government. The plan therefore speaks directly against the counter-proposal's demand, even though it shares concern for household costs.
Original (Swedish)
Partiprogrammet slår uttryckligen fast att den konstitutionella monarkin har tjänat Sverige väl och utgör en enande kraft bortom partipolitikens svängningar, och att kontinuiteten i den svenska nationen värdesätts. Motförslaget bygger på att monarkin bör ersättas av ett annat statsskick. Planen talar därför direkt mot motförslagets krav, även om den delar oron för hushållens kostnader.
- monarchy as unifying forcedecisive»konstitutionella monarkin har tjänat Sverige väl och utgör en« (party programme ↗)“the constitutional monarchy has served Sweden well and constitutes a”
- valued continuity»Moderaterna värdesätter den kontinuitet som Sverige« (party programme ↗)“The Moderates value the continuity that Sweden”
- history unites»Svensk kultur och svensk historia« (party programme ↗)“Swedish culture and Swedish history”
- household costs»Du ska ha råd med livet – vi ska städa undan de värsta rödgröna prishöjningarna« (2022 manifesto ↗)“You shall be able to afford life – we shall clean up the worst red-green price increases”
The party programme states that the party is a supporter of constitutional monarchy and that the monarch should be head of state.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The party programme states that the party is a supporter of constitutional monarchy and that the monarch should be head of state. The election manifesto also wants to create cohesion around Swedish culture and protect, care for and show Swedish culture, where festivities and traditions are included. The counter-proposal's demands that the monarchy should be replaced and that no flag day linked to the royal house is needed thus directly conflicts with the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Principprogrammet slår fast att partiet är anhängare av den konstitutionella monarkin och att monarken ska vara statschef. Valmanifestet vill dessutom skapa sammanhållning kring den svenska kulturen och värna, vårda och visa svensk kultur, där högtider och traditioner räknas in. Motförslagets krav på att monarkin ska ersättas och att ingen flaggdag kopplad till kungahuset behövs strider därmed direkt mot planen.
- constitutional monarchydecisive»Sverigedemokraterna är anhängare av den konstitutionella monarkin« (party programme ↗)“Sweden Democrats are supporters of constitutional monarchy”
- cohesion around culture»Skapa sammanhållning kring den svenska kulturen och den nationella identiteten« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Create cohesion around Swedish culture and national identity”
- protect Swedish culture»Sverigedemokraterna vill värna, vårda och visa svensk kultur.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden Democrats want to protect, care for and show Swedish culture.”
- respect for cultural heritage»Att värna om kulturarvet är också att visa respekt mot tidigare generationer, att minnas vad de har« (party programme ↗)“To protect cultural heritage is also to show respect to previous generations, to remember what they have”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2022/23:KU41)
- Committee report full text (HA01KU41)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2022/23:2396 — med anledning av prop. 2022/23:123 En tillfällig allmän flaggdag för att högtidlighålla 50-årsdagen av konungens trontillträde av Jessica Wetterling m.fl. (V)
- Proposition 2022/23:123 — En tillfällig allmän flaggdag för att högtidlighålla 50-årsdagen av konungens trontillträde
Source: The Swedish Parliament