2026-04-152025/26:NU17 · p.5NUBusiness & energy
Supply security and supply reliability
Security of supply, delivery reliability, and electricity preparedness
What's at stake: The question concerns how resilient the power system is to crises, cyberattacks, and extreme weather, and whether socially critical functions such as telecommunications and heating can be maintained during disruptions. The decision also affects the pace at which energy storage and local backup power are built out.
Case texts and AI reasoning are AI-translated from the Swedish originals; the Swedish text is authoritative.
What the vote decides
The question is whether parliament should make specific statements calling for increased decentralised power generation, energy storage, and strengthened crisis preparedness in the power system, or whether the ongoing work on electricity preparedness, cybersecurity, and total defence already gives sufficient attention to these issues.
Yes Yes — the committee proposal
The committee notes that questions of electricity preparedness have become more pressing following Russia's invasion of Ukraine, but takes a positive view of the fact that the government has already tightened requirements on the preparedness work of responsible authorities, introduced reporting requirements for the transmission system operator, and produced national strategies for resilience and cybersecurity. Overall, the committee judges that preparedness issues already receive sufficient attention and rejects the motions.
No No — the reservations
Reservation 12 (MP)
The reservation (MP) wants a national strategy for energy storage and technology-neutral support for large-scale energy storage, built near homes and businesses to balance the grid and be usable during power outages. The reservation also wants the transmission system operator's capacity reserve and disturbance reserve to consist of import-independent, ideally fully renewable, energy sources, and wants decentralised power generation combined with green baseload power to be built out for a more resilient energy system.
Summarised from the committee report. Party labels in the summary come from the report, not from the vote.
What do the votes mean here?
Yes The committee proposal: rejecting the motions (keeping things as they are).
No Backing the counter-proposal: reservation 12 by MP.
Abstain The party marks a position of its own that is not one of the two final alternatives.
The decision would have held
Explicit commitments that contradicted the vote: KDKristdemokraterna, LLiberalerna
Ja 149–15Ja 120–44
Counterfactual: the parties above are moved to the position their own documents explicitly point at, carrying their whole contingent present. Every other party keeps its real figures, including dissenters and absentees.
How the AI parties would have voted
For each party: what its own plan – election manifesto and party programme – argues for in this case, next to how the party actually voted. The AI can only answer Yes or No; a party can also abstain.
| AI | Vote | Confidence | Evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | No | Abstain 0/0/18/4 | differs | confidence: medium | derived |
| S | No | Abstain 0/0/91/15 | differs | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| MP | No | No 0/15/0/3 | match | confidence: high | explicit |
| C | No | Abstain 0/0/20/4 | differs | confidence: high | not addressed |
| L | No | Yes 13/0/0/3 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: medium | explicit |
| KD | No | Yes 16/0/0/3 | differsagainst own programme | confidence: high | explicit |
| M | Yes | Yes 56/0/0/10 | match | confidence: medium | not addressed |
| SD | Yes | Yes 61/0/0/9 | match | confidence: low | not addressed |
Committee proposal
Parliament rejects the motions 2025/26:767 by Joakim Sandell et al. (S) demands 6 and 7, 2025/26:1551 by Sten Bergheden (M), 2025/26:1867 by Ulrika Heindorff et al. (M) demand 1, 2025/26:2682 by Magnus Manhammar (S), 2025/26:2822 by Mikael Larsson et al. (C) demands 52 and 53, 2025/26:3273 by Linus Lakso et al. (MP) demands 49, 53 and 54, 2025/26:3405 by Emma Berginger et al. (MP) demand 34, 2025/26:3422 by Katarina Luhr et al. (MP) demand 59, 2025/26:3582 by Rickard Nordin et al. (C) demands 47, 48 and 133 and 2025/26:3594 by Fredrik Olovsson et al. (S) demand 8 in this part.
Original (Swedish)
Riksdagen avslår motionerna 2025/26:767 av Joakim Sandell m.fl. (S) yrkandena 6 och 7, 2025/26:1551 av Sten Bergheden (M), 2025/26:1867 av Ulrika Heindorff m.fl. (M) yrkande 1, 2025/26:2682 av Magnus Manhammar (S), 2025/26:2822 av Mikael Larsson m.fl. (C) yrkandena 52 och 53, 2025/26:3273 av Linus Lakso m.fl. (MP) yrkandena 49, 53 och 54, 2025/26:3405 av Emma Berginger m.fl. (MP) yrkande 34, 2025/26:3422 av Katarina Luhr m.fl. (MP) yrkande 59, 2025/26:3582 av Rickard Nordin m.fl. (C) yrkandena 47, 48 och 133 samt 2025/26:3594 av Fredrik Olovsson m.fl. (S) yrkande 8 i denna del.
Riksdag decision: Parliament rejected 132 proposals on electricity market issues in motions from the general motion period of 2025. The proposals deal with, among other things, general electricity market issues, grid development, electricity support, certain contract and fee issues, support and flexibility services, and energy communities. Parliament primarily refers to the policies pursued and ongoing work.
Counter-proposals
- The counter-proposal wants to accelerate expansion of renewable electricity production through targets of 100 TWh additional by 2030, establishment of green base power, and state electricity agreements. (MP) — Reservation 12
Plan vs actual vote
Every party, in chamber order: what its own plan pointed to, how it voted, and the reasoning behind both. Highlighted rows are where the two differ — but a vote that follows the plan is a result too, so the reasoning is there for every party.
The plan explicitly demands a radical expansion of renewable electricity production with crisis preparedness as one of the reasons, and wants Sweden to become more self-sufficient in energy.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly demands a radical expansion of renewable electricity production with crisis preparedness as one of the reasons, and wants Sweden to become more self-sufficient in energy. The counter-proposal's demands for storage, import independence and preferably renewable capacity reserves and decentralized production are the same direction. The plan furthermore sees electricity as infrastructure where investments should be directed by socio-economic goals.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver en radikal utbyggnad av den förnybara elproduktionen uttryckligen med krisberedskapen som ett av skälen, och vill att Sverige blir mer självförsörjande på energi. Motförslagets krav på lagring, importoberoende och helst förnybara kapacitetsreserver samt decentraliserad produktion är samma inriktning. Planen ser dessutom el som infrastruktur där investeringarna ska styras av samhällsekonomiska mål.
- renewable expansion for preparednessdecisive»En radikal utbyggnad av den förnybara elproduktionen är avgörande för Sveriges klimatomställning, krisberedskap och ekonomiska utveckling.« (party programme ↗)“A radical expansion of renewable electricity production is crucial for Sweden's climate transition, crisis preparedness and economic development.”
- energy self-sufficiency»Sverige har goda möjligheter att bli mer självförsörjande på energi och livsmedel.« (party programme ↗)“Sweden has good opportunities to become more self-sufficient in energy and food.”
- electricity as state-regulated infrastructure»Vi ser el och värme som en del av Sveriges infrastruktur, där investeringar och priser behöver utgå från samhällsekonomiska mål.« (party programme ↗)“We see electricity and heat as part of Sweden's infrastructure, where investments and prices need to be based on socio-economic goals.”
- state investments in renewable»därför behöver staten gå in med satsningar på förnybar energi« (2022 manifesto ↗)“therefore the state needs to step in with investments in renewable energy”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan requires a stop to Swedish dependence on fossil fuels from other countries and a stable, reliable and eventually renewable electricity production, while civil defence shall be upgraded.
Plan documents: party programme · 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan requires a stop to Swedish dependence on fossil fuels from other countries and a stable, reliable and eventually renewable electricity production, while civil defence shall be upgraded. Independent capacity reserves, large-scale energy storage and decentralised production are means for this supply security. However, the plan does not explicitly mention energy storage.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver stopp för svenskt beroende av fossila bränslen från andra länder och en stabil, tillförlitlig och på sikt förnybar elproduktion, samtidigt som det civila försvaret ska rustas upp. Importoberoende kapacitetsreserver, storskalig energilagring och decentraliserad produktion är medel för den försörjningstryggheten. Planen nämner dock inte energilagring uttryckligen.
- independent energy supplydecisive»Stopp för svenskt beroende av fossila bränslen från andra länder.« (party programme ↗)“Stop Swedish dependence on fossil fuels from other countries.”
- stable and fossil-free electricity»Stabil, tillförlitlig och fossilfri elproduktion som på lång sikt är förnybar.« (party programme ↗)“Stable, reliable and fossil-free electricity production that in the long term is renewable.”
- expanded electricity production»Bygg ut elproduktionen av alla slag.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Build out electricity production of all kinds.”
- civil preparedness»Rusta upp det civila försvaret.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Upgrade civil defence.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The plan explicitly wants to invest in energy storage and a smart energy system, and describes energy storage together with smart control and regulable renewable power as the path to stable green baseload power.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly wants to invest in energy storage and a smart energy system, and describes energy storage together with smart control and regulable renewable power as the path to stable green baseload power. The counter-proposal's requirement for a strategy for large-scale energy storage, import independence and preferably renewable capacity reserves and decentralized production is the same line. The plan also wants to facilitate own power generation.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill uttryckligen investera i energilager och ett smart energisystem, och beskriver energilagring tillsammans med smart styrning och reglerbar förnybar kraft som vägen till en stabil grön baskraft. Motförslagets krav på en strategi för storskalig energilagring, importoberoende och helst förnybara kapacitetsreserver samt decentraliserad produktion är samma linje. Planen vill också underlätta egen elproduktion.
- investments in energy storagedecisive»bygga ut elnäten, investera i energilager och satsa på ett smart energisystem.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“build out power networks, invest in energy storage and focus on a smart energy system.”
- green baseload with storage»I kombination med energilagring, smart styrning och reglerbar förnybar« (party programme ↗)“In combination with energy storage, smart control and regulable renewable”
- robust power supply in crisis»Samhället måste säkra kontroll över« (party programme ↗)“Society must secure control over”
- decentralized power generation»helt ta bort energiskatten för företag som producerar el för eget bruk.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“completely remove the energy tax for companies that produce electricity for their own use.”
The plan wants to make Sweden Europe's green battery, strengthen energy independence, and make it easier for more people to produce their own electricity, while civil defence and society's preparedness must be strengthened.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan wants to make Sweden Europe's green battery, strengthen energy independence, and make it easier for more people to produce their own electricity, while civil defence and society's preparedness must be strengthened. Technology-neutral support for energy storage and import independence, preferably renewable, capacity reserves is a direct application of these commitments. Energy storage is not mentioned as its own concept in the plan, however.
Original (Swedish)
Planen vill göra Sverige till Europas gröna batteri, stärka energioberoendet och göra det enklare för fler att producera sin egen el, samtidigt som civilförsvaret och samhällets beredskap ska rustas. Ett teknikneutralt stöd för energilagring och importoberoende, gärna förnybara, kapacitetsreserver är en direkt tillämpning av dessa åtaganden. Energilagring nämns dock inte som eget begrepp i planen.
- energy supply independence from importsdecisive»Sveriges energioberoende måste stärkas, bland annat genom att mångdubbla produktionen av biobränslen och biogas.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden's energy independence must be strengthened, among other things by multiplying the production of biofuels and biogas.”
- emission-free electricity production expanded»Sverige ska bli Europas gröna batteri och exportera el till grannländer som fasar ut sitt fossilberoende.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden must become Europe's green battery and export electricity to neighbouring countries that are phasing out their fossil dependence.”
- decentralised electricity production»Det ska bli enklare att producera mer av sin egen el, med bland annat solpaneler och bättre elförsörjning inne i tätorter.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“It must become easier to produce more of your own electricity, with, among other things, solar panels and better electricity supply in urban areas.”
- preparedness for power cuts»Även det civila försvaret är livsviktigt. Vi måste rusta civilförsvaret och samhällets beredskap inför krig och kris.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Civil defence is also vital. We must strengthen civil defence and society's preparedness for war and crisis.”
The plan takes no explicit position on what the committee actually decided — often because the committee's reason was procedural. The stance is derived and fully cited, but it does not show the party broke a commitment.
The election manifesto explicitly establishes that robust electricity supply requires investments in the power system and initiatives on energy storage.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto · party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The election manifesto explicitly establishes that robust electricity supply requires investments in the power system and initiatives on energy storage. The party programme further views energy dependency as a security policy issue and points to the need for reliable energy supply. A national strategy and technology-neutral support for energy storage and import-independent capacity reserves thereby follow from the plan's commitments.
Original (Swedish)
Valmanifestet slår uttryckligen fast att en robust elförsörjning kräver investeringar i kraftsystemet och satsningar på energilagring. Partiprogrammet ser dessutom energiberoendet som en säkerhetspolitisk fråga och pekar på behovet av tillförlitlig energitillförsel. En nationell strategi och teknikneutralt stöd för energilagring samt importoberoende kapacitetsreserver följer därmed planens åtaganden.
- energy storage initiativedecisive»Ska vi få ner elpriserna krävs att vi bygger inte bara kärnkraft utan också mer sol- och vindkraft i hela landet, investerar i kraftsystemet och satsar på energilagring.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“To get electricity prices down, we need not only to build nuclear power but also more solar and wind power throughout the country, invest in the power system and commit to energy storage.”
- energy independence as security issue»Att bryta behovet av olja och gas är inte endast en miljöfråga utan i högsta grad en säkerhetspolitisk fråga.« (party programme ↗)“Breaking the need for oil and gas is not only an environmental issue but to the highest degree a security policy issue.”
- robust electricity supply»Havsbaserad vindkraft är en viktig del av en robust elförsörjning.« (party programme ↗)“Offshore wind power is an important part of a robust electricity supply.”
- reliable energy supply»Detta behövs för att EU-medborgarna ska ha en tillförlitlig energitillförsel, för att näringslivet ska ha jämlika villkor samt av säkerhetspolitiska skäl.« (party programme ↗)“This is needed for EU citizens to have reliable energy supply, for business to have equal conditions, and for security policy reasons.”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan explicitly requires that technology development for energy storage is encouraged so that renewable sources can contribute with predictability and reliability, which is the core of the counter-proposal's demand for a strategy and technology-neutral support for energy storage.
Plan documents: party programme
Reasoning and quotes
The plan explicitly requires that technology development for energy storage is encouraged so that renewable sources can contribute with predictability and reliability, which is the core of the counter-proposal's demand for a strategy and technology-neutral support for energy storage. The plan also wants to secure self-sufficiency so that Sweden does not become dependent on electricity imports, which supports the demand for import-independent capacity reserves. That base power shall be protected is a limit to how far decentralisation can go.
Original (Swedish)
Planen kräver uttryckligen att teknikutvecklingen för lagring av energi uppmuntras så att förnybara kraftslag kan bidra med förutsägbarhet och tillförlitlighet, vilket är kärnan i motförslagets krav på en strategi och teknikneutralt stöd för energilagring. Planen vill också trygga självförsörjningen så att Sverige inte blir beroende av elimport, vilket bär kravet på importoberoende kapacitetsreserver. Att baskraften ska värnas är en gräns för hur långt decentralisering får drivas.
- energy storage shall be promoteddecisive»Teknikutvecklingen för lagring av energi ska uppmuntras för att förnybara« (party programme ↗)“Technology development for storage of energy shall be encouraged so that renewable”
- import-independent electricity supply»Självförsörjningen behöver tryggas för att Sverige inte ska bli beroende av elimport från« (party programme ↗)“Self-sufficiency needs to be secured so that Sweden does not become dependent on electricity imports from”
- preparedness in energy supply»kunna svara för befolkningens livsmedels och energiförsörjning samt hålla en god beredskap« (party programme ↗)“be able to answer for the population's food and energy supply and maintain good preparedness”
- protected base power»Denna baskraft« (party programme ↗)“This base power”
The stance rests on the quoted commitment in the party's own documents; the actual vote deviated. Click the quote to verify it in the document.
The plan builds supply security on plannable, weather-independent power: the goal shall change from 100 percent renewable to 100 percent fossil-free and many new reactors be built.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan builds supply security on plannable, weather-independent power: the goal shall change from 100 percent renewable to 100 percent fossil-free and many new reactors be built. A counter-proposal that wants capacity reserves to preferably be fully renewable and the system to become more decentralized goes against that line. The plan shares the goal of stability and wants to procure power production that strengthens it.
Original (Swedish)
Planen bygger leveranssäkerheten på planerbar, väderoberoende kraft: målet ska ändras från 100 procent förnybart till 100 procent fossilfritt och många nya reaktorer byggas. Ett motförslag som vill att kapacitetsreserverna gärna ska vara helt förnybara och att systemet ska bli mer decentraliserat går emot den linjen. Planen delar däremot målet om stabilitet och vill upphandla kraftproduktion som stärker den.
- fossil-free, not renewabledecisive»Ändra det energipolitiska målet från 100 procent förnybart till 100 procent fossilfritt« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Change the energy policy goal from 100 percent renewable to 100 percent fossil-free”
- weather-independent power production(2022 manifesto)
- procured stability»Upphandla kraftproduktion som stärker stabiliteten« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Procure power production that strengthens stability”
- strengthened supply readiness»Bygga bättre beredskapslager« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Build better emergency supplies”
flags: citat_ej_verifierat
The plan builds electricity supply on predictable and fossil-free production with nuclear power as central, and explicitly criticises the transformation of the power system into a weather-dependent system with extensive wind power expansion.
Plan documents: 2022 manifesto
Reasoning and quotes
The plan builds electricity supply on predictable and fossil-free production with nuclear power as central, and explicitly criticises the transformation of the power system into a weather-dependent system with extensive wind power expansion. The counter-proposal's direction towards decentralised, preferably entirely renewable production with storage is in the direction the plan opposes. However, parts of the demand, such as supply security and reduced import dependence, have support in the plan.
Original (Swedish)
Planen bygger elförsörjningen på planerbar och fossilfri produktion med kärnkraften som central, och kritiserar uttryckligen omvandlingen av kraftsystemet till ett väderberoende system med kraftig vindkraftsutbyggnad. Motförslagets inriktning på decentraliserad, gärna helt förnybar produktion med lagring ligger i den riktning planen vänder sig emot. Delar av kravet, som leveranssäkerhet och minskat importberoende, har dock stöd i planen.
- predictable power as foundationdecisive»Sverige behöver satsa på planerbar och fossilfri elproduktion.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Sweden needs to invest in predictable and fossil-free electricity production.”
- criticism of weather-dependent system»Där man uteslutande omvandlat kraftsystemet till att bli väderberoende med en kraftig utbyggnad av vindkraften.« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Where the power system has been exclusively transformed to become weather-dependent with extensive wind power expansion.”
- goal for supply security»Sätta upp mål för fossilfrihet och att ett mål för leveranssäkerhet införs« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Set goals for fossil-free and that a target for supply security is introduced”
- reduced import dependence»Minska beroendet av energiimport« (2022 manifesto ↗)“Reduce dependence on energy imports”
Share and embed
Sources and documents
- The committee report on riksdagen.se (2025/26:NU17)
- Committee report full text (HD01NU17)
- Per-MP voting data (API)
- Case status (API)
Documents under consideration
- Motion 2025/26:1316 — Jämlika villkor för alla svenska elkonsumenter oavsett geografisk plats av Per-Arne Håkansson och Niklas Karlsson (båda S)
- Motion 2025/26:1437 — En robust, kostnadseffektiv och rättvis energiförsörjning av Markus Selin m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1442 — För en stark industri och trygg elförsörjning - elektrifiering och fossilfri energi för klimatmålen av Patrik Lundqvist m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1447 — Bättre förutsättningar för en modern industri av Ida Karkiainen m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:1551 — Utbyggnad av gasturbiner i Västsverige av Sten Bergheden (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1867 — Reformer för rättvisa elpriser och stabil elförsörjning i Skåne av Ulrika Heindorff m.fl. (M)
- Motion 2025/26:1901 — Ett gemensamt elprisområde av Magnus Manhammar (S)
- Motion 2025/26:2238 — En övergripande säkrad elinfrastruktur av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2246 — Säkrad elförsörjning till Gotland av Ann-Sofie Lifvenhage (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2335 — Gemensamt elprisområde eller kompensation för utsatta regioner av Magnus Manhammar (S)
- Motion 2025/26:2519 — Kompensation för Skåne med anledning av stoppet av vindkraftsutbyggnaden vid Kriegers flak av Morgan Johansson m.fl. (S)
- Motion 2025/26:2656 — Ett sammanhållet statligt ägande av elnätet av Cecilia Rönn (L)
- Motion 2025/26:2669 — Robust elsystem för Sveriges välstånd av Lars Engsund (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2682 — En nationell strategi för ödrift i elnäten av Magnus Manhammar (S)
- Motion 2025/26:2789 — Klimatet av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2796 — Om grön tillväxt och gröna investeringar av Mathias Tegnér (S)
- Motion 2025/26:2797 — Energipolitik för mer och förnybar el till rimliga priser av Nooshi Dadgostar m.fl. (V)
- Motion 2025/26:2822 — Militärt och civilt försvar samt samhällets krisberedskap av Mikael Larsson m.fl. (C)
- Motion 2025/26:2898 — Rimlig effektavgift på el av Lars Beckman (M)
- Motion 2025/26:2974 — Avveckling av elcertifikatssystemet av Hans Eklind och Camilla Brodin (båda KD)
Source: The Swedish Parliament