2026-06-092025/26:NU20 · p.6NUBusiness & energy
Other matters on compensation to municipalities
Production-based compensation for municipalities with wind power
What's at stake: The decision affects how much economic benefit municipalities hosting wind power draw from the electricity produced within their boundaries, and whether local acceptance for new wind-power projects is strengthened through a direct link between electricity produced and revenue for the municipality and region.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether, in addition to the compensation already proposed, a production-based compensation for municipalities with wind power should be introduced - financed through the energy tax and shared between municipality and region - or whether the government's proposal is sufficient without such an addition.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee backs the government's bill and rejects the motions calling for an additional, production-based compensation for municipalities with wind power, referring to the reasoning set out in the bill.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 8 (V)
The reservation (V) welcomes the government's compensation to municipalities for the property tax on wind turbines but argues that a temporary budget allocation is not enough. It instead wants a long-term financing model, supplemented by production-based compensation in which 5 öre per kWh produced goes to municipalities via the energy tax, split 70 percent to the municipality and 30 percent to the region, to strengthen local benefit and increase municipalities' incentive to say yes to new wind power.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 8 by V.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: CCenterpartiet
Ja 195–23Ja 172–46
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | No 0/20/0/1 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| S | No | Abstain 0/0/106/0 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| MP | No | Abstain 0/0/18/0 | differs | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | No | Yes 23/0/0/1 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| L | Yes | Yes 16/0/0/0 | match | confidence: low | not addressed |
| KD | Yes | Yes 18/0/0/1 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| M | Yes | Yes 65/0/0/1 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | Yes | Yes 68/0/0/2 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
Committee proposal
The Riksdag rejects the motions 2025/26:4104 by Birger Lahti et al. (V) motion item 1, 2025/26:4126 by Fredrik Olovsson et al. (S) motion item 3 and 2025/26:4132 by Linus Lakso et al. (MP) motion item 2.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:4104 av Birger Lahti m.fl. (V) yrkande 1, 2025/26:4126 av Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S) yrkande 3 och 2025/26:4132 av Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP) yrkande 2.
Riksdag decision: The Government proposes a new law that gives neighbouring residents of wind power facilities the right to compensation equivalent to a share of the annual revenue from a facility, so-called wind power compensation. The Riksdag approved the Government's proposal. According to the Government's proposal, wind power compensation shall be paid by the operator of a wind power facility to owners of residential buildings located within nine wind turbine heights from a wind turbine in a wind power facility. Wind power compensation is proposed to be higher the closer the facility is to the residence. The Government also proposes amendments to the Income Tax Act, which means that wind power compensation shall be tax-free to the extent it concerns a private residence. The new law and the law amendment come into force on 1 July 2026.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants a public agency to manage the compensation system for wind power. (V) — Reservation 8
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan states that wind power should benefit both the municipality and residents in the surrounding area and that more of the value of natural resources should remain where they are produced.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan states that wind power should benefit both the municipality and residents in the surrounding area and that more of the value of natural resources should remain where they are produced. A long-term, production-based compensation to municipality and region is a direct application of that, as opposed to temporary budget allocation. The plan furthermore wants the countryside not to be depleted but to retain services and resources. The committee's argument—that the proposed suggestion is sufficient—is directly met by the plan's requirement for lasting local benefit.
Original (Swedish)
Planen slår fast att vindkraften ska gynna både kommunen och de boende i närområdet och att mer av naturresursernas värden ska stanna kvar där de produceras. En långsiktig, produktionsbaserad ersättning till kommun och region är en direkt tillämpning av det, till skillnad från en tillfällig budgetsatsning. Planen vill dessutom att landsbygden inte utarmas utan får behålla service och resurser. Utskottets skäl - att det framlagda förslaget räcker - möts direkt av planens krav på varaktig lokal nytta.
- wind power should benefit the municipalitydecisive»Vindkraften ska gynna både kommun och boende i närområdet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Wind power should benefit both the municipality and residents in the surrounding area.”
- local share of natural resource value»Mer av naturresursernas värden måste stanna kvar där de utvinns och produceras.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More of the value of natural resources must remain where they are extracted and produced.”
- resources to smaller places»Äldreomsorg, förskola, skola och matbutik behöver finnas på fler mindre orter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Elder care, preschool, school and grocery stores need to exist in more smaller places.”
- solidaristic distribution across the country»Inkomster och kostnader behöver fördelas solidariskt över landet.« (party programme ↗)“Incomes and costs need to be distributed solidaristically across the country.”
The election manifesto promises that municipalities participating in wind power plant expansion shall be able to receive economic support and wants to expand electricity production of all kinds.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto promises that municipalities participating in wind power plant expansion shall be able to receive economic support and wants to expand electricity production of all kinds. A long-term financing model with production-based compensation strengthens exactly that local benefit and the incentives the plan builds on. The plan also requires systems that strengthen the local community with major establishments and compensation in extraction of natural resources.
Original (Swedish)
Planen lovar att kommuner som medverkar till utbyggnad av vindkraftverk ska kunna få ekonomiskt stöd och vill bygga ut elproduktionen av alla slag. En långsiktig finansieringsmodell med produktionsbaserad ersättning stärker just den lokala nyttan och de incitament som planen bygger på. Planen kräver också system som stärker lokalsamhället vid stora etableringar och kompensation vid utvinning av naturresurser.
- compensation to wind power municipalitiesdecisive»Kommuner som medverkar till utbyggnad av vindkraftverk ska kunna få ekonomiskt stöd.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Municipalities participating in expansion of wind power plants shall be able to receive economic support.”
- expanded wind power»Bygg ut elproduktionen av alla slag. Vindkraft långt ute till havs kan bidra med mycket energi.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Build out electricity production of all kinds. Wind power far out to sea can contribute much energy.”
- strengthened local community»System för att stärka lokalsamhället vid stora industrietableringar.« (party programme ↗)“Systems to strengthen the local community at major industrial establishments.”
- local compensation»Hållbar utvinning och användning av naturresurser, med ekonomisk kompensation till« (party programme ↗)“Sustainable extraction and use of natural resources, with economic compensation to”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires substantial economic return to the municipalities where wind power is built and exists, and a system where local communities receive return at energy extraction.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires substantial economic return to the municipalities where wind power is built and exists, and a system where local communities receive return at energy extraction. The counter-proposal's requirement for a long-term financing model supplemented with production-based compensation to municipality and region is precisely such an arrangement. It also strengthens local benefit, which the plan links to rapid expansion of renewable energy.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver rejäl ekonomisk återbäring till de kommuner där vindkraft byggs och finns, och ett system där lokala samhällen får återbäring vid energiutvinning. Motförslagets krav på en långsiktig finansieringsmodell kompletterad med en produktionsbaserad ersättning till kommun och region är just en sådan ordning. Den stärker dessutom den lokala nyttan, vilket planen kopplar till en snabb utbyggnad av förnybar energi.
- substantial return to municipalitiesdecisive»bygga ut vindkraften till havs snabbt i hela landet, med hänsyn till livet i havet. Ge rejäl ekonomisk återbäring till de kommuner där det byggs och finns vindkraft.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“build out offshore wind power quickly throughout the country, with consideration for marine life. Give substantial economic return to the municipalities where it is built and exists.”
- system for local return»Vi vill se ett system där lokala samhällen får återbäring vid energi- och resursutvinning.« (party programme ↗)“We want to see a system where local communities receive return from energy and resource extraction.”
- affected benefit from profits»De som påverkas av exempelvis vattenkraft, vindkraft eller gruvetableringar ska få ta del av vinsterna som uppstår, till exempel genom investeringar i samhällsservice och infrastruktur.« (party programme ↗)“Those affected by for example hydropower, wind power or mining developments shall benefit from the profits that arise, for instance through investments in public services and infrastructure.”
- rapid expansion of wind power»Därutöver vill vi i Miljöpartiet se en snabb utbyggnad av förnybar energi som vindkraft och solenergi.« (party programme ↗)“Furthermore the Greens want to see rapid expansion of renewable energy such as wind power and solar energy.”
flags: citat_migrerat
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The election manifesto commits to more of the value from wind power remaining locally and profits from local power generation to a greater extent remaining in rural areas.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto commits to more of the value from wind power remaining locally and profits from local power generation to a greater extent remaining in rural areas. A long-term, production-based compensation for municipalities and regions is a direct application of that commitment, as opposed to temporary budget allocation. The plan also explicitly links local compensation to speeding up wind power expansion.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet åtar sig att mer av värdet från vindkraft ska stanna kvar lokalt och att vinsterna från lokal kraftproduktion i större utsträckning ska stanna i bygden. En långsiktig, produktionsbaserad ersättning till kommun och region är en direkt tillämpning av det åtagandet, till skillnad från en tillfällig budgetsatsning. Planen kopplar också uttryckligen lokal ersättning till att vindkraftsutbyggnaden ska gå snabbare.
- natural resource values remain locallydecisive»Mer av värdet som skapas från naturresurser — exempelvis vindkraft, vattenkraft och gruvor — ska stanna kvar lokalt.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“More of the value created from natural resources — such as wind power, hydropower, and mines — must remain locally.”
- fair local compensation»Att bygga lokalt stöd och ge rättvis ersättning till markägare och närboende är viktiga nycklar för att lyckas med den gröna omställningen.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Building local support and giving fair compensation to landowners and neighbours are important keys to succeeding with the green transformation.”
- rapid wind power expansion»Minst 50 TWh utsläppsfri el måste börja byggas nästa mandatperiod. Det krävs en kriskommission för att snabbare öka Sveriges utsläppsfria elproduktion och tillstånd för vindkraft ska få ta max två år.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“At least 50 TWh of emission-free electricity must begin to be built in the next term. A crisis commission is needed to more quickly increase Sweden's emission-free electricity production and permits for wind power must take a maximum of two years.”
- rural areas bear wind power expansion»Förutom skogen och vattnet så kommer den stora utbyggnaden av vindkraft i huvudsak att ske på landsbygden.« (party programme ↗)“Apart from forests and water, the major expansion of wind power will mainly take place in rural areas.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan advocates general and technology-neutral economic policy instruments and explicitly distances itself from climate policy becoming a competition in highest subsidies.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan advocates general and technology-neutral economic policy instruments and explicitly distances itself from climate policy becoming a competition in highest subsidies. A production-based compensation of five öre per kWh via the energy tax is the opposite: a technology-specific support that moreover locks in an electricity tax the plan wants to reduce. The plan does not directly address the question of municipal compensation.
Original (Swedish)
Planen förordar generella och teknikneutrala ekonomiska styrmedel och tar uttryckligen avstånd från att klimatpolitiken blir en tävling i högst bidrag. En produktionsbaserad ersättning på fem öre per kWh via energiskatten är motsatsen: ett teknikspecifikt stöd som dessutom låser fast en elskatt planen vill sänka. Planen behandlar inte frågan om kommunersättning direkt.
- technology-neutral instrumentsdecisive»Generella och teknikneutrala ekonomiska styrmedel, såsom koldioxidskatt och breda system för handel med utsläppsrätter, är det mest effektiva redskapet.« (party programme ↗)“General and technology-neutral economic policy instruments, such as carbon tax and broad systems for trading in emission rights, are the most effective tool.”
- instruments over subsidies»Därför är vi för riktiga klimatskatter i stället för att göra klimatpolitiken till en tävling i högst bidrag och flest symbolskatter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Therefore, we are for real climate taxes instead of making climate policy a competition in highest subsidies and most symbolic taxes.”
- lower electricity tax»Vi vill både sänka elmomsen och den särskilda extraskatten på el för att mildra elprischocken här och nu.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“We want to both reduce VAT on electricity and the special extra tax on electricity to mitigate the electricity price shock here and now.”
- municipal veto remains»Det kommunala vetot mot vindkraft ska bestå.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“The municipal veto against wind power shall remain.”
The counter-proposal wants to introduce production-based compensation per kWh that favours wind power.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The counter-proposal wants to introduce production-based compensation per kWh that favours wind power. The plan instead requires that all fossil-free power sources compete independently on an equal electricity market and rejects direct subsidies, while wind power according to the election manifesto can only be a complement. A targeted production support that should increase willingness to accept new wind power thus goes against the documents' line.
Original (Swedish)
Motförslaget vill införa en produktionsbaserad ersättning per kWh som premierar vindkraft. Planen kräver i stället att alla fossilfria kraftslag konkurrerar självständigt på en jämlik elmarknad och avvisar direkta subventioner, samtidigt som vindkraft enligt valmanifestet bara kan vara ett komplement. Ett riktat produktionsstöd som ska öka viljan att acceptera ny vindkraft går därför emot dokumentens linje.
- equal electricity market without targeted supportdecisive»konkurrera självständigt på en jämlik elmarknad.« (party programme ↗)“compete independently on an equal electricity market.”
- wind power only a complement»Bygg ut vindkraften men med respekt för den lokala demokratin och anpassa storleken efter lokala villkor. Vindkraft kan dock bara vara ett komplement.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Build out wind power but with respect for local democracy and adapt the size to local conditions. Wind power can however only be a complement.”
- no to targeted subsidies»motverkas. Direkta företagssubventioner avvisas.« (party programme ↗)“countered. Direct business subsidies are rejected.”
- base power shall be protected»baskraften som framförallt utgörs av kärnkraft, vattenkraft och kraftvärme. Denna baskraft« (party programme ↗)“base power which is above all made up of nuclear power, hydropower and combined heat and power. This base power”
The plan's energy line is that expanded nuclear power is entirely central and the goal shall change to 100 percent fossil-free; it contains no new support to make wind power more attractive to municipalities.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan's energy line is that expanded nuclear power is entirely central and the goal shall change to 100 percent fossil-free; it contains no new support to make wind power more attractive to municipalities. A production-based compensation via the energy tax is furthermore a new permanent expenditure that according to the plan must fit within the surplus target, while a tax ceiling has been promised. The counter-proposal's demand is rejected.
Original (Swedish)
Planens energilinje är att utbyggd kärnkraft är helt central och att målet ändras till 100 procent fossilfritt; den innehåller inga nya stöd för att göra vindkraft mer attraktiv för kommuner. En produktionsbaserad ersättning via energiskatten är dessutom en ny varaktig utgift som enligt planen måste rymmas inom överskottsmålet, samtidigt som ett skattehöjarstopp utlovats. Motförslagets krav avvisas.
- nuclear power is centraldecisive»I det läge Sverige har hamnat i på grund av dåliga politiska beslut kommer en utbyggnad av kärnkraften att vara helt central.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Given the situation Sweden has ended up in due to poor political decisions, an expansion of nuclear power will be entirely central.”
- reforms shall be financed»Alla nya löften och reformer – som till exempel våra inkomstskattesänkningar – behöver finansieras eller rymmas inom överskottsmålet.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“All new promises and reforms – such as for example our income tax cuts – need to be financed or fit within the surplus target.”
- tax ceiling»Införa ett skattehöjarstopp under den kommande mandatperioden som innebär att de samlade skatterna inte höjs« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Introduce a tax ceiling during the coming term, which means that total taxes will not increase”
- fossil-free instead of renewable goal»Ändra det energipolitiska målet från 100 procent förnybart till 100 procent fossilfritt« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Change the energy policy goal from 100 percent renewable to 100 percent fossil-free”
The plan prioritises marine and water environment over extensive wind power expansion and wants to protect the municipal veto in wind power establishment.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan prioritises marine and water environment over extensive wind power expansion and wants to protect the municipal veto in wind power establishment. A production-based compensation whose stated purpose is to increase incentives to accept new wind power goes against that line. The plan also wants to lower the tax on electrical energy and build electricity supply on new nuclear power, not on new energy-tax-financed support.
Original (Swedish)
Planen prioriterar havs- och vattenmiljön framför en omfattande vindkraftsutbyggnad och vill värna det kommunala vetot vid vindkraftsetablering. En produktionsbaserad ersättning vars uttalade syfte är att öka incitamenten att acceptera ny vindkraft går emot den linjen. Planen vill dessutom sänka skatten på elenergi och bygga elförsörjningen på ny kärnkraft, inte på nya energiskattefinansierade stöd.
- restrained wind power expansiondecisive»Vår havs- och vattenmiljö måste prioriteras tydligare framför ett allt för intensivt fiske och omfattande vindkraftsutbyggnad.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Our marine and water environment must be prioritised more clearly over overly intensive fishing and extensive wind power expansion.”
- municipal veto protected»Värna det kommunala vetot vid etablering av vindkraft« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Protect the municipal veto in wind power establishment”
- lower electricity tax»Sänka skatten på elenergi permanent för att underlätta elektrifieringen« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Permanently lower the tax on electrical energy to facilitate electrification”
- nuclear power as electricity strategy»Säkra tillgången till pålitlig och billig el genom satsningar på framtidens kärnkraft.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Secure access to reliable and cheap electricity through investments in future nuclear power.”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:NU20)
- Committee report full text (HD01NU20)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:4104 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:239 Vindkraft i kommuner av Birger Lahti m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:4126 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:239 Vindkraft i kommuner av Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:4132 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:239 Vindkraft i kommuner av Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP)
- Motion 2025/26:4137 — med anledning av prop. 2025/26:239 Vindkraft i kommuner av Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C)
- Proposition 2025/26:239 — Vindkraft i kommuner
Source: The Swedish Parliament